WHO ARE WE?
IDC Technologies is internationally acknowledged as the premier provider of practical, technical training for engineers and technicians.
We specialize in the fields of electrical systems, industrial data communications, telecommunications, automation and control, mechanical engineering, chemical and civil engineering, and are continually adding to our portfolio of over 60 different workshops. Our instructors are highly respected in their fields of expertise and in the last ten years have trained over 200,000 engineers, scientists and technicians.
With offices conveniently located worldwide, IDC Technologies has an enthusiastic team of professional engineers, technicians and support staff who are committed to providing the highest level of training and consultancy.
TRAINING THAT WORKS
We deliver engineering and technology training that will maximize your business goals. In today’s competitive environment, you require training that will help you and your organization to achieve its goals and produce a large return on investment. With our ‘training that works’ objective you and your organization will:
EXPERT INSTRUCTORS
We search the world for good quality instructors who have three outstanding attributes:
Each and every instructor is evaluated by the delegates and we assess the presentation after every class to ensure that the instructor stays on track in presenting outstanding courses.
HANDS-ON APPROACH TO TRAINING
All IDC Technologies workshops include practical, hands-on sessions where the delegates are given the opportunity to apply in practice the theory they have learnt.
REFERENCE MATERIALS
A fully illustrated workshop book with hundreds of pages of tables, charts, figures and handy hints, plus considerable reference material is provided FREE of charge to each delegate.
ACCREDITATION AND CONTINUING EDUCATION
Satisfactory completion of all IDC workshops satisfies the requirements of the International Association for Continuing Education and Training for the award of 1.4 Continuing Education Units.
IDC workshops also satisfy criteria for Continuing Professional Development according to the requirements of the Institution of Electrical Engineers and Institution of Measurement and Control in the UK, Institution of Engineers in Australia, Institution of Engineers New Zealand, and others.
CERTIFICATE OF ATTENDANCE
Each delegate receives a Certificate of Attendance documenting their experience.
100% MONEY BACK GUARANTEE
IDC Technologies’ engineers have put considerable time and experience into ensuring that you gain maximum value from each workshop. If by lunchtime on the first day you decide that the workshop is not appropriate for your requirements, please let us know so that we can arrange a 100% refund of your fee.
ONSITE WORKSHOPS
All IDC Technologies Training Workshops are available on an on-site basis, presented at the venue of your choice, saving delegates travel time and expenses, thus providing your company with even greater savings.
OFFICE LOCATIONS
AUSTRALIA • CANADA • INDIA • IRELAND • MALAYSIA • NEW ZEALAND • POLAND • SINGAPORE • SOUTH AFRICA • UNITED KINGDOM • UNITED STATES
idc@idc-online.com www.idc-online.com
Visit our website for FREE Pocket Guides
IDC Technologies produce a set of 6 Pocket Guides used by thousands of engineers and technicians worldwide.
Vol. 1 – ELECTRONICS
Vol. 2 – ELECTRICAL
Vol. 3 – COMMUNICATIONS
Vol. 4 – INSTRUMENTATION
Vol. 5 – FORMULAE & CONVERSIONS
Vol. 6 – INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION
To download a FREE copy of these internationally best selling pocket guides go to: www.idc-online.com/downloads/
On-Site Training
All IDC Technologies Training Workshops are available on an on-site basis, presented at the venue of your choice, saving delegates travel time and expenses, thus providing your company with even greater savings.
For more information or a FREE detailed proposal contact Kevin Baker by e-mailing:
training@idc-online.com
IDC TECHNOLOGIES
Worldwide Offices
AUSTRALIA
Telephone: 1300 138 522 • Facsimile: +27 86 6924368
West Coast Office
1031 Wellington Street, West Perth, WA 6005
PO Box 1093, West Perth, WA 6872
East Coast Office
PO Box 1750, North Sydney, NSW 2059
CANADA
Toll Free Telephone: 1800 324 4244 • Toll Free Facsimile: 1800 434 4045
Suite 402, 814 Richards Street, Vancouver, NC V6B 3A7
INDIA
Telephone : +91 444 208 9353
35 4th Street, Kumaran Colony, Vadapalani, Chennai 600026
IRELAND
Telephone : +353 1 473 3190 • Facsimile: +353 1 473 3191
Caoran, Baile na hAbhann, Co. Galway
MALAYSIA
Telephone: +60 3 5192 3800 • Facsimile: +60 3 5192 3801
26 Jalan Kota Raja E27/E, Hicom Town Center
Seksyen 27, 40400 Shah Alam, Selangor
NEW ZEALAND
Telephone: +64 9 263 4759 • Facsimile: +64 9 262 2304
Parkview Towers, 28 Davies Avenue, Manukau City
PO Box 76-142, Manukau City
POLAND
Telephone: +48 12 6304 746 • Facsimile: +48 12 6304 750
ul. Krakowska 50, 30-083 Balice, Krakow
SINGAPORE
Telephone: +65 6224 6298 • Facsimile: + 65 6224 7922
100 Eu Tong Sen Street, #04-11 Pearl’s Centre, Singapore 059812
SOUTH AFRICA
Telephone: +27 87 751 4294 or +27 79 629 5706 • Facsimile: +27 11 312 2150
68 Pretorius Street, President Park, Midrand
PO Box 389, Halfway House 1685
UNITED KINGDOM
Telephone: +44 20 8335 4014 • Facsimile: +44 20 8335 4120
Suite 18, Fitzroy House, Lynwood Drive, Worcester Park, Surrey KT4 7AT
UNITED STATES
Toll Free Telephone: 1800 324 4244 • Toll Free Facsimile: 1800 434 4045
5715 Will Clayton #6175, Humble, TX 77338, USA
Website: www.idc-online.com
Email: idc@idc-online.com
Presents
Electrical Maintenance
for
Engineers and Technicians
Rev 3
Website: www.idc-online.com
E-mail: idc@idc-online.com
IDC Technologies Pty Ltd
PO Box 1093, West Perth, Western Australia 6872
Offices in Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, United Kingdom, Ireland, Malaysia, Poland, United States of America, Canada, South Africa and India
Copyright © IDC Technologies 2010. All rights reserved.
First published 2008
ISBN: 978-1-921007-89-7
All rights to this publication, associated software and workshop are reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. All enquiries should be made to the publisher at the address above.
Whilst all reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the descriptions, opinions, programs, listings, software and diagrams are accurate and workable, IDC Technologies do not accept any legal responsibility or liability to any person, organization or other entity for any direct loss, consequential loss or damage, however caused, that may be suffered as a result of the use of this publication or the associated workshop and software.
In case of any uncertainty, we recommend that you contact IDC Technologies for clarification or assistance.
All logos and trademarks belong to, and are copyrighted to, their companies respectively.
IDC Technologies expresses its sincere thanks to all those engineers and technicians on our training workshops who freely made available their expertise in preparing this manual.
1 Electrical Preventive Maintenance 3
1.1 Introduction 3
1.2 Planning an EPM 6
1.3 Production economics 9
1.4 Energy conservation 9
1.5 Record keeping 10
2 Planning 13
2.1 Introduction 13
2.2 Survey of electrical installations 15
2.3 Installation modifications 17
2.4 Forms and records 18
2.5 Emergency procedures 18
2.6 Identification of critical equipment 19
2.7 Frequency of maintenance 20
2.8 Frequency of inspection 21
2.9 Test and maintenance requirements 22
2.10 Establishment of a systematic program 24
3 Electrical Drawings and Schematics 29
3.1 Electrical diagrams 29
3.2 Single line diagram 30
3.3 Three line diagrams 33
3.4 Common terms 33
3.5 Protective relays 35
3.6 Abbreviations 36
3.7 Schematic diagrams 37
3.8 Logic diagrams 47
3.9 Ladder diagrams 48
3.10 Plant cabling system drawings 49
3.11 Control cable interconnection diagrams 54
3.12 Panel internal wiring diagrams 55
3.13 Terminal diagrams 55
3.14 Summary 55
4 Principles of Safety Rules and Hazards 59
4.1 Overview 59
4.2 Industrial hazards 60
4.3 Electrical hazards 63
4.4 Protective Earthing 64
4.5 Dangers of static electricity 67
4.6 Electric arcing 69
4.7 Preventive maintenance 72
4.8 Reducing fault level 73
4.9 Reducing arcing time 76
4.10 Arc flash protection program 81
4.11 Electrical equipment in explosive atmosphere 82
4.12 Hazards due to high temperature 84
4.13 Electrical accidents and safety measures 88
4.14 Summary 89
5 Inspection of Electrical Systems for Safety 91
5.1 Objectives of inspection 91
5.2 IEE wiring regulations 92
5.3 Initial verification 93
5.4 Testing 94
5.5 Alterations and additions 95
5.6 Periodic inspection and testing 95
5.7 Follow up measures 95
5.8 Summary 96
6 Substation components, Maintenance and Asset Management of Switchgear 99
6.1 Voltage classification 99
6.2 Switchgear rating and specification 100
6.3 Substation types 102
6.4 Substation components 102
6.5 Overview of maintenance of power distribution systems 104
6.6 Maintenance of electrical switchgear 104
6.7 Insulation deterioration 110
6.8 Switchgear diagnostic techniques 112
6.9 Substation battery condition and monitoring 120
6.10 Circuit breaker measurements 122
6.11 Switchgear maintenance procedures 129
6.12 Problems that may be found during switchgear maintenance 133
6.13 Defect management 134
6.14 Case studies of switchgear defects 136
7 Testing- Introduction 141
7.1 Need for testing 141
7.2 Purpose of testing 142
7.3 Categories of tests 142
7.4 Variations to test voltages and results 143
8 Insulation Testing 145
8.1 Principles of insulation testing 145
8.2 Purpose of insulation testing 148
8.3 Testing the insulation of equipment 149
8.4 Insulation resistance test voltages 150
8.5 Types of testers 150
8.6 Construction of a tester 151
8.7 Connecting a tester 151
8.8 Test procedure 153
8.9 Precautions to be taken when measuring insulation 156
8.10 Polarization index 157
8.11 Step voltage test 158
8.12 Readings and interpretation 159
8.13 Dryness of insulation using absorption ratio 160
8.14 Burn test 161
9 High Potential Tests 163
9.1 Purpose of hi-pot testing 163
9.2 AC and DC hi-pot tests 164
9.3 Test equipment construction and connections 166
9.4 Safety precautions to be taken 166
9.5 Test voltages as per applicable standards 167
9.6 VLF high pot test 167
10 Ducter Testing 169
10.1 Need for the instrument 169
10.2 Description of instrument 169
10.3 Working principle 170
10.4 Milli-ohmmeter Vs micro-ohmmeter 173
10.5 Breaker contact resistance measurement 174
10.6 Transformer resistance measurement 175
10.7 Precautions during measurements 175
11 Tests on Other Major Equipment 177
11.1 Other major equipment 177
11.2 HV/MV switchgear and breakers 177
11.3 MV motors 183
11.4 MV capacitors 183
11.5 Disconnectors 185
12 Field Tests 187
12.1 Need for field tests 187
12.2 General safety procedures 188
12.3 Transformers 190
12.4 Switchgear 193
12.5 High voltage disconnectors 193
12.6 MV cables 194
12.7 MV bus ducts 194
12.8 Instrument transformers 195
12.9 Rotating machinery 195
12.10 Surge arresters 196
12.11 Outdoor bus structures 196
12.12 Engine generators 196
13 Testing of Transformers 201
13.1 General 201
13.2 Routine tests 202
13.3 Guarantees and tolerances 203
13.4 Visual inspection 203
13.5 Winding resistance measurements 203
13.6 Turns ratio measurement 204
13.7 Polarity and vector group check 204
13.8 Impedance voltage and load losses 206
13.9 No load losses and current measurement 206
13.10 Insulation resistance tests 207
13.11 Dielectric tests 207
13.12 RIV corona measurements 208
13.13 Partial discharge measurements 209
13.14 Impulse tests 209
13.15 Tests on OLTC 210
13.16 Type tests 210
13.17 Special tests 210
13.18 Tests on bushings 211
14 Transformers 215
14.1 Installation of transformers 217
14.2 Special aspects of installation of large power transformers 222
14.3 Fire protection measures for large transformer installations 228
14.4 Transformer troubleshooting 229
14.5 Liquid level indicator, pressure and temperature gauges 231
14.6 Transformer inspections 234
15 CT Testing 235
15.1 Major tests on a CT 235
15.2 Test procedures 236
15.3 Safety precautions 243
16 VT Testing 245
16.1 Tests on voltage transformers 245
16.2 Test procedures 246
17 Oil Testing 253
17.1 Transformer oil – dielectric properties and uses 253
17.2 The need for testing transformer oil 254
17.3 Dielectric test 255
17.4 Improvement of oil by filtration 256
17.5 Oil filtration units 258
17.6 Test of acidity 260
17.7 Other tests 261
17.8 Dissolved gas analysis 263
17.9 Precautions to be taken when sampling oil 277
18 Protection of Motors 281
18.1 Introduction 281
18.2 Stalling of motors 286
18.3 Over current / overload 290
18.4 Under-voltage / over-voltage 291
18.5 Under-frequency 291
18.6 Pole slip / out of step 292
18.7 Loss of excitation 292
18.8 Inadvertent energization 292
18.9 Over fluxing 293
18.10 Stall protection / acceleration time 293
18.11 Negative sequence currents 295
18.12 Derating factors 296
18.13 Earth faults – core balance, residual stabilising resistors 297
18.14 Calculation of protective relay settings 299
19 Installation and Fault Finding 305
19.1 General installation and environmental requirements 305
19.2 General safety recommendations 305
19.3 Power supply connections and earthing 307
19.4 Installing contactors in power circuit 310
19.5 Installation of AC converters into metal enclosures 311
20 Motor Failure Analysis 317
20.1 Types of motor failure 317
20.2 Common causes of motor failure 318
20.3 Modern developments 326
21 Testing 329
21.1 Insulation life and resistance 329
21.2 Polarization index 332
21.3 DC hipot 334
21.4 DC ramp test 334
21.5 AC hipot 335
21.6 Capacitance test 335
21.7 Dissipation factor 337
21.8 Partial discharge 339
21.9 Surge test 340
21.10 Mechanical testing 345
21.11 Online testing 346
22 Maintenance and Cleaning 349
22.1 Introduction 349
22.2 Factors effecting motor performance 349
22.3 Motor cleaning methods 356
23 Cables – Failure Modes and Fault Detection 361
23.1 Introduction 361
23.2 Various types of cables 362
23.3 Cable joints 362
23.4 Installation 363
23.5 Special locations 368
23.6 Fire prevention and fire protection for cable installations 369
23.7 Types of failures 373
23.8 Reasons for failures 374
23.9 Fault location 379
23.10 Cable testing 381
23.11 Electrical tests for detection of cable faults 385
23.12 Safety issues in fault location 387
23.13 Analysis of failures 389
23.14 Documentation of work 393
23.15 Documentation of failures 394
23.16 Summary 395
24 Introduction to Power Quality 398
24.1 Introduction 399
24.2 Sags and swells 400
24.3 Surges and transients 402
24.4 Harmonics and distortions 404
24.5 Interruptions 405
24.6 Noise disturbance 406
24.7 Notching 407
24.8 Noise definitions 409
24.9 Earthing conductor 410
24.10 Isolated/insulated connections 411
24.11 Ground/earth loops 411
24.12 Site examination 412
25 Installation Guidelines 415
25.1 Checklist of considerations for power quality 415
25.2 Equipment selection specifications 428
25.3 Building maintenance analysis 430
25.4 Power quality versus reliability 432
25.5 Typical project approach 433
26 Testing & Periodic Inspection and Maintenance of UPS Batteries 437
26.1 Introduction 437
26.2 UPS systems 439
26.3 Periodic inspection and maintenance of ups batteries 455
27 Protective Relays 459
27.1 Introduction 459
27.2 Classification of protective relays 460
27.3 Attracted armature relay 460
27.4 Electromagnetic induction relays 461
27.5 Overcurrent relays 461
27.6 Distance relays 461
27.7 Differential relays 461
27.8 Static relays 462
27.9 Comparators 462
27.10 Microprocessor based relays 463
27.11 Relay maintenance 464
27.12 Automated testing 466
27.13 Safety precautions 466
27.14 Basics on relay handling 467
28 Testing and Maintenance 471
28.1 Faults – types and their effects 471
28.2 Causes of inadequate grounding 473
28.3 Mitigation by multiple ground connection 474
28.4 Grounding system inspection 476
28.5 Testing and monitoring 476
28.6 Requirement for testing 484
28.7 Maintenance of grounding system 488
28.8 Grounding for safety during maintenance 490
29 Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) 493
29.1 Introduction 493
29.2 SCADA components 495
29.3 Maintenance and troubleshooting 499
29.4 The maintenance unit system – A case study 506
30 Safe Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Equipment 511
30.1 Introduction 511
30.2 Key safety factors in operation and maintenance of electrical installations 512
30.3 Isolation during maintenance of electrical installations 515
30.4 Visual checks for safety 517
30.5 Monitoring hot spots to improve safety 517
30.6 Earthing for Safety During Maintenance 522
30.7 Need for periodic inspection and maintenance 523
30.8 Emergency and first-aid training 524
31 Portable Electric Tools and Equipment 527
31.1 Introduction 527
31.2 Portable hand and power tools 528
31.3 Portable electric tools 529
31.4 Ground-type plugs and receptacles 530
31.5 Double insulated portable electric tools 532
31.6 Electrical cords 533
31.7 Safety precautions 536
31.8 Employee training 537
32 Maintenance Reports 543
32.1 Transformer test report 543
32.2 UPS inspection checklist 545
32.3 Batteries inspection checklist 546
32.4 Circuit breaker (oil) test report 547
32.5 Overcurrent relay test report 548
Appendix – Practical Exercises 549
In this chapter we will learn about Electrical Preventive Maintenance (EPM). We will discuss objectives and benefits of EPM. Planning an effective EPM program, record keeping, personal safety, equipment maintenance, production economics and energy conservation are covered in this chapter.
Preventative maintenance (PM) is a program of routine equipment inspections, maintenance tasks and repairs which are scheduled to ensure that degradation of equipment is minimized. A well planned and designed preventative maintenance program keeps equipment/facilities in satisfactory operational state by providing for systematic inspection, detection, and correction of incipient failures either prior to their occurrence or prior to their development into major failure.
Predictive maintenance is the technique of regularly monitoring selected parameters of equipment operation to detect and correct a potential problem before it causes a failure. This is done by trending measured parameters which allows a comparison of current parameters to historical data. From this approach ensures that the right maintenance activities are performed at the right time.
The main objectives of PM are to:
If maintenance is carried out reactively, in response to interruptions, breakdowns and other unfortunate events, then this kind of approach can be severe, especially at operations such as processing plants, assembly lines and power plants, where the failure of a relatively minor component can disrupt the entire facility. The total cost of downtime and emergency around-the-clock repairs can be overwhelming. Where as a preventive maintenance program ensures continuity of operation and reduces the danger of unplanned outages. Planned shutdowns during periods of least usage, helps in detecting troubles in the early stages and corrective action taken before extensive damage is done.
Table 1.1 shows results of the survey conducted by the IEEE Industrial Commercial Power Systems Committee.
Deterioration of electrical equipment is inevitable whereas the equipment failure is not inevitable. The deterioration process can cause malfunction or an electrical failure. An effective EPM program identifies and recognizes these factors and provides measures for coping with them.
Other potential causes of equipment failure can be detected and corrected through EPM, such as load changes, voltage conditions, improperly set protective relays and changes in circuits.
Number of failures versus maintenance quality for all equipment classes combined | |||
Number of failures | |||
Maintenance Quality | All causes | Inadequate Maintenance | Percent of Failures due to inadequate maintenance |
Excellent | 311 | 36 | 11.6% |
Fair | 853 | 154 | 18.1% |
Poor | 67 | 22 | 32.8% |
Total | 1231 | 212 | 17.2% |
The following are the seven elements of preventive maintenance (seen in Figure 1.1):
AS per NFPA 70B (National Fire Protection Association) standard, benefits of an effective EPM program fall into two general categories:
Direct, measurable economic benefits can be documented by equipment repair cost and equipment downtime records after an EPM program has been implemented.
Maintenance costs can be placed in either of two basic categories: preventive maintenance or breakdown repairs. The money spent for preventive maintenance will be reflected as less money required for breakdown repairs. An effective EPM program holds the sum of these two expenditures to a minimum. Figure 1.2 is a typical curve illustrating this principle. According to this curve, as the interval of time between EPM inspections increases, the cost of the EPM diminishes and the cost of breakdown repairs and replacement of failed equipment increases. The lowest total annual expense is realized by maintaining an inspection frequency that keeps the sum of repair/replacement and EPM costs at a minimum (Refer NFPA 70B Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance).
The purpose of an EPM program is to reduce hazard to life and property that can result from the failure of electrical systems and equipment. A preventive maintenance program can only be effective if it is both well planned and regularly carried out. Planning involves understanding the electrical system, identifying and prioritizing equipment maintenance requirements and then establishing a maintenance schedule.
AS per NFPA 70B standard, the following basic factors should be considered while planning an EPM program:
Personal safety should be given prime consideration in system design and in establishing maintenance practices. Safety rules should be instituted and practiced to prevent injury to personnel who are performing tasks and others who might be exposed to the hazard.
Maintenance should be performed only by qualified personnel who are trained in safe maintenance practices and the special considerations necessary to maintain electrical equipment. Employees who face a risk of electrical hazard should be trained to understand the specific hazards associated with electrical energy. The qualified personnel are expected to know the proper personal protection equipment (PPE) to avoid or mitigate electrical shock or burn exposure. The qualified person should determine if the hazard exposure is limited and restricted.
All employees should be trained in safety-related work practices and required procedures as necessary to provide protection from electrical hazards associated with their respective jobs or task assignments. The training should include information on the type of tools to be utilized. Instruction should be given in selecting the proper tool for the job and the limitations of the tool.
Electrically safe work condition should be established before performing maintenance of electrical circuits or equipment. According to 29 CFR 1910.333, “Occupational Safety and Health Act” (OSHA), circuits or equipment should be disconnected using proper de-energization means, also should be locked and tagged.
Article 130 of NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, requires that electrical conductors and circuit parts that have not been de-energized or that have been disconnected [but not under lockout/ tagout, tested, and grounded (where appropriate)] not be considered to be in an electrically safe work condition and that safe work practices appropriate for the circuit voltage and energy level be used. All insulating tools and PPE should be tested periodically.
Switchboards, panelboards, industrial control panels, and motor control centers that are likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized should be field marked to warn qualified persons of potential electric arc flash hazards. The marking should be located so as to be clearly visible to qualified persons before examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance of the equipment.
In spite of all precautions, de-energized circuits can be inadvertently reenergized. When this occurs, adequate grounding is the only protection for personnel working on those circuits. For this reason, it is especially important that adequate grounding procedures should be established (Refer NFPA 70B Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance).
The following safety precautions should be observed:
Many maintenance tasks require equipment to be shut down and de-energized for effective results. Other maintenance tasks might specifically require or permit equipment to be energized and in service while the tasks are performed. Examples include taking transformer oil samples and observing and recording operating temperatures, load conditions, corona, noise, or lamp output.
Coordinating maintenance with planned production outages and providing system flexibility such as by duplication of equipment and processes are two recommended means to avoid major disruptions of operations. An example of flexibility is a selective radial distribution system incorporating double-ended low-voltage substations. This system permits maintenance and testing to be performed on equipment such as the primary feeders, transformers, and main and tie circuit breakers during periods of light loads. Duplication of equipment enables maintenance to be performed economically without costly premium time and ensures continuous production in the event of an accidental breakdown.
Good quality equipment, appropriate for the task should be properly installed and maintained. Selection of quality equipment that is adequate for the present and projected load growth is a prime factor in reducing maintenance cost.
Effective maintenance program requires a positive mechanism for scheduling and recording the work that has been accomplished. Maintenance outages, particularly in plants that operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, are difficult to schedule. For example, low-voltage power circuit breakers should be inspected on an annual basis and tested under simulated overload and fault conditions every 3 to 5 years.
Many plants schedule shutdowns of 1 to 3 weeks duration to perform needed periodic maintenance on vital production apparatus that cannot be taken out of service at any other time. A total plant shutdown resolves the problem of scheduling partial outages around limited production operations. Even so, some difficulty might be encountered in providing power requirements for maintenance operations and still performing the needed maintenance on the electrical system. The distribution system should allow for maintenance work without load interruption, or with only minimal disturbances for critical loads. Table I.1 in NFPA 70B Recommended Practice for Electrical Equipment Maintenance Annex I gives an initial guideline for maintenance intervals for equipment.
The protective device should be capable of immediately sensing an abnormality and causing it to be isolated with the least destruction and minimum disturbance to the system. The degree of sensitivity and speed of response is vital to the effectiveness of the protection. Applying the settings and periodic testing of the protective devices, relays, series and static trip elements, checking the proper type and ampere rating of the fuses used in the system is part of maintenance.
Rework, remanufacturing, or retrofitting process can be conducted by the original manufacturer or by another party with sufficient facilities, technical knowledge, and manufacturing skills. Safety certifications should be sought for repaired or rebuilt equipment.
The cleaning method used should be determined by the type of contamination to be removed and whether the apparatus is to be returned to use immediately. Drying is necessary after using a solvent or water. Insulation should be tested to determine whether it has been properly reconditioned. Enclosure and substation room filters should be cleaned at regular intervals and replaced if they are damaged or clogged. Loose hardware and debris should be removed from the enclosures (new or unusual wear or loss of parts occurring after the cleaning can be detected during subsequent maintenance).
Dirt should be cleaned with clean, dry, lint-free cloth or soft brush if the apparatus is small. Waste rags should not be used as the lint will stick to the insulation and collects more dirt. Care should be used to avoid damage to delicate parts.
If the dirt cannot be removed by wiping or vacuuming, compressed-air blowing can be used. Care should be taken while cleaning with compressed air as contaminants as compressed air can cause contaminants to become airborne which can foul the mechanical operation of nearby equipment. Therefore, other equipment should be guarded from the cross contamination. Air should be dry and directed in a manner to avoid further blockage of ventilation ducts and recesses in insulations.
Accumulated dirt, oil, or grease might require a solvent to remove it. A rag barely moistened (not wet) with a non-flammable solvent can be used for wiping. Solvents used for cleaning of electrical equipment should be selected carefully to ensure compatibility with materials being cleaned. Equipment might require cleaning by nonconductive sandblasting. Devices containing radioactive materials can require special precautions.
Maintenance costs are usually due to manhours, materials and indirect costs. Preventive maintenance should be done when production is least effected. Assessing the costs of equipment downtime is an important step in the determination of costs of preventive maintenance.
A system in general is a complex configuration of different units, which may imply that downtime of one unit, does not necessarily halt the full system. It is important to identify which unit is most vital to production, and analyze the effect of repair or replacement of the unit on the production.
The failure of one component often is an opportunity to preventively maintain other components. Especially if the failure causes the breakdown of the production system it is favorable to perform preventive maintenance on other components. In such cases, only a little or no production is lost above that resulting from the original failure.
Maintenance scheduling in line with the production can reduce the good maintenance plan, one that is integrated with the production plan, can result in considerable cost savings. This integration with production is crucial because production and maintenance have a direct relationship. Any breakdown in machine operation results in disruption of production and leads to additional costs due to downtime, loss of production, decrease in productivity and quality, and inefficient use of personnel, equipment and facilities.
Selection of quality equipment that is adequate for the present and projected load growth is a can reduce the maintenance cost. Too often, installation cost without sufficient regard for efficient and economic maintenance influences system design. Within a few years, the added cost of performing maintenance plus production loss from forced outages due to lack of maintenance will more than offset the savings in initial cost.
Equipment that is well maintained operates more efficiently and utilizes less energy. Energy management incorporates engineering, design, applications, operation and maintenance of electrical power system to provide for the minimum overall use of the electrical energy. Optimized use of electrical energy involves factors such as comfort, healthful working conditions, the practical aspects of productivity, aesthetic acceptability of the space, and public relations.
Any process requires a certain minimum consumption of energy. Energy additions beyond this minimum consumption require an evaluation of the incremental cost of more efficient or techniques versus the resulting energy savings or costs. Energy conservation can be obtained by proper maintenance and operation as follows:
Records should be maintained by the management; analysis of the records should guide the breakdown repair and evaluate the results. They should contain accurate and vital information. Excessive record keeping will disrupt the EPM program. Usually records are classified into four categories:
Maintenance work records contain documentation of all the repairs and maintenance performed during the equipment service life to date. Cost records contain chronological records of profiles, labor, material costs by item. Figures should be kept to show the total cost of each breakdown. Inventory records contain information of equipment number, size and type, cost, date of manufacture or acquire, manufacturer, location of the equipment, etc. Other files include drawings, operating manuals, service manuals etc.
Record keeping is a practice and useful to determine operating performance trends, troubleshooting breakdowns, replacement or modification decisions, investigating faults, performing reliability and maintainability studies.
In this chapter we will learn how to plan an effective EPM. The various steps involved in planning like survey of the installation, installation modifications, documentation required for inspection and maintenance, procedures for maintenance and inspection are covered in detail.
Learning objectives
The purpose of planning an EPM program is to reduce hazard to life and property that can result from the failure or malfunction of electrical systems and equipment. This chapter explains the various steps involved in planning like survey of the installation, documenting the installation modifications, data and diagrams needed to maintain the installation, procedures for maintenance and inspection.
The following four basic steps should be considered in the planning and development of an EPM program.
The caliber of personnel responsible for its implementation, decide the success of an EPM program. The primary responsibility for EPM program implementation and its success lies with a single individual.
This individual responsible for the EPM program should be given the authority to do the job and should have the cooperation of management, production, and other departments whose operations might affect the EPM program.
Ideally, the person designated to head the EPM program should have the following qualifications:
The maintenance supervisor should have open lines of communication with design supervision. Frequently, an unsafe installation or one that requires excessive maintenance can be traced to improper design or construction methods or misapplication of hardware.
The work center of each maintenance work group should be conveniently located. This work center should contain the following:
There should be adequate storage facilities for tools and test equipment that are common to the group.
In a continuously operating facility, running inspections (inspections made with equipment operating) play a vital role in the continuity of service. The development of running inspection procedures changes with the type of operation. Running inspection procedures should be as thorough as practicable within the limits of safety and the skill of the craftsman. These procedures should be reviewed regularly in order to keep them current. Each failure of electrical equipment, be it an electrical or a mechanical failure, should be reviewed against the running inspection procedure to determine if some other inspection technique would have indicated the impending failure. If so, the procedure should be modified to reflect the findings.
Supervisors have a good scope for best motivational opportunities through handling the results of running inspections. When the electrical maintenance supervisor initiates corrective action, the craftsperson should be so informed. The craftsperson who found the condition will then feel that his or her job was worthwhile and will be motivated to try even harder. However, if nothing is done, individual motivation might be affected adversely.
Trends in failure rates are hard to change and take a long time to reverse. For this reason, the inspection should continue and resulting work orders should be written, even though the work force might have been reduced. Using the backlog of work orders as an indicator, the electrical maintenance supervisor can predict trends before they develop. With the accumulation of a sizable backlog of work orders, an increase in electrical failures and production downtime can be expected.
Organizing a survey should start with a look at the total package. Should check if the available manpower permits the survey of an entire system, process, or building, or should it be divided into segments?
Next, each segment must be assigned a priority. Segments to be done in sequential should be identified before the actual work commences.
All documentation must be assembled. This might need a search of desks, cabinets, and such, and might also require that manufacturers be contacted, to replace lost documents. All of the documents should be brought to a central location and marked immediately with some form of effective identification.
The availability of up-to-date, accurate, and complete diagrams is the foundation of a successful EPM program. No EPM program can operate without them, and their importance cannot be overemphasized. The diagrams discussed here are some of those in common use.
Single-line diagrams should include the electrical circuitry down to, and including, the major items of utilization equipment. They should show all electrical equipment in the power system and give all pertinent ratings. In making this type of diagram, basic information like voltage, frequency, phase, and normal operating position must be included. Important information that might be less obvious such as transformer impedance, available short-circuit current, and equipment continuous and interrupting ratings must also be covered. Other items include current and potential transformers and their ratios, surge capacitors, and protective relays. If one diagram cannot cover all the equipment involved, additional diagrams, appropriately noted on the main diagram, can be drawn.
Short-circuit and coordination studies are important. Many managers have the misconception that these engineering studies are part of the initial facility design, after which the subject can be forgotten. However, a number of factors can affect the available short-circuit current in an electrical system. Among these factors are changes in the supply capacity of the utility company, changes in size or percent impedance of transformers, changes in conductor size, addition of motors, and changes in system operating conditions:
Circuit-routing diagrams, cable maps, or raceway layouts should show the physical location of conductor runs. In addition to voltage, such diagrams should also indicate the type of raceway, number and size of conductors, and type of insulation.
Layout diagrams, plot plans, equipment location plans, or facility maps should show the physical layout (and in some cases, the elevations) of all equipment in place.
Schematic diagrams should be arranged for simplicity and ease of understanding circuits without regard for the actual physical location of any components. The schematic should always be drawn with switches and contacts shown in a de-energized position.
Wiring diagrams, like schematics, should show all components in the circuit but arranged in their actual physical location. Electromechanical components and strictly mechanical components interacting with electrical components should be shown. Of particular value is the designation of terminals and terminal strips with their appropriate numbers, letters, or colors. Wiring diagrams should identify all equipment parts and devices by standard methods, symbols, and markings.
An effective EPM program should have manufacturers’ service manuals and instructions. These manuals should include recommended practices and procedures for the following:
System diagrams should be provided to complete the data being assembled. The importance of the system determines the extent of information shown. The information can be shown on the most appropriate type of diagram but should include the same basic information, source and type of power, conductor and raceway information, and switching and protective devices with their physical locations. It is vital to show where the system might interface with another system, such as with emergency power; hydraulic, pneumatic, or mechanical systems; security and fire-alarm systems; and monitoring and control systems. Some of the more common of these are described below.
Ventilation systems normally comprise the heating, cooling, and air-filtering systems. Exceptions include furnace, dryer, oven, casting, and similar areas where process heat is excessive and air conditioning is not practical. Numerous fans are used to exhaust the heated and possibly foul air. In some industries, such as chemical plants and those using large amounts of flammable solvents, large volumes of air are needed to remove hazardous vapors. Basic information, including motor and fan sizes, motor or pneumatically operated dampers, and so on, should be shown. Additionally, many safety features can be involved to ensure that fans start before the process — airflow switches to shut down an operation on loss of ventilation and other interlocks of similar nature. Each of these should be identified with respect to type, function, physical location, and operating limits.
Heating and air-conditioning systems are usually manufactured and installed as a unit, furnished with diagrams and operating and maintenance manuals. This information should be updated as the system is changed or modified. Because these systems are often critical to the facility operation, additional equipment might have been incorporated: for example, electronic, and similar processes and corrosive and flammable vapor control for chemical and related industries. Invariably, these systems interface with other electrical or nonelectrical systems: pneumatic or electromechanical operation of dampers, valves, and so on; electric operation for normal and abnormal temperature control; and manual control stations for emergency smoke removal are just a few. There might be others, but all should be shown and complete information given for each.
Control and monitoring system diagrams should be provided to describe how these complicated systems function. They usually are in the form of a schematic diagram and can refer to specific wiring diagrams. Maximum benefit can be obtained only when every switching device is shown, its function is indicated, and it is identified for ease in finding a replacement. These devices often involve interfaces with other systems, whether electromechanical (heating or cooling medium) pumps and valves, electro-pneumatic temperature and damper controls, or safety and emergency operations. A sequence-of-operation chart and a list of safety precautions should be included to promote the safety of personnel and equipment. Understanding these complex circuits is best accomplished by breaking down the circuits into their natural functions, such as heating, cooling, process, or humidity controls. The knowledge of how each function relates to another enables the craftsperson to have a better concept of the entire system and thus perform assignments more efficiently.
Lighting system diagrams (normal and emergency) can terminate at the branch circuit panel board, listing the number of fixtures, type and lamp size for each area, and design lighting level. The diagram should show watchman lights and probably an automatic transfer switch to the emergency power system.
The documentation of the changes that result from engineering decisions, planned revisions, and so on, should be the responsibility of the engineering group that initiates the revisions.
Periodically, changes occur as a result of an EPM program. The EPM program might also uncover undocumented practices or installations.
A responsibility of the EPM program is to highlight these changes, note them in an appropriate manner, and formally submit the revisions to the organization responsible for the maintenance of the documentation.
For a testing and maintenance program to provide optimum benefits, all testing data and maintenance actions should be recorded on test circuit diagrams and forms that are complete and comprehensive. Recording both test data and maintenance information on the same form is often found useful. A storage and filing system should be set up for these forms to enable efficient and rapid retrieval of information regarding previous testing and maintenance on a piece of equipment.
A variety of forms can go along with the inspection, testing, and repair (IT&R) procedure; these forms should be detailed and direct, yet simple and durable enough to be used in the field. Field notes should be legibly transcribed. One copy of reports should go in the working file of the piece of equipment and one in the master file maintained by first line supervision. These forms should be used by the electrical maintenance personnel; they are not for general distribution. If reports to production or engineering are needed, they should be separate, and inspection reports should not be used.
Important records must be maintained by the management to evaluate results. Analysis of the records should guide the spending level for EPM and Breakdown repairs.
Figures should be kept to show the total cost of each breakdown. This should be the actual cost plus an estimated cost of the business interruption. This figure is a powerful indicator for the guidance of expenditures for EPM.
A variety of approaches exist to perform this phase of the program, but the following approach is a typical one that fulfils the minimum requirements:
Emergency procedures should list, step by step, the action to be taken in case of emergency or for the safe shutdown or start-up of equipment or systems. To make optimum use of these procedures, they are bound for quick reference and posted in the area of the equipment or systems. Some possible items to consider for inclusion in the emergency procedures are interlock types and locations, interconnections with other systems, and tagging procedures of the equipment or systems. Accurate single-line diagrams posted in strategic places are particularly helpful in emergency situations. The production of such diagrams in anticipation of an emergency is essential to a complete EPM program. Diagrams are a particularly important training tool in developing a state of preparedness. Complete and up-to-date diagrams provide a quick review of the emergency plan. During an actual emergency, when time is at a premium, they provide a simple, quick reference guide.
In the emergency situations, properly trained electrical maintenance personnel can make an important contribution. However, most such situations will also involve other crafts and disciplines, such as operating personnel, pipe fitters, and mechanics. An overall emergency procedure for each anticipated emergency situation should be developed by the qualified personnel of each discipline involved working as a team. The procedure should include detailed steps to be followed, sequence of steps, and assignment of responsibility. Each of these emergency procedures must be run periodically as a drill to ensure that all involved personnel are familiar with the tasks they are to perform as and when the emergency arises.
Equipment (electric or otherwise) should be considered critical if its failure to operate normally and under complete control will cause a serious threat to people, property, or the product. Electric power, like process steam, water, and so forth, might be essential to the operation of a machine, but unless loss of one or more of these supplies causes the machine to become hazardous to people, property, or production, that machine might not be critical. The combined knowledge and experience of several people might be needed to make this determination. In a small plant, the plant engineer or master mechanic working with the operating superintendent should be able to make this determination.
A large operation should use a team comprising the following qualified people:
The team should go over the entire plant or each of its operating segments in detail, considering each unit of equipment as related to the entire operation and the effect of its loss on safety and production.
There are entire systems that might be critical by their very nature. Depending on the size and complexity of the operation, a plant can contain any or all of the following examples: emergency power, emergency lighting, fire-alarm systems, fire pumps, and certain communications systems. There should be no problem in establishing whether a system is critical and in having the proper amount of emphasis placed on its maintenance.
More difficult to identify are the parts of a system that are critical because of the function of the utilization equipment and its associated hardware. Some examples are as follows:
There are parts of the system that are critical because they reduce the widespread effect of a fault in electrical equipment. The determination of these parts should be primarily the responsibility of the electrical person on the team. Among the things that fall into this category are the following:
Parts of the control system are critical because they monitor the process and automatically shut down equipment or take other action to prevent catastrophe. These items are the interlocks, cutout devices, or shutdown devices installed throughout the plant or operation. Each interlock or shutdown device should be considered carefully by the entire team to establish whether it is a critical shutdown or a “convenience” shutdown. The maintenance group should thoroughly understand which shutdowns are critical and which are convenience. Critical shutdown devices are normally characterized by a sensing device separate from the normal control device. They probably have separate, final, or end devices that cause action to take place. Once the critical shutdown systems have been determined, they should be distinctly identified on drawings, on records, and on the hardware itself. Some examples of critical shutdown devices are overspeed trips; high or low temperature, pressure, flow, or level trips; low-lube-oil pressure trips; pressure-relief valves; overcurrent trips; and low-voltage trips.
There are parts of the system that are critical because they alert operating personnel to dangerous or out-of-control conditions. These are normally referred to as alarms. Like shutdown devices, alarms fall into at least three categories:
The entire team should consider each alarm in the system with the same thoroughness with which they have considered the shutdown circuits. A truly critical alarm should be characterized by its separate sensing device, a separate readout device, and, preferably, separate circuitry and power source. The maintenance department should thoroughly understand the critical level of each alarm. The critical alarms and their significance should be distinctly marked on drawings, in records, and on the operating unit. For an alarm to be critical does not necessarily mean that it is complex or related to complex action. A simple valve position indicator can be one of the most critical alarms in an operating unit.
Frequency of maintenance cannot be fixed as the recommended frequency depends on environmental and operating conditions of an application.
Routine maintenance tests are tests that are performed at regular intervals over the service life of equipment. These tests normally are performed concurrently with preventive maintenance on the equipment.
Special maintenance tests are tests performed on equipment that is thought or known to be defective or equipment that has been subjected to conditions that possibly could adversely affect its condition or operating characteristics. Examples of special maintenance tests are cable fault “locating tests or tests performed on a circuit breaker that has interrupted a high level of fault current.
Most routine testing can best be performed concurrently with routine preventive maintenance, because a single outage will serve to allow both procedures. For that reason, the frequency of testing generally coincides with the frequency of maintenance. The optimum cycle depends on the use to which the equipment is put and the operating and environmental conditions of the equipment. In general, this cycle can range from 6 months to 3 years, depending on conditions and equipment use. The difficulty of obtaining an outage should never be a factor in determining the frequency of testing and maintenance. Equipment for which an outage is difficult to obtain is usually the equipment that is most vital in the operation of the electrical system. Consequently, a failure of this equipment would most likely create the most problems relative to the continued successful operation of the system. In addition to routine testing, tests should be performed any time equipment has been subjected to conditions that possibly could have caused it to be unable to continue to perform its design function properly.
Those pieces of equipment found to be critical should require the most frequent inspections and tests. Depending on the degree of reliability required, other items can be inspected and tested much less frequently.
Manufacturers’ service manuals should have a recommended frequency of inspection. The frequency given is based on standard or usual operating conditions and environments. It would be impossible for a manufacturer to list all combinations of environmental and operating conditions. However, a manufacturer’s service manual is a good basis from which to begin considering the frequency for inspection and testing.
An annual inspection of the entire switchgear assembly, including withdrawable elements during the first 3 years of service, is usually suggested as a minimum when no other criteria can be identified.
There are several points to consider in establishing the initial frequency of inspections and tests. Electrical equipment located in a separate air-conditioned control room or inspection interval might be extended 30 percent. However, if the equipment is located near another unit or operating plant that discharges dust or corrosive vapors, this time might be reduced by as much as 50 percent.
Continuously operating units with steady loads or with less than the rated full load tend to operate much longer and more reliably than intermittently operated or standby units. For this reason, the interval between inspections might be extended 10 to 20 percent for continuously operating equipment and possibly reduced by 20 to 40 percent for standby or infrequently operated equipment.
Once the initial frequency for inspection and tests has been established, this frequency should be adhered to for at least four maintenance cycles unless undue failures occur. For equipment that has unexpected failures, the interval between inspections should be reduced by 50 percent as soon as the trouble occurs. On the other hand, after four cycles of inspections have been completed, a pattern should have developed. If equipment consistently goes through more than two inspections without requiring service, the inspection period can be extended by 50 percent. Loss of production due to an emergency shutdown is almost always more expensive than loss of production due to a planned shutdown. Accordingly, the interval between inspections should be planned to avoid the diminishing returns of either too long or too short an interval.
Adjustment in the interval between inspections should continue until the optimum interval is reached. This adjustment time can be minimized and the optimum interval approximated more closely initially by providing the person responsible for establishing the first interval with as much pertinent history and technology as possible.
Inspection frequency can be increased or decreased depending on observations and experience. It is good practice to follow specific manufacturers’ recommendations regarding inspection and maintenance until sufficient knowledge is accumulated that permits modifying these practices based on experience. It is recommended that frequent inspections be made initially; the interval can then be gradually extended as conditions warrant.
The frequency of inspection for similar equipment operating under differing conditions can differ widely. Typical examples are as follows:
The inspection, testing and repair (IT&R) procedure folder for a piece of equipment should list the following items:
Special precautions relative to operation, such as the following, should be part of the IT&R document:
All maintenance work requires the use of proper tools and equipment to properly perform the task to be done. In addition to their ordinary tools, crafts persons (such as carpenters, pipe fitters, and machinists) use special tools or equipment based on the nature of the work to be performed. The electrician is no exception, but for EPM, additional equipment not found in the toolbox should be readily available. The size of the plant, the nature of its operations, and the extent of its maintenance, repair, and test facilities are all factors that determine the use frequency of the equipment. Economics seldom justify purchasing an infrequently used, expensive tool when it can be rented. However, a corporation having a number of plants in the area might well justify common ownership of the same device for joint use, making it quickly available at any time to any plant. Typical examples might be high-current or dc high-potential test equipment or a ground-fault locator.
Because a certain amount of mechanical maintenance is often a part of the EPM program being conducted on associated equipment, the electrical craftsperson should have ready access to such items as the following:
The use of well-maintained safety equipment is essential and should be mandatory for work on or near live electrical equipment. Prior to performing maintenance on or near live electrical equipment, NFPA 70E, Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace, should be used to identify the degree of personal protective equipment (PPE) required. Some of the more important equipment that should be provided includes the following:
A statiscope is recommended to indicate the presence of high voltage on certain types of equipment.
Portable electric lighting should be provided, particularly in emergencies involving the power supply. Portable electric lighting used for maintenance areas that are normally wet or where personnel will be working within grounded metal structures such as drums, tanks, and vessels should be operated at an appropriate low voltage from an isolating transformer or other isolated source. This voltage level is a function of the ambient condition in which the portable lighting is used. The aim is to limit the exposure of personnel to hazardous current levels by limiting the voltage. Ample supply of battery lanterns and extra batteries should be available. Suitable extension cords should be provided.
Portable meters and instruments are necessary for testing and troubleshooting, especially on circuits of 600 volts or less. These include general-purpose volt meters, volt-ohmmeters, and clamp-on-type ammeters with multi-scale ranges. In addition to conventional instruments, recording meters are useful for measuring magnitudes and fluctuations of current, voltage, power factor, watts, and volt-amperes versus time values. These instruments are a definite aid in defining specific electrical problems and determining if equipment malfunction is due to abnormal electrical conditions. Other valuable test equipment includes devices to measure the insulation resistance of motors and similar equipment in the mega ohm range and similar instruments in the low range for determining ground resistance, lightning protection systems, and grounding systems. Continuity testers are particularly valuable for checking control circuits and for circuit identification.
Special instruments can be used to test the impedance of the grounding circuit conductor or the grounding path of energized low-voltage distribution systems and equipment. These instruments can be used to test the equipment grounding circuit path of electrical equipment.
Insulation-resistance-measuring equipment should be used to indicate insulation values at the time equipment is put into service. Later measurements might indicate any deterioration trend of the insulation values of the equipment. High-potential ac and dc testers are used effectively to indicate dielectric strength and insulation resistance of the insulation, respectively. It should be recognized that the possibility of breakdown under test due to concealed weakness is always present. High-potential testing should be performed with caution and only by qualified operators.
Portable ground-fault locators can be used to test ungrounded power systems. Such devices will indicate ground location while the power system is energized. They thus provide a valuable aid for safe operation by indicating where to take corrective steps before an insulation breakdown occurs on another phase.
Receptacle circuit testers are devices that, by a pattern of lights, indicate some types of incorrect wiring of 15- and 20-ampere, 125-volt grounding-type receptacles.
Although these test devices can provide useful and easily acquired information, some have limitations, and the test results should be used with caution. For example, a high resistance ground can give a correct wiring display, as can some multiple wiring errors. An incorrect display can be considered a valid indication that there is an incorrect situation, but a correct wiring display should not be accepted without further investigation.
The purpose of any inspection and testing program is to establish the condition of equipment to determine what work should be done and to verify that it will continue to function until the next done in conjunction with routine maintenance. In this way, many minor items that require no special tools, training, or equipment can be corrected as they are found. The inspection and testing program is probably the most important function of a maintenance department in that it establishes what should be done to keep the system in service to perform the function for which it is required.
The atmosphere or environment in which electrical equipment is located has a definite effect on its operating capabilities and the degree of maintenance required. An ideal environment is one in which the air is:
Under such conditions, the need for maintenance will be minimized. Where these conditions are not maintained, the performance of electrical equipment will be adversely affected. Good housekeeping contributes to a good environment and reduced maintenance.
Dust can foul cooling passages and thus reduce the capabilities of motors, transformers, switchgear, and so on, by raising their operating temperatures above rated limits, decreasing operating efficiencies, and increasing fire hazard. Similarly, chemicals and vapors can coat and reduce the heat transfer capabilities of heating and cooling equipment. Chemicals, dusts, and vapors can be highly flammable, explosive, or conductive, increasing the hazard of fire, explosion, ground faults, and short circuits. Chemicals and corrosive vapors can cause high contact resistance that will decrease contact life and increase contact power losses with possible fire hazard or false overload conditions due to excess heat. Large temperature changes combined with high humidity can cause condensation problems, malfunction of operating and safety devices, and lubrication problems. High ambient temperatures in areas where thermally sensitive protective equipment is located can cause such protective equipment to operate below its intended operating point. Ideally, both the electrical apparatus and its protective equipment should be located within the same ambient temperature. Where the ambient temperature difference between equipment and its protective device is extreme, compensation in the protective equipment should be made.
Electrical equipment installed in hazardous (classified) locations as described in NFPA70, National Electrical Code, requires special maintenance considerations.
Equipment is designed and rated to perform satisfactorily when subjected to specific operating and load conditions. A motor designed for safe continuous operation at rated load might not be satisfactory for frequent intermittent operation, which can produce excessive winding temperatures or mechanical trouble. The resistance grid or transformer of a reduced-voltage starter will overheat if left in the starting position. So-called “jogging” or “inching” service imposes severe demands on equipment such as motors, starters, and controls. Each type of duty influences the type of equipment used and the extent of maintenance required. The five most common types of duty as defined in NFPA 70, National Electrical Code are:
Some devices used in establishing a proper maintenance period are running-time meters (to measure total “on” or “use” time); counters to measure number of starts, stops, or load-on, load-off, and rest periods; and recording ammeters to graphically record load and no-load conditions. These devices can be applied to any system or equipment and will help classify the duty. They will help establish a proper frequency of preventive maintenance.
Safety and limit controls are devices whose sole function is to ensure that values remain within the safe design level of the system. Because these devices function only during an abnormal situation in which an undesirable or unsafe condition is reached, each device should be periodically and carefully inspected, checked, and tested to be certain that it is in reliable operating condition.
Wherever practical, a history of each electrical system should be developed for all equipment or parts of a system vital to a plant’s operation, production, or process. The record should include all pertinent information for proper operation and maintenance. This information is useful in developing repair cost trends, items replaced, design changes or modifications, significant trouble or failure patterns, and replacement parts or devices that should be stocked. System and equipment information should include the following:
This chapter explains the purpose and applications of various types of electrical diagrams with suitable examples for reading and interpretation of these diagrams.
Engineers and technical personnel associated with an engineering organization use drawings to convey graphically the ideas and plan necessary for execution and completion of a project involving construction or assembly of components or systems. Drawings work as a tool for problem solving at various stages of working in an organization. The drawings are at the centre of activities taking place in an engineering organization whether a manufacturing organization or a turnkey contracting organization. Every effective troubleshooter must be able to read these drawings in order to quickly find failures in electrical controls. Technical drawings are used to convey a large amount of exact, detailed information in an abbreviated language. They consist of lines, symbols, dimensions, and notations to accurately convey an engineer’s designs to electricians/technicians who install the electrical system on a job. Some of the types of electrical drawings used for any project can be categorized as block diagrams, layout drawings, single line diagrams, wiring diagrams etc. All drawings should be prepared in line with the international standards mentioned above or any company specific standards.
A single line diagram (SLD), also sometimes called a one-line diagram, is a drawing that shows by single lines and symbols a simplified layout of a three-phase electrical system. It is a schematic drawing of an electrical power system that uses a concise, standard notation accepted by all power engineers. Single line or one-line diagrams get their name from the fact that only one phase of a three-phase system is shown and only one line is used to represent any number of current carrying conductors. Standard symbols are used to represent components of power systems, such as transformers, circuit breakers, generators, fuses and switches.
A single line diagram must incorporate the following information as a minimum:
General
Incoming Circuit/Sectionalising Circuits
Transformers
Bus-Bars
Feeders
A typical example for single line diagrams are given below:
Figure 3.1 shows the power distribution system in a plant with 13.8 kV incomers. Voltage and current transformers are provided with relays for protection and metering. Voltage is stepped down to 480 Volts through 1000 kVA transformers through ACB of 1200 Amps. Output from the transformers is fed to the medium voltage switchgear with outgoing feeders for large motors and auxiliary transformers/ other distribution boards. Power from the MV switchboard is further step down transformers for lighting and control supply. The MV switchboard also has a bus-coupler of 1200 Amp for coupling of the two incomers.
The 3-line diagram shows the different components of the circuit as simplified standard symbols, and the power and signal connections between the devices. Arrangement of the component interconnections on the diagram does not correspond to their physical locations in the finished device. Figure 3.2 shows a simple 3-line diagram for a motor DOL starter.
Some of the common terms associated with the single line diagram are listed in Table
Term | Explanation |
Electrical Bus | The conductor(s) usually made of copper or aluminium, which carries the current and serves as a common connection for two or more circuits. |
Fault | See “œShort Circuit.” |
Fault Current | The surge of amperage created during an electrical failing. |
Fixed Low Voltage Circuit Breaker | A circuit breaker rated for less than 1000V and bolted into a fixed position with bus or cable mechanically bolted to breaker terminations. |
Fully Rated | This is a type of system coordination in which all circuit breakers are rated to operate independently |
Ground Fault | Current leakage from an ungrounded conductor to the grounding path in an electrical system. |
Interrupting Rating | The maximum short circuit current that an overcurrent protective device can safely interrupt. |
Load centre | A wall mounted device that delivers electricity from a supply source to loads in light commercial or residential applications. |
Network Distribution System | Interconnected circuits connect the customer to two or more power sources. Most reliable for continuity of service. |
Overcurrent | A current higher than the current a conductor or electrical component can safely handle. |
Overload | A temperature build-up caused by excessive loads on a circuit causing damage to the conductor’s insulation. |
Panel board | A wall mounted device that delivers electricity from a supply source to loads in light commercial, commercial and industrial applications. |
Selectively Coordinated | A type of system coordination in which all circuit breakers are fully rated at the point of application |
Series Rated | A type of system coordination in which the main upstream circuit protection device must have an interrupting rating equal to or greater than the available fault current of the system. |
Short Circuit | An electrical fault that is created when two exposed conductors touch or when conductor insulation fails. |
Single-Phase | A continuous single alternating current cycle. |
Specification | The detailed descriptions of electrical equipment to be provided for an application. |
Standards | Guidelines and regulations for the manufacturing of electrical equipment. |
Step-Down Transformer | Decreases the output voltage that is being supplied. |
Step-Up Transformer | Increases the output voltage that is being supplied. |
Three-Phase | A continuous series of three overlapping AC cycles offset by 120 degrees. |
UL Listed | Listed by Underwriters Laboratory, an independent laboratory that tests equipment to determine whether it meets certain safety standards when properly used. |
Protective relays are commonly used in single line diagrams for denoting protective devices used for generators, motors, transformers etc. Protective relays are denoted through numbers designated by IEEE/ANSI. A device could also be a combination of two relays e.g. 50/51 denotes a combination of instantaneous over current and time over current. Letters can be added to clarify application (87 T for transformer differential, 59G for ground over voltage). The list of relay numbers as per ANSI is provided below:
2 – Time Delay Starting or Closing Relay
3 – Checking or Interlocking Relay
21 – Distance Relay
24 – Over-Excitation Relay
27 – Undervoltage Relay
30 – Annunciator Relay
32 – Directional Power Relay
37 – Undercurrent or Underpower Relay
44 – Unit Sequence Starting Relay
46 – Reverse-phase or Phase-Balance Relay
47 – Phase-Sequence Voltage Relay
48 – Incomplete-Sequence Relay
49 – Machine or Transformer Thermal Relay
50 – Instantaneous Overcurrent
51 – AC Time Overcurrent Relay
53 – Exciter or DC Generator Relay
55 – Power Factor Relay
56 – Field Application Relay
58 – Power Rectifier Misfire Relay
59 – Overvoltage Relay
60 – Voltage or Current Balance Relay
62 – Time-Delay Stopping or Opening Relay
64 – Ground Detector Relay
67 – AC Directional Overcurrent Relay
68 – Blocking Relay
74 – Alarm Relay
76 – DC Overcurrent Relay
79 – AC-Reclosing Relay
81 – Frequency Relay
82 – DC-Reclosing Relay
83 – Automatic Selective Control or Transfer Relay
85 – Carrier or Pilot-Wire Receiver Relay
86 – Lockout Relay
87 – Differential Protective Relay
91 – Voltage Directional Relay
92 – Voltage and Power Directional Relay
96 – Autoloading Relay
Abbreviations are frequently used in electrical diagrams. Table 3.3 identifies a few commonly used abbreviations.
Abbreviation | Definition |
CT | Current transformer |
PT | Potential transformer |
V | Volts |
kV | Kilo volts |
W or kW | Power meter |
kWH | Energy meter |
A | Ampere meter |
TP | Three pole |
FP | Four pole |
DP | Douple pole |
VCB | Vacuum circuit breaker |
Abbreviation | Definition |
ACB | Air circuit breaker |
OLR | Over load relay |
OLTC | On load tap changer |
RTCC | Remote tap changer cubicle |
The purpose of electric circuits is to direct and control current flow, at the correct time, to the various components in any system. A broken wire or open switch or wiring error can stop the current from flowing, thereby preventing the system, or part of the system from functioning. A schematic diagram shows an electrical circuit in detail. By clearly depicting individual current paths, it also indicates how the electrical circuit operates. Most schematic diagrams are current flow diagrams. They are arranged from top to bottom, so that we can clearly see how the current flows through the circuit. It shows the different components of the circuit as simplified standard symbols, and the power and control connections between the devices. Unlike the single line or the block diagram, the schematic diagram shows the actual connection details.
Schematic diagrams are usually spread over a number of sheets and the different sheets provide the following details:
An example of schematic diagram for the motor control centre for a press machine is provided in Figure 3.3. The sheet-wise details are as below:
Sheets 1 and 2: Motor power circuit
Sheet 3: Power circuit diagrams for service plugs and cabinet lamps
Sheet 4: Power circuit for transformer and bridge rectifier for getting 24 V DC from 380 volts AC and
Sheet 5: Alarm circuits for field pressure switches (low and high pressure switch contacts).
Sheet 6: Emergency circuits for press machine stopping
Sheet 7: interlock circuits for emergency stop from external panel, overload relays, tool safety position sensor contacts.
Sheets 8, 9, 10: Fault indication and interlock circuits
Logic diagrams are easy to read graphic representations of the operation of system equipment controls using basic digital logic symbols. These symbols functionally relate manual and process input actions to the process control and operator display output actions. The logic diagram in itself does not provide the details of the hardware to be used or the details of the control signal levels but it works as a basis for other drawings such as electrical schematics or solid-state logic systems.
Before the advent of solid-state logic circuits, logical control systems were designed and built exclusively around electromechanical relays. Relays are far from obsolete in modern design, but have been replaced in many of their former roles as logic-level control devices, relegated most often to those applications demanding high current and/or high voltage switching. Solid state logic circuits are in common use now and these are based on voltage levels. These are designed to input and output only two types of signals: ‘high’ (1) and ‘low’ (0), as represented by a variable voltage: full power supply voltage for a ‘high’ state and zero voltage for a ‘low’ state.
Figure 3.4 shows the control logic for a solenoid valve which can be operated automatically in ‘Auto’ mode or manually through a hand switch with ‘OPEN’, ‘CLOSE’ and ‘AUTO’ positions. A limit switch in the field sends a signal that the valve is fully open. Only when this signal is activated, the valve remains open in the ‘AUTO’ mode. Otherwise it remains open as long as the hand switch is manually kept at the “œOPEN’ position.
A ladder diagram reflects a conventional wiring diagram (Figure 3.5). A wiring diagram shows the physical arrangement of the various components (switches, relays, motors, etc.) and their interconnections. The ladder diagrams are more schematic and show each branch of the control circuit on a separate horizontal row (the rungs of the ladder). They emphasize the function of each branch and the resulting sequence of operations. The base of the diagram shows two vertical “rails” one connected to a voltage source and the other to ground, and a series of horizontal “rungs” between them.
Ladder logic is widely used to program PLCs, where sequential control of a process or manufacturing operation is required. Ladder logic is useful for simple but critical control systems, or for reworking old hardwired relay circuits. As programmable logic controllers became more sophisticated it has also been used in very complex automation systems.
Cabling drawings are a part of the detailed design and engineering activity of a project. These drawings are usually prepared on the basis of the single line diagram, the load schedule, equipment schedule and piping/plant layout drawings.
The intent of the conduit, cable and tray schedule is to provide all pertinent information to assist in installing, connecting, identifying, and maintaining control and power cables. Each cable and conduit should be identified with an individual designation. The cable and conduit are tagged with a designation at each end and at intermediate points as necessary to facilitate identification. The designation is also shown on equipment wiring diagrams, tray loading diagrams, on conduit plans and details, on cabinet layouts, and on junction and pull box layouts.
An example of cable schedule is provided in Figure 3.6.
Cable layouts are prepared on the basis of the plant layout, electrical layout/ equipment layout, power distribution system layout and the load schedule. This is a diagram which shows the layout of the plant cabling system.
Cable layouts comprise of the following:
Figure 3.8 is an example of a plan drawing showing layout of cable from the Motor Control Centre to the Pump Area. The tag numbers of the cables both power and control which are passing through the cable trench are mentioned in the drawing. For example P001 is the power cable and C 001 is the control cable connected to the motor 3580-NPP-001/M1 and so on.
Figure 3.9 is an example of Wiring Diagram for conduits (indoor illumination and utility power supply). The drawing provides the details of the circuit number for the conduits and their connection scheme with the lighting fixtures, power sockets etc. The legend in the drawing shows details for the fixtures and utilities.
Electrical equipment may require controls from various sources and systems. In such cases control wiring for the equipment requires interconnections between the different systems which may have varied locations. These interconnections could be made through a panel or a junction box. Interconnection diagrams and listings show details of all control interconnections in the plant including TJBs (terminal junction boxes), MCCs and Control Panels. These diagrams differ from wiring diagrams in the way the information is organized (according to multi-conductor cables or TJBs and terminal strips). For example, in an interconnection diagram, all connections on the either side of a multi-conductor cable are shown together or alternatively all connections to terminal strips in a TJB are shown together.
Panel internal wiring diagrams are prepared once the single line diagram, the logic diagram and the control schematic have been finalized. Panel internal wiring diagrams provide the following details:
These are used for providing details of terminal strips for junction boxes, control panels, etc. Terminal diagrams provide details of the terminal number and the corresponding ferrule number of the outgoing cable to be terminated at the particular terminal.
Electrical drawings and documentation are extremely important for the troubleshooting and maintenance of any electrical system. The basic key diagram for any electrical installation is the single line diagram. Cabling and wiring drawings are prepared as part of the detailed design and engineering activity of a project. These drawings are usually prepared on the basis of the single line diagram, the load schedule and equipment schedule. The different types of cabling drawings are the cable schedule/layout, conduit/tray schedule/layout, control cable interconnection diagram and the panel internal wiring diagrams. The electrical drawings are important at all stages of project execution right from the tendering stage to the plant operation and maintenance stage.
Electrical safety is an important issue in any industry and requires adequate attention while planning, designing, installing operating and maintaining electrical equipment and installations in an industrial facility. A number of serious accidents, including fatalities, occur every year in industrial establishments due to accidents involving electricity. Electric shock is the major hazard posed by any electrical equipment to those working on electrical systems. In this, we will take a detailed look at various hazards present in any general industrial environment and in particular, electrical hazards. We shall also learn about electric shocks and shocks due to direct and indirect contact.
Note:
In this text, the term ‘earth’ has generally been used to represent the reference point of power supply system, in accordance with the practice followed in UK literature and standards. ‘Earthing’ refers to connections of exposed metallic parts to this reference point. Depending on the context, ‘earth’ may also mean soil mass and ‘earthing’ may stand for the connection of the reference point to the soil mass. The terms ‘ground’ and ‘grounding’ common in the North American practice have been avoided, but where encountered, they should be understood to have the same meaning as ‘earth’ and ‘earthing’ respectively.
It is often remarked that electricity is a good slave but a bad master. Improper use of electricity or careless handling of electrical equipment leads to a number of avoidable accidents every year, resulting in huge loss of productive man-hours and monetary compensation liability to the employer. Even more serious are the instances of fatalities due to electrocution or as a result of grievous injuries. In this text, we will take a detailed look at the electrical hazards in substations and other premises handling electricity. We will learn a little about the theory behind electrical safety as well as examining the preventive measures that need to be adopted to ensure safety while working on electrical installations.
Electrical safety is a well-legislated subject and the various Acts and Regulations enacted in most countries emphasis the responsibility of both employers and employees in ensuring safe working conditions. We will briefly trace the history of regulations on the subject of workplace safety in general, and electrical safety, in particular.
Safety is not simply a matter of taking precautions in the workplace. It has to, as a matter of course, begin at the stage of equipment design. Safety should be built into the design of electrical equipment and it is the responsibility of every manufacturer of electrical equipment to remove every possible hazard that can arise from its normal use. Another important aspect involved with safety in the workplace is the correct selection of equipment. Incorrect selection and application of even the most well designed piece of electrical machinery, can give rise to hazardous conditions. Similarly, a lot of care is required in the operation and maintenance of any electrical equipment in order to avoid accidents. Appropriate knowledge of equipment and systems is essential for each and every person who operates or maintains the equipment. This knowledge is initially acquired through structured training and thereafter by hands-on experience. The training should be comprehensive and should deal not only with the technical details of the equipment, but also with the possible hazards present in the specific working environment. This training should also teach the working personnel about the measures required in order to prevent accidents, and the skills needed to deal with accidents when they occur.
Another important factor involves the close monitoring of all electrical equipment/installations to ensure their continued safe operation. A thorough inspection during initial erection and commissioning (as well as periodic inspections and maintenance thereafter) is absolutely essential to ensure safety. Any defects brought to light during such inspections must be attended to promptly.
We will devote our attention to the use of electrical equipment in environments where hazardous materials are likely to be present. We will also discuss in detail the safety of substations, and the precautions necessary while handling DC storage battery installations. Batteries need particular attention since they contain toxic materials such as lead, as well as corrosive chemicals such as acid or alkali. These chemicals are particularly dangerous because of their electrical voltage and the risk of explosion due to the presence of the explosive mixture of hydrogen and air. Finally, we will review the organizational aspects of safety. Electrical safety is not merely a technical issue. Accidents can only be prevented if appropriate safety procedures are evolved and enforced. A mechanism should be put in place to ensure that all working personnel are aware of the hazards and are trained to carry out their duties in a safe manner.
But firstly, we will discuss in general the hazards present in any industry and more particularly, the hazards present in electrical installations.
In any industrial facility several types of hazards exist. The hazards may be due to any of the following:
The main hazard from electrical equipment is, naturally, the danger from electric shock. Electric shock or electrocution can cause many problems in a human body. It can cause the human heart to stop, thereby resulting in death. Even if an electric shock is not fatal, it can cause other problems such as internal organ damage due to excessive heating of body tissues, burns at the point of contact of the skin with live conductors, loss of consciousness, or loss of balance resulting in a fall while working at a height.
Apart from electric shocks caused by contact with parts that are (or become) live, another major danger for those who work on electrical equipment, is the risk of burns due to arc faults. Such faults are often caused by the affected workers themselves. When working on live equipment, or in the vicinity of live equipment, workers can inadvertently cause a short circuit fault. In fact, arc faults in equipment and their potential dangers, are subjects of extensive study and have given rise to standards such as IEEE 1584 (Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations). We will discuss in detail the basic safety issues of electrical equipment in subsequent chapters.
Hazards from mechanical equipment are quite numerous and depend largely on the type of industrial process involved and the machinery in use. The following is a representative list of hazards that one may come across in an industrial environment.
Unlike electrical hazards, most of the dangers listed above arising from mechanical equipment, are quite apparent to those who work near them except, of course, when they happen unexpectedly. For example, machinery with a moving component, for example a belt drive, is a visible potential hazard. However, by providing suitable barriers or guards, one may avoid the hazards that could be caused by them. The real danger is when such a drive starts unexpectedly while maintenance work is being carried out on it. This is usually a result of a procedural lapse during maintenance. Thus, we have two possible approaches for avoiding dangers from mechanical equipment. The first is by implementing safety through proper equipment design. The second is by adopting safe working practices in operations and during maintenance. In fact, these approaches work for any of the hazardous conditions that we will be discussing.
The dangers due to handling of toxic materials can occur as a result of any of the following:
One of the examples of this type of contamination is lead dust, where exposure can occur while working on lead-acid battery plates. In this instance, the exposure can happen in any of the ways listed above, and appropriate precautions are necessary to avoid all these methods of contact. The seriousness of the injury depends on the nature of the hazardous material and the concentration of the material/amount to which a person is exposed.
Fire is one of the most common hazards in any industrial environment and is usually a result of some other accident. An electrical short circuit is the culprit in most cases. The excessive heat produced in conductors, and sometimes the arc flash accompanying the short circuit, ignites nearby flammable materials and can result in a fire. Once a fire is initiated, it can however become self-sustaining.
The best way to avoid fire hazard is by prevention. However, preventive measures alone cannot totally eliminate fires. Therefore, in addition to preventive measures, it is imperative to install alarm systems to warn of incipient fires. It is essential also to initiate fire fighting measures appropriate to the materials involved. These measures should include, where possible, automatic extinguishing systems to limit the damaging effects of a fire. Transformer fires are a case in point. In spite of the presence of a large volume of combustible coolant and other insulating materials, transformer fires, to a great extent, can be avoided. This can be achieved by designing the transformer fires with the necessary capacity to withstand the expected loading. Another design factor which will reduce the risk of fire in this area, is the inclusion of protective devices to trip the transformer in the event of over currents or excessive winding temperature. However, as a matter of abundant caution, large transformers are also provided with fire detection and fire fighting systems, which get activated automatically when a fire is detected.
Fire inspection and certification of industrial or other premises where a number of people work (or gather), is a mandatory requirement in most countries of the world.
A common cause of industrial accidents is burn injuries from contact with hot surfaces, liquids or gases. Enclosures of electrical equipment can often attain high temperatures when they are in operation. Therefore, contact with them can cause burn injuries. Such enclosures are normally placed out of reach, or otherwise protected, from accidental contact. Similarly, conducting parts can attain very high temperatures, and working on them immediately after they are de-energized can result in burns.
Similar precautions are necessary in the case of other hot substances. This includes handling of molten metals and hot gases, including steam. Molten metals should be prevented from coming into accidental contact with water, as the resulting sudden evaporation can result in explosions and the splashing of liquid metal.
Cold liquids such as liquid nitrogen can also cause burns if they come into contact with skin. Some cold liquids such as liquid oxygen are explosive and due care is essential when handling them.
Acids and alkalis are highly corrosive and can cause injuries if they come into contact with skin. In electrical installations, battery electrolyte, which is an acid such as sulphuric acid, or alkaline such as sodium hydroxide, pose such hazards. The hazards in this case are:
Explosion is a result of accidental ignition of explosive mixtures formed by combustible gases or fumes with oxygen in air. The source of ignition is often electrical. The effects of explosions are manifold and can include:
Prevention of hazards due to explosions is primarily through the following approach:
Hazards from electrical equipment could include any of the following:
Electric shock is a result of the following conditions.
The last named is similar to indirect contact except that it does not involve contact with any electrical equipment (either a live part or enclosure). Electric shock causes current flow through the body, resulting in muscular contraction. If the current flows through heart muscles, it can cause the heart to stop through a condition called fibrillation.
Direct contact is the condition when a human body comes into contact with a part that is normally live. In this case the current flow through the body will be the governed by the voltage at the point of contact across the body earth and resistance of the human body. Part of the earth loop impedance may also be included in the current path, but this will not affect the current flow significantly since the value is usually negligible in comparison to the body resistance.
The voltage to which a human body is subjected is the main factor influencing the current flow through the body in the case of a direct shock condition. Direct contact hazard can be minimized by:
It should be noted that live parts are normally protected by suitable insulation so that direct contact is not possible. Instances of live parts remaining exposed in systems deploying voltages higher than extra low voltage limit are kept to a minimum and occur only where it is absolutely necessary. Direct contact in such cases is prevented by providing suitable barriers to prevent accidental contact and by providing adequate clearance between exposed live parts and work areas so that a person working in the area is not within an ‘arms reach’ of exposed conductors. Where possible, residual current devices sensitive enough to detect accidental contact (by detecting the leakage current that such a contact causes) can be deployed as supplementary protection. Usually such devices can be put in final circuits feeding low power equipment where possibility of direct human contact is high (e.g. utility socket outlets, or low capacity domestic circuits) and the normal leakage current through insulation is negligible. It must be stressed that the residual current devices do not make a system safe by themselves against direct contact but offer supplementary protection only.
Indirect contact is the condition when a potential is applied on a human body in situations other than ‘direct’ contact. This usually happens in two ways.
The first case is when a human body is in contact with an external (or under certain cases extraneous) conductive part of an electrical installation and there is a fault in the system involving a live conductor and the external conductive part. For example, a person standing on the earth with his hand touching the earthed metallic enclosure of electrical equipment just at the moment when a fault occurs between the live conductor of the equipment and the enclosure, will be exposed to an electric shock. The second instance is the case of a potential difference between two points on the earth arising out of an earth fault in a system which is applied across the two feet with the distance being about 1 Meter. This condition usually happens in high voltage electrical switchyards when a live conductor snaps and falls to the ground. This creates appreciable potential differences, which arise when the high voltage gets dissipated into the soil
Electrical equipment earthing is primarily concerned with connecting conductive metallic enclosures of the equipment (which are not normally live) to the earthing system of the substation or other consumer facility through conductors known as earthing conductors. For the earthing to be effective, the fault current (in the event of a failure of insulation of live parts within the equipment) should flow through the equipment enclosure to the earth return path without the enclosure voltage exceeding the value of safe touch potential. This is also applicable to other parts that are normally dead (refer to Figure 4.1).
Earth fault protection in LV branch circuits is usually achieved using over current protective devices such as fuses or circuit breakers and no special protective relaying is used. However, main circuit feeders and the incoming circuit-breaker from the supply transformer are provided with specific protection for earth faults. Sensing of earth faults is done using one of the following approaches:
Adding sensitive earth fault relays will enable the protection system to sense even low value of earth fault currents and trip the circuit faster. Inclusion of the neutral in Figure 4.2 cases b and c is for canceling any unbalance currents that may flow in the neutral from being sensed as earth faults.
Bonding is the practice of connecting all accessible metalwork – whether associated with the electrical installation (known as exposed-metalwork) or not (extraneous-metalwork) – to the system earth. In a building, there are typically a number of services other than electrical supply, which employ exposed metallic parts in their design. These include water piping, gas piping, HVAC ducting and so on. A building may also contain steel structures in its construction. We have seen earlier in this chapter that when an earth fault takes place in an installation, the external conducting surfaces of the installation and the earth mass in the vicinity may attain higher potential with reference to the source earth. Therefore it is possible that a dangerous potential may develop between the conducting parts of non-electrical systems including building structures and the external conducting parts of electrical installations as well as the surrounding earth. It is therefore necessary that all such parts are bonded to the electrical service earth point of the building to ensure safety of occupants. This is called equipotential bonding.
There are two aspects to equipotential bonding; the main bonding where services enter the building, and supplementary bonding within rooms, particularly kitchens and bathrooms. Main bonding should interconnect the incoming gas, water and electricity service where these are metallic, but can be omitted where the services are run in plastic, as is frequently the case nowadays. Internally, bonding should link any items, which are likely to either be at earth potential or which may become live in the event of a fault. These items are large enough to make contact with a significant part of the body or large enough to be gripped. Small parts, other than those likely to be gripped, are ignored because the instinctive reaction to a shock is muscular contraction, which will break the circuit. Refer to Figure 4.3.
In each electrical installation, main equipotential bonding conductors (earthing wires) are required to connect to the main earthing terminal for the installation of the following:
It is important to note that the reference above is always to metal pipes. If the pipes are made of plastic, they need not be main bonded.
The following are the dangers posed by static electricity:
It is necessary to study the static buildup potential of any workplace and institute protective measures to control such buildup.
Charge buildup takes place when two surfaces, which are in contact and across which electrons migrate, get suddenly separated. Connecting such surfaces together with a conducting medium prevents charge accumulation by providing a leakage path. This is called bonding, and can be achieved by using a bare or insulated conductor of adequate mechanical strength. Where electric current flows are due to charge leakage of very low magnitudes, the size of the conductor is immaterial and so is the resistance of this conductor.
For moving objects, an earth brush of metal, brass or carbon can be used to provide the required leakage path. This method is commonly used for shafts of rotating machines to prevent bearing surface damages (refer to Figure 4.4). For objects which are in contact with earth already, no separate earthing or bonding is necessary.
Earthing cannot, however, provide a solution in all cases, especially where a bulky non-conducting material is involved. In this case, the part of the substance which is a distance away from the earthed portion, can retain sufficient charge, since movement of charge will not be fast enough in an insulating material. This charge can result in a spark.
Many insulating materials such as fabric, paper, etc., can absorb small quantities of water when the atmospheric humidity is sufficiently high. Even in the case of materials that do not absorb water, a thin layer of moisture gets deposited on the surface due to humidity (for example, plate glass). If the environment has a humidity reading of over 50%, moist insulating materials can leak charges as fast as they are produced. This prevents high charge buildup, thereby avoiding sparks.
Conversely, most of the materials become dry when the humidity becomes lower than 30% since they tend to lose moisture to the atmosphere. This results in increased charge accumulation, which can cause sparking. Keeping humidity levels at 60% to 70% can solve static problems in many cases such as industries handling paper and fibers where charge buildup causes unwanted adhesion. In some cases, localized humidification using steam ejectors can be useful, particularly where the large space involved makes increase of humidity in the entire space a difficult proposition.
However, this method is unsuitable where:
In all such cases, other methods of static control may have to be resorted to.
Ionization consists of forced separation of electrons from air molecules by application of electric stress or other forms of energy. The air thus ionized becomes conductive and can drain charges from charged bodies with which it is in contact. The positive ions and electrons are also attracted by the negative and positive charges respectively, thus resulting in charge neutralization.
Ionization can be produced by high voltage electricity, by ultra violet light, or by open flames. Various devices using a step up transformer operating on mains supply and producing high electric fields are commercially available. Due care is needed however to address safety issues arising from the use of high voltage. Such devices find application in paper and fabric processing plants. They are, however, unsuitable for use in situations where the environment contains inflammable gas mixtures.
A simpler device is the static comb, which does not use electricity at all. It consists of a metallic bar with a row of sharp points projecting from it and bonded to earth. When this device is placed near the charged surface, the electric stress due to accumulation of charge near the sharp points causes ionization and helps to drain the charge from the surface. This method is commonly used in belt driven equipment near the point of separation of the belt and pulley (refer to Figure 3.5).
Another method of ionization is by using a row of small open flames. This method, however, requires caution where combustible materials are handled.
In addition to these hazards of electricity, the accumulation of static electrical charge while processing/conveying materials that are not good electrical conductors (examples: paper, wood chips and grains) also poses hazards of electric shock, ignition and explosion.
An electric arc takes place when current flows through the air or through the insulation between two conductors at different potentials. The path of the current becomes conducive due to the ionization of the gas. Since arcs are associated with faults, the fault current level and the heating effect, is usually very high. Injury from arcs is usually a direct result of burning from the arc.
Many of the short circuit faults happen as a result of insulation failure or the electrical breakdown of air between two exposed live parts. In this case, an arc is always struck between these exposed parts. ARC FLASH is the SUDDEN release of large amounts of heat and light energy at the point of a fault. Exposure to an arc flash frequently results in a variety of serious injuries and in some cases, death. Workers have been injured even when ten feet or more away from the arc center. Equipment can be destroyed causing extensive downtime and requiring expensive replacement and repair. Nearby flammable materials may be ignited resulting in secondary fires that can destroy entire facilities.
The following can cause electric arcs:
Arcs created by a fault do not remain stationary. The interaction between an arc and the electromagnetic field caused by the fault current flow will cause the arc to move away from the source point with the arc behaving very much like a conductor placed in a magnetic field. The arc also causes sudden heating of the air in its immediate vicinity causing a violent expansion much like an explosion. This can result in the dislocation of loose components around the fault point and their being thrown like projectiles outwards from the arc. Following are some important effects of arc flash:
Figure 4.6 is a model of an arc fault and the physical consequences that can occur.
An arc flash protection program is implemented as part of the electrical safety program, which in turn, is part of the overall safety program of the company. The main objective of the program is to prevent or minimize injuries to workers from arc flash. Since arc flash hazard mitigation is a fairly new concept in the industry, it is expected that considerable efforts and allocation of resources will be required to effectively launch the program.
The arc flash hazard program consists of following steps:
Workers exposed to an arc flash event may suffer from injuries including burns, cardiac arrest, amputation, memory loss, hearing loss, fracture, cataract, and blast trauma. Barrier protection when applied to switchgear can reduce the risk and impact of electrical burns and pressure waves. Enclosures containing primary elements are compartmentalized and grounded for maximum isolation. All live parts (where possible) are fully insulated, reducing the possibility of an arcing fault to occur. All primary elements such as breakers, PTs, CPTs, etc. have a disconnect means involving isolating shutters. Other methods used to reduce arc flash hazards are discussed below:
Exposure to arc flash can be eliminated in three ways:
The following procedures used correctly can reduce arc flash accidents:
Understanding arc flash and its causes and taking steps to minimize them can avoid accidents.
Preventive maintenance practices exist in most companies that can boast a high reliability of supply or process continuity. Preventive maintenance also provides for a safer workplace. Procedures needed to be included that address arc flash hazards, such as the enhancement of maintenance procedures when carrying out inspections, and preventive or breakdown maintenance. This reduces the overall cost of implementing the arc flash program. Following are some recommended maintenance practices:
The incident energy exposure can be reduced by system design or operating procedures. Below are several ways to reduce the energy on an existing system:
Fault level can be reduced in following ways:
Arcing time can be reduced in several ways. Some changes in the system of settings may be required for this purpose. Some characteristics underlined in this chapter are as follows:
If bus differential relaying is not possible, then main relay can be retrofitted with an instantaneous device and safety control switch. As shown in Figure 4.9, a selector switch can be used to place the instantaneous device in service when maintenance is being done.
Certain protective devices are current-limiting in design. By limiting the current available for a fault, there is a corresponding reduction in the incident energy for clearing times that are short in duration (1-3 cycles). Fault duties at these devices must be in the current limiting range for them to be effective (typically at least 10-15 times the device rating).
An arc flash protection program is implemented as part of the electrical safety program, which in turn, is part of the overall safety program of the company. The main objective of the program is to prevent or minimize injuries to workers from arc flash. Since arc flash hazard mitigation is a fairly new concept in the industry, it is expected that considerable efforts and allocation of resources will be required to effectively launch the program. The arc flash hazard reduction program consists of the following steps:
There are eight standardized protection principles for the safe use of electrical apparatus in potentially explosive atmospheres, in addition to some non-standardized methods. This standardized principle is commonly considered as a type of protection and for each of the principles, harmonized European standards or Euro-norms have been issued.
Hazardous areas, where potentially explosive atmospheres exist are encountered in a wide variety of industries. Thankfully, the science of how to operate safely within such areas is now well understood. However, knowing how best to comply with the requirements of this operation is something that still causes widespread confusion. Particular care has to be taken with electrical apparatus because of its potential for creating sparks and hotspots that could ignite a gas, vapour, mist or dust-laden atmosphere. Such environments are encountered in everyday life, with petrol station forecourts being an obvious example; Industry sectors that are prone to hazardous areas are mining, chemical processing, petrochemicals, and oil and gas. In addition, pharmaceutical production facilities often have areas where solvents are used; likewise, chemical plants often have hazardous areas. Flour mills, bakeries, sugar processors, timber processors, coal handling plant, paper mills and processors of metals such as aluminum and magnesium, for example, can all have areas where dust-laden atmospheres are potentially explosive. It is apparent therefore that the full spectrum of production and process plants which contain hazardous areas is extremely broad.
There are three zones for gases and vapours as shown in Table 4.1:
Zone 0 | Explosive atmosphere highly likely to be present for long period of time or continuously. |
Zone 1 | Explosive atmosphere possible but unlikely for longer period of time. |
Zone 2 | Explosive atmosphere unlikely to be present except for short periods of time – typically as a result of a process fault condition. |
When on considers the size of a refinery or chemical factory and the amount of liquids and gases that circulate, as well as the various processes that occur, it is clear that there exists a certain amount of risk of leaks and other hazards. In some cases the gas, vapour or dust is present all the time or for long periods. Refineries and chemical complexes should therefore be divided into areas of risk, areas called zones, which are categorized by the various releases of gas, vapors or dust.
Safe area
A domestic domain such as a house would be classed as safe area where the only risk of a release of explosive or flammable gas would be the propellant in an aerosol spray. The only explosive or flammable liquid would be paint and brush cleaner. These are classed as very low risk.
Zone 2 area
This is a step up from the safe area. In this case it has been decided that in this zone the gas, vapour or dust would only be present under abnormal conditions (most often leaks). Unwanted substances should only be present under 10 hours/year or 0–0.1% of the time.
Zone 1 area
These areas are where special or classified electrical equipment must be used. It is expected that the gas, vapour or dust will be present or expected for long periods of time under normal running. This is defined as 10–1000 hours/year or 0.1–10% of the time. In this case there must be no sparks at all that can ignite these mediums.
Zone 0 area
This is the worst scenario as gas or vapor is present all of the time (over 1000 hours/year or >10% of the time). Although this is the worst case it is very rare that a zone 0 area will be in the open. Usually this would be the vapour space above the liquid in the top of a tank or drum.
General principles of design
With very few exceptions, the ignition of a flammable atmosphere results in a potentially destructive explosion, caused by the heat generated in a thermochemical chain reaction. In this respect, the LEL of gas/air mixture is analogous to the critical mass of a nuclear device. Hence electrical apparatus for use in potentially explosive atmospheres must be designed so that it is not capable of initiating an explosion.
If we only consider normally sparking and heated components, design will be very easy.
But we have to consider abnormal conditions such as mechanical overloads and electrical faults, which often lead to dangerous conditions. The design requirement is therefore either to prevent these faults from occurring, or to ensure in some way that they cannot cause ignition.
Circuits where safe fault levels cannot be exceeded are termed as intrinsically safe circuits. Flameproof enclosures for power equipment and intrinsic safety for light current apparatus are still the two most important and widely used concepts for electrical installations in explosion/hazardous areas.
Flameproof enclosures: The principle of flameproof protection is to place electrical equipment in an enclosure, which does not need to be sealed, but which will not ignite a surrounding explosive gas if same explosive mixture is ignited within the enclosure. A flameproof enclosure is therefore, in effect, a type of pressure vessel in which all openings and running clearances have been shown by test as reliable flame traps.
The following rules are considered while designing a flameproof enclosure:
Application and Limitation of flameproof protection
This type of protection is useful for all apparatus including switches, contactors, commutators and slip-ring motors, and incandescent lamps.
This equipment is very robust.
Limitations:
Protection by intrinsic safety
Research has shown that the lowest current, which can cause an explosion, falls very rapidly with increase in supply voltage. If the voltage and current at the spark lie below the curve as shown in Figure 4.13, the circuit is said to be intrinsically safe.
Application of intrinsic IS system
This protection is applicable to low power and low voltage equipment. It is widely used in the protection of the electronic process control and telemetering system, where all parts of the circuit are within the hazardous area.
Excessive temperatures can cause burns, start a fire, or degrade insulation within the equipment. The standards generally provide temperature limits for various internal and external parts. Installation or mounting methods are considered when evaluating the product: for example, under the counter, installed in a cabinet, etc.
Hazards due to high temperature include:
We have discussed at length arc fault prevention through proper design of insulation and enclosure in the previous sections. Arc hazard from live electrical equipment and the precautions required against this hazard were also discussed in an earlier chapter. In this section, we will confine the discussions to the temperature produced by the normal/abnormal operation of electrical equipment and electrical equipment related fires.
Adverse thermal effects are a result of high temperatures occurring during equipment operation:
Current flowing in a conducting part produces watt losses due to the resistance of the material causing the heating of the conductors. This heat is dissipated in the form of thermal radiation and convection when the conductors are kept bare and exposed to the cooling medium. In the case of insulated conductors, the heat is first conducted through the insulation to its outer layers and then dissipated by convection and radiation. (Strange, but true; one of the requirements of an electrical insulator is that it should conduct heat adequately).
In a conductor carrying a steady load current, the temperature initially starts rising but reaches a steady state value when the heat generated and the heat dissipated are in equilibrium. The temperature, which a conductor can attain, is limited by the maximum permissible value which the insulating components in contact with it can withstand. Thus the conductor temperature of a wire with PVC insulation should not exceed the limiting temperature value applicable to PVC material (say 70 deg C). Exceeding this temperature will cause accelerated ageing and thermal failure of the insulation as discussed earlier. When abnormal conditions are encountered, the conductor temperature can go up to a much higher value compared to the temperature during normal operation. Such an increase must also be factored into the design of insulation in any electrical equipment. Abnormal conditions stated here include:
When there is a metallic enclosure around the live conductors, they too participate in the heat dissipation process and in doing so, their temperature rises beyond ambient value. Exposed and accessible parts of any electrical equipment must not attain temperatures beyond specified limits. If the part is to be held by hand for operation, the limit is the lowest. For parts which need not be held or touched during normal operation, higher limits are permissible. Though these parts are not normally handled, such requirement may occur occasionally. In addition, they can ignite any nearby flammable materials. Suitable limits must therefore be adopted. Table 4.2 below shows the typical limits for accessible parts (source: IEE wiring regulations):
Accessible part | Surface material | Max. Temperature Deg. C |
A hand held means of operation | Metallic | 55 |
Non metallic | 65 | |
A part intended to be touched but not hand held | Metallic | 70 |
Non metallic | 80 | |
A part which need not be touched for normal operation | Metallic | 80 |
Non metallic | 90 |
Similarly, lightning flashes striking a facility can have dangerous consequences unless they are safely dissipated to the ground. We will discuss these aspects in subsequent chapters.
In some instances an electric shock may not, by itself, cause injury. However, a resulting fall from a height could. Those who are working at heights on electrical equipment (e.g. changing lamps in a high bay factory premises or on road lighting poles) must take precautions to avoid a fall as a consequence of electric shock.
Burn injuries result from an arc flash, which happens when there is a short circuit between exposed live parts. The extent of arcing and the seriousness of injury depend on the following factors:
For example, the arc energy in an MV system short circuit fault is usually much higher compared to an LV mains circuit fault, which in turn has a much higher energy compared to a branch circuit fault in the same system. The longer an arc fault is allowed to persist, the higher the damage. Faults which are cleared much faster are therefore much less dangerous from the viewpoint of injury the resulting arc can inflict. High-energy faults will also cause melting of components such as copper/aluminium conductors or the steel parts of an enclosure. Copper is particularly dangerous because it can result in deposition of toxic copper salts on the skin. Direct electrical contact with a live part at the point of contact (without overt arcing) can also cause burns on the skin. Internal burn injuries and organ damage can be the result of the passage of electricity through the body (example: lightning current through a human body). Sometimes, the sudden expansion of air due to an arc fault within an enclosed space may dislodge mechanical parts (e.g. terminal covers) with a great force. Documented cases of such accidents causing injury or even death are on record. It is common practice in the design of equipment such as HV switchgear, to provide vents or flaps which open in the event of explosive arc faults, thereby avoiding damage to the enclosure. They also help to direct the arc products way from an operator who may be stationed nearby.
Another hazard arises due to the high temperature on the surface of electrical equipment enclosures and current carrying parts. As stated earlier, external surfaces of electrical equipment often attain elevated temperature: for example, the enclosure of bus ducts which can often attain surface temperatures of over 60 °C. Exposed conducting parts such as overhead line conductors can attain even higher temperatures. For example, the bus bars in switchgear often run at temperatures in excess of 100 °C. Electrical joints/mating surfaces can have temperatures exceeding the conductor temperature. This is because of increased localized resistance. Apart from causing less serious burn injuries (compared to arc flash), high surface temperature can cause ignition if flammable vapors are present in the environment.
Electrical faults can also cause fire danger as discussed in an earlier section. Special care is required when the electrical equipment itself contains flammable materials. Examples of this type of equipment include oil circuit breakers and mineral oil cooled transformers. In some cases, a fire can result because of combustible materials stored in the vicinity of electrical equipment.
Electrical equipment installed in explosive environment needs special attention. Frequently, components of electrical equipment produce arcing or sparking in the course of normal operation. Contactors, carbon brushes, push buttons, control switches are examples of such equipment. Some equipment may generate arcs during abnormal conditions such as a short circuit occurring within a motor terminal chamber. While in a normal environment such instances would be quite harmless, they may cause an explosion if hazardous substances are present in the surrounding atmosphere. Equipment intended to operate in such an environment should be designed to prevent an explosion being caused in the external environment. The nature and characteristics of the hazardous materials present in the environment play an important role in these cases. We will discuss in detail the safety measures to be taken in a hazardous environment in a subsequent chapter.
Table 4.3 identifies the safety hazards posed by electrical equipments commonly used in electrical generation and distribution systems and substations.
Type of equipment | Hazards |
Generation equipment | Electric shock, arc flash, mechanical hazards |
Transformers | Electric shock, arc flash, fire hazard |
Overhead Transmission/Distribution Lines | Electric Shock, Arc Flash, Fall From Heights |
Cables | Electric shock, arc flash, fire hazard |
Bus ducts | Electric shock, arc flash, thermal hazard |
Distribution equipment | Electric shock, arc flash, thermal hazard, fire hazard |
Motive equipment | Electric shock, arc flash, thermal hazard, mechanical hazards |
Heating equipment | Electric shock, arc flash, thermal hazard |
Lighting equipment | Electric shock, arc flash, thermal hazard, fall from heights |
Uninterrupted power supplies with battery | Electric shock, arc flash, hazards from corrosive liquids and explosive gases |
We will discuss briefly in the section the reasons why electrical accidents happen and how we can avoid them. These points will be elaborated on in more detail in subsequent chapters. Electrical accidents happen mostly as a result of the following:
Isolating normally live equipment before starting any work on it, can improve safety substantially in any system. We must however bear in mind that there are certain kinds of equipment where live work is possible. Furthermore, there are certain kinds of activities where work in the vicinity of exposed live parts is unavoidable. However, such work must be carried out according to well laid safety procedures.
The other major cause of accidents is faulty equipment (which can include both poorly designed or improperly operating equipment). Unless safety is built into the design of the equipment, accidents and injury will result. Similarly, improperly maintained equipment can also lead to failures which may result in accidents.
Insufficient knowledge of operating personnel, as well as a lack of familiarity with equipment and systems, can also result in unsafe situations. Absence of proper operational safety procedures as well as violations of existing procedures can result in accidents.
The following are the general safety measures, which need to be adopted to reduce the possibility of accidents in electrical equipment.
We will discuss these measures in detail in the ensuing chapters.
Improper use of electricity or careless handling of electrical equipment, leads to a number of otherwise avoidable accidents. Electrical safety is a well-legislated subject and the various acts and regulations enacted in each industrialized country emphasize the responsibility of both the employer and the employee to ensure safe working conditions. However, it must also be understood that safety is not simply a matter of taking precautions in the workplace: safety must start at the stage of equipment design.
In any industrial facility, several types of hazards exist. The hazards may be due to electrical faults, mechanical faults, as well as several other causes. Electrical hazards result, in the main, from electric shock, a fall as a result of an electric shock, burns due to arc flash and injuries by explosive expansion of air due to the arc. Other safety hazards include high temperature on the surface of electrical equipment/enclosures, exposed conductors and electrical faults resulting in fire within electrical equipment or nearby combustible materials. Special attention must be given to electrical equipment installed in an explosive environment. Equipment intended to operate in such an environment should be designed to prevent an explosion being caused in the external environment.
The reason for over 60% of accidents is the result of a failure to isolate live parts, as well as inadequate or insecure isolation of live parts. The proper isolation of normally live equipment from the mains supply before commencement of work can improve safety substantially. Poor maintenance and faulty equipment, insufficient information about the system being worked on, and a lack of safety procedures are the other major reasons for electrical accidents.
The possibility of accidents can be reduced substantially by the implementation of various steps. These steps include the initial design and installation of equipment in accordance with the appropriate safety features and relevant regulations. Adoption of proper documented procedures, as well as making available adequate training to working personnel and creating safety awareness among the workforce, are examples of further steps that could be taken. In the next chapter, we will discuss the basic theory of electrical safety and shock hazards.
We have discussed in earlier chapter about electrical hazards in installations. In this chapter, we will discuss the need for periodic inspection of electrical installations to ensure their continued safe operation. Various stipulations of IEE Wiring Regulations form the basis of the chapter.
The quality of an electrical installation and ensuring safety of personnel who operate and maintain the installation are important issues. Carrying out the design and construction of an installation as per various applicable standards, regulations and codes of practice is crucial in ensuring the quality, safety and integrity of the installation, since standards and codes put must emphasis on matters pertaining to safety. An installation must be inspected for conformity with the applicable regulations and for safety on completion of erection and thereafter periodically.
IEE Wiring regulations stipulate various requirements to achieve these objectives. Planning, design and erection of an electrical system need extreme care in order to ensure that the installations are safe for the personnel who use, operate and maintain them. Proper planning using the methods of systematic assessment given in Chapter 3 of the Regulations will ensure that the installations function as intended and are not unduly affected by the presence of external influences. Proper design of the system and selection of equipment, which form part of the installation, ensure that the system is safe and remains safe over its entire intended life. Proper erection ensures that the equipment operates and meets the functional requirements as intended. Inspection verifies the compliance with regulations and safety requirements.
The objectives of inspection are as follows:
Chapter 7 of the Regulations deals with the inspection of installations, prior to commissioning (called initial verification) and on an ongoing basis (periodic inspection). Initial verification ensures that there are no defects or non-compliance issues in the completed installation and it is fit to be put in service. Periodic inspection ensures that it is fit to continue in service.
Note:
IEE Wiring Regulations do not deal with high voltage equipment. However, the general principles discussed here are equally applicable for HV installations and can be extended to such installations with specific additions to suit the equipment involved.
In general, during inspection it should be ensured that electrical equipment is designed, manufactured and erected as per the applicable standards using good workmanship and proper materials. The characteristics of the equipment should not be impaired in the process of erection. It should also be ensured that the design temperatures are not exceeded. Measures for identification of equipment and wiring should be as per the requirements stipulated in the wiring Regulations. Joints should be of good electrical and mechanical quality.
On completion of any new electrical installation, as well as additions or modifications to an existing installation, appropriate inspection and testing should be carried out to verify that the requirements of the Regulations have been met. Similarly, periodic inspection and testing should be carried out in an operating installation to ensure that the installation quality has not deteriorated in service, due to the service conditions or other external influences. Appropriate reporting and certification should be performed by the authority carrying out the inspection/testing.
These aspects are covered in Part 7 of the Regulations in the following sections:
The basic objective of inspection is therefore to verify that all relevant requirements of the Regulations have been met and to make sure that the installation is safe to energize, operate and maintain. The steps involved in inspection are:
Every installation should be inspected and tested on completion and prior to putting in service, in order to confirm that all relevant requirements of the Regulations have been met. Due precautions should be taken during inspection and testing to avoid danger to persons and property. The result of assessment of the general characteristics (as per Part 3 of the Regulations) together with the drawings and documents pertaining to the installation should be made available to the person carrying out the inspection and testing.
Inspection should precede testing and should be performed after disconnecting the supply to that part of the installation which is under inspection. The inspection should verify that all equipment forming part of the installation conforms to the appropriate standards based on markings and certification/documentation by the installer or manufacturer. The inspection should also check that the equipment is correctly selected and erected as per the Regulations and is not visibly defective or damaged. The following are the aspects that should be checked during inspection. Some of the points will require checking during erection itself (as the parts may not be accessible for external inspection once the installation is completed):
As may be noticed, the points covered by verification indicate the emphasis of the Regulations on safety against electric shock and the prevention of various other unsafe conditions as discussed in earlier chapters.
Any other aspects not specifically listed but which are appropriate to the installation may be added to this list. It would be advisable that any shortcomings observed during the above inspection are rectified before proceeding with the testing.
The following tests should be carried out and the results compared with the appropriate criteria. (The results of initial testing often form a reference for subsequent testing, particularly where no definite norms are available for acceptable values of the tests). The tests should be carried out in the order mentioned in the Regulations (713-02 to 713-09) and any non-compliance or fault revealed during a test must be rectified. The test (including any previous test whose results might have been affected by the fault) should be repeated. The installation can be energized only after successful completion of all the tests.
On completion of inspection and testing, the person conducting the inspection and testing shall give an Electrical Installation Certificate together with a schedule of inspections and a schedule of test results to the person ordering the inspection.
Verification on the lines indicated in the previous paragraphs (for initial verification and testing) will be done whenever any addition or alteration to an existing installation is carried out. This is to ensure that the work completed fulfills the requirements of the Regulations as applicable and does not impair the safety of an existing installation.
On completion of the verification, an Electrical Installation Certificate will be issued as in the case of the Initial verification.
The objective of periodic inspection and testing is to determine whether an installation is in a satisfactory condition for continued service. Periodic inspection should comprise of careful scrutiny of the installation without dismantling or with partial dismantling as per scope decided by a competent person based on the availability of records and the condition of the installation. Inspection will generally be along the lines followed for the initial verification. The following aspects need to be especially examined:
No fixed periodicity is recommended in the Regulations. In the case of an installation which is under effective supervision in normal use, periodic inspection may not be necessary. Instead, a scheme of continuous monitoring and maintenance by skilled persons with appropriate documentation would be adequate. In other cases, a suitable periodicity can be determined based on the type of installation, its use and operation, as well as the type and frequency of maintenance.
The person carrying out the work should give a Periodic Inspection report together with the schedule of inspection and the schedule of tests to the person ordering inspection. The record of defects/damage/non-compliance with regulations etc. should be included in this report. The person carrying out the inspection will record the recommendation regarding the next appropriate date of inspection.
The defects revealed by periodic inspection reports should be attended without delay to avoid unsafe situations. Apart from defect resolution, the following actions are also required:
A planned schedule of preventive maintenance should be drawn up based on the manufacturer’s recommendation/code of practices and implemented rigorously. This will avoid too many defects from showing up during the inspection.
Measures for condition-based preventive maintenance may be adopted to attend to incipient problems, resolving the defects in early stages. Examples: Monitoring of oil parameters (online dissolved gas monitoring) in large transformers, hot-spot detection in indoor switchgear using infrared detectors, incipient arc fault detection through photo electric sensors etc.
While planned preventive maintenance is completed according to a fixed schedule using a recommended list of maintenance works, condition-based maintenance is pro-active and relies on an early warning of problems. While this practice is well established in specific segments of mechanical machinery (such as vibration signature analysis in high speed machines), the applications in the electrical field are gradually becoming popular. The main benefit is need-based maintenance and preventing major unforeseen failures, both of which have major cost implications.
Carrying out the design and construction of an installation as per various applicable standards, regulations and codes of practice is crucial in ensuring the quality, safety and integrity of the installation. Standards and codes put much emphasis on matters concerning safety. IEE Wiring Regulations stipulate various requirements to achieve these objectives. Chapter 7 of the Regulations deals with inspection of installations prior to commissioning (called initial verification) and on an ongoing basis (periodic inspection). Initial verification ensures that there are no defects or non-compliance issues in the completed installation and it is suitable to be put into service. Periodic inspection ensures that it is fit to continue in service. Appropriate reporting and certification should be undertaken by the authority carrying out the inspection/testing. The defects revealed by periodic inspection reports should be attended to without delay to avoid unsafe situations. A planned schedule of preventive maintenance should be drawn up and implemented rigorously. Measures for condition-based preventive maintenance may also be adopted to attend to incipient problems, thereby resolving the defects in the early stages.
A proper plan to manage electrical distribution system assets is essential to improve operational performance and also to maximize revenues and profits. In this chapter we will discuss the basic principles of planning of electrical systems and substation components. We shall also learn about asset management in the context of electrical switchgear, which is one of the most critical assets in any distribution system.
A number of standard voltages are used in different parts of the world both at utilization level as well as the transmission and distribution levels. For the purpose of convenience these voltages are grouped using the following classification (Ref: IEEE 141:1993).
Low voltage (LV): Systems of nominal voltage up to 1000V
Common usage: 380V, 416V, 480V
Medium voltage (MV): Systems of nominal voltage 1000V and above and less than 100000V
Common usage: 4160V, 6900V, 12000V, 13800V, 34600V, 69000V
High voltage (HV): Systems of nominal voltage 100000V and above and up to 230000V
Common usage: 116kV, 138kV, 230 kV
A majority of the plant loads are normally supplied at LV. This includes motors of up to 200 kW rating, lighting systems and so on. Unless loads of higher rating is involved, distribution at the utilization voltage is always a possibility. As such, power is usually received from MV distribution system.
Power can either directly distributed at the receiving voltage within the plant and be stepped down at different locations to the utilization levels or it can be stepped down at the incoming point and then distributed at a lower voltage to different consumers.
In large facilities, there may be a need for motors of higher ratings and these may require supply at MV. In other words, there is more than one level of utilization voltage in such plants; an LV system for the lower rated loads and an MV system for larger loads.
This may not be acceptable in some cases, because the drives at the MV utilization level may interfere with the other loads connected to the system; especially if direct-online starting of the motors is involved. Therefore there may be need to have a separate voltage level for the main distribution different from the MV utilization voltage. Taking a typical case, the following voltage levels may be used.
LV utilization voltage | : | 416V |
MV utilization voltage | : | 3300V |
Main distribution voltage | : | 11000V |
Incoming supply voltage | : | 33000V |
The incoming voltage naturally will have to be what the power supply agency can provide in the area in question.
Power distribution system needs to be planned with care. In any modern industry, the power system is an essential facility that keeps the industrial process functioning. It should be planned considering the need for trouble free service under various conditions the normal and not-so-normal.
The basic step in the design is to plan the basic system parameters of the power distribution system. The parameters to be selected are:
Once the basic system parameters have been finalized, the next task is to plan the overall distribution system configuration. This is a very important step and requires the planner to consider all the aspects and arrive at an optimal configuration. The configuration once finalized is extremely difficult if not impossible to modify at a later date. At the end of this step we will have finalized the following details:
Deciding the ratings of distribution equipment is the next stage in system planning. The common ratings required to be finalized at this stage are:
While equipment sizing is the first step in finalizing the required distribution equipment, there are other factors which play an important role too:
Planning must be done with due regard to maintainability of the equipment in service. Space for maintenance and other requirements must be integrated into the facility while the planning process is going on. Also, equipment such as switchboards may undergo additions or changes during this process. The initial assumptions must be constantly reviewed and necessary changes must be made in the layout to ensure space adequacy. Some of the aspects to be taken care of are as follows:
While the requirement of space, maintenance access and clearances are usually obvious, the other points may need careful attention. These may only be known after finalizing the exact equipment as they vary from vendor to vendor. Early discussions after order placement will be required to freeze requirements arising from equipment-specific aspects.
As stated in the previous module, any distribution system equipment must be expandable to accommodate changes or additions to the plant process without major changes to the distribution system. Apart from expandability of equipment, other requirements such as space for such additions must also be planned without which equipment expandability alone will not be of much use. Important aspects to be considered as a part of expandability of distribution equipment are:
As stated earlier, the ratings of principal equipment should be selected adequately to accommodate near-term growth of the system.
An electrical substation is a subsidiary station of generation, transmission and distribution system where AC voltages are transformed from one level to the other and convert AC to DC and vice versa. It is an assemblage of equipment that switches, protects and controls transmission, distribution. Substations can be classified as following:
Components of a substation are as follows:
Any power distribution system has several critical assets such as switchgear, transformers, cabling and so on. These assets need to be properly managed in order to maximize revenue and profit. This would include timely maintenance, life extension programs and finally planned/phased replacements. The objective of maintenance is to ensure optimum performance and avoiding failures in service to the extent feasible. Sudden failure in service may result in lengthy loss of service leading to revenue loss and loss of customer confidence besides high repair costs. At the same time, maintenance itself has associated costs. Unnecessary maintenance will increase the operating cost and thus lower profits. Sometimes, it may also add to the probability of failures by human errors committed during maintenance. Thus, excessive maintenance is as much a problem as lack of maintenance. A properly planned and implemented asset management system will limit the maintenance to the optimum degree which is appropriate to the level of operations and ensure least total cost of ownership. We will concentrate in this module on maintenance of switchgear which is a crucial asset for continuity of power supply to illustrate the above principles.
Before the introduction of SF6 and Vacuum switchgear, oil circuit breakers and other types of oil switchgear predominated at Medium Voltage and Air Blast at High Voltage. Oil switchgear is characterised by a high maintenance requirement, due to fast rates of contact wear, deterioration of the arc control devices and rapid contamination of oil by Carbon. Research on 11 kV oil circuit breakers undertaken approximately 30 years ago identified the deterioration mechanisms illustrated in Figure 6.1.
At that time, switchgear maintenance regimes were mainly based upon elapsed time, typically between 6 and 10 years for general overhaul, whilst the oil circuit breakers themselves were maintained according to an allowed number of actual current interruptions, typically between 6 and 16, depending upon type. A special purpose device, sometimes incorporated in one of the protection relays, counted the number of interruptions.
The burden of continuous maintenance was costly and involved a number of operational engineers whose sole task was to take switchgear out of service and then restore it, together with their associated maintenance teams. These costs represented an additional and continuing expense over the lifetime of the switchgear, adding to the ‘whole life cost’ also called as Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). When SF6 and Vacuum switchgear first appeared, it was significantly more expensive in first cost than oil switchgear of equivalent rating, but the greatly reduced maintenance expenditure made it cost effective, that is the TCO was reduced.
Along with the change in arc interruption technology came significant changes to insulation materials. In bushings, polymers and elastomers began to supersede porcelain and in cable terminations, polymeric cable and heat shrinkable rubber began to supersede paper insulation and bitumen compound. Voltage transformers changed from oil filled to solid encapsulation, as did current transformers. Although somewhat outside the scope of this seminar, it is worth noting that electro-mechanical relays began to be superseded by microprocessor types, again with a significant reduction in maintenance requirement.
These technology changes prompted a review of maintenance policy, in particular introduction of the concepts of Asset Management, Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) and Reliability Centred Maintenance (RCM), which are now discussed.
In a utility, the major operating cost is that of servicing the debt created by purchasing and installing the distribution system. This cost may be regarded as fixed, or at least beyond the immediate control of the company, being largely dependent on prevailing money interest rates. However, maintaining the asset and the rate of replacement of the various components are determined by the policies adopted and can be regarded as controllable costs. Thus in recent years, maintenance and replacement have been the focus of attention and great efforts have been made to drive down these costs.
In asset management, the ‘Asset’ to be ‘Managed’ is considered to be the whole of the electricity distribution system, both active and passive components, that is, the sum total of all the historic investments that have been made, that are still in service. Some of these investments will be within the assigned lifetime over which the investment is depreciated financially (typically 40 years) whilst other assets will have been in operation for a longer period, but are still serviceable. Extending the life of these assets is critical to overall costs and therefore, in a privately owned utility, to profitability. This is because replacement before the end of an asset’s financially depreciated life is an absolute loss, whereas if life can be extended beyond the depreciated life the asset’s cost is only its continuing inspection and maintenance.
The ‘sinking fund’ formula below allows the annual cost of an asset to be calculated over a nominal service lifetime, leaving no debt at the end of the period.
The sum of money calculated by the above formula is sufficient to pay the interest on the debt and pay back the capital at the end of the period. The actual period of service lifetime varies according to the type of asset but for switchgear, transformers and cables it is usually 40 years, somewhat less for overhead lines. For example, calculate the annual cost of a circuit breaker costing $20,000 over 40 years at 6% interest rate.
For oil circuit breakers, the annual cost of initial purchase and installation has to be increased by annual sums covering after fault maintenance (typically every 3 years) and full maintenance (typically every 10 years). Although the equivalent rated Vacuum or SF6 circuit breaker could cost $26,000, its reduced maintenance nevertheless reduces the whole life cost. These factors are shown in Figure 6.2.
The annual cost of an asset is very dependent upon the service lifetime obtained. For example, the $20,000 oil circuit breaker identified in Figure 23.2 costs $1330 each year over a 40-year service life, but $1743 each year over a 20-year service life. Because of the rapid growth of load and major economic development that took place between thirty and forty years ago, many utilities and companies have switchgear assets already well into their assigned lives. This factor sets the stage for policies aimed at extending asset lifetime.
The management of these assets involves inspection, maintenance, repair and ultimately replacement, together with the installation of additional or improved specification assets to meet the needs of the system and to continuously improve network performance. The accurate formulation of these programmes of work is fundamental to the long-term management of the distribution system.
The following statements are taken from the stated Asset Management objectives of a major utility:
Note from the second statement that a reduction in ‘whole life cost’ through more effective (that is, less but more targeted) inspection and maintenance is not the sole objective, it is also intended to increase the system ‘level of utilisation’, that is, the overall system loading. This is to be achieved by a more detailed knowledge of the condition of the system, on the understanding that a system in good condition is better able to withstand increased loading with fewer failures, compared to a system in poor condition.
A prior condition of effective Asset Management is to know what the asset is and its condition; in practice this means drawing up an Asset Register. To be fully effective, the register needs to be in computer format and should contain as much information as possible about the individual system components. Having an asset register in a computer allows for automatic production of inspection and maintenance schedules, sophisticated ‘what if’ modelling and the identification of trends in different types and classes of switchgear. The collected data for switchgear could include the items shown in Table 6.1.
The collection of all necessary data to compile a comprehensive asset register is a very large task indeed that may require several years to complete, unless a specialist contractor is brought in to undertake, or at least assist in the work. Furthermore, some of the required information may be obtainable only during outage. Circuit outage should be regarded as a resource, comparable to manpower. An outage has a cost, not only financial, but also the cost of risk to the system. This is because, where supplies are duplicated, one feeder will be inoperative during the outage and the system then relies on a single feed. Therefore outage should be used as little as possible and generally not just to collect asset data. Where data is only available through an outage, maximum use of each outage should be made both to obtain condition data and to complete all the outstanding maintenance required on the section of system taken out of service. Condition data is considered later in this chapter.
Manufacturer | Type | Voltage rating |
Current rating | Short circuit rating | Type of operating mechanism |
Method of arc interruption | Auxiliary supply voltage | Telecontrol whether fitted |
Circuit name | VT details | CT ratios |
Protection details | Date of installation | Date of last inspection |
Date of last maintenance | Historic defects | Condition measurements taken at last maintenance |
If maintenance is to be scheduled and targeted by switchgear condition rather than time, it is vital that information that can only be obtained during plant maintenance is accurately measured and securely stored for future reference. In particular, it is important that plant type-specific defects are checked for, put right if found and recorded as complete. It is this kind of information that identifies trends in plant condition and allows maintenance resources to be targeted to where they will be most effective.
In practice, Asset Registers are built up over time, starting with the most critical items of plant at the strategic, generally higher voltage, locations in the network, gradually extending to less critical plant. This policy gives the greatest and quickest benefit for the least cost.
The prime objective of Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) is to move towards a maintenance philosophy that directly relates ‘work done’ to ‘condition’. This represents a change in direction away from time-based maintenance where work was done at pre-determined intervals regardless of need. Overall, the total amount of maintenance can be considerably reduced compared with a time-based maintenance policy and as well as the obvious reduction in cost, it also produces the benefit of reduced risk to system security that is inherent with invasive maintenance.
The key to effective timing of preventive maintenance for each asset type is to understand the progressive nature of asset condition deterioration with time and/or use. Maximum value comes from understanding the relationship, with respect to time, between potential failure and functional failure (the P-F interval). Figure 6.3 provides a simplified model illustrating this concept. Ideally the ageing or performance characteristics should be determined such that preventative maintenance can be scheduled just before a condition indicator enters the area in which a particular asset condition indicator reaches the criteria defined as failure.
Where a condition is allowed to progress beyond the point of unacceptable risk of failure, it is likely that failure will occur and maintenance can then be regarded as remedial. This is likely to be more expensive. CBM aims to carry out maintenance no sooner but certainly no later than the time needed to prevent a failure and:
It is an absolute requirement of good maintenance that the plant asset should be in better condition after the maintenance than it was before.
Clearly, for condition based maintenance to be effective, the condition of the asset must be known; if it is not known, time based maintenance must still prevail. Knowledge of condition implies the use of diagnostic tools, of which there are two types, invasive and non-invasive. Invasive inspection describes the collection of condition data, which involves one or more of the following:
Non-invasive inspection falls into two categories:
Non invasive technique (a) can be difficult, because development work is still in progress and a considerable amount of data needs to be collected, analyzed and compared to actual failures of equipment, before absolute, safe limits can be established for many of the condition indicators gathered in this manner. In practice, trend data between inspections, or between inspection and first installation, are the only guides. However, over a longer period of time, it is expected that appropriate limits can eventually be set.
If asset condition can be established with confidence, maintenance requirements can then be assessed and the priorities ranked by a process that takes account of both the condition of an asset and its relative importance in the distribution system. This process is known as establishing a Condition Importance Rating with the highest priority being given to plant scoring highest (that is, ranking condition alongside the consequences of failure).
This technology originated in 1974 and was first utilized in the aviation industry, although it has since been extended to other industries, including the electric power industry. It differs from other techniques by focusing on the function of the equipment, rather than the equipment itself.
RCM can be described as a process used to determine the maintenance requirements of any physical equipment, based upon the operational requirements, standards of performance and in particular, failure modes and the consequences of failure. This process essentially repeats the ‘form and function’ analysis carried out by the equipment manufacturer at the design stage, which is referred to as the Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) or sometimes the Failure Modes Effects Critical Analysis (FMECA).
The only difference between the manufacturer’s FMEA worksheet and the user’s RCM worksheet is that the former summarises the manufacturer’s expectations of how the equipment may fail in the future and the latter is based upon historical knowledge of how the equipment actually fails. The RCM worksheet specifies the known failure modes and also analyses the maintenance actions required to prevent failures.
Risk can be defined as the product of the probability of an event occurring and the consequences of that event. Using a matrix diagram, risk can be quantified and ranked, as shown in Tables 6.2 and 6.3:
RISK MATRIX Risk = Probability of occurrence of an event x consequences of that event |
|||||
Consequence | Probability | ||||
Ranking | 1. Frequent | 2. Probable | 3. Occasional | 4. Remote | 6. Improbable |
1 Catastrophic | A | A | A | B | B |
2. Critical | A | A | B | B | C |
3. Moderate | A | B | B | C | C |
4. Negligible | A | B | C | C | C |
Level of Risk | Description of Risk |
A | High |
B | Moderate |
C | Low |
An RCM analysis is implemented as a seven-step process as follows:
RCM recognises three major categories of preventive tasks as follows:
In circuit breakers, deterioration of insulation can usually be attributed to one or more of the following causes:
The condition of insulation can be assessed using the sophisticated technologies described later in this seminar. However, where the insulation is directly accessible (usually during outage) a relatively simple test can be applied which, with skilled application, training and experience can yield useful information on particular components or assemblies. In this test, a steady DC voltage is applied to the insulation. The current which flows (and which will be very small) is made up of three components:
These currents combine and are shown graphically in Figure 10.4, note that the scales are logarithmic.
The graph shows that the total current starts at a high value, decreases with time and stabilises at a low value. The low initial value of insulation resistance is partly caused by the high initial capacitance charging current, which falls to a negligible value, usually within about 16 seconds, as the insulation becomes charged. The low initial insulation resistance is also partly caused by the initial dielectric absorption current, which also decreases with time but more gradually, typically taking from 10 minutes to several hours to decay to a negligible value. However for test purposes, this current can be disregarded after 10 minutes. The leakage current does not decrease with time and it is this current which determines the insulation quality. The situation is:
A curve plotted between total insulation current (logarithmic scale) and time (linear scale) is known as the dielectric absorption curve. The test is based upon a comparison of the absorption characteristics of good insulation versus that of insulation that has absorbed moisture or is otherwise contaminated.
In the graph of Figure 6.5, the slope of the curve indicates the condition of the insulation. Good insulation will show a continuous increase in resistance, as shown in curve A. Contaminated, moist or cracked insulation will show a relatively flat curve, B. A value known as the polarization index is obtained by dividing the 10 minute reading by 1 minute reading. Values as high as 10 are obtained for good insulation. Note that this test is good for most insulation (for example cast resin VTs) but does not work well for bushings.
The inspection checklist for switchgear and switch rooms described earlier in the seminar falls well short of providing reliable data on which to found a condition based maintenance regime. Manual inspection can trigger appropriate maintenance if a failure characteristic can be observed and a predictable pattern recognized, but this is difficult with deterioration processes taking place inside a closed metal box. Much more detailed information is required and this should be based upon the special diagnostic techniques described in the section. These techniques do not provide for absolute maintain now/maintain later decisions to be made, rather they provide continuing data, from which trends of deterioration can be identified.
Partial discharge within and on the surface of insulating materials is one of the most reliable indicators of equipment condition and possible failure. It has been the focus of considerable research effort and is therefore well understood.
Consider Figure 6.6, showing a layer of solid insulation between two flat plate electrodes. The insulation is imperfect because it contains an air filled void. As the applied voltage rises, the voltage distribution is non-uniform, due to the different dielectric constants and the air filled void will tend to be more electrically stressed than the remainder of the solid insulation.
At some point in the AC voltage cycle, the stress across the air filled void is sufficiently great that ionisation occurs instantaneously. This causes a high frequency electrical signal that is small but detectable; it may also be detectable by sound. As the voltage falls during the second quarter cycle, ionisation ceases, followed by a further ionisation and cessation during the third and fourth quarter cycles. In the positive going half cycle, the pulse is negative and during the negative half cycle the pulse is positive, as shown in Figure 6.7.
The voltage at which ionisation commences is called the ‘inception voltage’ and the voltage at which ionisation ceases is called the ‘extinction voltage’. In practice, partial discharge is a good measure of the quality of the insulation, which ideally should be partial discharge free at the equipment’s operating voltage. However, this is seldom the case.
Because PD is voltage dependent, it will tend to increase as voltage stress increases and ever-smaller voids begin to ionise, not only within the body of the insulation but also at the interfaces between the insulation surface and the electrodes. A more typical pattern of partial discharges is shown in Figure 6.8.
In the situations shown in Figure 6.8 the inception voltage is the voltage at which the first partial discharge can be detected. The total number of PD pulses and the total PD charge (in Coulombs) can also provide useful indicators.
Partial discharge is not confined to the interior of solid insulation. Figure 6.9 shows an insulated bushing, which is internally satisfactory, but contaminated on the surface with a semi-conducting layer of dust and metallic particles. Gaps in this contamination act in exactly the same manner as the void in Figure 10.6. That is, they ionise and de-ionise in a random pattern as arcing, sparking and surface erosion re-distributes the contaminating material. Careful and expert analysis of the recorded waveforms can detect the following forms of PD:
Power distribution measurement can be undertaken online or off-line. When measured on line, either coupling capacitors or radio frequency antennas may be used, but accurate measurement is more difficult, because the small signals tend to be masked by general electrical noise in the supply and the metal casing of the equipment.
For off line measurement, a partial discharge free voltage source is required, preferably with the equipment and the test specimen inside an earthed metal enclosure so that the electromagnetic conditions are perfect for accurate measurement. This is seldom available outside a laboratory.
Another factor to consider is whether the equipment being monitored for PD is on or off load. When on load, the temperature will rise and any imperfections at the interfaces will tend to become more pronounced. To allow for this possibility, monitoring should preferably continue over a period of time (this can only be on line measurement). Extended PD monitoring on line can provide further useful data, over a medium to long timescale. This is called ‘time trending’ and includes:
Short term PD monitoring (1 – 2 hours). This duration of testing simply allows a more accurate measurement by removing short-term variations.
Semi-permanent monitoring (1 – 3 days). This length of monitoring allows measurement of variations of PD with load, that is, component temperature and mechanical stress. This method is useful for older installations with high levels of PD activity.
Continuous monitoring – This measures the long-term trends in PD activity and may be combined with an alarm facility. Due to cost, continuous monitoring can only be justified for critical, high value installations with high cost of failure.
In an inspection and maintenance context, it is economic and useful to carry out PD monitoring at intervals, perhaps yearly, so that a baseline level is established and long-term trends monitored.
Although it is difficult to give exact guidance on what is and what is not an acceptable level of PD, sharp rises in activity over short periods of time or a strongly rising trend should encourage a more detailed investigation. A PD analysis expert may categorise PD levels into the following categories:
In general, air insulated switchgear will be more susceptible to PD than switchgear where the insulation surfaces are within a gas filled (SF6) enclosure. The following locations in switchgear are known to be common sources of PD:
Where a company or utility has a population of switchgear of the same or very similar type, valuable information can be obtained by comparing the levels of PD occurring at the various installations and between different switch panels in the same installation. In some parts of the world, ‘user clubs’ have been established where this information can be exchanged. This is the type of information that the PD expert analyst draws upon and should have access to.
If PD in a particular installation is greater than the PD in the remainder of installations in that group, this may be taken as a warning of impending failure. At worst, if PD activity has risen to a very high value, it may be a signal that an end-of-life decision needs to be taken.
Developed over the last 16 years, TEV monitoring locates partial discharge activity by measuring the transient voltages occurring in the switchgear metal enclosure. It has the great advantage that it can be carried out whilst the switchgear is in service and it is also capable of locating the site of a partial discharge. Figure 6.10 shows the test method in diagrammatic form.
When a partial discharge occurs, in the example phase to earth, a small quantity of electric charge is transferred by capacitance to the earth metal cladding. The quantity of charge is extremely small, normally a few pico-coulombs and the transfer occurs very quickly, just a few nanoseconds. As the charge is transferred, electromagnetic waves propagate away from the discharge site in all directions as transient voltages. Due to skin effect, these transient voltages occurring on the inside of the enclosure cannot be detected on the outside. However, at an opening in the cladding, such as a gasketted joint, the electromagnetic wave can propagate into free space. The wave front impinges on the outside of the enclosure creating a voltage wave that may be detected, although the equipment must be very sensitive and very fast. By using two capacitive probes, the location of the discharge site may be estimated by comparing the time of arrival of the two waves.
Although TEV monitoring requires expert interpretation, TEV can locate partial discharge sites in live equipment, providing that the electrical noise is not excessive. TEV survey is usually carried out in two stages; in the first stage one probe is used to find PD sites and in the second stage both probes are used to locate them more precisely. The equipment has a 2 ns capability, equivalent to a distance of 600 mm, so in practice a PD site can be reliably attributed to a particular switch panel in a multi panel switchboard or even an individual cable box.
Monitoring of Partial Discharge by electrical methods has the limitations that coupling capacitors may not be available, or difficult to connect. In these circumstances, monitoring may be carried out by an acoustic method. Portable test equipment is available and has the advantages that:
Measuring can be carried out at any time, it is not necessary to take the switchgear off line.
Even where the electrical (radio frequency) signal from a Partial Discharge is suppressed by the metal enclosure, some sound signal may escape.
Figure 6.11 shows an acoustic discharge probe made by Detectaids Ltd. This unit can be fitted with different sensors suitable for detecting both airborne sound and sound conducted through structures. It is sensitive to sounds up to 40 kHz, that is, well above the human range of hearing and it can also amplify sound from a non-audible to an audible level.
Acoustic measurement has much the same advantages and disadvantages as electrical methods. It does not provide an absolute satisfactory/unsatisfactory indication, but it can alert users to developing problems and monitor trends over longer periods of time. Because the instrument and its sensor can be moved, it can provide some information on the location of a problem.
Monitoring needs to be done in a consistent manner and good records taken, so operative training is required. However, the device is cheap enough to be issued to substation inspectors.
Historically, Tan Delta testing is much older than Partial Discharge testing and dates back at least 60 years. Despite its age, it can still be useful in certain circumstances. Consider the cracked bushing of Figure 6.12, together with the equivalent circuit to the right. The crack, though difficult to see by eye, is nevertheless contaminated with dust and moisture and forms a high resistance path in parallel with the bushing capacitance.
In the bushing of Figure 6.12, current flows through both the capacitance and the resistance, forming the vector diagram shown in Figure 6.13. The current through the resistor is in phase with the applied voltage, but out of phase with the capacitance current by 90°.
In practice the resistive current tends to be much smaller than the capacitive current and Tan Delta (the ‘Loss Angle’) is small. This is one of the reasons that the ‘Schering’ bridge measurement method is used.
All insulating materials have a loss angle and the better the insulation quality, the smaller the loss angle. The loss angle at a low applied voltage is called the ‘material loss’. As the voltage applied to the specimen is increased, any voids in the insulation tend to ionise and discharge (that is, partial discharge). The PD current is an additional loss, called the gaseous loss and adds arithmetically to the material loss, resulting in increased Tan Delta with increasing voltage. The increase is not linear, but tends to increase sharply above a PD inception voltage (Figure 6.14).
The main limitations of Tan Delta testing are that it is strictly an off line test and that it can only be applied to single component. Tan Delta testing of an entire switch unit could not identify any single component causing a problem. Nevertheless, the graph of Tan Delta with voltage is a useful indicator of insulation quality/deterioration and finds major application in cable testing.
This technology is also several decades old and originally used solely by the military; it was too expensive for general use. However over the last 30 years it has steadily declined in cost and increased in performance. Infra red radiation, also known as thermal energy, is electromagnetic energy emitted by all objects whose temperature is greater than absolute zero. The lower the temperature, the longer the infra red wavelength, but it is always longer in wavelength than visible light. The human eye cannot see it, but special electronic sensors can detect it. Also, thermal energy does not bounce off objects like visible light does, it only comes directly from the objects emitting it. In general, dark, dull surfaces emit infra red radiation better than shiny, light colored surfaces and glass does not transmit infra red energy at all; that is, it is not transparent to infra red in the same way that it is transparent to visible light.
In the early years, infra red sensors had to be cooled to extremely low temperatures to be effective; it was the necessary refrigerating equipment that made the technology so expensive. A further disadvantage was that the early cameras were incapable of registering a steady image, the view had to be continuously moved for an image to be obtained. Later, improved sensors were introduced that did not need cooling and also provided a steady image. Mostly these uncooled systems were based upon the ‘PyroElectric Vidicon’, (PEV) a sensor similar to a television camera tube. Unfortunately, PEVs were easily ‘overloaded’ by hot objects, causing a white area on screen where the image should have been. This effect was called ‘blooming’.
Modern cameras use a solid state technology first introduced about 20 years ago, in which the heat detecting elements are grouped on a printed circuit board. ‘Blooming’ has been eliminated. This development has allowed camera size and weight to decrease to a level that is easily hand held. Cost has fallen to between $10,000 for the cheapest models up to $30,000 for a high specification unit.
Because the infra red energy cannot be seen by the human eye, the viewing screen of the camera has to translate the various temperatures it sees into either ‘false colors’ (in the more expensive models) or into a ‘grey scale’ (in the cheaper models). Figure 6.15 illustrates.
A point worth noting is that cameras are made to a performance standard that includes ‘Minimum Resolvable Temperature Difference’ (MRTD), the measure of how small a temperature difference it can detect. For example, a thermal imaging camera with an MRTD of 20° would be half as sensitive as a camera with an MRTD of 10°. In addition, the number of ‘picture elements’ in the sensor and on the viewing screen determines the smallest detail that can be seen. Thermal imaging cameras do not directly indicate an absolute value of temperature, though they sometimes have the facility of downloading the image, plus a temperature scale to a computer (Figure 6.16).
Viewing screens indicate objects hotter than those in the background very well and this is entirely suitable for locating hot spots in exposed conductors. Also, it is a monitoring technique that is non-invasive and therefore can be used at any time, either as a routine monitoring tool, or to investigate suspected problems, or both.
The main application in electrical networks is in the detection of hot spots in overhead lines and in exposed busbar systems in substations. Thermal imaging finds only a limited application for metal enclosed switchgear indoors, although it can detect hot cable boxes and would detect a switchgear enclosure that was significantly hotter than its neighbour (refer to Figure 6.17).
Typical camera specifications
Substation batteries are so critically important to safe switchgear and system operation that a section on them has been included in this seminar, with particular focus on battery failure alarms. The purpose of the battery alarm is to detect a battery charge condition that is so low that circuit breaker tripping is not achieved. This can be due to battery failure (sulphation, cell short circuit) or more probably, charger failure.
However, an alarm that is a simple voltage measurement device is generally not sufficient. This is because, in substations, short-term heavy current loads are imposed on batteries for example by switchgear closing solenoids. These loads can temporarily depress the battery voltage well below the open circuit voltage, but they only reduce the amount of charge in the battery by a marginal amount. For example, a closing solenoid operation of 300 A for 3 seconds results in 900 Ampere second or 0.26 Ampere hour discharge. This is small in relation to the total battery capacity, which may be several hundred ampere hours. Nevertheless, these heavy loads cause a significant fall in battery voltage, resulting from the battery internal resistance.
A further aspect of the problem is that, as well as voltage drop due to battery internal resistance during the period of the solenoid operation, there is also polarisation within the cells, a condition that persists for tens of seconds after disconnection of the heavy load. The duration of polarisation depends on three factors:
Because of these factors, to prevent spurious charger fail relay operations it is necessary to introduce a time delay between detection of the low battery voltage condition and the initiation of the charge fail alarm. The earliest type of charge-fail device incorporating a time delay was the thermal relay. This provided very good service for several years (some still exist) but was superseded by an electrical version, fitted with independent adjustments for voltage setting and time delay. More recently and as a result of the introduction of supervisory control, the 30 second time delay has proven inadequate, because the use of supervisory control for closing circuit breakers results in longer duration of solenoid operating currents. Under remote control, the operator cannot hear the circuit breaker close as is the case when operating locally. Under these conditions a longer time delay is required, as long as 120 s. This requires the use of electronic circuitry for the delay device, in lieu of the resistance/ capacitance discharge circuit which was used for the 30 s delay. The values of resistance and for capacitance applicable to a 120 s delay are impracticably high.
The voltage setting of the charge fail portion of the alarm should comply with the tables at the end of this section. If the lower settings are used, there is a serious risk that the device will remain passive until the battery has become near to complete discharge and possibly permanently damaged in the case of lead/acid batteries. There is also the obvious risk of complete failure of switchgear to operate with either lead/acid or nickel/cadmium types. Table 6.4 gives the characteristics of typical batteries used for substation applications.
Nickel/Cadmium batteries | Voltage per cell |
Open circuit voltage | 1.26 to 1.28 V |
Float charge voltage | 1.40 V |
Charger fault relay setting LOW | 1.32 V |
Charger fault relay setting HIGH | 1.60 V |
Lead/Acid Batteries (HP Plante) | |
Open circuit voltage | 2.08 V |
Float charge voltage | 2.2 to 2.26 V |
Charger fault relay setting LOW | 2.16 V |
Charger fault relay setting HIGH | 2.40 V |
Experience with constant voltage chargers has shown that apart from loss of charge (or undercharging) make of charger. In one type of charger a possible cause is the blowing of the sensing-circuit fuse which unbalances the differential amplifier with the resultant triggering of the main series transistor and consequent saturation of the transductor. In another type the likely cause is failure of the main control transistor.
Whatever the cause, a prolonged state of overcharge will cause gassing of the battery and gradual loss of electrolyte resulting ultimately in damage to the plates of cells. To avoid persistent overcharging, the alarm should respond to over voltage as well as under voltage. Hence in the most modern designs of alarm, separate controls are provided for both high and low settings. A third control allows the time delay to be set.
It is entirely possible for substation batteries to suffer earth faults and monitoring devices are available to detect this condition. One type of earth fault detecting device comprises a centre-tapped potentiometer connected between the end terminals of the battery, together with a relay connected between the centre-tap of the potentiometer and earth. This is shown in Figure 6.18. The suggested design requirements for a battery earth fault detector are:
Although this is an ‘invasive’ measurement technology requiring an outage to perform it is nevertheless very useful, allowing both OK/not OK decisions and long term trend monitoring. It can be used during maintenance to measure not only the circuit breaker contact resistance (the main concern) but also all the other main current carrying contacts (busbar joints, isolating contacts, etc.). The measured value of any contact carrying load current should be in the low λΩ range, for example at 1000 A, a 6 contact resistance will dissipate:
1,000 x 1,000 x 6/1,000,000 = 6 W
At 400 A, a 30λΩ contact resistance will dissipate:
400 x 400 x 30/1,000,000 = 4.8W
Contact resistance values greater than these will generate more heat and may, at worst, lead to thermal runaway. Oil circuit breakers can tolerate a higher contact resistance than contacts in gas or vacuum, due to better cooling. With more sophisticated equipment, for example a ‘Kelman Profiler’, it is possible to measure contact ‘wipe’ as well as contact resistance.
The simplest method of measuring contact resistance is by a portable bridge device known as a ‘Ducter’. However more sophisticated devices are available, allowing contact resistance to be measured under simulated load conditions. Figure 10.19 (a) shows an instrument of this type. This test set is a heavy current device intended to measure contact resistance at the normal load current (test sets up to 600 A are available). Figure 6.19 (b) shows how the set is connected and used.
With the output of the test set OFF, connect the heavy current leads, ensuring that all connections to be measured are included in the circuit. Connect the voltage sensing leads either side of the connection as shown and switch the test set ON. Increase the current to the required level then switch the test set OFF. The contact resistance reading and the measuring current will be held and shown on the display.
Contact resistance measurement technology is particularly appropriate to SF6 and Vacuum circuit breakers, where direct access to contacts is not possible. It is also applicable to the three position ON – ISOLATED – EARTH disconnectors associated with many SF6 circuit breaker designs (see Table 6.5).
Rated Voltage kV | Rated Current A | Contact resistance limit λΩ | |
In vacuum or gas | In oil | ||
6 – 16 | 600 | 100 | |
1200 | 60 | ||
2000 | 60 | ||
7.2 – 16 | 600 | 600 | 300 |
1200 | 160 | ||
2000 | 76 | ||
4000 | 40 | ||
23-24 | All | 600 | |
46 | All | 700 | |
69 | 600 | 600 | |
1200 | 600 | ||
2000 | 100 | ||
116-230 | All | 800 |
The trip mechanism is second in importance only to the circuit breaker itself. It must open the circuit called upon to operate, perhaps decades. Statistics show that trip mechanisms and trip coils are responsible for a high proportion of circuit breaker faults and investigation shows the following factors as primary causes:
It follows that maintenance of the trip mechanism is vitally important and effort should be directed toward monitoring its performance. The best method of test is to measure the time interval(s) between the instant when current begins to circulate in the trip coil and the circuit breaker main contact(s) open. Alternatively and more simply, the length of time between inception of trip coil current and its interruption by the opening of the secondary contacts can be measured, as this closely approximates to the total circuit breaker opening time. Trip coil testing is an off line test undertaken during maintenance and should, of course, be undertaken before any maintenance of the mechanism is undertaken or the circuit breaker CLOSED or OPENED.
Ideally the circuit breaker should be tested on first installation so that later measurements can be compared to the original performance. IEC 66 requires that the trip coil should operate correctly at 60% of the normal battery voltage, this is to allow for the situation where several circuit breakers trip simultaneously and current demand on the battery is high, depressing the battery voltage. Hence testing should take place not only at normal battery volts, but also at lower voltages. Traditionally tapping the main battery carried out this reduced voltage testing, but newer testers have facilities to continuously vary the trip coil voltage, typically between 6 and 96% of the nominal value.
A further matter of concern is the length of time that the trip coil is energised during a circuit breaker operation. In the design of circuit breaker trip mechanisms, secondary contacts are arranged to disconnect the supply to the trip coil after the mechanism has been triggered, to prevent burn out. The time limit for an energised trip coil is 0.6 s and there are devices on the market that will automatically disconnect the supply after this period of time. The secondary contacts that interrupt the trip coil current undertake a severe duty, because the induction of the coil stores significant energy and a good deal of arcing can take place on these contacts. They should therefore be given careful attention during maintenance.
As a further refinement of protection, it is possible to fit devices that will detect a continuously energised trip circuit and, via an inter-trip link, cause another circuit breaker, the ‘backup’ circuit breaker to operate after a pre-determined time. Schemes of this type are justified where the consequences of a circuit breaker to operate are severe. For example, if a generator circuit breaker fails to operate after the generator prime mover has shut down, the generator will continue to operate as an induction motor, drawing its supply from the network. Even if the generator circuit breaker is fitted with reverse power protection, it will still not be immune to the consequences of trip mechanism failure.
Testing can be further extended to monitor and record the actual current flow through the trip coil, the movement of the circuit breaker operating lever and the opening of the contacts. The coil is of course an inductive device and the operating current will take time to rise to a level where the mechanism is released.
Figure 6.20 shows a typical trip coil graph of time against trip coil current and contact opening. Further useful measurements on the trip coil are:
Taken together, these measurements of trip coil parameters are called the ‘trip coil fingerprint’. They should be measured and recorded on commissioning of the circuit breaker and at every subsequent maintenance. A typical tester is shown in Figure 6.21.
Typical instrument specifications
If the cost of the necessary test equipment can be justified, it is possible to make time-travel or motion analyzer records. Motion analyzers are portable devices that monitor the operation of the complete circuit breaker by coupling the sensors of the motion analyzer to the circuit breaker operating lever or rod. These include high-voltage and extra- high-voltage dead tank and SF6 breakers and low-voltage air and vacuum circuit breakers.
Motion analyzers can provide graphic records of close or open initiation signals, contact closing or opening time with respect to initiation signals, contact movement and velocity, and contact bounce or rebound. The records obtained not only indicated when mechanical difficulties are present but also help isolate the cause of the difficulties. Like other measurements, it is preferable to obtain a motion analyser record on a breaker when it is first installed. This will provide a master record which can be filed and used for comparison with future maintenance checks. Tripping and closing voltages should be recorded on the master record so subsequent tests can be performed under comparable conditions.
Time-travel records are taken on the pole nearest the operating mechanism to avoid the inconsistencies due to linkage vibration and slack in the remote phases
Programma Electric TM1600/MA16 Motion Analyser
The effectiveness of SF6 as an insulator and in extinguishing arcs is dependent on its purity. In service this purity may degrade due to contamination by:
To prevent contamination, a ‘molecular sieve’ is usually incorporated in each enclosure; this contains chemicals to filter out contaminants but they have a limited life. Monitoring of SF6 circuit breakers should include taking and analyzing gas samples for these contaminants; the switchgear manufacturer should be able to advise on acceptable limits.
In general user replacement of SF6 in a circuit breaker or enclosure is not practicable, either the unit should be returned to the maker (particularly if the circuit breaker is a cassette) or the manufacturer, or a specialist contractor, should be asked to replace the gas on site. SF6 is a powerful greenhouse gas and should never be allowed to escape into the atmosphere. Where an SF6 circuit breaker has faulted and arc products are exposed, great care will need to be taken. The white powder like deposits contain toxic Fluoride and they are irritant to the skin, so a specialist contractor should be employed. Typical features of analytical instruments are given below.
Teledyne’s 3010TAC and 3010PAC BASEEFA / CENELEC approved, intrinsically safe trace and percent oxygen analyzers are versatile, microprocessor based instruments used for detecting oxygen from 0 – 10 ppm to 100% in a variety of gases. Simple menu choices, membrane command switches, and dual displays make set-up and operation clear and quick. Three user-configurable ranges are offered with an excellent linearity precluding the need to recalibrate when changing ranges. A bi-directional RS-232 serial interface is incorporated to relay information to a host computer for remote monitoring of zero and span calibration. Applications include: Power, Air separation, Furnace, Chemical processes (see Figure 6.23).
Model SDDLG has a range 0 – 80 °C dew point, to room air. The self-extending head allows up to 20 litres a minute flow for clearing the air supply pipe work without wetting the test chamber. Note the absence of knobs, calibrating, cooling, and servicing required by other methods. The automatic dry down measuring head accelerates the remarkably quick response from the sensor. An additional Shaw sensor can be connected to the rear of the hygrometer if desired, so that the external and internal switch can monitor two positions. Accuracy is guaranteed to better than one part in a million of moisture in very dry air or gas, and as the reading is specific to water vapour, so calibration is accurate for different gases. Flow rate has no effect on the accurate measurement.
The heart of the meter is a Shaw molecular sieve moisture sensor with a gold internal filter and gold plated exterior, a jewel of a sensor in fact with a rapid 1 s response time from dry to wet. (99%) So simple to use, blocking the outlet with a finger for a moment, raises the measurement head, and directs air or gas to the sensor (see Figure 6.24).
The HF-1000 enables the determination of trace levels of HF in SF6, therefore enabling the prevention of the damaging effects of this aggressive contaminant (see Figure 6.25).
The following procedure is specific to oil switchgear but it is included as an example of a written maintenance procedure. Most procedures are combinations of:
Generic requirements – those applicable to that class of switchgear (for example Ring Main Unit, Load Break, Fault Make Switch, Air Break CB, Oil Break CB, Small Oil Volume CB, SF6, CB, Vacuum CB)
Type specific requirements – those applicable to a particular make and type of switchgear. This should include instructions to check and if necessary rectify historic defects known to apply to that class of switchgear.
Lighting
Portable lighting will be required to supplement the permanent substation lighting, so that the interiors of chambers can be properly examined and safe access can be gained. All power tools and portable lights must be 110 V operated and supplied from centre tapped 66 – 0 – 66 V transformers.
Safe exit from substation
Check that the emergency exists are clear and that door panic bars, if fitted, operate correctly.
Tools and equipment
Insulated tools and guards shall be provided as necessary, together with any other special equipment for operation of the switchgear (for example circuit breaker slow closing handles).
Safe working – power closing
Before work commences it is important that all power-closing devices have been rendered inoperative. This should be confirmed on the safety document. The work involved may require the restoration of the power closing supply at some stage, if so, the arrangements for this should be made clear to the fitters carrying out the work.
Environmental protection
When working on outdoor switchgear, a temporary shelter shall be erected if rain is falling or appears likely to fall.
Protection from live LV equipment
If any part of the LV distribution board is live, it is to be covered over with an Approved insulation sheet that shall be fitted before work commences and removed only when all work is complete.
Cleaning materials
Only approved cleaning materials shall be used. Under no circumstances shall steel wool be used as it will cause contamination.
Unit identification
Before maintenance work commences check that substation nameplates are in position and that all switchgear is clearly labelled with the circuit names. If the switchgear is labelled at the front and at the back, check that the labels agree. All labels must be securely fixed and legible. Any temporary labels should be replaced with permanent labels.
Cleanliness
Only lint free wipes may be used in oil filled chambers, not cloth or paper wipers that can leave fibres to contaminate the oil. All loose dust should be swept away before opening any normally closed access. After a delay to allow dust to settle the equipment should be wiped down, any rust removed and the area cleaned and spot primed. Wipe down exposed insulating surfaces with a clean, dry, dust free wiper and cover them over until maintenance is complete. When oil tanks are removed these should be covered over to prevent ingress of dust or other foreign matter. Grease and other lubricants should be applied sparingly and any spillage wiped off.
Use an Approved plastic sponge to wipe down in oil filled chambers, followed by rinsing with clean oil. After use, the sponge should be well rinsed in clean oil and stored in a clean, closed container. A polythene food container with a snap-on lid is recommended. Tanks should be refilled from a pipe reaching to the bottom of the tank to avoid entraining air. Pipes should be flushed with clean oil and the outside wiped with a clean oil soaked sponge before using them for refilling. Test bushings that enter oil must be cleaned immediately before use by wiping with a clean oil soaked sponge or by polishing with clean chamois leather. After use, paper wipers may be used to dry off excess oil. Oil sampling thieves should be treated in a similar manner. Where a tank must be entered, a plastic mat well sponged down before use should be used to stand on. Ladders and all other items that enter the tank should be well cleaned before entry to the tank. In these situations it is usually possible finally to swill down with clean oil to a drain in the tank.
Cleaning down oil filled switchgear
The preferred procedure for cleaning down oil filled switchgear is as follows:
Spray all components with clean oil, working from top to bottom. Remove all oil from the chamber using a wet/dry vacuum cleaner ensuring that the suction tube reaches the bottom of the tank. Repeat the above procedure until residual oil is clean. Take care to adjust the spray so that a mist is not created in the work area.
Avoiding the ingress of moisture
At all stages of inspection or maintenance, precautions must be taken to avoid the ingress of moisture or wind borne debris by using suitable temporary shelters over outdoor equipment. Tools, wipers, oil, etc. must be kept dry.
Any sign of moisture in equipment being maintained or inspected must be reported, to allow remedial work to be initiated. Particular attention shall be given to gaskets, tank breathers and the seals on those parts of the mechanism that pass through the sides of oil filled chambers.
Solvents
Care must be taken with the selection and use of cleaning solvents and penetrating oils with respect to fire risk and possible damage to insulation, indicator windows, moulded components, seals, gaskets, etc. Their use should be avoided wherever possible and any excess removed immediately.
Position indicators and oil level indicator windows
Before maintenance or operation, check the semaphore windows for signs of cracking, crazing, discoloration or any signs of ingress of moisture. If damage is considered the result of vandalism or interference, ensure that this is reported for a re-assessment of the substation’s security classification. Take appropriate actions to prevent recurrence before leaving site.
Arc gaps
If arcing horns are fitted make sure that gaps are correct and that the fastenings are secure.
Earth bonding continuity
Ensure that earthing connections are tight and electrically clean, and that all contact screws are tight and full contact is maintained. Take care to tighten all bolts and nuts, together with any locking devices that may have been disturbed during maintenance. All exposed metal work should be effectively earthed.
Shutters and locking devices
Make sure that shutters and all locking devices function correctly and that where they need to prevent an action, they do so. Mechanisms should be free from corrosion and freely operating with all items such as nuts, locking devices, being secure.
Unless otherwise stated in the manufacturer’s handbook, servicing should be limited to occasional light lubrication applied to bearings, shafts and pivots. Thin machine oil should be used on actuating levers and rollers.
Purpose
Interlocks are incorporated to ensure safe operation of the switchgear.
Knowledge of interlocking requirements
In order to maintain interlocks correctly, an understanding of their purpose is required and a person should be designated who has the relevant knowledge and experience. The manufacturer’s handbook and any relevant plant diagrams should be available for reference.
Maintenance of interlock systems
This should include implementation of the following recommendations, depending on the types of interlock installed.
Ventilation
Ventilated equipment should be examined to make sure that the airflow is not restricted in any way and, in the case of forced ventilation, that any airflow interlock operates correctly. Filters, if any, should be cleaned or renewed as necessary.
Functional test
Where the relevant busbar and/or feeder circuits can be made dead, all interlocks should be functionally tested before equipment is restored to service. These checks should be carried out in both the positive and negative modes to ensure that the interlock system not only permits fulfilment of the intended operational sequence, but also prevents, when necessary, unintended and unsafe action. When an interlock is found to be defective and remedial action cannot be implemented immediately, steps need to be taken to ensure safety by other adequate means.
Equipment heating and lighting
The operation of heaters, lights, emergency lighting installations and changeover equipment for alternative low voltage (LV) supplies, where fitted, should be verified. WARNING: These circuits often remain live when the equipment is otherwise isolated.
Lifting devices
The maintenance of lifting devices should be carried out at regular intervals. In some types of equipment these form an integral part of the item and should be dealt with during the maintenance of the equipment. Some lifting devices are portable; these should be separately maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations, and should be examined and tested In accordance with statutory requirements.
Equipment tools, spares and test instruments
Tools, spares and test instruments stored local to and associated with a particular equipment should be regularly checked against an inventory.
Tripping and closing supplies
It is particularly important that tripping and closing supplies be maintained in good order. Compressed air plant and battery installations should be regularly maintained, including associated indicators and alarms, in line with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cable boxes, compound filled busbar chambers, band joints and endcaps
Proceed as follows:
Test Access Covers
Test access covers are likely to be opened more frequently than any other sealed cover on switchgear. Particular attention should be paid to the fastening and compression of the gasket. During maintenance the test bushings should be inserted and all associated interlocks checked. The surface of the test bushing should be inspected and any damage repaired. Restore weather protection to all disturbed surfaces; nuts, threads etc. either by repainting or by use of grease coating.
Insulation, bushings, barriers and tank linings
Porcelain
Visually examine all porcelain components carefully for cracks, deterioration of the cement or any other defects. Do not ‘feel’ for cracks, because edges can be dangerously sharp. ‘Ring’ the porcelain component by tapping it with a pencil, the sound should be sharp not dull. This may not be effective in all situations, depending upon the mounting or enclosure.
SRBP
Visually examine all SRBP (Synthetic Resin Bonded Paper) and cast resin bushings. If the bushing is in air, wipe clean and examine for cracks, tracking, blistering, de-lamination or discoloration. In oil, wipe clean with an Approved wiper soaked in clean oil and continue as above.
Permali
Visually examine compressed densified laminated wood (Permali) drive links. Inspect them carefully for any sign of moisture absorption, swelling distortion, or de-lamination. Also check for treeing or tracking. This type of insulation is moisture absorbent if the varnish layer is broken; therefore it should be out of oil for the shortest possible period of time.
Epoxy resin & DMC
Wipe clean and visually examine Epoxy Resin and DMC (Dough Moulding Compound) components for any signs of cracking, treeing or tracking, especially those at the bottom of tanks where water can collect and promote tracking.
Insulating oil – the insulating oil filling should be changed at each maintenance.
Fuses and Fuseholders
Check fuses for distortion, discoloration or damage. Check fuse mounts for discoloration and the security of any retaining clips. Ensure that the spring clips remain resilient.
Fastenings
During the course of maintenance, check all fastenings for security, this includes lock nuts, lock washers, circlips, taper pins, split pins etc. Renew these items as necessary.
Weather protection
Whenever weather protection is disturbed, for example by the removal of filling orifice covers, access covers to switchgear compartments or cable boxes, it is essential that a weather protective coating is restored at all outdoor locations and preferably at indoor situations as well. This means the renewal of paint films or re-coating with a corrosion inhibitor, for example grease.
Test on completion of maintenance
On completion, voltage test the switchgear, 6 kV DC phase to phase and phase to earth, with the unit in the OPEN and CLOSED positions. In the OPEN position, also test between poles.
Note on polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Mineral oil used for insulation and arc extinguishing may be contaminated by PCB. Although this problem mainly concerns transformer oil, circuit breaker oil may also be contaminated. PCB is both toxic and very persistent in the environment, therefore extreme care should be taken when handling oil that may be contaminated, because PCB may be absorbed through the skin. Test kits are available for determining the amount of PCB in oil and where the level of contamination exceeds 60 parts per million, the material is classed as toxic and specialist advice should be sought.
The following difficulties should be looked for during internal breaker inspections:
Type-specific switchgear defects are normally identified in the course of routine maintenance, but they may be found from actual switchgear failures or, at worst, accidents to operators. In addition, the manufacturer may notify defects or, where information exchange arrangements exist, they may be notified by other utilities or companies. The action to be taken varies according to the nature of the defect and the assessed risk, which will be a value judgment.
The first step will normally be to identify other locations on the network having the same type and class of switchgear, in particular to identify critical locations. This allows the extent of the problem to be assessed. Where a central control room exists, it may be appropriate to mark up the main system diagram with those substations containing the affected switchgear.
If the defect is potentially dangerous to operators, an immediate operational ban should be imposed and a programme of remedial works drawn up, for early implementation. An intermediate category covers those defects that may affect the ability of the switchgear to carry out its job of interrupting fault current. Here the situation is less critical but remedial work should begin as soon as resources permit. The final category of defect is one that is not dangerous and will not affect the function of the switchgear, but may affect the life of the equipment. Remedial work for this category of defect is another value judgement; either draw up a programme for non-priority attention or defer the work until next planned maintenance. An action diagram describing this process is shown in Figure 6.26.
Computer based asset registers provide facilities for defects to be associated with particular equipment, often as a letter or number code. This allows the operational situation for any particular defect to be assessed over time, in terms of:
Over the service lifetime of any particular type of switchgear, a number of defects may be identified and corrected. It is therefore important that records are kept so that the defect status of individual switches is always known.
Example 1: Oil filled Ring Main Unit-Loss of ‘spirol’ roll pin
Summary – This defect concerns the possible loss of ‘Spirol’ roll pins from the main and earth switch operating shafts, on both the left and right hand circuit switches. Spirol roll pins (Figure 6.27) are used to lock two drive components together and transfer the operating torque between them. Loss of a pin implies loss of drive between the operating mechanism and the switch contacts. To prevent this possibility, modification DM fitted a worm drive clip directly over each pin. Therefore, four worm drive clips should be visible on inspection.
The illustration on the left hand side of Figure 6.28 shows the location of the Spirol pin on the main shaft of the right hand circuit switch, looking directly down into the ring main unit (below the fuse tray). The shaft is round at the location of the pin, where it enters a boss, but becomes square further along. The equivalent pin on the earth switch drive shaft is located close by. The equivalent pair of pins on the left hand circuit switch are located on the opposite side of the unit in a mirror image configuration, bosses on the left, shafts on the right.
The illustration on the right hand side of Figure 6.28 shows the worm drive clip fitted over the Spirol pin. Four of these clips should be visible and each one should be checked that it is in its correct position (no Spirol pin should be visible). Worm drive clips are unlikely to fall off, but they could move along the shaft.
Example 2: Oil filled Ring Main Unit-Clearance stop bolt quadrant
Summary – This defect concerns failure of the circuit switch mechanism to latch when moved from the OFF to the ON position and was identified during remedial work for defect code AQ. Drawing A26746 reproduced in Figure 6.29. overleaf shows that part of the mechanism affected by this defect and its proper settings. Unless 1 mm clearance exists between the stop bolt and the stop quadrant, intermittent latching may occur, resulting in slow operation from ON to OFF. The following information is reproduced from composite defect document CH:
To check that mechanism is latched in the ON or EARTH Position
Refer to Figure 6.29. Operate the switch to ON. With a spanner on the square main drive shaft attempt to move the switch to OFF. The movement should be stopped by the mechanism latch and in this position check the clearance between the ON stop screw and the stop lever, dimension Y on Figure 6.29. This should be a minimum of 1mm. If the movement is not stopped and the switch moves to the OFF position, the mechanism has not latched. Adjust the ON stop screw until the switch latches and the clearance Y is correct (1mm minimum). Check that with the switch closed the moving contact engagement on the fixed contact is 50% as shown on Figure 6.29, both with the stop lever tight against the stop and against the latch.
Repeat above with switch in the EARTH position. Dimension W may be much greater than 1mm because of the requirements of setting the oil switch stop position under defect code AR.
Note that Figure 6.29 shows only the right hand circuit switch, the left hand switch is a mirror image.
Documentation for switchgear maintenance should contain both generic maintenance information, relating to the type of switchgear for example, Vacuum cb, Air Break cb, together with type-specific information covering the known potential defects. This latter information is best accompanied by detailed illustration, so that the maintenance staffs know precisely what to look for.
The questions that maintenance staff must answer are:
The continuity of power distribution depends on the reliability of the electrical equipment in a system. While the reliability of many equipment have increased manifold during the last century, it is not recommended to connect any finished equipment to a system directly from the manufacturing place, unless its performance is proven. Earlier manufacturers had to think of many ways to prove the worthiness and reliability of their equipment. Nevertheless due to various reasons, manufacturers duplicating proven equipment also gained entry into the market. This had led to claims and counterclaims by the sellers, with consumers and end users being confused.
However the concepts have changed and bringing equipment under a common umbrella to prove their performance have slowly become the practice in every country. Each country had established committees and organizations to ensure the uniformity and performance of electrical equipment in an orderly way. This has led to the release of electrical standards in each country (for all electrical equipment). The major content of most of these cover the minimum tests that are to be conducted on any equipment in an environment that may be more severe than normal operating conditions; in terms of voltage and current levels.
With the sharing of knowledge among intellectuals from different regions and with globalization leading to the use of electrical equipment from different parts of the world, a common way to establish the capability of equipment has been accepted. This has lead to mandatory testing of electrical equipment before being put into use. The tests and the methods to be followed are covered in all electrical standards.
It can be concluded that testing on electrical equipment is needed
Most electrical equipments are produced by assembling various components made of different materials. The internal construction of the final equipment like transformers, circuit breakers, etc are not visible from the outside and it is not possible to visually check the performance of each and every part under a particular operating condition. Hence it is necessary to find ways to check the performance of the equipment in its full form without dismantling it. Accordingly ways and means have been drawn out to check the performance of the complete equipment in its final form which has become the basis of all electrical equipment standards. The testing helps in identifying the defects that may be inherent in particular equipment. Hence it enables the user to take a decision whether to use or not to use the equipment under known circumstances.
The purpose of electrical testing on major equipment is basically to ensure that the equipment will function as desired, when it is installed and energized within its specified voltage and load conditions. This is basically like an insurance premium to be spent before the equipment is accepted in a particular installation. The other purpose is to develop a set of base line test results of the equipment that can be compared in future to identify deterioration and therefore for taking corrective actions.
Depending on the area/nature of the tests, they may be categorized as
The factory tests are the major tests that are to be conducted by the manufacturer before declaring that the equipment suits a particular application.
These are categorized as:
It is not practically possible to test the electrical equipment in ambient conditions at which they are expected to be in service. The major conditions that can affect performance and its acceptance by the end user are
Hence it is customary to define the performance requirements at pre-defined altitude and temperature and also to correct the test results to some basic temperature conditions; so that the equipment performance can be evaluated in a true sense.
The major requirement for any electrical equipment is that it shall be able to withstand some minimum voltage across its terminals and also across each terminal to earth, since the equipment is expected to carry its rated voltage throughout its life. Hence almost all HV and MV equipment shall be tested to prove its capacity to withstand voltage conditions. These are generally called Dielectric tests. Most electrical equipment has its terminals separated by air. This means that air is the insulating medium, though internally their parts may be filled with some other insulating medium like oil. It is well known that the breakdown voltages across two terminals separated by air vary with the ambient temperature due to the presence of moisture at higher altitude conditions. Hence it is usual to define test voltages at some minimum altitude conditions. The standards normally consider an altitude of 1000 meters above sea level, to define the test voltages to be withstood by equipment. Correction factors shall be applied for altitudes above this value, which means the equipment, shall be able to withstand higher operating voltages at higher altitudes.
Similarly the operating temperature can vary the factors like impedance, temperature rise, etc. The variation of temperatures could be critical to assess the losses of major electrical equipment (like power transformers, motors, generators, etc). It is usual to correct the results to a common temperature, which is 75ºC for electrical equipment. Hence the testing engineer shall ensure that the test results are properly corrected to take care of the altitude and temperature conditions.
The operating temperatures can affect the ratings of some main equipment like transformers and generators because their current ratings are dependent on the windings that carry the currents. Hence it is necessary to define the ratings based on the expected operating temperatures.
The other major condition on which test results are dependant is the applicable tolerance level. It is necessary that there cannot be any tolerance on the test voltages after applying the above correction factors. This means that any equipment failing at 99.9 kV with its defined test voltage of 100 kV can not be considered to have passed this test. At the same time the losses and impedance values which are normally measured during tests, cannot meet the guaranteed figures exactly. Hence it is usual to define tolerances on test result values for such guaranteed figures and the equipment is accepted to meet the testing requirements if the results fall within the defined tolerance value.
The following sections also include the conditions and tolerances that are normally applicable for various HV/MV equipment test values and their respective results.
The fundamental Ohm’s law is
E = I — R,
Where I is the current and R is the resistance of the equipment to which voltage is applied. The equipment function will suffer if it is not getting the required current. At the same time, the total equipment will fail if it takes more than its allowable current or voltage. In the above equation, imagine two resistances in parallel (R1 and R2, with R2 >>>R1), then it is obvious that the maximum current will flow through R1 with almost negligible current flowing through R2.
In the above clause insulation material is generally referred to be a non-conducting material, which is not 100% true. It cannot be denied that all the materials in the world are built with some integral resistance, with their values being almost zero for conducting materials and almost infinite for non-conducting materials. The insulation is basically made of some materials that offer almost infinite resistance to ground. The most common insulating material is Poly Vinyl Chloride (PVC) that covers a cable and has its external surface in contact with ground. Even if the outer surface is touched by humans, the voltage is not diverted to ground. When the insulation covers a conductor like in a cable, it basically ensures that the equipment voltage is not diverted to the ground but gets routed only through the conductor enclosed by the insulation. Hence the fundamental requirement for an insulation material is that it shall have a resistance equal to many times the conductor resistance, so that maximum current flows through it.
In a similar way air, SF6, etc that separate the terminals also have a higher resistance provided this medium separates the terminals at least for some minimum distance for a particular voltage. When the distance across the terminals is reduced, it effectively means that the molecules across the terminals are getting reduced. The resistance of the separating medium in comparison starts reducing which allows a current to flow through it. As the distance is further reduced, it may ultimately lead to a large current across the terminals in the form of an arc; referred to as short-circuit.
The insulation can be considered simply as a capacitor in parallel with a resistor as shown in Figure 8.1 below, with the phase to earth voltage applied to the insulation material.
A marginal current through the insulation material is unavoidable but its value may be in the order of micro amperes due to the high resistance it offers. The current flow that results will comprise of two components: the capacitive current (Ic) and the resistive current (Ir).
The normal currents that flow during the application of a high voltage comprise of many currents as detailed below:
The capacitive current charges the capacitance in the system. It normally stops after flowing for a few seconds (at most) after the DC voltage is applied. The short burst of capacitive current flow may put a rather substantial stress on any test equipment that is applied to very large insulation systems such as cables or large rotating machines.
The applied insulation voltage puts a stress on the molecules of the insulation. The positive sides of the molecules are attracted to the negative conductor and the negative sides of the molecules are attracted to the positive conductor. The result is an energy that is supplied to realign the molecules much like force will realign a network of rubber bands. Like Ic, Ida usually dies off fairly quickly as the molecules realign to their maximum extent.
This is the electron current flow that actually passes through the insulation. In good insulation the resistive current flow will be relatively small and constant. In bad insulation the leakage current may be fairly large and it may actually increase with time.
The insulating material that is used for a particular voltage may be able to offer a maximum resistance value at that voltage, so that it does not offer a path to ground under healthy operating conditions. However in case the resistance reduces or becomes zero, the voltage will try to drive the full current to earth, which is limited only by the system impedance. Hence in the above case, the value of Ir should be very low depending on the voltage that is likely to be applied across the insulation during its life. It is also possible that the insulation will offer this high resistance only up to certain voltage levels, depending upon its properties and thickness, beyond which it is likely to fail.
Typical currents during IR test are mentioned in Figure 8.3. Ir is basically measured, which stabilizes after some time.
The basic principle of insulation testing lies with Ohm’s law and the quality of insulation is ensured by checking the following:
The insulation resistance test is very simple and non destructive because of the short duration of application.
A typical connection is is shown in Figure 8.4.
It is very important that the resistance offered by the insulation, maintains a high value for achieving the purpose for which the electrical equipment is intended. This includes air or SF6 or oil or PVC, etc that separates the terminals or the conductor from one phase to another or one phase to ground. This will ensure high efficiency in power distribution at optimum cost while simultaneously offering safety to humans. It is generally observed that the insulation resistance value is very high at the time of manufacture or commissioning. But it becomes very low to such an extent that it leads to equipment failure.
The quality of insulation is linked to some basic parameters that are obtained during insulation testing. Hence the first purpose for insulation testing, (i.e. measurements done during insulation testing) is to assess how well the insulation is and whether it can withstand the continuous voltage stress during normal operation (without ‘puncture’ or ‘breakdown’).
The majority of tests performed on electrical equipment are related to the verification of the quality of the insulation, which is basically the measurement of insulation resistance. The low value of resistance means some thing is seriously wrong.
The insulation of the equipment, that had given high resistance values before being put into service, is constantly stressed over its life by a constant application of a very high voltage. In addition, there are other environmental factors like dirt, moisture, oil, corrosion, vibration, electrical spikes and surges, mechanical stresses from pulling and tugging, and many other factors that add up to deteriorate the ‘good’ insulation. This can be catastrophic, but may happen slowly and steadily even if the voltage values are within acceptable limits.
Established practice is to conduct insulation testing at various stages as noted below:
All electrical equipment shall be able to prove their insulation characteristics before the standard rated voltage is applied. Hence all the equipment shall be subjected to insulation test, and the most common HV/MV electrical items are
It is to be noted that the insulation test is not conducted across the terminals of the transformers and motors (unless they are physically disconnected). This is because the insulation testing will give a negligible resistance value due to a very low resistance of the windings. Similarly, some components have a very low resistance but are connected across the equipment terminals or bus bars. Application of 500V or 2000V across such low resistance will result in heavy currents through these components giving wrong results and may also lead to failure of these components. For this reason these components used between any bus bars/terminals to another bus bar/terminal or to the neutral shall be kept out of the circuit while the main bus bars are insulation tested.
Some such components are
Insulation tests are generally expected to be across the phase terminals or between a phase terminal-to-ground, because the insulation offered to the ground is very important from the safety point of view. As noted above even if insulation tests are avoided between phases for motors and transformers, the insulation to ground tests are very important from safety point of view. Hence the persons responsible for testing must ensure that the insulation tests to ground are conducted for all equipment. But insulation tests across phases are done only for equipment whose terminals are not internally interconnected but always maintained at a minimum distance.
The readings obtained during an insulation resistance (IR) test should give reasonable values and it is necessary that the resistance values increase with any increase in service voltages. A higher resistance may prevent flow of substantial current through the testing instrument if the voltage is not sufficient. IR test instruments are available that can produce 500 V, 1000 V, 2500 V, 5000 V and 10,000 V across their output terminals. Most common test voltages that are applied to measure the IR values are as below depending upon the system voltage (line-to-line voltage)
System voltage | Test voltage |
Up to 1000 V | 500 volts |
> 1000V up to 3300 volts | 500–1000 volts |
>3300 V up to 6600 V | 2500–5000 V |
> 6600 volts | 5000 volts |
The 10 kV test voltage is generally adopted for motor windings above 12 kV. In the above table the two values indicate the applicability of both test voltages. Though it may be possible to verify the IR value with low test voltage like 500 V for a system of 3300 volts, it is recommended to follow the above test voltages to get consistent results with comparatively lesser errors.
IEEE 43 recommends the following test voltages for rotating machineries. The rated voltage means the line-to-line voltage for the three-phase machines and line-to-ground voltage for single phase machines and rated DC voltage of DC motors/field windings.
Winding rated voltage | IR test voltage |
<1000 | 500 |
1000–2500 | 500–1000 |
2501–5000 | 1000–2500 |
5001–12000 | 2500–5500 |
>12000 | 5000–10000 |
Megger® is the most common alternate name referred for IR tests. Megger is a patented brand name of the insulation resistance tester manufacturers. The tester is basically able to produce a voltage without any external means so that its output voltage is applied to the terminals under test. The most common types are
When the testers were introduced in the market in early 20th century, they were hand operated because of the technology prevailing in those days.
Subsequently the motor operated types entered into the market and with the advent of electronics technology, battery operated ones are gaining entry.
All these types are still most commonly used in most of the installations during manufacture and also in the field.
Due to the advancement in measuring technology, present day testers are available with analog display and digital display to show the results and accordingly they are named as analog type and digital type. We also have meters that can be used for two or more different voltages like 2.5–5 kV with output terminals marked as applicable. These are called multi range type and care should be taken to connect the correct terminal depending upon the rated voltage of the equipment under test.
The insulation resistance tester is a portable instrument that can be carried to the point of measurement and connected to the equipment being tested. Most of the types do not need external power but some operate with auxiliary single phase 110/220 V AC supply. The instrument gives direct measurement of IR values in ohms, mega-ohms, giga-ohms, etc based on the model used. It is essentially a high resistance ohm meter having built-in DC generator, generating the appropriate voltage to be applied. The DC generator is hand cranked type in case of a manual type, like a bi-cycle dynamo. A hand rotation at a good speed produces the necessary voltage.
Where a battery or AC source is used, electronic circuits produce the necessary DC voltage which can be stably maintained (unlike hand-operated ones).
In older types connecting the positive and negative terminals to the test points is critical because connecting a positive to a ground always gives low resistance values, irrespective of insulation quality. In case of three-phase (A,B,C) neutral (N) winding equipment, connections are done for the following cases separately and readings are taken separately.
In case of rotating machineries IEEE recommends that each phase is isolated and tested separately by connecting the test instrument between the reference phase and ground. This helps in identifying the condition of each winding independently. Also while conducting the tests, all external components like cables, surge arresters and surge capacitors are preferably disconnected to get better readings. Some times in the field, it is normal to conduct the IR test at motor terminals along with connecting cables. A common ground shall be used to prevent stray losses in the round circuit, which may affect the results.
Some instruments are provided with an additional terminal called the guard terminal. It should not be confused with ground and it basically shorts some external current paths that may be getting into the instruments hence giving wrong results. For example in the case of bushings, dirt and moisture produce leakage currents across the positive and negative terminals and in such cases the guard is connected to a bare wire wrapped around the bushing. Nevertheless any visible dirt and moisture is removed before applying the tester (to avoid getting low value results). Figures 8.5 and 8.6 show typically how insulation testers are connected.
Cable length does not have an influence on the time for IR measurement.
The steps involved during testing insulation resistance are as follows:
Step | Procedure | Remarks |
1 | Apply the applicable DC Voltage based on the nominal voltage rating of equipment under test | Usually applied with a meg-ohm-meter or high potential test set |
2 | Wait one minute. This will allow the capacitance current and dielectric absorption current ( Ic and Ida ) to decay | If using a high voltage test set monitor current closely for indications of insulation failure |
3 | At the end of one (1) minute read the meter current (Ir) or the insulation resistance in meg Ohms directly depending on the meter used. | Compare to previous values of identical equipment or refer to industry standards such as International Electrical Testing Association (NETA) |
Figure 8.8 shows the terminal voltage of the insulation tester vs insulation resistance of the item under measurement. Since the insulation tester has a limit for the current it can deliver, the terminal voltage of the insulation tester drops with lower values of insulation resistance as shown in the figure. In the example shown, the instrument can deliver a maximum of 1mA current.
Date | Insulation Resistance (M.Ohms) | Temperature (ºF) | Temperature corrected Insulation Resistance (M.Ohms) |
1st Jan 2000 | 14300 | 68 | 14290 |
1st Jul 2000 | 8700 | 81 | 14341 |
1st Jan 2001 | 14500 | 68 | 14490 |
1st Jul 2001 | 8900 | 81 | 14671 |
1st Jan 2002 | 14200 | 69 | 14748 |
1st Jul 2002 | 8900 | 80 | 14117 |
1st Jan 2003 | 13600 | 68 | 13591 |
1st Jul 2003 | 8900 | 78 | 13071 |
1st Jan 2004 | 13500 | 66 | 12491 |
1st Jul 2004 | 7500 | 80 | 11896 |
1st Jan 2005 | 11300 | 68 | 11292 |
1st Jul 2005 | 6500 | 80 | 10310 |
1st Jan 2006 | 8000 | 67 | 7693 |
Temperature has got a significant effect on insulation resistance values. Resistance value gets lowered with increase in temperature. Each insulation material has a different rate of change of resistance with temperature. Temperature correction factor tables have been developed for the various types of electrical apparatus and can be acquired from the manufacturer. On the other hand correction factor tables can be developed by measuring and plotting the insulation resistance values of the same equipment at different temperatures. The graph is plotted with temperature in the logarithmic scale and the temperature on a linear scale. The graph is a straight line and can be extrapolated to any temperature for obtaining correction factors.
The following table shows the significance of the effect of temperature on insulation resistance values and the importance for applying the correction factors.
As can be observed, that without temperature correction factors applied, the insulation values do not give meaningful trend pattern.
The following table shows the correction factor table using multiplier factors as per the information provided by NETA (International Electrical Testing Association Inc., USA). This is shown in Table 8.4.
Temperature | Multiplier | ||
ºC | ºF | Apparatus Containing Immersed Oil Insulations | Apparatus Containing Solid Insulations |
0 | 32 | 0.25 | 0.40 |
5 | 41 | 0.36 | 0.45 |
10 | 50 | 0.50 | 0.50 |
15 | 59 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
20 | 68 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
25 | 77 | 1.40 | 1.30 |
30 | 86 | 1.98 | 1.60 |
35 | 95 | 2.80 | 2.05 |
40 | 104 | 3.95 | 2.50 |
45 | 113 | 5.60 | 3.25 |
50 | 122 | 7.85 | 4.00 |
55 | 131 | 11.20 | 5.20 |
60 | 140 | 15.85 | 6.40 |
65 | 149 | 22.40 | 8.70 |
70 | 158 | 31.75 | 10.00 |
75 | 167 | 44.70 | 13.00 |
80 | 176 | 63.50 | 16.00 |
A general thumb rule is that for every 10 deg C increase in ambient temperature the IR value halves and hence these correction factors shall be applied to get the realistic values for comparison of previous readings.
The following are the minimum recommended values for good insulation as per NETA standards.
Maximum Rating of Equipment in Volts | Minimum Test Voltage DC | Recommended Minimum Insulation Resistance in MegOhms |
250 | 500 | 25 |
600 | 1000 | 100 |
5000 | 2500 | 1000 |
8000 | 2500 | 2000 |
15000 | 2500 | 5000 |
25000 | 5000 | 20000 |
35000 | 15000 | 100000 |
46000 | 15000 | 100000 |
69000 | 15000 | 100000 |
The recommended minimum IR values after 1 minute at 40ºC are as below based on the experience with different machines.
Minimum IR | Applicability |
kV + 1 (Refer Note) | Machines built around 1975 and before |
100 | Most machines of today |
5 | For machines rated below 1 kV |
In the first row, kV refers to the rated line to line voltage of the machine. IEEE indicates that both IR value and PI value shall be met for machines rated 10,000 kVA and above whereas for machines below 10,000 kVA, either PI value or IR value shall meet the minimum values as per the tables. All the values are referred at 40 deg C ambient temperature.
When a motor winding insulation resistance is measured from phase-to-ground, it can be seen that the value of IR slowly increases after application of voltage for one minute. The result is basically the healthiness of the insulation. Polarization index is the ratio between IR value after 10 minutes to IR value recorded at the end of one minute. The following are the steps involved for the PI measurements.
Step | Procedure | Remarks |
1 | Apply the DC Voltage based on the nominal voltage of the system | Usually applied with a meg-ohm-meter, |
2 | Wait one minute for the Ic and Ida to decay. Read and record the insulation resistance (R1 ) at the end of one minute. | If using a high voltage test set monitor current closely for indications of insulation failure |
3 | Continue voltage application for nine (9) additional minutes (10 minutes total) and record the insulation resistance again. (R10 ) | If using a high voltage test set monitor current closely to detect insulation failure |
4 | Calculate the polarization index (P.I.) | P.I. = R10 /R1 |
PI value varies with the class of insulation and is applicable for all classes of insulation as per IEC 60085-01 irrespective of the application. The following are the minimum values that are recommended based on the insulation class.
Thermal class | PI value (minimum) |
A | 1.5 |
B | 2.0 |
F | 2.0 |
H | 2.0 |
PI tests are not applicable to oil insulated transformers, since the presence of oil affects the PI values. PI concept is based on the relatively rigid structures of solid insulation materials, where absorption energy is required to reconfigure the electronic structure of comparatively fixed molecules against the applied voltage field. In the case of liquid insulation materials, the flow of current causes convection currents in the oil, resulting in an unstable structure that does not support the concept on which PI testing is based. PI tests are however applicable to dry type transformers since the windings in a dry type transformer are solid and similar to that of the winding in a motor.
Since a good insulation is mostly resistive and remains constant, any increase in the applied voltage will have a proportionate increase in the current flowing to provide the same resistance value for a wide range of voltages. Any deviation means some defects in the insulation exist. Normally the resistance values are observed to be almost the same at 500 and 1000 volts instilling confidence that the insulation is good. However there could be some cracks and cavities that may become prominent in ionization effects as the voltage level increases, making increased currents and lower IR values. The step voltage test is a useful tool for tests that are carried at 2.5 kV and above. Though step voltage can be an under-voltage test or an over-voltage test, it is preferred to consider under-voltage step tests (below the rated equipment voltage) to minimize catastrophic failures.
A recognized step voltage test is to increase the voltage in five equal steps at one minute intervals and record the IR value at the end of one minute before going to the next voltage level. Any considerable reduction in the IR values at any point indicates the possibility of poor insulation characteristics. The following could be the possible results and the inferences accordingly may vary.
Observation | Remarks |
No appreciable differences | Reliable insulation |
Appreciable differences beyond 25% | Insulation requires thorough inspection and reconditioning. Possibilities of moisture presence |
Failure (Less than the minimum value per standards) at 2.5kV | Most likely to fail if put into service, even if the rating is more than 2.5kV |
The step voltage test is one of the most reliable tests whose results do not differ much because of ambient temperature corrections and hence do not require any corrections.
With hand operated low voltage type testers often a reading close to infinity is seen in the meter scale and invariably the results are obtained as infinite. But as we have noted earlier, a very high value may be possible but not infinity. Still if the equipment is for low voltage application it can be concluded safely that the IR value is in the order of mega ohms and hence acceptable, without a need to decide the exact value. However it means that the value is beyond the instrument’s capability and generally does not give a chance to check the values that may be obtained later. For critical equipment, it would be preferable to use an instrument with higher ranges (in Giga ohms) so that a reasonable figure can be recorded for future reference.
The measurements taken for one machine shall not be generalized for all the machines. Relative comparisons of the same equipment will give more accurate feedback on the insulation quality. In case the IR values of machine 1 are lower than machine 2 but machine 2 values vary considerably, and reduce within a short period compared to almost a constant value for machine 1, it could mean that machine 2 needs much closer inspection and correction. Hence periodic insulation resistance measurements give a much better picture on insulation quality rather than a single measurement. Table 8.10 gives the possibilities depending upon the variations in the IR values recorded for equipment.
Results | Inference |
Average to higher values but well maintained | No need for worry |
Similar to above but more towards low values | May need a check and correction |
Low but well maintained | Though not a concern the possibility could be due to the material characteristics |
Unacceptably low | Needs drying and repeating the measurement before putting the equipment into service. |
Sudden drop from a previous higher values | May need more tests to check the tendency and if the value reaches safe figures and is maintained, no major concern. But if the value shows downward trend, this could mean problem. |
The readings of PI also give a good indication of insulation quality. Though the standards define some minimum values, often new equipment gives values far exceeding the minimum values. Inferences can be derived depending on the PI values as shown in Table 8.11.
PI Value | Insulation condition |
< 1.0 | Very poor. |
1 to 2 | Questionable and may need a review before acceptance |
2 to 4 | Passed |
4 to 5 | Good |
>5 | May be due to brittle or cracked insulation needing inspection |
Similarly an increase of more than 20% after any maintenance done compared to previous readings may also indicate trouble and would require inspection and correction.
Normally the dielectric absorption current in the insulation and its discharge takes a much longer time than the capacitive current. It is because of the dipoles randomizing their alignment within the insulation. This is equivalent to a current flowing with the discharge circuit still connected or a voltage appearing across if left open circuited. Rapidly removing the effects of leakage and capacitive currents allow a measurement relating to the moisture content in the insulation.
This test is mainly used to check the moisture absorption in the insulation. This test monitors the condition of the insulation during the discharge of the dielectric by measuring the dielectric discharge current and was developed mainly for application to large rotating machines by EDF in France. The following steps and observations are involved.
The dielectric discharge ratio or absorption ratio can identify absorbed moisture in the insulation as this basically decides the absorption behavior of the dielectric which is masked by its capacitive effects if we try to measure it on the charging cycle. The factor is temperature dependent.
The above test also helps to show if an internal layer is damaged. The time constant of this damaged individual layer will mismatch the other good layers, generally giving rise to a higher value of capacitive current than for a good insulation. The following inferences may be derived from the ratio.
Ratio Value | Insulation condition |
< 2 | Good |
2 to 4 | Questionable |
4 to 7 | Poor |
> 7 | Bad |
In a normal, insulation tester the specified high voltage is applied to measure the insulation value. In the event of a problem in the insulation, the applied voltage is tripped by the automatic Hi-Pot tester when a preset leakage current level is reached. However in a ‘Burn test’, the applied voltage is deliberately maintained to cause burning at the problem location for facilitating easy identification of the location. Burn testing is generally performed using a ‘Flash tester’. The ‘Flash tester’ provides a continuously variable A.C test voltage up to max. 4kV, having a frequency same as the supply voltage. Three modes of testing can be selected namely ‘Breakdown’, ‘Trip Level’ and ‘Burn’.
In The ‘Breakdown’ Mode, The Instrument Responds Only To The High Frequency Signals Produced By The Flashing Arc Of Breakdown And Trips The Test Voltage Only When This Occurs. In The ‘Trip Level’ Mode, The Output Voltage Is Tripped When The Preset Threshold Level Of Leakage Current Is Exceeded Or If A Breakdown Occurs. In The ‘Burn’ Mode, The Output Is Maintained Irrespective Of The Leakage Current Or Breakdown, But The Output Voltage Level Is Reduced To Limit The Level Of Current Flow. The Burning At the Fault Site Enables the Detection of the Fault
Four basic approaches are used for testing insulation with AC.
The high potential test (Hi-pot test) is basically an over voltage test on an equipment with the test voltage being considerably higher than the equipment nominal design voltage. Since the applied voltage is higher than the nominal voltage it is termed as a ‘high potential’ test. The test is also known as ‘voltage withstand’ test or ‘voltage proof’ test.
This is also a test to check the capacity of the insulation. As reviewed in the earlier chapters, the purpose of this testing is to verify the healthiness of the equipment by checking its ability to withstand a voltage stress higher than for what it is designed. The test values are defined in International Standards, which are slightly more than two times the AC rated rms voltage of the equipment being tested.
The equipment that fails this test is invariably rejected and hence this test is also referred to as a Go-No-Go test, meaning whether you do go or do not go for using the equipment in the service for which it is intended for. Example – where stator coils tested in the motor plant before assembly where if the insulation fails, the coils are not taken up to build the motor.
This test measures the ratio of resistive current to the total current (called power factor) or ratio of resistive current to the capacitive current (called dissipation factor). Since a good insulation has a low resistance the ratio should be low for good insulation. It requires a sophisticated instrument to measure different types of current and hence generally this is done for special cases like transformers, etc.
This test is basically conducted at very low frequencies. Since the capacitors have very high impedance at low frequency, the resultant current at low frequency is predominantly resistive indicating the soundness of insulation. The low frequency set generates 0.1 Hz, which also makes it very small compared to a 60 Hz test.
This test set has the ability to adjust its inductive reactance to cancel the effect of the capacitive reactance to enable measuring only the resistive current. However the set cost is quite prohibitive and hence normally used for equipment rated 230 kV and above.
The last three tests are relatively specialized compared to the first one which is straight forward. These tests require special training for the test personnel and some times the results require complex interpretations. Hence the hi-pot test still dominates the scene in electrical tests on the insulation.
The high voltage in a hi-pot test can be either AC or DC. Since most of the systems are AC rated and AC generation is simpler, it is still the logical choice today. AC testing normally tries to drive a current through the insulation which is typically a resistance in parallel with a capacitance as shown in Figure 51.1. For a good insulation,
Ica >>> Ir equal to almost 100 times the Ir
Ica leads Ir by almost 90 degree due to the capacitive predominance.
In case of marginally good insulation the value of Ica may still be large but not large enough and may be around 50 times the resistive current, with the resultant power factor angle getting reduced to around 0.75 to 0.80. In AC hi-pot tests, it is generally difficult to distinguish between a good and a marginally good insulation.
When a DC voltage is applied, the capacitive current dies down after a small time if the insulation is good and hence the readings at the end of one minute are not generally related to the capacitance current unless it happens to be bad insulation.
AC testing has two significant problems
The principal concern while testing the insulation with DC is the possibility of damaging otherwise good insulation. Some studies have indicated that DC testing at very high voltages may cause insulation damage for one of the following two reasons:
To avoid this problem insulation should always be drained of DC test voltage for 1 to 5 times the length of the duration for which the test voltage was applied before it is re-energized.
However this test is considered destructive compared to the IR test referred in the earlier chapter. The test voltages are typically as per Table 9.2. Though a higher voltage is applied at the factory, subsequent tests consider reduced voltages as given below. Though AC voltages are applied at the factory, it is normal to consider DC voltage in subsequent tests to avoid insulation getting affected.
Factory AC test voltage | 2 × Name plate voltage + 1000 V |
DC proof test voltage before commissioning | 0.8 × factory AC test × 1.6 |
DC proof test voltage during maintenance tests | 0.6 × factory AC test × 1.6 |
Example for 2400 V motor | |
Factory AC test voltage | 2 × 2400 + 1000 V = 5800 V AC |
DC proof test voltage before commissioning | 0.8 × 5800 × 1.6 = 7424 V DC |
DC proof test voltage during maintenance tests | 0.6 × 5800 × 1.6 = 5568 V DC |
DC Test is generally preferred after the Go-No-Go AC test at the factory due to the following specific advantages.
The test instrument is similar to the IR test with a DC voltage being generated internally. The instrument is normally provided with ammeters and timers to enable direct readings during the tests, with the timer cutting off the voltage after the set time.
Typical instrument is shown above.
The following NETA table gives the test voltages recommended for the hi-pot test on different equipment based on their rated maximum voltage, depending on whether AC or DC test is adopted.
Type of Switchgear | Rated Maximum Voltage (kV) (rms) | Maximum Test Voltage (kV) | |
AC | DC | ||
Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breaker Switchgear |
0.254/0.508/0.635 | 1.6 | 2.3 |
Metal-Clad Switchgear |
4.76 | 14 | 20 |
8.25 | 27 | 37 | |
15.0 | 27 | 37 | |
27.0 | 45 | Consult Manufacturer | |
38.0 | 60 | Consult Manufacturer | |
Station Type Cubicle Switchgear | 15.5 | 37 | Consult Manufacturer |
38.0 | 60 | Consult Manufacturer | |
72.5 | 120 | Consult Manufacturer | |
Metal Enclosed Interrupter Switchgear | 4.76 | 14 | 20 |
8.25 | 19 | 27 | |
15.0 | 27 | 37 | |
15.5 | 37 | 52 | |
25.8 | 45 | Consult Manufacturer |
Recommended maximum are 1 minute for AC Hipot test and 5 minutes for DC Hipot test.
VLF High pot test (very low frequency AC high pot) is a test that is becoming popular for the testing of cables and electrical apparatus like transformers, motors etc. VLF stands for very low frequency sinusoidal AC voltage having generally frequency of the order of 0.1 Hz or lower. VLF is used wherever a high capacitance load needs to be tested with AC voltage, especially in applications of field testing where the large and heavy series resonant AC test systems are not practicable. The reason for using low frequency is that, use of the system frequency (60Hz) necessitates large, high capacity, heavy and expensive equipment. Usage of low frequency enables the test equipment to be of small capacity, lighter weight and less expensive.
Testing at a frequency of 0.1 Hz reduces the power requirement by approximately 600 times when compared with testing at 60Hz. Testing of long runs of shielded power cable is the most common application for VLF testing. The problems associated with DC high voltage testing namely damage to the solid dielectric insulation and inability to detect many types of cable defects are not present in VLF Hi pot testing.
VLF testing is a go/no-go type of AC stress test for verifying the integrity of cables. If the cable is able to hold the applied test voltage, the cable is deemed healthy. VLF finds application in the following three types of cable testing.
For testing the equipment, the HV output of the tester is connected to the HV terminal of the equipment and the ground terminal is connected to the ground terminal of the equipment. The test voltage is applied for the required duration and it is checked whether the equipment is able to hold the test voltage till the duration of the test.
Figure 9.2 shows the schematic setup for performing VLF High Pot test for a cable.
A ducter is basically a low resistance meter (unlike mega ohm meter) used in insulation resistance tester. Ohm’s Law dictates that for a specified energy source, operating on V AC or V DC, the amount of current drawn will be dependent upon the resistance of the circuit or the component. The satisfactory operation of the circuit or the component depends on the controlled flow of current within the design parameters for the given piece of equipment.
In this age of electronics, increased demands are placed on all aspects of electrical circuitry. In the present demanding industrial electronic environments, the engineer is now required to make measurements which show repeatability within a few micro-ohms or less to prove the reliability of the equipment.
The electrical system comprises of many interconnections and joints that introduce considerable resistance in various electrical circuits. These may be a few micro ohms at each point but their summation may introduce long term damage to existing equipment and will also waste considerable energy as heat. Any restrictions in current flow will prevent a machine from generating its full power and may also allow insufficient current to flow to activate protective devices in the case of a fault. Hence it is necessary at an early stage to test and establish resistance values and then continuously monitor any upward changes to identify unexpected changes in measured values. The trending of this data helps to forecast possible failure conditions. Excessive changes in measured values would need corrective actions to prevent a major failure.
A low resistance measurement is typically a measurement below 1 ohm. At this level it is important to use test equipment that will minimize errors introduced by the test lead resistance and/or contact resistance between the probe and the material being tested. Also, at this level, standing voltages across the item being measured (e.g. thermal emfs at junctions between different metals) may cause errors and need to be identified.
The original DUCTER™ low resistance ohmmeter was developed by Ever shed & Vignoles in 1908 and employed the cross coils meter movement that was already used in insulation resistance testers. This initial design evolved into field units in the 1920s that required a leveling procedure at the time of the test due to the sensitivity of the coil. These early models did not travel well and were sensitive to shock and vibration.
To allow a measurement to compensate the errors, a four terminal measurement method had been developed with a reversible test current along with a suitable Kelvin Bridge meter which enables measuring very low resistance values. Subsequent demands required ranges up to kilo ohms, which used a Wheatstone bridge.
The low range on many resistance ohmmeters resolves 0.1 micro-ohms. This level of measurement is required to perform a number of low range resistance tests.
The Kelvin Bridge (also known as the Thomson Bridge) is used for precision measurements below the typical range of the Wheatstone bridge. Sir William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) devised this in 1854. The classic arrangement has six resistors in a rectangle, bisected by a galvanometer (see Figure 10.1), which includes an unknown resistance. A comparatively large current is passed through this unknown resistance and also through a known resistance of a comparatively low value. The galvanometer compares the voltage drops across these two resistances with the double-ratio circuit comprised of the other four resistors.
The two pairs of ratio resistors (A/B, a/b) are in parallel to each other and connected across with the galvanometer. One pair (a/b) is in series with the unknown (X) and the reference standard (R). The latter is an adjustable low-resistance, usually a manganin bar with a sliding contact.
This arrangement introduces a total resistance of A+X+a and B+R+b in parallel with the galvanometer. A connecting link (Y), sometimes called the yoke, shunts the ratio pair (a/b) that are otherwise in series with the unknown and the standard. This has minimal effect on the accuracy of the measurement so long as the two pairs of parallel ratio resistors are kept exactly equal (A to a, B to b). Lead and contact resistances are included in the value of the ratio pairs, and any effects can be nullified by keeping the resistance of the yoke extremely low. Keeping the yoke resistance low also accommodates the large test currents often used in Kelvin Bridges without causing unwanted heating effects.
When potential is balanced across the two parallel circuits, the unknown is equivalent to the parallel ratio multiplied by the adjusted reference value.
X = A/B × R
For very low measurements, the Kelvin Bridge has the advantage of nullifying extraneous resistances from leads and contacts by employing the system of double-ratio arms. The resistances of the connecting leads are in series with the high-resistance ratio arms and not with the reference or tested resistors.
A pioneering method for measuring resistance was devised in 1833 by S. H. Christie and made public by Sir Charles Wheatstone. The arrangement is a square pattern having four resistors with a galvanometer connected across one diagonal and a battery across the other (see Figure 56.2). Two of the resistors are of known appropriate values and comprise the ratio arm (A + B). A third has a known value which can be varied in small increments over a wide range, and is thus designated the rheostat arm (R). The fourth is the resistance being measured, the unknown arm (X).
The bridge is considered balanced when the rheostat arm has been adjusted so that the current is divided in such a way that there is no voltage drop across the galvanometer and it ceases to deflect (is nulled). The resistance being measured can then be calculated from the knowledge of the values of the ratio resistors and the adjusted value of the rheostat arm. The basic formula is:
X = B/A × R
Where
B and A are the ratio resistors
R is the rheostat resistance used.
The Wheatstone bridge can be constructed to a variety of ranges and is generally used for all but the highest and lowest measurements. It is suited to a range of about 1 to 100,000 ohms.
There are basically three ways of measuring resistance of an element viz., 2-wire, 3-wire and 4-wire instruments.
Two wire testing is the simplest method and is used to make a general assessment of a circuit element or a conductor in a circuit. The two-wire lead configuration is the most familiar one, used in multi-meters. It is generally used when the probes contact resistance, series lead resistance or parallel leakage resistances, do not degrade the quality of the measurement beyond an acceptable point.
The disadvantage with this method is that the measured value will include the test lead wire resistance and contact probe resistance values. This resistance may be equal to some tens of mille-ohms to the actual resistance, thereby introducing considerable errors when the resistance value is low. In most instances this may make little difference to the measured value, but when the measurement is below 1.000 ohm the two-wire method can easily introduce an error. This error could be several percentage of the actual resistance value. The lead resistance may be zeroed out, but that leaves the uncertainty of the contact resistances, which can change with each measurement. Contact resistance values may be in the 35 mille-ohm range at each probe and can vary with the temperature of the material under investigation.
The two-wire test method is best used for readings above 10.00 ohms up to about 10.0 megohms.
Three-wire testing is used for very high resistance and is typically used for measurements above 10.0 megohms. This is nothing but the insulation resistance tester where a third test lead is used as a guard, and allows for resistances in parallel with the test circuit to be eliminated from the measurement. This parallel resistance is usually considerably lower than the insulation resistance being measured. In fact it may, in severe cases, effectively short out the insulation resistance such that a meaningful measurement cannot be carried out without the use of a guarding circuit.
Four-wire measurement is the concept used by a Ducter. This is more suitable for accurately measuring resistances starting from mille ohms up to about 10 ohms. Out of the four wires two are called voltage leads and the other two are called current leads. A typical arrangement is as shown in Figure 56.3. The four-wire measurement compensates for usual errors that are introduced by the probe lead wire and the contact resistance values in the final reading, thus ensuring more accurate measurements.
A DC instrument should be used when trying to measure the pure resistance of a circuit or device. An AC instrument is used for applications such as ground bed testing or impedance testing.
Current is injected into the item under test via leads C1 and C2. The current that flows will be dependent upon the total resistance of this loop and the power available to push the current through that resistance. Since this current is measured, and the measured value is used in subsequent calculations, the loop resistance, including the contact resistance of the C1 and C2 contacts and the lead resistance of C1 and C2, does not have an effect on the final result.
From Ohm’s Law, if we pass a current through a resistance we will generate a voltage across the resistance. This voltage is detected by the P1 and P2 probes.
The voltmeter to which these probes are connected internally has a high impedance, which prevents current flowing in this potential loop. Since no current flows, the contact resistance of the P1 and P2 contacts produces no voltage and thus has no effect on the potential difference (voltage) detected by the probes. Furthermore, since no current flows through the P leads their resistance has no effect.
A high current output is one of the qualifying characteristics of a true low resistance ohmmeter. Generic multi-meters do not supply enough current to give a reliable indication of the current-carrying capabilities of joints, welds, bonds and the like under real operating conditions. At the same time, little voltage is required, as measurements are typically being made at the extreme low end of the resistance spectrum. Only the voltage drop across the measured resistance is critical, and it is measured at the mille-volt level.
As the name implies, a mille-ohmmeter is less sensitive than a micro-ohmmeter, with measurement capability in mille-ohms rather than micro-ohms (minimum resolution of 0.01 mille-ohm). This type of instrument is normally used for general circuit and component verification. Millie-ohmmeters also tend to be less expensive than micro-ohmmeters, making them a good choice if measurement sensitivity and resolution are not critical. The maximum test current is typically less than two amperes and as low as 0.2 amperes.
In contrast, the micro-ohmmeter uses 10-amp maximum test current which provides a comfortable and suitable test current through the test sample to make the measurements. The best 10-amp micro-ohmmeters offer measurements from 0.1 micro-ohm to 2000 ohms with a best resolution of 0.1 micro-ohm at the low end of the range and accuracy of ±0.2%, ±0.2 micro-ohms. On some instruments, different measurement modes may be selected which address different types of testing conditions. Measurement modes could include manual, automatic or continuous testing, or a high power test for large windings.
The following is a selected list of key DC resistance measurement applications for 10-amp micro-ohmmeters.
There are different ways in which the leads are provided as shown in Figure 10.5.
According to IEC62271-100, testing the contact resistance of high voltage AC circuit breakers calls for a test current with any convenient value between 50 A and the rated normal current. ANSI C37.09 specifies that the test current should be a minimum of 100 A. Most electrical utilities prefer to test at higher currents, as they believe this is more representative of working conditions. Field portable instruments are available that can supply anywhere from 100 A up to 600 A (subject to the load resistance and supply voltage). The best instruments have measurement resolution to 0.1 micro-ohm and offer variable test current to address a wider range of applications.
By testing at 10 Amp and then at a higher current, the operator can get a better understanding of the maintenance requirements for the circuit breaker. In addition to circuit breakers, electrical utilities and testing companies use higher current micro-ohmmeters on other high voltage apparatus, including:
It is some times a practice to initially perform a 10 amp test and then see improved resistance readings with test currents beyond 100 amps as per standards.
However it is necessary to realize that high current meters are intended to be used at high currents. Their accuracy may reduce considerably at low currents, particularly when measuring small resistances.
Mechanical wear and tear on circuit breaker contacts reduces the area of the contact surfaces. This reduction combined with sparking and/or arcing during operations increase the resistance across the working connections. This condition will produce heat that can reduce the effectiveness of the circuit breaker. Periodic measurements will show the rate of increase of the contact resistance value. When these values are compared to the original manufacturer’s specification, a decision can be made to continue or repair. By tracking the trend of the readings, the operator gets an idea of when the circuit breaker should be pulled for service before damage is done.
Some of the transformer ohmmeters include dual meters with independent range controls such that the high voltage/primary (high resistance) and low voltage/secondary (low resistance) windings of a transformer can be measured at the same time.
The transformer ohm meter is a multi current device with measurement resolution to 1 micro-ohm and is used both in factory tests and for field operating verification. Operation of the transformer ohmmeter is sometimes enhanced by connecting the test current through both windings with opposite polarity, thus providing the fastest test time (the mutual inductance between the windings is minimized by this way). This current connection operation is used on wye-to-wye, wye-to-delta and delta-to-delta transformers. The ability to measure primary and secondary windings at the same time also speeds up the testing time.
The power supply is often designed to deliver the energy to saturate the winding and then provide a stable level of test current. The test set should also be able to test the windings and contact resistance on tap-changers with make-before-break contacts and voltage regulators. Tap-changers are the most vulnerable part of the transformer and face more failures and outages than any other component. Frequent testing is required to ensure proper and reliable operation. A transformer ohmmeter is used to:
The temperature of the device will have a strong influence on the measured values. For example, the resistance measured for a hot motor will be different from a measurement done in cold conditions. As the motor warms up, the resistance readings will go up. The resistance of copper windings responds to changes in temperature based on the basic nature of copper as a material. Different materials will have different temperature coefficients. As a result, the temperature correction equation will vary depending on the material being tested.
As a general safety measure, normal testing should always be performed on de-energized samples. Special training and equipment are required to perform tests on energized circuits. Internal fused input circuits are designed into a few instruments that will protect the instrument if inadvertently connected to an energized test sample. The low input impedance of the current supply internal to general instruments becomes a willing current sink when connected across a live circuit.
Safety is the responsibility of the field test engineer or technician, whoever will be in contact with the sample being tested. The majority of field tests are performed on de-energized circuits. When testing magnetic components, a state of winding saturation may occur.
The operator should connect a short circuit across the winding to neutralize the energy stored in the winding and then make a voltage test to verify the neutral state of the sample.
Battery strap testing represents a special condition, as the batteries must remain connected. The operator is required to use insulated gloves, facemask and a body apron for protection when performing these tests. This is one of the few times when electrical resistance tests are performed in the field on energized systems. Special probes, rated for 600 V operations, are available with the newer instruments to perform these tests.
When planning a test on circuit breakers, the operator must be aware of IEC62271-100 and ANSI C37.09 for test current requirements. When testing large oil circuit breakers, the best instrument is one that ramps up current slowly and steadily, holds it for a period of time to complete measurements and then ramps down in a similar fashion. This method reduces magnetizing, which would otherwise be created by the sudden switching ON and OFF of the test current. This may also result in inaccurate ‘CT’ measurements when the system is returned to normal AC operation.
Care should be taken when making a measurement across a CT as high DC currents may saturate the CT, leading to potential faults. Also, any ripple on the test current may cause circuit breakers to trip. Careful positioning of the current probes should prevent this happening, and the ripple present on the current waveform may be minimized by separating the test leads.
When connections have higher than normal resistance measurements, one should not resort to retightening the bolts, as this will over stress the soft lead connection. Over tightening does not cure the problem. The proper procedure is to disassemble the straps, clean, grease and then reconnect with the bolts tightened to the supplier’s torque level. All the three phase resistances should be balanced within a narrow tolerance of ±10 to 20%.
A common error in the field is to use a low resistance ohmmeter to sample the resistance of a ground bed. This application is incorrect, as the ground bed test method requires an instrument that toggles the test signal at a known frequency and current level.
A low resistance ohmmeter used in this application will provide an erroneous reading as the ground current will have an undue influence on the measurement. A proper ground tester performs in essentially the same way as a low resistance ohmmeter, that is, by injecting a current into the test sample and measuring the voltage drop across it. However, the earth typically carries numerous currents originating from other sources, such as the utility. These will interfere with the DC measurement being performed by a low resistance ohmmeter. The genuine ground tester, however, operates with a definitive alternating square wave of a frequency distinct from utility harmonics. In this manner, it is able to perform a discrete measurement, free of noise influence.
This chapter briefly covers the tests normally done on other HV/MV equipment not covered in earlier chapters. These are
MV switchgear are generally designed for indoor use and basically comprise of the following compartments on one vertical section. (A switchgear panel line up may consist of many such vertical sections.)
It is necessary to have tests on integrated assembly of all the units. IEC recommends the following tests on switchgear.
The type tests should be carried out on a maximum of four test specimens unless otherwise specified in the relevant IEC standards and/or mutually discussed with the supplier.
Most of the tests are related to their names. Some of the main tests which generally use higher than the rated voltages are as below.
Switchgear and outdoor circuit breakers should be subjected to lightning impulse voltage tests. While panels are tested for their ability to withstand these voltages in dry conditions, the outdoor equipments are also tested in wet conditions. The tests should be performed with voltages of both polarities using the standard lightning impulse 1.2/50 µseconds according to IEC. The applicable voltages are based on the maximum system voltages for which the switchgear and equipment are designed and are given in the table below.
These are similar to the PF tests on transformers and bushings covered earlier. All switchgear and breakers should be subjected to short-duration power-frequency voltage withstand tests in accordance with IEC guidelines. For each test condition the test voltage should be raised to the appropriate test value and maintained for one minute. The tests should only be performed in dry conditions (for indoor units). Tables 11.1 and 11.2 are not only for assembled switchgear but also for the stand-alone high voltage circuit breakers. For outdoor breakers the wet test is conducted at the prescribed wet PF voltage by maintaining the applicable voltage for 10 seconds.
Rated voltage kV (r.m.s.) | Rated short-duration power-frequency withstand voltage kV (r.m.s.) | Rated lightning impulse withstand voltage kV (peak) | ||
Common value | Across the Isolating distance | Common value | Across the isolating distance | |
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) |
3,6 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 23 |
40 | 46 | |||
7,2 | 20 | 23 | 40 | 46 |
60 | 70 | |||
11 | 28 | 32 | 60 | 70 |
15 | 85 | |||
17,5 | 38 | 45 | 75 | 85 |
95 | 110 | |||
24 | 50 | 60 | 95 | 110 |
115 | 145 | |||
36 | 70 | 80 | 145 | 165 |
170 | 195 | |||
52 | 95 | 110 | 250 | 290 |
72,5 | 140 | 160 | 325 | 375 |
100 | 150 | 175 | 380 | 440 |
185 | 210 | 450 | 520 | |
113 | 185 | 210 | 450 | 520 |
230 | 265 | 550 | 630 | |
145 | 230 | 265 | 550 | 630 |
275 | 315 | 650 | 750 | |
170 | 275 | 315 | 650 | 750 |
325 | 375 | 750 | 860 | |
245 | 360 | 415 | 850 | 950 |
395 | 460 | 950 | 1050 | |
460 | 530 | 1 050 | 200 |
Maximum System voltage kV (r.m.s.) | Rated short-duration power-frequency withstand voltage kV (r.m.s) | Rated lightning impulse withstand voltage kV (peak) | ||||
Common value | Across the isolating contacts | Common value | Across isolating distance | |||
(1) | (2) | (2a) | (3) | (3a) | (4) | (5) |
4.76 | 19 | — | 21 | — | 60 | 70 |
8.25 | 26 | 24 | 29 | 27 | 75 | 80 |
35 | 30 | 39 | 33 | 95 | 105 | |
15 | 35 | 30 | 39 | 33 | 95 | 105 |
50 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 110 | 115 | |
25.8 | 50 | 45 | 55 | 50 | 115 | 140 |
70 | 60 | 77 | 66 | 150 | 165 | |
38 | 70 | 60 | 77 | 66 | 150 | 165 |
95 | 80 | 105 | 88 | 200 | 220 | |
48.3 | 110 | 100 | 132 | 110 | 250 | 275 |
72.5 | 160 | 140 | 176 | 154 | 350 | 385 |
Internal faults inside metal-enclosed switchgear can occur in a number of locations. The arc energy resulting from an arc developed in air at atmospheric pressure or in another insulating gas within the enclosure will cause an internal overpressure and local overheating. This will result in mechanical and thermal stressing of the equipment. Moreover, the materials involved may produce hot decomposition products, either gaseous or vaporous, which may be discharged to the outside of the enclosure.
IEC specifies a method of testing switchgear enclosures against the effects of internal faults, as a type test. It involves setting up deliberate faults within the switchgear enclosure and then testing for the effect by use of what are called ‘indicators’; i.e. large metal screens covered with black cotton textile material. This test procedure demands for operator safety and is covered here.
IEC gives allowance for internal overpressure acting on covers, doors, inspection windows, etc. of the switchgear and also takes into consideration the thermal effects of the arc or its roots on the enclosure and of ejected hot gases and glowing particles. But it does not cover the damages to partitions and shutters and hence does not cover all effects that may constitute a risk (such as toxic gases). The test procedure only simulates situations when doors and covers are fully closed and correctly secured.
The choice of functional units, their numbers, their equipment and their position in the test area as well as the place of initiation of the arc are to be decided between the manufacturer and user. The following points should be observed:
The tests on metal-enclosed switchgear should be carried out on three-phase units. The short-circuit current applied during the test corresponds to the rated short-time withstand current. It may be lower, if specially required by the manufacturer. The applied voltage of the test circuit should be equal to the rated voltage of the metal-enclosed switchgear. A lower voltage may be chosen if the following conditions are met:
The short-circuit current for which the metal-enclosed switchgear is specified with respect to arcing should be set within a +5%–0% tolerance. This tolerance applies to the prospective current only if the applied voltage is equal to the rated voltage. The current should remain constant. If the test plant does not permit this, the test should be extended until the integral of the AC component of the current equals the value specified within a tolerance of + 10%–0%. In this case, the current should be equal to the specified value at least during the first three full cycles and should not be less than 50% of the specified value at the end of the test.
The instant of closing should be chosen so that the prospective value of the peak current (with a tolerance of + 5%–0%) flowing in one of the outer phases is 2.5 times the r.m.s. value of the AC component defined above so that a major loop also occurs in the other outer phase. If the voltage is lower than the rated voltage, the peak value of the short-circuit current for the metal-enclosed switchgear under test should not drop below 90% of the prospective peak value.
At a rated frequency of 50 Hz or 60 Hz, the frequency at the beginning of the test should be between 48 Hz and 62 Hz. At other frequencies it should not deviate from the rated value by more than ± 10%.
The duration of the arc is chosen in relation to the probable duration of the arc determined by the protection facilities and does not normally exceed 1 second. For testing metal-enclosed switchgear with pressure relief devices, an arc duration of 0.1 second is generally sufficient to prove its resistance to internal pressure. This does not apply for gas-filled compartments. It is generally not possible to calculate the permissible arc duration for a current which differs from that used in the test. The maximum pressure during the test will generally not decrease with a shorter arcing time and there is no universal rule according to which the permissible arc duration may be increased with a lower test current.
The neutral is only earthed in the case of metal-enclosed switchgear to be operated in a solidly earthed system. Care should be taken in order that the connections do not alter test conditions. Generally, inside the enclosure, the arc may be fed from two directions and the direction should be the one which is likely to result in the highest stress.
The arc should preferably be initiated between the phases by means of a metal wire of about 0.5 mm diameter or, in the case of segregated phase conductors, between one phase and earth.
If the application of such a wire is not practicable (for arc initiation in a component), as an alternative it is permissible to initiate the fault by other methods. In this case, the method chosen should be agreed upon by the manufacturer and the user. In functional units where live pacts are covered by solid insulating material, the arc should be initiated between two adjacent phases or, in the case of segregated phase conductors, between one phase and earth at the following locations:
Indicators should be fitted vertically at the operator’s side of the enclosed switchgear and, if applicable, at sides which are readily accessible to personnel. They should be placed, up to a height of 2 m and at a distance of 30 cm + 5% from the enclosed switchgear, facing all points where gas is likely to be emitted (e.g. joints, inspection windows, doors). Care should be taken when positioning the indicators to take into account the possibility of hot gas escaping in slant directions. Indicators should also be arranged horizontally at a height of 2 m above the floor and between 30 cm and 80 cm from the enclosed switchgear. Black cretonne (cotton fabric approximately 150 g/m2) should be used for the indicators.
Indicators should be fitted vertically on all accessible sides of the enclosed switchgear. They should be placed, up to a height of 2 m and at a distance of 10 cm ± 5% from the enclosed switchgear, facing all points where gas is likely to be emitted (e.g. joints, inspection windows, doors). Care should be taken when positioning the indicators. They should also be arranged horizontally at a height of 2 m above the floor and between 10 cm and 80 cm from the enclosed switchgear and control-gear. If the test unit is lower than 2 m, indicators should be placed horizontally on the top covers, facing all points where gas is likely to be emitted and close to the vertical indicators, which in this case, are only required up to the actual height of the equipment. Black cotton-interlining lawn (approximately 40 g/m2) should be used for the indicators.
It is to be observed:
The following information should be given in the test report:
The following are the major tests conducted on medium voltage motors that are used to drive mechanical equipment like compressors, blowers, pumps, etc. The tests not only determine the losses and the efficiency but also cover procedures involved in calculating the various loss components to arrive at the efficiency figures.
Some of the tests like noise level measurements and heat run test are type tests which are conducted on one motor if multiple motors of the same rating are supplied. The stator coils and insulation also go through high voltage tests before assembly of motor coils.
The capacitors are mainly in the form of multiple banks and mounted either indoor or outdoor. The major tests to be conducted per IEC are as below.
Some of the test procedures are given below
The capacitance should be measured at 0.9 to 1.1 times the rated voltage, using a method that excludes errors due to harmonics. Measurement at another voltage is permitted, provided that appropriate correction factors are agreed upon between the manufacturer and the purchaser. The final capacitance measurement should be carried out after the voltage test.
In order to reveal any change in capacitance, for example due to puncture of an element, or failure of an internal fuse, a preliminary capacitance measurement should be made, before the other electrical routine tests. This preliminary measurement should be performed with a reduced voltage not higher than 0.15 times the nominal voltage.
The capacitance should not differ from the rated capacitance by more than:
The capacitor losses (tan δ) should be measured at 0.9 to 1.1 times the rated voltage using a method that excludes errors due to harmonics. The accuracy of the measuring method and the correlation with the values measured at rated voltage and frequency should be given.
The AC test should be carried out with a substantially sinusoidal voltage equal to 2.15 times the nominal system voltage. In the United States of America the value is twice the nominal voltage. In case of DC test the test voltage should be 4.3 times.
This is a type test and conducted between terminals and the container. The lightning impulse test is applicable for capacitor units intended for use in banks with insulated neutral and for connection to overhead lines.
Units having all terminals insulated from the container, and with the containers connected to ground, should be subjected to fifteen impulses of positive polarity followed by 15 impulses of negative polarity applied between bushings joined together and the container. After the change of polarity, it is permissible to apply some impulses of lower amplitude before the application of the test impulses.
The capacitor is considered to have passed the test if:
Tests to prove satisfactory operation and mechanical endurance
Dielectric tests on disconnectors or earthing switches when in the OPEN position should be
carried out:
The disconnector or earthing switch should be considered to have passed the impulse tests if the following conditions are fulfilled:
This is verified by at least five impulses without disruptive discharge following that impulse out of the series of 15 impulses, which caused the last disruptive discharge. If this impulse is one of the last five out of the series of 15 impulses, additional impulses should be applied. Some times disruptive discharges may occur and evidence cannot be given during testing that the disruptive discharges were on self-restoring insulation. In such cases, after the completion of the dielectric tests the disconnector or earthing switch should be dismantled and inspected. If punctures of non-self-restoring insulation are observed, the disconnector or earthing switch should be considered to have failed the test.
The units are normally tested at the manufacturer’s works and transported to the site once the test results are satisfactory. Invariably there will be considerable time elapsed between the factory tests and the readiness of the site where the installation will take place. The time elapsed may vary from a month to several months depending on many factors. The installation and provision of necessary connections also takes considerable time, even if the site is waiting for the equipment. The following factors are unavoidable from the time the equipment is ready at manufacturer’s place till it is ready to get charged in the place of use.
Time for packing and arranging for the transportation after completing all the commercial formalities.
Transportation time from the manufacturer’s works to the place of installation depending upon whether the item is imported or locally available. Even in case of locally available equipment distances may make the transportation and delivery time go from a week to few weeks. Possible damages during transportation, either directly on the equipment or indirectly due to unknown reasons. Rough handling and improper packing can also lead to unknown damages. The delay in readiness of the foundation or the building may result in the equipment being kept in unfavorable climatic conditions that can affect internal insulation. Some times environmental conditions at a construction site or an existing nearby plant can also result in some deterioration to internal components and oil used in the equipment.
All the above reasons plus many other possible human errors generally delay the energizing of electrical equipment. Hence it is necessary to ensure that there are no internal damages that can affect its life and performance. For example, the oil dielectric strength might have gone down over a period of time that would require filtration before charging a transformer. If not, an internal flashover or short circuit may make the whole project wait while the transformer is repaired. Similarly in a switchgear panel, some internal links or shorting may lead to problems.
The above reasons are basically related to the delay in energizing due to unavoidable reasons. Once the equipment is energized, it is necessary to ensure periodical maintenance to maintain health. Maintenance may result in replacement of components, some adjustments in the internal mechanism, rewiring, etc. All these need to be checked for correctness before the equipment is put back into service.
Some basic tests are prescribed (especially for HV/MV equipment) that are to be conducted before restoring the service or charging the equipment for the first time. These tests are called pre-commissioning tests/checks, commissioning tests, maintenance tests, etc and since most of these tests are done in the field of service, these are referred to as field tests in this chapter.
Field tests are usually performed by independent contractors, the installation contractor or the manufacturer himself. The individuals who perform the acceptance tests should preferably be certified and/or licensed for the equipment under test. The system should be initially checked for damage, deterioration and component failures using specific component checks, inspections, and tests defined by the equipment manufacturer. Then the interconnection of the system components should be checked in a de-energized and energized state, to verify the proper interconnection and operation of components, ON/OFF control, system interlocks and protective relaying functions. It is recommended that all field tests are witnessed by a person who could be the operator of the plant or in case of shortage of skilled man power, a commissioning engineer who is not associated professionally with the agency/person performing the tests. Once the above tests are complete, the system can be energized, operational tests conducted and measurements recorded. All steps and results of the field tests should be carefully documented for review and for use in future for comparison. Considerable variation in the results of present tests compared to earlier tests is indicative of problems like deterioration of insulation, dirty environmental conditions, etc.
The safety procedures given below are from IEEE Standard 510-1983 which stipulates safety practices to be followed by all personnel dealing with high voltage applications and measurements, so that any possible accidents due to the presence of electrical hazards while conducting the tests are avoided.
Safety considerations in electrical testing apply not only to personnel but to the test equipment and apparatus and or the system under test. These recommended practices generally cover the practices needed while testing in laboratories, in the field and of systems incorporating high voltage power supplies, etc. A voltage of approximately 1,000 volts has been assumed as a practical minimum for these types of tests. Individual judgment is necessary to decide if the requirements of these recommended practices are applicable in cases where lower voltages or special risks are involved.
All ungrounded terminals of the test equipment or apparatus under test should be treated as energized and hence any contact with enclosures and internal parts always avoided.
The test set grounding connections should be solidly connected to the equipment being tested. As a minimum, the current capacity of the ground leads should exceed that necessary to carry the maximum possible ground current. The effect of ground potential rise due to the resistance and reactance of the earth connection should be considered.
Precautions should be taken to prevent accidental contact of live terminals by personnel, either by shielding the live terminals or by providing barriers around the area.
The circuit should include instrumentation for measuring and/or indicating the test voltages.
Appropriate master isolation switch or an observer should be provided to ensure immediate de-energizing of test circuits in case of unforeseen problems occurring. In the case of DC tests, provisions for discharging and grounding charged terminals and supporting the insulation should also be considered.
High-voltage and high-power tests should be performed and supervised by qualified personnel only.
Appropriate warning signs like DANGER – HIGH VOLTAGE should be posted on or near the entrance in case of indoor equipment or on the barrier at all possible entry points.
Automatic grounding devices should be provided to apply a visible ground on the high-voltage circuits once they are de-energized after the test. This may not be practically feasible for most HV/MV equipment. In such cases the operator should attach a ground to the high-voltage terminal using a suitably insulated handle. In the case of several capacitors connected in series, it is not always sufficient to ground only the high-voltage terminal. The exposed intermediate terminals should also be grounded. This applies in particular to impulse generators where the capacitors should be short-circuited and grounded before and while working on the generator.
Safe grounding of instrumentation should take precedence over proper signal grounding unless other special precautions have been taken to ensure personnel safety.
Leads should not be run from a test area unless they are contained in a grounded metallic sheath and terminated in a grounded metallic enclosure and other precautions have been taken to ensure personnel safety. Control wiring, meter connections and cables running to oscilloscopes fall into this category. Meters and other instruments with accessible terminals should normally be placed in a metal compartment with a viewing window.
Temporary measuring circuits should be located completely within the test area and viewed through the fence. Alternatively, the meters may be located outside the fence, provided the meters and leads, external to the area are enclosed in grounded metallic enclosures.
Temporary control circuits should be treated the same as measuring circuits and housed in a grounded box with all controls accessible to the operator at ground potential.
The routing and connections of temporary wiring should be such that they are secure against accidental interruptions that may become hazardous to personnel or equipment.
Devices which rely on a solid or solid/liquid dielectric for insulation should preferably be grounded and short-circuited when not in use.
Any capacitive object which is not in use but may be in the influence of a DC electric field should have its exposed high-voltage terminal grounded. Failure to observe this precaution may result in a voltage induced in the capacitive object by the field.
Capacitive objects having a solid dielectric should be short-circuited after DC proof testing. If not, it may result in a buildup of voltage on the object due to dielectric absorption in the insulation. The short circuit should remain on the object until the dielectric absorption has dissipated or until the object has been reconnected to a circuit. It is good practice for all capacitive devices to remain short-circuited when not in use.
Any open circuited capacitive device should be short-circuited and grounded before being contacted by personnel.
All objects at ground potential must be placed away from all exposed high voltage points at a minimum distance of one inch (25.4 mm) for every 7,500 volts, e.g. 50 kV requires a spacing of at least 6.7 inches (171 mm).
A creep age distance of at least one inch (25.4 mm) for every 7,500 volts for insulators placed in contact with high voltage points.
High-power testing involves a special type of high-voltage measurement in that the level of current is very high. Careful consideration should be given to safety precautions for high-power testing for this very reason. The explosive nature of the test specimen also brings about special concern relating to safety in the laboratory.
Protective eye and face equipment should be worn by all personnel conducting or observing a high-power test where there is a reasonable probability that eye or face injury can be prevented by such equipment. Typical eye and face hazards present in high-power test areas include intense light (including ultraviolet), sparks, and molten metal.
Safety glasses containing absorptive lenses should be worn by all personnel observing a high-power test even if electric arcing is not expected. Lenses should be impact-resistant and have shade numbers consistent with the ambient illumination level of the work area but yet capable of providing protection against hazardous radiation due to any inadvertent electric arcing.
Whenever electric arcs are to be directly observed, safety glasses containing filter lenses should be worn by all personnel observing the electric arc test.
All high-voltage generating equipment should have a single obvious control to switch the equipment off under emergency conditions.
All high-voltage generating equipment should have an indicator which signals that the high-voltage output is enabled.
All high-voltage generating equipment should have provisions for external connections (interlock) which, when open, cause the high-voltage source to be switched off. These connections may be used for external safety interlocks in barriers or for a foot or hand operated safety switch.
The design of any piece of high-voltage test equipment should include a failure analysis to determine if the failure of any part of the circuit or the specimen, to which it is connected, will create a hazardous situation for the operator. The major failure shall be construed to include the probability of failure of items that would be overstressed in the event of a major failure. The analysis may be limited to the effect of one major failure at a time, provided that the major failure is obvious to the operator.
Inspect for physical damage and record, if any.
Ensure nameplate information meets latest one line diagram and record discrepancies, if any.
Verify proper operation of all auxiliary devices.
Check and ensure tightness of bolted joints as per manufacturer’s recommendations.
Ensure proper level of oil in tank and bushings.
Conduct mechanical tests of auxiliary devices like OLTC, etc.,
Insulation resistance tests shall be conducted between windings and windings to ground. Recommended test voltages are
150 – 600 V Rating | 1000 V megger |
501 – 5000 V Rating | 2500 V megger |
Above 5001 V | 5000 V megger |
Polarization index value (10 minutes IR to 1 minute IR) should be found and must exceed 1.5
Turns ratio test on all tap positions.
Measurement of power factor test values for bigger transformers generally above 10 MVA.
Oil Dielectric test results should comply with the following.
Dielectric breakdown voltage 35 kV minimum below 69 kV, and 30 kV minimum for 69 kV upwards.
Neutralization number 0.025 mg KOH/gm, maximum.
Interfacial tension 35 dynes/cm minimum.
Color 1.0 maximum.
Winding resistance values shall not exceed 1.0% for adjacent windings and comparable overall.
AC high voltage potential test not exceeding 75% of the factory test values.
Site Acceptance tests | Test criteria and Acceptable values |
Oil Dielectric breakdown voltage test | Normally with disc or spherical electrodes having 2.5 m spacing – 30 k minimum acceptable voltage |
Insulation Resistance test between windings and windings to earth | The IR values shall be as below. Oil filled: 100 Meg Ohm upto 600 V, 1000 Meg Ohm 5000 V and 5000 Mega Ohm beyond 5000 V. Dry Type: five times the above figures. |
Ratio check at normal tap and other taps | Values should be within 0.5% of the calculated values, same as the factory tests. |
Winding Resistance | Cross check for conformance with factory tests. Changes require thorough investigation. |
Pressure test if transformer is supplied with inert gas. | At least 6 pounds pressure for 12 hours minimum and check for any leaks using soap solution around seals and gaskets. |
Power factor (DDF) test for above 15 kV windings rated above 10 MVA | Ensure the values are below 0.5% |
Oil sample test | In an approved laboratory and ensure the test values are within acceptable figures given earlier. |
Accessories test | Ensure proper operation of all accessories, relays, pressure relief device, gauges, etc. |
Verify missing parts or damaged parts
Check all components as per approved drawings
Check and ensure tightness of bolted joints as per manufacturer’s recommendations
Inspect and ensure proper anchorage and grounding
Checking of breaker alignment
Proper operation of safety shutter
Mechanical ON/OFF Operation verification
Contact resistance check by ducter
Insulation resistance of main bus with appropriate tester (1 kV or 2.5 kV or 5 kV)
Insulation resistance test on PT & control power transformers
Insulation resistance test on breakers phase-to-phase, phase-to-ground and across open contacts
Hi-pot test on vacuum bottles to check integrity across open contacts
Calibration of all relays by primary and secondary injection as appropriate
Electrical ON/OFF operation with auxiliary AC/DC supply.
Tripping checks on set values of the protective relays at minimum voltages
Check for continuity and correct operation of all remote wiring
Insulation resistance check of control wiring
Normal value shall be around 500 micro ohms with breakers in closed position and shall generally be provided by manufacturers.
Over potential and DC high-pot test values shall be as per tables given in chapters 2 and 3.
General inspection and verification of nameplate ratings
Mechanical ON/OFF operation both manual and motor, if provided.
Blade alignment and contact separation verification
Mechanical key interlocks and their functions.
Insulation resistance test between phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground using a suitable tester, based on the equipment’s rating
DC over potential test pole to pole and pole to ground
Contact resistance across each switch blade with ducter.
Over potential values shall meet the table values as per equipment ratings. Generally tests are limited to around 75% of he values given in standards to minimize damages.
Contact resistance values shall be limited to around 50 micro ohms and differences of more than 50% with respect to the adjacent contact values shall be investigated and corrected.
Inspect exposed parts for mechanical damages, if any
Ensure that sizes are proper matching the loads
Inspect for proper supports, shield groundings and proper termination and bolted connections
Ensure bending radii are meeting the recommended values.
The first test is the DC high-pot test for each conductor with appropriate test voltages based on the system voltages and insulation. This shall be done in incremental values to about 8 steps from zero and record the leakage currents at each incremental voltage. The test at required voltage shall be for 10 minutes. Take the readings of leakage currents during the incremental voltage steps (one every minute or 30 seconds) and the same during the last 10 minutes with the test voltage. The voltages shall then be brought to zero slowly and the voltage held up in the tested terminals shall be discharged to ground.
Rated Line voltage Volts | Conductor size AWG | 100% insulation level | 133% insulation level |
2001–5000 | 8–1000 | 25 | 25 |
5001–8000 | 6–1000 | 35 | 35 |
8001–15000 | 2–1000 | 55 | 65 |
15001–25000 | 1–1000 | 80 | 100 |
25001–35000 | 1/0–1000 | 100 | N.A. |
Insulation resistance test phase to phase and phase to ground with appropriate instrument
The variation in leakage currents shall be linear and proportionate to the incremental voltages.
The slope shall be negative.
Maximum leakage current shall preferably be restricted to about
The IR values shall be not less than 250 megohms
Inspect the bus for physical damage, if any and ratings in line with approved drawings and nameplate data
Bus bar material and hardware as per design data
Proper Bracing, Insulator supports, suspension alignment and grounding connection
Tightness of bolts in line with the manufacturer’s recommendations
Insulation resistance test phase to phase and phase to ground with appropriate instrument
DC Hi-pot test on each phase to phase and phase to ground.
Bus tightening values shall be proper with correct torque wrench
IR values in line with the table below
Over potential tests withstood for appropriate voltages based on system rated voltage
Rated Voltage | AC Voltage | DC Voltage |
5 | 14.3 | 20.2 |
15 | 27 | 37.5 |
25 | 45 | — |
35 | 60 | — |
Inspection and verification on physical damages, if any and compliance with approved drawings
Mechanical clearances and proper operation of disconnecting switches for potential transformers
Proper grounding and CT shorting links.
Polarity verification as per connections
Transformer ratio in case of voltage transformers
Insulation resistance test on secondary to ground with 500 V instrument
Optional – saturation curve and burden test on secondary side
Transformer ratio
Secondary LV injection tests on VT with primary disconnected
Polarity shall meet the requirements as per connections. If not, correct the connections.
The ratio shall be within tolerance as per approved test reports.
The IR values shall be around 100 mega ohms.
Inspection for physical damage, if any
Nameplate information meeting the requirements and load data
Proper anchoring, mounting and grounding connections
Dielectric absorption test
Polarization index test
Insulation resistance phase to ground
No load and full load currents measurements
Vibration tests on bearings with portable devices
Over potential test winding to ground based on the system voltage 80% of the factory test value plus 1000 volts.
Polarization index of less than 3 shall be investigated for correction.
Full load current shall not exceed the nameplate value.
No issues in over-potential and IR tests.
Maximum vibration altitudes shall be less than specified values. Generally less than 0.001 inch peak to peak for two pole, 0.002 inch for four pole, 0.0025 inch for six pole and 0.003 for higher pole motors.
Inspect for physical damages, chipped or broken porcelain
Nameplate information meeting the system requirements
Grounding connections proper
Spark over test
RIV test
Power factor test (optional)
Ground continuity test
Spark over voltage must be between 1.5 to 2.0 times the rating.
No RIV below the rated voltage.
Power factor test values not much differing from test certificates.
Ground grid resistance les than 0.5 ohm.
Arrangements in line with the plans
Verify supports are intact with no cracks, chipped porcelain, etc
Tightness of bus bar bolts by torques wrench
IR test on each section phase to phase and phase to ground
Over potential test phase to phase and phase to ground
Bus section joints contact resistance measurements
Bolt torque values as per manufacturer’s recommendation
IR and over potential results are satisfactory
Measured resistance not above 115% of calculates value or the earlier test results. Investigate and correct if it is more.
Inspect for physical damages, if any.
Nameplate rating meeting the requirements
Proper anchorage, support and grounding.
Dielectric absorption test winding to ground and polarization index measurement
Engine shutdown protection checks
Resistive load bank test at 100% rated capacity not less than 30 minutes at 25%, 50% and 75% loads in steps and for 3 hours at 100% load. Record all electrical parameters and vibration readings at coupling and bearings.
Over potential test phase to ground.
Polarization index less than 3 requires investigation and correction.
Load test figures shall meet the manufacturer’s figures.
Vibration amplitudes shall be less than the factory test values.
International Electrical Testing Association Inc (NETA) recommends the following table to be followed for deciding the periodicity of the above field tests as periodical maintenance tests. The next table has values that decide the periodicity in months. This is only for guidance and the actual user should justify the periods based on the actual load conditions and environmental factors.
The table called maintenance matrix table gives the multiplication factor to be applied for the period provided in the next clause based on equipment conditions which may depend on the usage and environmental factors. These have to be decided by the user and the table serves as a mere guide. The periodicity also depends upon the criticality of the equipment for satisfactory running of the total plant. High critical equipment may require three to four times the periodicity needed for a low critical item. Similarly the poor condition of the equipment due to local factors may require roughly three times more maintenance inspection/tests compared to equipment in good condition.
Equipment Reliability Requirement |
EQUIPMENT CONDITION | ||
POOR | AVERAGE | GOOD | |
LOW | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.5 |
MEDIUM | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
HIGH | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.75 |
The values given in the following table shall be multiplied with the factors given in the above table to arrive at the actual schedule in months for various equipments.
ITEM DESCRIPTION | Visual | Visual and Mechanical | Visual, Electrical and Mechanical |
Switchgear Panels | 12 | 12 | 24 |
Small Dry type transformers | 2 | 12 | 36 |
Large Dry type transformers | 1 | 12 | 24 |
Oil filled transformers | 1 | 12 | 24 |
Oil sampling | — | — | 12 |
LV/MV/HV Cables | 2 | 12 | 36 |
MV Bus ducts | 2 | 12 | 24 |
MV/HV open switches | 1 | 12 | 24 |
MV Vacuum/ SF6 Breakers | 1 | 12 | 24 |
HV SF6 Breakers | 1 | 12 | 12 |
AC/DC Motors | 1 | 12 | 24 |
AC/DC Generators | 1 | 12 | 24 |
MV Motor control centers | 2 | 12 | 24 |
Surge Arresters | 2 | 12 | 24 |
Capacitors | 1 | 12 | 12 |
Dry type reactors | 2 | 12 | 24 |
Outdoor Bus structures | 1 | 12 | 36 |
Engine Generators | 1 | 2 | 12 |
There are a number of regional standards that define the functional and testing requirements for power and distribution transformers. Universally the transformer principle is the same comprising two or three windings (mostly 2) with magnetic core and enclosure tank. For example some of the main standards available for transformers under IEC are as below:
Some of the British standards for transformers are as below.
These standards not just define the standard construction requirements but indicate the acceptance criterion for a transformer before putting it in service. The standards mainly relate to the testing of transformers at the manufacturer’s works or in an approved laboratory. This is done to ensure that they meet the specific needs of an application.
The tests are broadly classified as:
Further, like any standard electrical equipment, transformers are tested on-site before commissioning, which may be classified as
This chapter briefly covers the requirements laid down by international standards and best practices followed in industry for transformers before accepting for an application (routine and type tests) and before putting into service (Pre-commissioning tests). Maintenance related tests are covered in a separate chapter.
The quality of transformers depends on successfully verifying the performance of components that go into it.
A manufacturer is expected to ensure that the following checks and tests are conducted before/during assembly.
The above test reports do not normally form a part of completed transformers. But in the interest of quality, it is necessary to ensure that the manufacturer is in possession of all pertinent records.
Once the transformer is fully assembled, the following routine tests are recommended. These tests are to be normally carried out in the presence of the customer at a manufacturer’s works. Hence it is expected that the manufacturer’s factory includes a well-equipped testing division.
The test results are always subjected to ambient conditions and some of the figures are allowed with tolerances considering the intricacies involved in manufacture, use of different materials, etc. Following results are based on tolerances as applicable.
No load Losses | 10% |
Full load losses | 10% |
Combined losses | 10% |
Impedance Value | 10% |
Turns Ratio | Not above 0.5% of voltage ratio |
The temperature rise figures are normally guaranteed at an ambient of 40ºC unless other values are specified by the user. The resistance figures are normally referred at 75ºC.
The visual inspection is not only to check the finish of the equipment but also to cover the following issues:
The purpose of this test is to establish the copper losses which are basically I2R losses in the winding varying with load. Measurement of winding resistance is done across the terminals through balanced bridge (Wheatstone Bridge or Kelvin Bridge) configurations. Sufficient time should be given to ensure that the resistance reaches a steady state value, which happens once the core saturates with a DC voltage. The time taken may be longer if the winding inductance is high. Also it is to be ensured that the windings are not unduly hot when resistance measurements are taken.
It should be noted that three-phase transformers have the terminals connected in Star or Delta and accordingly the measurements will give net parallel resistance values depending on the configuration. For example with A, B, C, N as terminals and connected in Star, the resistance across A-B will give the total resistances of AN and BN. In Delta connections two windings will be in series and parallel to the third winding across which the measurement is taken. The main point is to ensure that the values are uniform and the copper losses are within the guaranteed figures. The readings shall be taken across the two terminals of the transformer to check uniformity. In case there is discrepancy noted, it could be due to some open winding or loose connections, which should be thoroughly checked and rectified.
The measurement of turn’s ratio is done by applying nominal voltage across the terminals of the primary winding and measuring the open circuit secondary voltage across its terminals. The expectation is that the turn’s ratio should be the same as the voltage ratio. The ratio is measured between the primary winding to the full secondary end with tap position at 0 and also by changing to the other taps of the primary winding (which are available outside for external connections). The acceptance criterion is that the turn’s ratio should have a tolerance not exceeding 0.5% of the required voltage ratio. Generally 380/415/480 V 3-phase supply which is commonly available is applied to the HV windings of the transformer for this purpose (in case of three-phase transformers, and may be lesser voltage for single-phase ones).
A transformer turns ratio instrument with leads is shown in Figure 13.1.
Polarity and vector group verification is another important test required to ensure that the secondary voltage displacements are as per specifications so that the connected protective devices operate correctly. Figure 13.2 illustrates the testing connections and the method to determine the polarity of a transformer.
The connections basically require interconnecting the phase terminals of primary and secondary windings, applying voltage to one set of winding and measuring the voltage across the various terminals caused by the induction phenomenon. As is evident from the diagrams, if the voltage measured across A1–A2 is less than the voltage measured across A1–a2 then the polarity is said to be subtractive, and if it is greater, then the polarity is additive.
Figure 13.3 illustrates the test connections for a three-phase star-star connected transformer with subtractive polarity and the result verifies that the vector group matches with the requirement.
The voltage measured across C2–A2 and C2–B2 must be equal and shall be more than the measurements between C2–c2 and B2–b2. Further the voltage across C2–b2 must be more than C2–c2 and similar result is to be checked between B2–c2 and B2–b2.
The load losses in a transformer basically comprise of I2R losses in the windings and stray losses due to eddy currents in conductors, clamps and the tank. Since stray loss is frequency dependent, the test frequency should be the rated frequency. Normally the guaranteed figures are for an operating temperature of 75ºC. Corrections will be applied to the losses measured at ambient temperature in the works.
The principle is that the impedance voltage is to be applied to the primary to get the full rated current to flow in the short circuited secondary winding. Though the standards do not say that 100% secondary current is to be flown, it is recommended to get not less than 50% of rated secondary current during this test by applying a reduced voltage on the HV winding. Then,
Since the power factor during these measurements could be very low (less than 0.1), watt meters suitable for such low power factors should be considered. Further, the three watt meter method is preferred when compared to two watt meter method (to avoid a large multiplication constant).
The no load test not only establishes the no load losses but also indicates the soundness of insulation after HV tests. Hence normally no load losses are taken before and after the HV tests to ensure that the windings did not suffer any damage due to HV tests.
No load test is conducted by feeding the voltage to the LV winding at the rated frequency. The core loss consists of eddy current losses and hysteresis losses. The eddy current value is dependent on the rms value of supply voltage while hysteresis loss depends on the average value of voltage. Two voltmeters are used with a bridge rectifier to indicate the average value and a dynamometer type to indicate rms value. The actual losses P is given by:
Where, Pm is the measured no load loss
P1 being the fraction of hysteresis loss to the total iron loss
(0.5 for grain oriented steel and 0.7 for non-grain oriented steel)
P2 being the fraction of eddy current loss to the total iron loss
(0.5 for grain oriented steel and 0.3 for non-grain oriented steel)
These tests are carried out between phases-to-ground, neutral-to-ground, primary-to-secondary with 500 V/ 1000 V/ 2000 V/ 5000 V meggers depending upon the voltage ratings. The insulation resistance values shall be in hundreds of mega ohms to ensure proper insulation. These tests are conducted before and after high voltage tests to ensure integrity of the insulation after HV tests.
Though there is no standard value for these insulation resistance values, based on experience and temperature conditions some standard acceptable values are applied to verify the soundness of the insulation. If the test results give reduced values, it is preferable to take up some improvement methods like drying out, etc, before the transformer is accepted. Table 13.1 gives typical acceptable values.
Rated Voltage kV | Safe IR values in Mega ohms at applicable ambient temperatures | |||
30º C | 40º C | 50º C | 60º C | |
66 kV and above | 600 | 300 | 150 | 75 |
22 / 33 kV | 500 | 250 | 125 | 65 |
6.6/11 kV | 400 | 200 | 100 | 50 |
Below 6.6 kV | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 |
The following dielectric tests are conducted on the transformers.
Normally, the above dielectric tests should be conducted after the lightning impulse and switching impulse tests, if they are applicable (for EHV windings) or if the customer’s specifications demand these impulse tests. Otherwise they can be conducted as a routine test.
The power frequency voltage is normally applied for one minute, where its magnitude is almost 2 times the standard voltage and depending upon the grounding method, applied to the neutral. The line terminals of the windings under test are connected together and test voltage is applied to these terminals with the other windings and tank connected to the ground. The application of test voltage is for one minute.
The power frequency withstands voltage values applicable are given in Table 13.2 and are based on the system voltage. Standard 1 values refer to effectively (solidly) earthed applications and standard 2 values are for non-effectively earthed systems.
Operating Voltage (KV) | Highest System Voltage (KV) | Power Frequency withstand Voltage KV rms | |
Std 1 | Std 2 | ||
3.3 | 3.6 | 16 | 16 |
6.6 | 7.2 | 22 | 22 |
11 | 12 | 28 | 28 |
15.75 | 17.5 | 38 | 38 |
22 | 24 | 40 | 50 |
33 | 36 | 70 | 70 |
66 | 72.5 | 140 | 140 |
110 | 123 | 230 | 185 |
132 | 145 | 275 | 230 |
220 | 245 | 460 | 395 |
The induced potential voltage test is basically to check the inter turn insulation and the main insulation between the windings and ground. The test voltage is twice the rated voltage of the winding with uniformly insulated windings. For graded insulation windings (generally adopted for 66 kV and above) the test voltage is about 1.5 times the nameplate voltage. For higher voltages it is usual to raise each V terminal in turn by applying single phase voltage to the LV winding. The neutral terminal may be raised to a higher potential to get at least twice the normal voltage per turn of the tested winding. The duration is 60 seconds for up to twice the rated frequency. However in order to avoid core saturation, the test frequency is chosen at higher value of around 150 to 240 Hz with the time of application reduced suitably as below.
The value of K may be 100 or 120 depending on whether it is a 50 Hz or 60 Hz rated transformer (with a minimum duration of 15 seconds).
For transformers rated above 132 kV, the RIV corona voltage measurements are taken by applying the potential for one-hour. A rating of 1.7 times the normal voltage is applied for 2 minutes and then reduced to 1.5 times and maintained for one hour. Radio Interference Voltages (RIV) is measured 5 minutes after the voltage is reduced to 1.5 times. The readings are taken at 5 minute intervals during this one hour. The RIV readings at any moment in time and at any terminal shall not exceed 100 μV with readings not differing by more that 20 μV. If the values/differences are exceeding these values, the tests should be repeated until the transformer can match these figures.
For voltage ratings 220 kV and above, the partial discharge measurements are also taken during this one-hour test. The partial discharge test is basically to check the possible discharges in cavities of the solid insulation and in gas bubbles in the liquid insulation or along the dielectric surfaces. Partial discharge can result due to the following conditions.
This test requires special circuits to measure partial discharges while applying a higher voltage for a considerable duration. Typically the transformer phase and neutral is applied 1.3 times the rated phase to neutral voltage value for 5 minutes and raised to 1.5 times the rated phase to neutral voltage value for 5 seconds and again continuing with 1.3 times the voltage for 30 minutes. During this entire sequence the partial discharge should not exceed 300 pC at 1.3 times voltage and should be within 500 pC during the short 5 seconds while applying 1.5 times the voltage. These tests are normally carried out for power plant and EHV transformers rated 220 kV and above. In practice however customers require this test at much lower voltages and the new standards revision currently being debated is expected to reflect that.
The lightning impulse voltage magnitudes are shown in Table 13.3 and normally conducted on EHV transformers as routine tests. The duration of the impulse is 1.2/50 μsec. One application of a reduced voltage (50 to 70% of the table values) is done after which two lightning impulses of the applicable values are applied to the terminal of the transformer.
Operating Voltage (kV) | Highest System Voltage (kV) | Lightning Impulse Test Voltage kV peak | |
Std 1 | Std 2 | ||
3.3 | 3.6 | 45 | 45 |
6.6 | 7.2 | 60 | 60 |
11 | 12 | 75 | 75 |
15.75 | 17.5 | 95 | 95 |
22 | 24 | 125 | 125 |
33 | 36 | 170 | 170 |
66 | 72.5 | 325 | 325 |
110 | 123 | 550 | 450 |
132 | 145 | 650 | 550 |
220 | 245 | 1050 | 900 |
Note:
Std 1: Non-effectively earthed systems (Resistance/Reactance grounding)
Std 2: Effectively earthed system (Solid grounding)
As a special test, chopped wave tests are often prescribed, aimed to simulate spark gaps and external flashovers across the porcelains. Dependent on the applicable standard, the value of chopped waves is 100 to 110% of the full wave values. The wave shape is similar except that the voltage is collapsed to zero after 2–8 µ seconds. The standard sequence for chopped impulse application is
The switching impulse test is similar to the lightning impulse test with one reduced full wave (75%) and two full waves of the rated impulse magnitude.
The tests on OLTC normally consist of checking the proper operation of motors, the sequence of tap changing, manual controls, etc.
The following are type tests which are optional and carried out on units if the client specifies the same. Normally these are conducted at additional cost.
The temperature rise test basically comprises of allowing a full current load to be passed through the windings until the thermometer readings reach steady state values. The source is normally a low voltage, high current one. After the steady state temperature is reached the transformer will start cooling thereby changing the winding resistance value. The change in resistance value is taken to find the thermal constant of the transformer windings and to interpolate the rise in winding temperature.
The normal duration of a temperature rise test may be about 10 hours and increasing to one day for large capacity transformers. Though this is a type test, the temperature rise within the agreed limits will give a clear condition of the transformer under service conditions.
Different cooling modes are normally tested separately. On large or important transformers a test at up to 1.5 times continuous maximum rating is often specified and is then carried out for a period of some 2–10 hours to prove compliance with AS/IEC. This is done subject to a maximum hot-spot temperature of 120–1400ºC and the performance checked by analyzing the oil for dissolved gases (DGA) afterwards.
Special tests are normally carried out only if required for checking performance. The following special tests are carried out if specified in the contract.
This test is carried out for star connected transformers with earthed neutral to determine the fault current value during phase-to-earth faults. The type of core (whether 5 limb or 3 limb) also has an effect on the value, since the reluctance paths are different in the two types. A five limb construction may have above 90% to 100% value of positive sequence impedance as zero sequence impedance, while a 3 limb construction value could be 80 to 90% of the positive sequence impedance.
The three terminals of the star winding are connected and a voltage is applied between these terminals to neutral with the Delta winding left floating. Zero sequence impedance value in ohms is equal to three times V/I where V is the single phase voltage applied and I being the resultant current.
The short circuit test is normally a destructive test and to be carried out on an identically designed transformer. The transformer should pass all the routine tests before being taken up for the short circuit test. The symmetrical short circuit is calculated using the measured impedance value plus the system impedance.
This test requires three shots on each phase at each tap, which means 9 shots are required for three phase transformers with shots at normal tap, minimum tap and maximum tap. The transformer is supposed to have passed the test if,
The noise level is an environmental issue and is necessary where transformer noise may become objectionable. The loss measurements for auxiliary pumps and fans depend upon the cooling method used for the transformers.
Though the transformer bushings are tested at the sub vendor’s works some of the tests may be repeated to check integrity. Normally bushing tests are repeated for EHV bushings that are condenser types.
Bushings are a critical part of the electrical system that transform and switch AC voltages ranging from a few hundred volts to several thousand volts. Bushings not only handle high electrical stress, they could be subjected to mechanical stresses, affiliated with connectors and bus support, as well. Power factor test or Tan δ test is basically carried out to check the deterioration and contamination of bushings. The voltage is applied in steps up to the rated voltage and capacitance and tan delta values are recorded for each voltage (using a Schering Bridge). Increase in capacitance and tan delta values over a period of time indicates the deterioration of the bushing.
The following are the important factors measured to decide the condition of a bushing.
Modern condenser bushings are usually equipped with test taps. Bushings rated 115 kV and above usually have voltage taps. Bushings rated below 115 kV have test taps. The availability of either a voltage tap or a test tap allows for the testing of the main insulation C1. The test tap is normally designed to withstand only about 500 volts while a voltage tap may have a normal rating of 2.5 to 5 kV. Before applying a test voltage to the tap, the maximum safe test voltage must be known and observed. Any excessive voltage may puncture the insulation and render the tap useless. If absolutely no information is available on the tap test voltage, 500 volts is the maximum test voltage recommended.
General guidelines on PF values recorded are as below. Between nameplate pf and up to twice nameplate pf |
Bushing is acceptable |
> Twice nameplate pf and < 3 times Nameplate pf | Monitor bushing closely |
Above 3 times nameplate pf | Replace the bushing |
General guidelines for capacitance data are as below. | |
Nameplate capacitance ±5% | Bushing acceptable |
Nameplate capacitance ±5% to ±10% | Monitor bushing closely |
Nameplate capacitance ±10% or greater | Replace bushing |
Changes in C1 testing are usually contamination issues caused by moisture ingress, oil contamination or breakdown and short-circuited condenser layers.
The C2 tests are similar to the above but the test voltage is to be limited as earlier indicated.
For bushings not equipped with a test tap or a voltage tap, the only possibility is to conduct the hot collar test. The test provides a measurement of the losses in the section directly beneath the collar and is especially effective in detecting conditions such as voids in compound filled bushings or moisture penetration – since the insulation can be subjected to a higher voltage gradient than can be obtained with normal bushing tests. This method is also useful in detecting faults within condenser layers in condenser-type bushings and in checking the oil level of oil-filled bushings after a pattern of readings for a normal bushing has been established.
General guidelines for evaluating the hot collar data are as follows:
If Watt-loss values are in the unacceptable range, cleaning may be necessary on the exposed insulation surface of the bushing. Effects of surface leakage can be substantially minimized by cleaning and drying the porcelain surface and applying a very thin coat of Dow Corning #4 insulating grease (or equal) to the entire porcelain surface.
The RIV test is done basically to determine the corona discharges in bushings at the rated operating voltage (which lowers its performance and life). Oil type bushings are normally tested for moisture content similar to other transformers.
The other tests include power frequency voltage withstand test, switching impulse tests, partial discharge test, etc., to test the integrity of the bushings.
In this section, we will learn about testing and maintenance of power and distribution transformers, which form one of the key assets in any power distribution system. We will discuss about the their installation, operation and troubleshooting requirements and testing procedures.
Learning objectives
Transformers may be located indoor or outdoor. The choice is dependent on the size, space requirements, etc. Locating indoor is more common in commercial establishments, though it does not mean industries do not have indoor transformers. Indoor transformers are recommended in commercial establishments like multi-storey buildings, shopping malls, hotels, etc considering space constraints and number of common users/ outside visitors in such establishments. However in an industrial atmosphere the substations can be properly laid out to prevent access by unauthorized personnel. Cost considerations also play a role in choosing outdoor transformer installations in most of the industrial units as this avoids the cost of the building or enclosure required for an indoor location.
In locating a transformer indoors, decisions on the following are essential:
It is quite uncommon to have high capacity transformers mounted indoors mainly because of the space limitation, fire hazard conditions, maintainability, etc. Also the transformers with HV bushings of the order of 66 kV and above are mounted outdoor because of the simplicity in bringing the conductors by overhead lines. The insulated cable connections at these voltages are uneconomical, non-feasible and also pose a lot of limitations in routing large sized cables. Hence it can be presumed that a transformer is normally mounted outdoor if it is having EHV bushings, unless special requirements demand otherwise.
Once it is decided to have transformers indoors, whether oil filled or dry type, then adequate ventilation and physical isolation is required. Physical isolation is mainly for oil-filled ones but ventilation is a main requirement for all types of indoor transformers.
The main issue with ventilation is insufficient or non-availability of free air to cool the transformer. Hence, transformer windings reach their maximum permissible temperatures with loads as low as 50%. It is recommended that the transformer room is provided with open doors/ shutters and ventilation fans to enforce forced cooling, if the layout does not allow natural free flow of air across the transformer body.
The room in which transformers are placed must have ventilation arrangements to ensure that heated air escapes readily and can be replaced by cool air. Inlet openings should be near the flow and distributed to be most effective. The outlet opening(s) should be as high above the apparatus as the construction of the building will permit. The number and size of outlets required will depend on their distance above the transformer and on the efficiency and load cycle of the apparatus. In general, about 60 square feet of outlet opening or openings should be provided for each 1000 kVA of transformer capacity. Air inlets should be provided with the same total area as the outlets.
A typical transformer mounted indoors with such arrangements is given in Figure 14.1. It is to be noted that forced ventilation shall allow cross-flow of air from one end to other end of the transformer.
Another issue with indoor mounting of transformers is the approach required during installation as well as during regular maintenance, once put into service. During installation normally the space availability may not be a concern but the growth subsequent to transformer installation in a plant may pose problems. Once installed, the access requirements may be for regular inspections or filtering and also for changing oil in extreme cases. Hence proper planning is required during initial project phases to avoid complications at a later date due to the above issues.
The transformer installation position should be such that the breather, oil level indicator, rating and diagram plate, dial thermometers, etc., can be safely examined with the transformer energized. It should also be possible to have access to the operating mechanisms of the on-load tap changer/off circuit tap switch, marshalling box, etc. The sampling valve, drain valve, etc. also should be at convenient locations.
In selecting the dielectric type for indoor transformers, the following must be adhered to:
This does not mean that liquid-filled transformers cannot be used within buildings. They would meet all of the above criteria and in addition are cheaper and smaller than cast-resin or other dry type units. However there must be a provision for total spillage of the dielectric with suitable sumps and/or bund catchments areas, such that in the event that spillage occurs the building drains would not be flooded with the dielectric liquids. If the transformers are installed on higher levels, then suitable precautions must be taken to prevent leakages to lower floors.
On the other hand the building must be made totally weatherproof and care taken to ensure that there should be no deluges due to pipe leaks on dry type of transformers, after installation. Needless to say, every installation should have proper ventilation.
It is necessary to take samples of the insulating liquid from the top and bottom of the tank and test its dielectric strength. The dielectric strength should be 30 kV or higher. If it is lower, the transformer should not be placed in service until the dielectric strength has been restored by filtration, which will be covered in the next chapter.
In the case of pressurized and sealed transformers, it is common that a pressure vacuum gauge if supplied along with transformer could read negative due to lower temperature at the site of installation, compared to the ambient temperature at which it is sealed. This is not an indication of an abnormality, but in fact an indication that the tank is properly sealed.
The major points to be considered while installing multiple transformers are:
Self-cooled transformers should always be separated from one another and from adjacent walls, partitions, etc., in order to permit free circulation of air around the tanks. This separation should not be less than 750 mm and may be restricted to around 1 meter. The access to the components of each transformer shall be ensured without disturbing the other transformers. The fencing could be common when multiple transformers are installed but minimum of two gates shall be provided.
Transformers are usually separated by 2 hour fire rated walls to avoid spread of fire and these walls normally project about 600mm above the top point of the transformer being separated.
Oil filled transformers are normally mounted indoors in separate rooms where no other equipments are usually provided except for neutral grounding apparatus, etc. But dry type transformers are generally mounted indoors along with their primary and secondary switchgears without any partition walls because the dry type transformers are installed in steel enclosures with louvers for air circulation. Since oil is not there, the chances of spillage and associated issued do not exist.
In the case of oil filled transformers, due to their separation, the switchgears are also installed in a separate room away from the transformer. The interconnections are done by laying cables and bus ducts between transformers and the associated switchgear. This necessitates proper ear marking of space and routing for such connections. However in case of dry type transformers the interconnections can be done by extending the buses similar to a switchgear lineup. The result is a compact integrated substation with all controls and equipment located at a single place.
Dry-type transformer enclosures are larger than fluid-filled because they require air circulation to effectively insulate and cool the transformer. With air-cooled transformer designs, electrical and thermal clearances are critical. Air cooling/insulation also reduce or eliminate the flexibility to incorporate other electrical equipment into the transformer enclosure. As a result, additional air insulated switchgear must be added external to the dry-type transformer. Figure 14.2 shows the typical transformers integrated with switchgear and this type of installation is also called unit substation.
These transformers comprise of magnetic core and windings like any other type of transformers with the only exception being the elimination of oil for cooling/dielectric purposes. The main reason for this type is the desire of industries to reduce the maintenance and monitoring devices required in oil-filled transformers. Accordingly these transformers may also be called maintenance-free transformers.
Since the cooling medium is absent, there is a limit to transformer capacities where dry type transformers can be economically and safely used. For example all electronic gadgets and household appliances use dry type transformers mainly because of the smaller size and also the need to be maintenance free (by the common man). Typical examples are televisions, radios, tape recorders, computers, etc.
In the case of industries that use comparatively larger capacities, FRP is the most common insulation separating the windings. FRP is the short form for Fire Retardant Paper. The insulation materials are paper, pressboards, etc., and insulation up to class H is in common use. The insulation in the transformer may be epoxy encapsulated, vacuum pressure impregnated or cast resin type. There are no major differences in these types for the end user in terms of performance and guarantees, but normally the size and cost decides the type of dry transformer used. The major advantage of dry type transformers is that they can be accommodated at any location like basements, switchgear rooms, etc, provided the minimum clearances and ventilation for cooling purposes are taken care of. A typical dry type transformer internal view will be as per Figure 14.3
Cast resin transformers are used in areas where use of oil filled transformers are not preferred due to fire risks. Typical installations are for hospitals, shopping complexes, commercial complexes etc. having multi-storied buildings with considerable power requirements.
It is well known that air is not a good cooling medium. Normally air-cooled transformers without oil are thermally less efficient compared to oil filled transformers of same capacities. Extending the same logic, encapsulation of full windings by cast resin creates yet another barrier between surrounding air and the windings. Hence the cast resin transformers are still poorer in their cooling characteristics. The added disadvantage is that cast resin transformers have comparatively lower short time over load capacities compared to the oil filled ones.
The cores and frames of a cast resin transformer are identical in construction features compared to oil filled transformer core and frame. Normally foil windings are used for low voltage side in cast resin transformers and hence they are not resin encapsulated. The cast resin transformers normally use cast resin for the high voltage windings only, mainly where the secondary is less than 480V as most of the cast resin transformers do have. It is also a practice to just have cast resin coating for the secondary foil windings instead of complete encapsulation for getting uniform characteristics.
When the resin is used in the high voltage side, there are more chances for having voids in the filling and also possibilities for resin cracking. The resin has a more coefficient of thermal expansion compared to copper conductors and almost the same thermal coefficient for aluminum conductors. Hence aluminum is a preferred conductor for cast resin transformer windings.
The encapsulation process is normally carried out in full vacuum in steel moulds. To ensure that the filler materials are completely mixed, part filler is mixed with resin and the remainder fully mixed with hardener before both are mixed together in the moulds. It is necessary that the resin should penetrate fully between the winding conductors if the windings are made of wire wound conductors. In order to minimize the resin cracking, it is necessary to control the temperature of the curing process by cooling in between. Most of the resin curing processes adopts microprocessor controlled curing process to ensure reliable encapsulation. The whole transformer is normally mounted in a ventilated enclosure unless special enclosures are required as in the case of oil and gas installations.
Oil filled transformers are normally provided with off circuit tap switch with +5% to –5% variation of turns ratio. However the cast resin transformers are provided with link terminals and the desired taps are chosen by using bolted links instead of a switch which means the transformer needs to be in de-energized condition to do any change to these connections.
Since cast resin transformers are mostly used to feed a 415V switchboard, it is also a practice to have the transformer as a part of the MCC lineup and interconnected with bus. This can save some cost associated with space and cable/ bus duct requirements of an oil filled transformer mounted away from the switchboard.
It is quite common to come across transformers mounted outdoors in old plants as well as in modern plants. The main reasons are basically the large size of transformers and their cooling requirements, which are difficult to get accommodated in an indoor installation. Hence it is quite an accepted practice to have the large transformers mounted outdoors with adequate clearances and following necessary precautions to avoid damages to surroundings which could be directly exposed to the transformers, unlike an indoor installation which separates the surroundings by suitable walls. The following are some of the major points to be considered while installing transformer outdoors:
Sometimes the transformer foundation may have to be raised sufficiently to get adequate sectional clearances to the ground particularly for open type bushings and the overhead lines that are brought to the terminals for termination. Transformers at 11 kV/ 13.8 kV may be smaller in size, but in case open bushings are provided, the height of foundation may be half or more than half the transformer height. Proper facilities shall be made to inspect and access parts of transformers during regular checks or during problems. The tank top surfaces are normally sloped downwards to avoid collection of water at the top though it does not completely eliminate water collection. It is also common practice to have large size transformers located away from the center of the active plant area. This is due to overhead conductors associated with EHV connections, which cannot be taken inside the plant area. Hence proper fencing and access restrictions shall be necessary in these installations.
For outdoor installations, a level concrete plinth of correct size to accommodate the transformer in such a way that no person may step on the plinth should be provided for transformers. Further the access requirements are the same as per indoor transformers and should be adopted. i.e. the breather, oil level indicator, rating and diagram plate, dial thermometers, etc., are to be accessible for safe examination with the transformer energized. It should also be possible to have safe access to the operating mechanisms of the on-load tap changer/off circuit tap switch, marshalling box etc. The sampling valve, drain valve etc should also be at convenient locations.
It is generally approved to have a clearance of around 1000 mm all around transformers to allow access from any side and also to ensure proper cooling. These clearances are generally found acceptable for large transformers also.
Large power transformers usually have their neutral connected to ground through a resistance, reactance, etc. In such cases it is usual to mount them close to the respective transformer and the layout planning shall include proper access and provisions for such neutral grounding apparatus.
One of the main issues with large transformers is the noise generated by the transformers. Transformer noise is caused by a phenomenon called magnetostriction. When a piece of magnetic sheet steel is magnetized it undergoes extension and goes back to its original condition once the magnetic force is removed. All transformers operate on AC systems which mean that the magnetic circuit also undergoes the cyclic changes in line with the supply magnitude changes as per applicable frequency. The extension and contraction of these sheets is not uniform throughout the length of the sheet due to the irregular concentration of impurities and hence the expansion/contraction varies along the length of the sheet. The extensions and contractions happening are not visible to the human eye but are sufficient enough to cause vibrations of the molecules forming the sheet steel. These vibrations are transferred in the form of noise, which we hear from the transformer. The noise factor increases with the size of the transformer. The level of this noise depends on the magnetic flux produced by the system voltage, which cannot be reduced beyond the minimum required values. The noise level is also due to the varying properties of steel over the length of the sheet, which is also unavoidable.
It is noted that the internal vibrations basically produce the noise and hence a transformer installation shall consider limiting these vibrations as well as limiting the transfer of these vibrations to the surroundings as much as possible. Especially for large power transformers, the installation practice plays an important role in limiting the transfer of vibration levels to the foundations as otherwise it could cause problems.
The main practice to be followed for isolating such vibrations is to isolate the core and coils of the transformer from the ground so that the vibrations are not transferred through the foundation. In air-cooled dry types this means to isolate the core and coil of the transformers from its support on the ground. For an oil-filled transformer it is achieved by isolating the core and coil from its tank base, and isolating the transformer tank base from the supporting ground.
The following guidelines could be helpful in containing these vibrations and the resultant sound:
The volume of oil used in transformers increase with the capacity of the transformers almost in direct proportion. Such large volume of oil exerts constant pressure on the tanks. It is possible some leakages could take place over a period of time. Sometimes the oil may have to be completely drained out or removed for replacement. The fault conditions leading to tank blasts would result in large volume of oil getting out of the transformers. It would be necessary that the layout shall have provisions to completely drain out the oil, which is normally done by providing oil collection pits having adequate capacity. Further the oil cannot be allowed to leak inside the room or other factory areas.
It is very necessary to ensure that the oil drained out under emergency conditions are taken in bunds and are not disposed to storm water drains or surrounding equipment foundations. This is also an environmental issue with many Governments introducing legislations for providing bunds around the transformer and safe oil disposals without polluting the surroundings.
Oil-filled large transformers are common in power plants with capacities going up to 500 MVA and using tons and tons of oil. It is common to have the foundation itself acting as a sump for the transformer oil with any oil coming out directly goes below the transformer.
In power plants, provisions are made to contain any oil leakage or spillage resulting from a ruptured tank or a broken drain valve. The volume of the containment should be sufficient to retain all of the oil in the transformer to prevent spillage into waterways or contamination of soil around the transformer foundations. Special provisions (oil-water separators, oil traps, etc.) must be made to allow for separation of oil spillage versus normal water runoff from storms, etc. IEEE 979 and 980 provide guidance on design considerations for oil containment systems.
The pits so provided would also collect water during rains and hence the collection pit will have oil and water normally when disposal is being taken up. Note that water displaces oil and any old oil spillage would be washed up from the sump. Therefore, it is imperative that this large quantity of excess oil and water be carted away as quickly as possible to deluge water treatment centers before allowing the water to enter into storm water drains. Provision should be made to separate oil from water and for containment before this separation.
It is generally preferable to keep the large power transformers separated from the main plant, mainly in industrial areas. Separation involves locating the transformer well away from all other equipment, but this may not be convenient, as there may be space constraints. The other possibility is to segregate the transformer from other areas. Segregation basically calls for firewalls to be built around transformers such that fires, if any, would be contained within these walls. This firewall or barrier must be suitably reinforced to be capable of withstanding any explosion from the transformer. The main reason for such separation and segregation requirements is because in the event of transformer oil igniting (for whatever reason), the damage caused shall be restricted to the transformer alone and its immediate ancillary equipment, and shall not interfere with any other unit assemblies in its vicinity.
It is also a recommended practice and sometimes statutory to have firewalls between transformers, when the installation includes multiple transformers adjoining each other. This is to ensure that an oil explosion in one transformer is not carried over to the other transformers. Though it is not mandatory in some countries, it is an accepted practice to have 2 hour fire rated walls between transformers which are mounted side by side. These walls are called blast wall/ fire-wall and the main purpose of the wall is to basically prevent oil splash over to the adjacent transformer in case of severe faults leading to transformer blasts and fires. Normally installations having multiple transformers have standby transformers and in such cases it is very important to ensure that these walls are provided to minimize breakdowns in power supply. Figure 14.4 shows transformers placed on foundations separated by fire-walls.
Normally the transformers are dispatched with oil filled in the transformer tanks but with removable items like radiators transported separately. Hence the balance of oil to be occupied in the radiators is transported separately. Sometimes, for big transformers, the oil is transported separately with the transformer tank filled with nitrogen gas to avoid entry of moisture during transportation. Where transformers are sent along with radiators mounted to the body, the isolation valves connecting the radiator to the tank are shutoff to avoid any leakages. These valves shall be opened once transformers are received at site. The silica-gel breather is sent separately and the same shall be fitted on the transformer as soon as possible to prevent moisture absorption. All components and transformer conditions shall be verified on arrival at site and any leakage issues shall be sorted out immediately. Any delay on these could pose problems during commissioning.
Lifting of a transformer is to be done carefully and the use of cranes is recommended considering the weight and importance of the equipment. The recommended lifting arrangement is as per Figure 14.5.
Hydraulic jacks shall be employed at the jacking points provided in the transformer, when required for transferring from the truck and when fastening or turning transport rollers. During such times care must be taken to lift not more than 2 inches at every point so that no torsional strains are imposed on the transformer body.
Earthing of transformer body is a must and it shall be ensured that proper earthing connections are provided at the transformer yard.
Transformers received at site and not installed immediately are likely to absorb moisture. Hence it is desirable to erect and commission the transformer with minimum delay. However this may not always be the case. A transformer should not be stored or operated in the presence of corrosive vapors or gases, such as chlorine. Should it become necessary to store accessories for a long period of time, they should be stored in a clean, dry place or the manufacturer should be contacted for explicit instructions on the storage of individual pieces.
Overhead high-voltage power distribution lines are prone to direct lightning strikes as well as induced voltages from strikes on the protecting shield wires. While much of this lightning energy is dissipated by high voltage surge protection devices installed at the ends of a power line, a substantial part will travel further along the distribution system. This is because of the steep wave front which imparts to it the characteristics of a high frequency voltage, It thus passes through the inter winding capacitance between the HV and LV windings of power transformers into the power systems of individual buildings. Refer to Figure 14.6.
Most transformer installations are subject to surge voltages originating from lightning disturbances, switching operations, or circuit faults. Some of these transient conditions may create abnormally high voltages from turn to turn, winding to winding, and from winding to ground. The lightning arrestor is designed and positioned so as to intercept and reduce the surge voltage before it reaches the electrical system. Lightning arresters are similar to big voltage bushings in both appearance and construction.
They use a porcelain exterior shell to provide insulation and mechanical strength, and they use a dielectric filler material (oil, epoxy, or other materials) to increase the dielectric strength. Lightning arrestors, however, are called on to insulate normal operating voltages, and to conduct high level surges to ground. In its simplest form, a lightning arrester is nothing more than a controlled gap across which normal operating voltages cannot jump. When the voltages exceeds a predetermined level, it will be directed to ground, away from the various components (including the transformer) of the circuit. There are many variations to this construction. Some arrestors use a series of capacitances to achieve a controlled resistance value, while other types use a dielectric element to act as a valve material that will throttle the surge current and divert it to ground.
Considering the cost of the transformers, it is necessary to avoid flashovers near the transformer bushings due to lightning discharges, switching voltages, etc as this could affect their availability. Surge diverters are positioned at the entrance of overhead conductors connecting the exposed bushings with one number per phase to ground located close by and mounted suitably. In case of transformers which are used for frequent switching operations like arc/ furnace applications, use of surge diverters need to be carefully selected considering the operations and likely impulses. This is because the failure of surge diverters could also affect transformers if not properly coordinated with the dielectric with stand voltage requirements.
Surge diverters are sometimes placed on the transformer tank itself when the transformer design provides for the same. Many vendors will integrate this feature in their design if the same is included in the specification. The other option is to mount the surge arrestors on separate structures between the transformer and the incoming line gantry. It should be ensured that this structure does not interfere with the removal of the transformer for major repair work. The location of the structure must be as close to the transformer as feasible.
Fire protection systems are those that are provided to extinguish fires caught by insulation and oil that can spread and damage the full transformer as well as the surroundings. There are many methods of avoiding or at the very least minimizing the risk of such hazards. Conventionally, it has been a general practice in many substations that employ oil filled transformers and switchgear, to provide surfaces of chipping and a drainage sump to transport away any oil spillage that could potentially fuel a fire. This method however is not foolproof. It has been found that over a period of time, these chipping collect dust and grime and this grime would provide the wick for sustained combustion. Alternatively, one could explore the possibility of providing a firewater sprinkler system around the transformer, which could be automatically triggered in the event of a fire.
The other system that can be employed for fire protection is the inert gas extinguishing system using a gas such as Nitrogen. The comprises of main storage cylinders and interconnecting pipe lines that can inject nitrogen gas once fire or internal explosion is detected, thus cutting-off oxygen supply. Figure 14.7 shows the operation of a scheme using nitrogen gas as the extinguishing medium.
The bulk sprinkler systems are employed only in large power transformer installations because of the cost and space requirements associated with such systems. For example, if the outage of a transformer can have serious financial impact (example: generator transformers), the investment definitely will make sense. In a distribution system, with redundant circuits, a fire-protection system may be difficult to justify. These systems have to be deployed when local statutory and insurance company requirements specify their use for safety and improved life of transformer installations.
The passive method of containing fires (often a mandatory requirement in installation standards) by providing adequately sized fire barriers was already discussed in an earlier section in this chapter. These barriers mainly avoid the spread of a fire from a transformer to other equipment in the vicinity.
For any equipment to provide satisfactory and uninterrupted service, it is necessary that proper operating procedures are followed and recommended maintenance practices are adopted. A transformer is no exception to this rule. It is well known that transformers are the main link providing power to any type of plant and its breakdown cannot be tolerated in any installation. Transformers do not have any moving parts and hence the problems associated with rotating and moving equipment are almost eliminated, except for the accessories like OLTC and cooling fans/pumps.
It is observed that a failure of a transformer may be due to any of the following reasons:
The above problems are mostly due to load conditions or deterioration of components over a period of time or due to poor maintenance. Accordingly the transformer problems and consequent failures can be classified into one of the following classifications:
A rigorous system of inspection and preventive maintenance will ensure long life, trouble-free service and low maintenance cost for the transformers. Maintenance consists of regular inspection, testing and reconditioning where necessary. Records should be kept of the transformer, giving details of all inspections and tests made, and of unusual occurrences if any. The principal objective of transformer maintenance is to maintain its internal insulation in good condition. Moisture, dirt and excessive heat are the main causes of insulation deterioration and avoidance of these will in general keep the insulation in good condition.
Electrical faults internal to a transformer can result in the following actions within the transformer windings and other parts:
Such problems within transformers usually give rise to:
Overheating: Even though the insulation will not char or ignite, temperatures like 140°C will begin to decompose the cellulose and produce carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide. When hot spot temperatures (which can be as high as 400°C) occur, portions of the cellulose are actually destroyed by pyrolysis and much larger amounts of carbon monoxide are formed.
Arcing: Arcing is a prolonged high energy discharge and produces a bright flame. It also produces a characteristic gas (acetylene), which makes it the easiest fault to identify. Acetylene will occur in a transformer’s oil only if there is an arc.
Corona and sparking: With voltages greater than 10 kV, sharp edges or bends in the conductors will cause high stress areas, and allow for localized low energy discharges. Corona typically produces large amounts of free hydrogen, and is often difficult to differentiate from water contamination and the resulting rusting and oxidation. When the energy levels are high enough to create a minor spark, quantities of methane, ethane and ethylene will be produced. Sparks are usually defined as discharges with duration below one microsecond.
The thermal faults inside a transformer are classified as:
Gases are formed in the oil when the insulation system is exposed to thermal, electrical, and mechanical stresses. These stresses lead to the following gas producing events.
When insulating materials deteriorate, when sludge and acid is produced, or when arcing or overheating occurs, various gases are formed. Some of these gases migrate to the air space at the top of the tank, but a significant amount is trapped, or “entrained” in the oil. By boiling off these gases and analyzing their relative concentrations with a gas chromatograph, certain conclusions can be drawn about the condition of the transformer. Detection of certain gases in an oil filled transformer is frequently the first indication of a malfunction as noted below:
The nature of transformer operation is normally indicated by an analysis on the following gases present in the oil:
The analysis of the percentage of combustible gases present in the nitrogen cap of sealed, pressurized oil-filled transformers can provide information as to the likelihood of incipient faults in the transformer. Fault-gas analysis can be performed on mineral-oil-immersed transformers of all sizes. When arcing or excessive heating occurs below the top surface of the oil, some oil decomposes. Some of the products of the decomposition are combustible gases that rise to the top of the oil and mix with the nitrogen above the oil.
IEC 60270 defines partial discharge as an electric discharge that partially bridges and bypasses the insulation between conductors. Such discharges may, or may not, occur adjacent to the conductor. Partial discharges occurring in any test object under given conditions may be characterized by different measurable quantities such as charge, repetition rate, etc. PDs are mainly caused by a local field enhancement, due to imperfections in the insulation, as for instance gas-filled inclusions as voids and cracks. With continued exposure to PD the insulation may fail. An early warning can be given if dangerous PD events are detected.
One method of detecting PD in large transforms is an off-line electrical test. This test requires special circuits to measure the partial discharges while applying a higher voltage for a considerable duration. Typically the transformer phase and neutral is applied 1.3 times the rated phase to neutral voltage value for 5 minutes and raised to 1.5 times the rated phase to neutral voltage value for 5 seconds and again continuing with 1.3 times the voltage for 30 minutes. During this entire sequence the partial discharge shall not exceed 300 pC at 1.3 times voltage and shall be within 500pC during the short 5 seconds while applying 1.5 times the voltage.
The more common method for on-line detection of partial discharges (PD) is the use of acoustical sensors mounted external to the transformer. One example of a commercially available acoustic emission monitoring instrument is the Corona 500, by NDT International, Inc., which is designed to detect partial discharge of electrical transformers while on-line. The main difficulty with using acoustical sensors in the field, however, is in distinguishing between internal transformer PD and external PD sources, such as discharges from surrounding power equipment. Also, localization of the fault is not possible in this method.
An alternative to the above method is by detection of ultrasonic emissions by using sensors mounted at specific points on the tank which are then converted electronically to oscilloscope traces or audible frequencies and recorded. By triangulation, a general location of a fault (corona or arcing/sparking) may be determined so that an internal inspection can be focused in that location.
These indicators are precision instruments composed of two main parts, the bezel and the body. The bezel or outer assembly includes the calibrated dial and indicating needle. The indicating needle is directly mounted on the forward end of a shaft; the other end carries a powerful actuating magnet (as shown in Figure 14.8). The bezel, when in place, covers and protects the mounting screws with which the body is attached to the flange or boss on the transformer tank or equipment.
The body is sealed against liquid leakage and encloses a second powerful magnet opposite the magnet in the bezel. The magnet in the body is mounted on a shaft coupled to the float arm. In operation, the float arm rotates the body magnet, which in turn positively displaces the bezel magnet to which the indicating needle is attached.
Liquid level indicators are usually shipped mounted on the transformer tank, or equipment, and require no maintenance. Table 14.2 gives the variations in the temperature levels for corresponding liquid levels.
Intensity | Average Liquid Temp. (ºC) | Correct Filling Level (% of Scale Above or Below 25ºC Level) |
High | 85 70 55 40 |
100 75 50 25 |
Normal | 25 10 -5 |
0 -33 -67 |
Low | -20 | -100 |
Most transformers are equipped with a pressure gauge. The gauge assembly consists of:
Maintenance of the pressure gauge should be performed if there are no changes noted during the inspection intervals (see Figure 14.9).
Temperature gauges are either of the hot spot or average tank temperature type. Average reading and hot spot temperature gauges can use a bulk-type detecting unit that is immersed in the oil either near the top of the oil level (Figure 14.10), or near the windings at the spot that is expected to be the hot test. A capillary tube is connected to the bulb and brought out of the tank. The temperature indication is provided either by a linear marking on the tube itself or by a dial-type indicator (Figure 14.11).
Dial type indicators have three sets of contacts to actuate any of the following devices:
Most dial-type gauges have red indicating needle to indicate the highest temperature since it was last reset. This reading should be recorded for each inspection interval and the needle should be reset to ambient temperature for future readings.
Routine inspections should include current readings, voltage readings and ambient temperature readings.
Prior to other repairs or inspections, visual inspection should be performed. While inspecting the transformer must be de-energized, tagged and locked-out. In general transformers have no moving parts; the only maintenance required is listed below:
IEC 60044 Part 1 specifies the testing requirements for current transformers. The major tests recommended as per the standard are as below.
The following are the type tests and these are not normally done on all the manufactured current transformers.
All the dielectric type tests should be carried out on the same transformer, unless otherwise specified. After transformers have been subjected to the dielectric type tests, they shall be subjected to all the routine tests as below.
The following tests apply to individual current transformer before each is accepted for dispatch.
The order of the tests is not standardized, but determination of errors should be performed after all the other tests.
The following are special tests that are to be performed based on an agreement between the manufacturer and the purchaser:
For this test the CT shall initially be at a temperature between 10°C and 40°C and the test is made with the secondary winding(s) short-circuited. A current I for a time t is circulated such that I2×t is not less than the square of the rated thermal current Ith2 and provided the time t has a value between 0.5 and 5 seconds.
The dynamic test shall be made with the secondary winding(s) short-circuited, and with a primary current peak value not less than the rated dynamic current Idyn for at least one peak. The dynamic test may be combined with the thermal test, provided the first major peak current of that test is not less than the rated dynamic current. The transformer shall be deemed to have passed these tests if, after cooling to ambient temperature, it does not show any visual damage, it retains its earlier recorded accuracies, etc.
Done similar to the power transformer temperature rise test with the test conducted at an ambient of 10 to 30ºC with the CT mounted in a manner representative of the service condition. If practicable this is done by measuring the increase in resistance.
The test is done by applying the applicable voltage between the primary terminal and earth with frame, core and secondary terminals connected to ground. The applicable test voltages are as per the following tables.
Highest system Voltage Um (kV peak) | Rated short-duration power-frequency withstand voltage kV (r.m.s) | Rated lightning impulse withstand voltage kV (peak) |
0.72 | 3 | — |
1.2 | 6 | — |
3.6 | 10 | 20/40 |
7.2 | 20 | 40/60 |
12 | 28 | 60/75 |
17.5 | 38 | 75/95 |
24 | 50 | 95/125 |
36 | 70 | 145/170 |
52 | 95 | 250 |
72.5 | 140 | 325 |
123 | 185/230 | 450/550 |
145 | 230/275 | 550/650 |
170 | 275/325 | 650/750 |
245 | 395/460 | 950/1050 |
Note: Choose the highest value for exposed installations)
Highest system Voltage Um (kV peak) | Rated switching impulse withstand voltage (kV peak) | Rated Lighting impulse withstand voltage (kV peak) |
300 | 750/850 | 950/1050 |
362 | 850/950 | 1050/1175 |
420 | 1050/1050 | 1300/1425 |
525 | 1050/1175 | 1425/1550 |
765 | 1425/1550 | 1950/2100 |
Note: Choose the highest value for exposed installations
Rated lightning impulse withstand voltage (peak) kV | Rated power frequency withstand voltage (r.m.s.) kV |
950 | 395 |
1050 | 460 |
1175 | 510 |
1300 | 570 |
1425 | 630 |
1550 | 680 |
1950 | 880 |
2100 | 975 |
F For windings with Um < 300 kV, the lightning impulse voltage test is done on both positive and negative polarities by applying 15 consecutive impulses on each polarity. In case of CTs having Um 300kV and above the test is done by applying three consecutive impulses on each polarity. The CT passes the test if there are no disruptive discharges and no flashovers along the external insulation.
Switching impulse test voltages are applied on positive polarity only and fifteen consecutive switching impulses as appropriate corrected to atmospheric conditions is applied. For outdoor transformers, the test is done in wet condition. A maximum of two flashovers is allowable across the external insulation under this test.
In regard to wet PF tests for windings with Um < 300 kV the test is performed with the applicable voltage while for Um ≥ 300 kV, it is the switching impulse voltage on the positive polarity.
The test is done with ambient temperature limited between 10 to 30ºC and a humidity level of 45 to 75%.
The test voltage shall be applied between one of the terminals of the primary winding of the test object and earth. The frame, case (if any), core (if intended to be earthed) and all terminals of the secondary winding(s) shall be connected to earth. The measuring circuit is provided in IEC. The measuring circuit should preferably be tuned to a frequency in the range of 0.5 MHz to 2 MHz, the measuring frequency being recorded. The results shall be expressed in micro volts. The impedance between the test conductor and earth (Zs + (R1 + R2)) shall be 300 Ω ± 40 Ω with a phase angle not exceeding 20°. A capacitor Cs may also be used in place of the filter Zs and a capacitance of 1 000 pF is generally adequate.
The filter Z shall have high impedance at the measuring frequency in order to decouple the power frequency source from the measuring circuit. A suitable value for this impedance has been found to be 10 000 Ω to 20 000 Ω at the measuring frequency.
The radio interference background level (radio interference caused by external field and by the high-voltage transformer) shall be at least 6 dB (preferably 10 dB) below the specified radio interference level.
A pre-stress voltage of 1.5 Um/√3 shall be applied and maintained for 30 s. The voltage shall then be decreased to 1.1 Um/√3 in about 10 s and maintained at this value for 30 s before measuring the radio interference voltage.
The CT is considered to have passed the test if the radio interference level at 1.1 Um/√3 does not exceed the limit prescribed per IEC. Some times by agreement between manufacturer and purchaser, this test may be replaced by partial discharge test. In such case the allowable PD value is 300 pC at 1.1 Um/√ 3.
Procedure A: The partial discharge test voltages are reached while decreasing the voltage after the power-frequency withstand test.
Procedure B: The partial discharge test is performed after the power-frequency withstand test.
The applied voltage is raised to 80% of the power-frequency withstand voltage, maintained for not less than 60 s, then reduced without interruption to the specified partial discharge test voltages.
If not otherwise specified, the choice of the procedure is left to the manufacturer. The test method used shall be indicated in the test report.
The applicable test voltage shall be applied for 60 seconds in sequence between the short-circuited terminals of each winding section, or each secondary winding and the earth. The frame, core (if there is a special earth terminal), and the terminals of all the other windings or sections shall be connected together and to earth when one winding/section is tested.
Procedure A: with the secondary windings open-circuited (or connected to a high impedance device which reads peak voltage), a substantially sinusoidal current at a frequency between 40 Hz and 60 Hz and r.m.s. value equal to the rated primary current shall be applied for 60 sec to the primary winding. The applied current shall be limited if the test voltage of 4.5 kV peak is obtained before reaching the rated current.
Procedure B: with the primary winding open-circuited, the prescribed test voltage (at some suitable frequency) shall be applied for 60 seconds to the terminals of each secondary winding, ensuring that the r.m.s. value of the secondary current is not exceeding the rated secondary current. The value of the test frequency shall not be greater than 400 Hz. At this frequency, if the voltage value achieved at the rated secondary current is lower than 4.5 kV peak, the obtained voltage is to be regarded as the test voltage.
The procedure to be adopted is based on agreement between manufacturer and the purchaser.
The test shall be carried out with negative polarity only, and be combined with the negative polarity lightning impulse test. The voltage shall be a standard lightning impulse, chopped between 2 µs and 5 µs. The chopping circuit shall be so arranged that the amplitude of overswing of opposite polarity of the actual test impulse shall be limited to approximately 30% of the peak value. The test voltage of the full impulses shall have the appropriate values based on the highest system voltage and the specified insulation level.
The sequence of impulse applications shall be as following:
For windings having Um < 300 kV:
For windings having Um ≥ 300 kV:
Differences in wave shape of full wave applications before and after the chopped impulses are an indication of an internal fault. Flashovers during chopped impulses along self-restoring external insulation shall be disregarded in the evaluation of the behavior of the insulation.
The measurement of capacitance and dielectric dissipation factor shall be made after the power-frequency withstand test on the primary windings. The test voltage shall be applied between the short-circuited primary winding terminals and earth. Generally the short-circuited secondary winding(s), any screen, and the insulated metal casing shall be connected to the measuring bridge. If the current transformer has a special device (terminal) suitable for this measurement, the other low-voltage terminals shall be short circuited and connected together with the metal casing to the earth or the screen of the measuring bridge.
A low-voltage impulse (U1) shall be applied between one of the primary terminals and earth.
For single-phase current transformers for GIS metal-enclosed substations, the impulse shall be applied through a 50 Ω coaxial cable adapter with the enclosure of the GIS section connected to earth as to be done in service. The terminal(s) of the secondary winding(s) intended to be earthed shall be connected to the frame and to earth.
The transmitted voltage (U2) shall be measured at the open secondary terminals through a 50 Ω coaxial cable terminated with the 50 Ω input impedance of an oscilloscope having a bandwidth of 100 MHz or higher which reads the peak value. If the current transformer comprises more than one secondary winding, the measurement shall be successively performed on each of the windings.
In the case of secondary windings with intermediate tappings, the measurement shall be performed only on the tapping corresponding to the full winding. The over voltages transmitted to the secondary winding (Us) for the specified over voltages (Up) applied to the primary winding shall be calculated as follows:
Us = (U2 / U1) × Up
In the case of oscillations on the crest, a mean curve should be drawn, and the maximum amplitude of this curve is considered as the peak value U1 for the calculation of the transmitted over voltage.
The current transformer is considered to have passed the test if the value of the transmitted over-voltage does not exceed the limits given in the IEC table.
The CT ratio is typically represented as 100/5 amps, 200/1 amps where 100, 200 are the primary currents and 1 and 5 the corresponding secondary currents. This ratio shall be inverse to the turn’s ratio as per transformer fundamentals.
The ratio verification is similar to the turn’s ratio test done on a transformer. The primary current is passed through the primary and the secondary currents are measured to ensure that the secondary current follows a proportionate change in line with primary current variations. The ratio test is more relevant for a metering CT where the secondary currents follow the primary current with minimum error in the 50 to 100% range. Generally, present day current transformers exhibit a good characteristic even at around 20% rated primary current.
The errors in the protection CT are permitted in the lower range and again readings should preferably be taken higher than the rated current. The main issue would be the withstand time and hence fast reading instruments which apply the current for a few seconds and automatically display the secondary current are to be used for the same.
Type tests to prove compliance with accuracy classes in the case of CTs of classes 0.1 to 1, should be made at each value of current given as per Table 54.1 at 25 % and at 100 % of rated burden (subject to 1 VA minimum). Transformers having extended current ratings greater than 120 % shall be tested at the rated extended primary current instead of at 120 % of rated current. Transformers of class 3 and class 5 shall be tested for compliance with the two values of current given in table at 50 % and at 100 % of rated burden (subject to 1 VA minimum).
Figure 15.1 shows the simple testing arrangement for verifying the CT polarity markings at the time of commissioning electrical systems. The factory test is similar in principle except for the large power source.
Connect the battery negative terminal to the current transformer P2 primary terminal. This arrangement will cause a current to flow from P1 to P2 when +ve terminal is connected to P1 till the primary gets saturated due to the DC Voltage. If the polarities are correct, a momentary current will flow from S1 to S2.
A center zero galvanometer is connected across the secondary of the current transformer. Touch or flick the +ve battery connection to the current transformer primary terminal P1. If the polarity of the current transformer is correct the galvanometer should flick in the +ve direction.
It is necessary to test the characteristics of a CT before it is put into operation, since the results produced by the relays and meters depend on how well the CT behaves under normal and fault conditions. Figure 15.2 shows a simple test connection diagram that is adopted to find the magnetic curve of a CT.
In the above circuit the current is passed through the secondary from zero to the full rated current across S1 and S2. Hence a mille-ammeter is used to measure the currents, and the corresponding voltages across S1 and S2 are measured. This basically indicates the voltage generated at the secondary terminals corresponding to the currents flowing in the winding.
The readings shall be taken until the effect of increase in the current does not generate a proportionate in the voltage. The curve is to be drawn and the exact knee point is decided where the current increase of 50% causes less than 10% change in the excitation voltage.
This is normally a destructive test and hence not done as a routine test. The short circuit ratings are generally defined to match the switchgear ratings in which they are used.
Current transformers generally work at a low flux density. Hence the core is made of very good metal to give small magnetizing current. On open-circuit mode, secondary impedance becomes infinite and the core saturates. This induces a very high voltage in the primary – up to approximately system volts and the corresponding volts in the secondary will depend on the number of turns, multiplying up by the ratio (i.e. volts/turn × no. of turns). Since CT normally has much more turns in secondary compared to the primary, the voltage generated on the open circuited CT will be much more than the system volts, leading to Flashovers.
HENCE AS A SAFETY PRECAUTION, NEVER OPEN-CIRCUIT A CURRENT TRANSFORMER ON LOAD!!!
The general safety procedures to be followed while handling HV or MV equipment shall be applicable while testing the CT.
Following are the tests recommended per IEC 60044 Part 2
All the dielectric type tests should be carried out on the same transformer, unless otherwise specified. After transformers have been subjected to the dielectric type tests, they should be subjected to all routine tests.
The following tests apply to each individual transformer:
The order of the tests is not standardized but determination of errors should be performed after the other tests. Repeated power-frequency tests on primary windings should be performed at 80 % of the specified test voltage.
The following tests are performed upon agreement between manufacturer and purchaser:
The test procedures are mostly similar to the current transformers but are reproduced to have a review on the same.
Done similar to the power transformer temperature rise test with the test conducted at an ambient of 16 to 30ºC with the VT mounted in a manner representative of the service condition. If practicable this is done by measuring the increase in resistance.
The voltage to be applied to the transformer for the temperature rise test should be one of the following (as applicable).
Class of insulation | Maximum temperature rise K |
All classes immersed in oil | 60 |
All classes immersed in oil and hermetically sealed | 65 |
All classes immersed in bituminous compound | 50 |
Classes not immersed in oil or bituminous compound : | |
Y | 45 |
A | 60 |
E | 75 |
B | 85 |
F | 116 |
H | 135 |
For this test, the voltage transformer should initially be at a temperature between 16°C and 30°C. The voltage transformer is energized from the primary side and the secondary terminals are shorted.
One short circuit should be applied for the duration of 1 second. During the short circuit, the r.m.s. value of the applied voltage at the transformer terminals should not be less than its rated voltage. In the case of transformers provided with more than one secondary winding, or section, or with tappings, the test connection should be agreed between manufacturer and purchaser.
The transformer is accepted to have passed this test if, after cooling to ambient temperature,
Typical insulation test voltages are as given in Tables 55.5 to 55.7. The test voltage should be applied between each line terminal of the primary winding and earth. The earthed terminal of the primary winding or the non-tested line terminal in the case of an unearthed voltage transformer, at least one terminal of each secondary winding, the frame, case (if any) and core (if intended to be earthed) should be earthed during the test. The reference impulse voltage should be between 50% and 75% of the rated impulse withstand voltage. The peak value and the wave shape of the impulse should be recorded. For failure detection the record of current(s) to earth or of voltages appearing across the secondary winding(s), should be performed in addition to the voltage record.
For Windings having Um < 300 kV the test should be performed with both positive and negative polarities. Fifteen consecutive impulses of each polarity, not corrected for atmospheric conditions, should be applied. The transformer passes the test if for each polarity
For unearthed voltage transformers, approximately half the number of impulses should be applied to each line terminal in turn with the other line terminal connected to earth.
For windings having Um ≥ 300 kV the test should be performed with both positive and negative polarities. Three consecutive impulses of each polarity, not corrected for atmospheric conditions, should be applied.
The transformer passes the test if:
Highest system Voltage Um(kV peak) | Rated short-duration power-frequency withstand voltage kV (r.m.s) | Rated lightning impulse withstand voltage kV (peak) |
0.72 | 3 | — |
1.2 | 6 | — |
3.6 | 10 | 20/40 |
7.2 | 20 | 40/60 |
12 | 28 | 60/75 |
17.5 | 38 | 75/95 |
24 | 50 | 95/125 |
36 | 70 | 145/170 |
52 | 95 | 250 |
72.5 | 140 | 325 |
123 | 185/230 | 450/550 |
145 | 230/275 | 550/650 |
170 | 275/325 | 650/750 |
245 | 395/460 | 950/1050 |
(Note: Choose the highest value for exposed installations)
Highest system Voltage Um (kV peak) | Rated switching impulse withstand voltage (kV peak) | Rated Lighting impulse withstand voltage (kV peak) |
300 | 750/850 | 950/1050 |
362 | 850/950 | 1050/1175 |
420 | 1050/1050 | 1300/1425 |
525 | 1050/1175 | 1425/1550 |
765 | 1425/1550 | 1950/2100 |
(Note: Choose the highest value for exposed installations)
Rated lightning impulse withstand voltage (peak) kV | Rated power frequency withstand voltage (r.m.s.) kV |
950 | 395 |
1050 | 460 |
1175 | 510 |
1300 | 570 |
1425 | 630 |
1550 | 680 |
1950 | 880 |
2100 | 975 |
The test voltage should have appropriate values, depending on the highest voltage for equipment and the specified insulation level. The test should be performed with positive polarity. Fifteen consecutive impulses, corrected for atmospheric conditions, should be applied. For outdoor-type transformers the test should be performed under wet conditions.
The transformer passes the test if:
For windings having Um < 300 kV, the test should be performed with power-frequency voltage of the appropriate value depending on the highest voltage for equipment applying corrections for atmospheric conditions. For windings having Um ≥ 300 kV, the test should be performed with switching impulse voltage of positive polarity of the appropriate value, depending on the highest voltage for equipment and the rated insulation level.
The test is done with ambient temperature limited between 16 to 30ºC and a humidity level of 45 to 75%.
The test voltage should be applied between one of the terminals of the primary winding of the test object and earth. The frame, case (if any), core (if intended to be earthed) and all terminals of the secondary winding(s) should be connected to earth. The measuring circuit is provided in IEC. The measuring circuit should preferably be tuned to a frequency in the range of 0.5 MHz to 2 MHz, the measuring frequency being recorded. The results should be expressed in micro volts. The impedance between the test conductor and earth (Zs + (R1 + R2)) should be 300 Ω ± 40 Ω with a phase angle not exceeding 20°. A capacitor Cs may also be used in place of the filter Zs and a capacitance of 1 000 pF is generally adequate.
The filter Z should have a high impedance at the measuring frequency in order to decouple the power frequency source from the measuring circuit. A suitable value for this impedance has been found to be 10 000 Ω to 20 000 Ω at the measuring frequency.
The radio interference background level (radio interference caused by external field and by the high-voltage transformer) should be at least 6 dB (preferably 10 dB) below the specified radio interference level.
A pre-stress voltage of 1.5 Um/√3 should be applied and maintained for 30 seconds. The voltage should then be decreased to 1.1 Um /√3 in about 10 seconds and maintained at this value for 30 s before measuring the radio interference voltage.
The VT is considered to have passed the test if the radio interference level at 1,1 Um/ √3 does not exceed the limit prescribed by IEC. Some times by agreement between the manufacturer and purchaser, this test may be replaced by the partial discharge test. In such a case the allowable PD value is 300 pC at 1.1 Um /√ 3.
This is normally a routine test and similar to those done on power transformers. For separate source withstand test, the duration should be 60 seconds. For the induced voltage withstand test, the frequency of the test voltage may be increased above the rated value to prevent saturation of the core. The duration of the test should be 60 seconds.
If, however, the test frequency exceeds twice the rated frequency, the duration of the test may be reduced from 60 seconds as below:
Duration of test (in seconds) = (twice the rated frequency/test frequency) × 60 with a minimum of 15 seconds.
For windings having Um < 300 kV test values are as per table based on the system’s highest voltage.
The applicable test voltage should be applied for 60 seconds in sequence between the short-circuited terminals of each winding section, or each secondary winding and the earth. The frame, core (if there is a special earth terminal), and the terminals of all the other windings or sections should be connected together and to earth when one winding/section is tested.
Procedure A: The partial discharge test voltages are reached while decreasing the voltage after the induced voltage withstand test.
Procedure B: The partial discharge test is performed after the induced voltage withstand test.
The applied voltage is raised to 80% of the induced voltage, maintained for not less than 60 seconds, and then reduced without interruption to the specified partial discharge test voltages.
If not otherwise specified, the choice of the procedure is left to the manufacturer. The test method used should be indicated in the test report.
For unearthed transformers two tests are done by applying voltages alternately to each of the HV terminals with the other terminal connected to ground (along with the other windings and frame).
The test should be carried out with negative polarity only, and be combined with the negative polarity lightning impulse test. The voltage should be a standard lightning impulse, chopped between 2 µs and 5 µs. The chopping circuit should be so arranged that the amplitude of over swing of opposite polarity of the actual test impulse should be limited to approximately 30% of the peak value. The test voltage of the full impulses should have the appropriate values based on the highest system voltage and the specified insulation level.
The sequence of impulse applications should be as following:
For windings having Um < 300 kV:
For unearthed transformers, two chopped impulses and approximately half the number of full impulses should be applied to each terminal.
For windings having Um ≥ 300 kV:
Differences in wave shape of full wave applications before and after the chopped impulses are an indication of an internal fault. Flashovers during chopped impulses along self-restoring external insulation should be disregarded in the evaluation of the behavior of the insulation.
The measurement of capacitance and dielectric dissipation factor should be made after the power-frequency withstand test on the primary windings. The test voltage should be applied between the short-circuited primary winding terminals and earth. Generally the short-circuited secondary winding(s), any screen, and the insulated metal casing should be connected to the measuring bridge. If the current transformer has a special device (terminal) suitable for this measurement, the other low-voltage terminals should be short circuited and connected together with the metal casing to the earth or the screen of the measuring bridge.
A low-voltage impulse (U1) should be applied between one of the primary terminals and earth.
For single-phase current transformers for GIS metal-enclosed substations, the impulse should be applied through a 50 Ω coaxial cable adapter with the enclosure of the GIS section connected to earth as to be done in service. The terminal(s) of the secondary winding(s) intended to be earthed should be connected to the frame and to earth.
The transmitted voltage (U2) should be measured at the open secondary terminals through a 50 Ω coaxial cable terminated with the 50 Ω input impedance of an oscilloscope having a bandwidth of 160 MHz or higher which reads the peak value. If the current transformer comprises of more than one secondary winding, the measurement should be successively performed on each of the windings. In the case of secondary windings with intermediate tappings, the measurement should be performed only on the tapping corresponding to the full winding. The over voltages transmitted to the secondary winding (Us) for the specified over voltages (Up) applied to the primary winding should be calculated as follows:
Us = (U2 / U1) × Up
In the case of oscillations on the crest, a mean curve should be drawn, and the maximum amplitude of this curve is considered as the peak value U1 for the calculation of the transmitted over voltage.
The voltage transformer is considered to have passed the test if the value of the transmitted over voltage does not exceed the limits given per IEC table.
These are both type tests and routine tests. The requirement is that the voltage error and phase displacement at rated frequency should not exceed the values (given earlier) at any voltage between 80% and 120% of rated voltage and with burdens between 25% and 100% of rated burden at a power factor of 0.8 lagging. To prove compliance with this, type tests should be made at 2%, 5% and at 100% of rated voltage and at rated voltage multiplied by the rated voltage factor, at 25% and at 100% of rated burden at a power-factor of 0.8 lagging.
The routine tests for accuracy are in principle the same as the type tests, but routine tests at a reduced number of voltages and/or burdens are permissible, provided it has been shown by type tests on a similar transformer that such a reduced number of tests is sufficient to prove its characteristics.
For measuring voltage transformers of accuracy class 0.1 and 0.2 and having a rated burden lower than 10 VA an extended range of burden can be specified. The voltage error and phase displacement should not exceed the values given in the table, when the secondary burden is any value from 0 VA to 160 % of the rated burden, at a power factor equal to 1. This requirement is mostly requested for certified accuracy of energy measurements.
The measurement errors should be determined at the terminals of the voltage transformer and should include the effects of any fuses or resistors as an integral part of the VT.
Till about 30 years back (around 1975) the oil used for transformers was produced by acid refining of naphtha crude. Basically, acid refining removes undesirable components from the oil by using sulphuric acid to turn the impurities to form sludge. The acidic sludge is subsequently removed by a centrifuge. The acid salts resulting in the process were removed by neutralization. Water and alcohol are removed by a steam ‘stripper’, and remaining polar contaminants are removed by an earth treatment. This process was costly, and disposal of the sludge had caused environmental concerns and criticism. Environmental pressures have forced refiners to curtail the use of the acid refining technique and develop new refining techniques. Presently, two types of refining, hydrogen and solvent, are being utilized by several refiners. These methods are less wasteful, potentially cheaper, and involve fewer environmental problems than acid refining. The oil used in today’s electrical industries is called mineral oil and all country standards clearly define the requirements of this oil.
Oil filled transformers are the most common types of transformers used for high voltage and medium voltage applications. Though dry type transformers using cast resin insulation are evoking some interest in medium voltage transformers, using oil cannot be ruled out for high voltage winding transformers above 33 kV. The main reason is that the capacity of the transformers with cast resin is limited both in terms of voltage as well as capacity. Added to this are the difficulties of having on load tap changers for these new types.
The major reason for limiting capacities of dry type cast resin transformers is the high temperature to be taken care of and generally these types of transformers are not suited for outdoor applications. Hence the chances of increased failure rates of cast resin types are also more if proper care is not taken for dissipating the heat generated by the transformers. Though these are very helpful in cutting down major maintenance needs of oil filled types, the limitations in capacities, etc make the oil filled transformers the preferred choice in many installations. This is especially so in power plants and utility industries which use voltages up to 865 kV with capacities in hundreds of MVA.
Since the mineral oil is obtained from raw petroleum crude, it is a mixture of a large number of hydrocarbons which only differ from one another in their structure and molecular weight. The oil in a transformer basically serves three purposes when a transformer is in service.
Transformer oil is normally a bought-out item in a transformer as far as the transformer manufacturers are concerned but their quality is vital to keep the transformers in service. The condition and safe operation of an oil filled transformer can be verified by testing the oil. This section describes the recommended tests on transformer oil and their importance, acceptable values, etc.
Typical acceptable values for transformer oil characteristics are as below and a value deviating from these values for any parameter needs immediate attention and correction as otherwise the transformer will not be able to meet its purpose and may ultimately fail during its service.
Viscosity at 400C | 11~16.5 mm2/sec |
Minimum flash point | 145ºC |
Maximum pour point | –40ºC (very cold climates demand –60ºC) |
Maximum neutralization value | 0.03 mgKOH/g |
Maximum acidity | 0.4 mgKOH/g |
Maximum water content | 35 ppm |
Min. electric strength | 30 kV |
Dielectric dissipation factor | 0.005 (max) |
Interfacial tension | 45 dynes/cm |
Specific Gravity at 15.6ºC | 0.865 to 0.91 |
Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) | Nil |
During its service the oil undergoes oxidation leading to the formation of peroxides, water and organic acids along with sludge. These products lead to the deterioration of the cellulose which is the common insulation used in transformer windings. Sludge can impair the heat transfer capabilities of the oil as it forms a layer over the winding and the tank. In addition sparks and discharges inside the transformer lead to the disintegration of oil leading to the formation of gases, which mainly remain dissolved in the oil. The early detection of the deterioration of the oil will lead to considerable increase in the life of the oil and the transformer leading to improved performance.
As we have seen earlier insulation is very vital for keeping any electrical equipment in service. Naturally with transformers being major electrical equipment its oil which serves as the insulation must maintain its dielectric properties to keep the transformers in healthy operating conditions. Hence oil testing is very important to ascertain insulation properties and other properties of the transformers as discussed in the subsequent paragraphs.
It is a usual practice for the oil manufacturer to provide a test report confirming the condition of the oil meeting the above specified parameters, in line with any bought-out item. Hence a transformer manufacturer normally does not conduct oil tests to verify all the above characteristics, while supplying the transformer. But it is the responsibility of the buyer to ensure that the oil manufacturer’s test report is submitted by the transformer manufacturer and the oil is properly handled in the transformer factory. In case considerable time has elapsed between the time of tests by the oil manufacturer and the transformer testing, it is necessary to verify almost all the above parameters by testing a small sample of oil. This is done in some approved laboratory.
Nevertheless the dielectric strength is to be verified as part of a transformer’s routine tests and it is considered healthy only if the oil conditions meet the dielectric properties as per standards.
The life of the transformer oil insulation is also based on its operating temperature as noted in the following table.
Operating Temperature | Transformer Oil Life |
60°C | 20 years |
70°C | 10 years |
80°C | 5 years |
90°C | 2.5 years |
100°C | 13 months |
110°C | 7 months |
A major reason for transformer failure is due to oil properties getting affected during operation. It is possible that the transformer may not be continuously loaded but still there could be occasional overloading and a temperature rise due to ambient conditions, which in turn affect’s the oil and the transformer life. Hence oil testing does not end at a manufacturer’s factory but has to be carried on during service to take proactive steps to ensure that the transformer does not suddenly fail. Oil sample test is one major critical test to ensure that the oil retains its characteristics during its operating life.
The dielectric strength of the insulation is defined as the maximum voltage that can be withstood by the insulation when the voltage is applied across the conductor and the ground or the conductor and its insulation which is at ground potential. However the oil is a floating medium and hence it is difficult to verify its dielectric strength in a similar way and it is necessary to device alternate means. As we have seen earlier, air is also an insulation medium the air breaks down and allows conduction in the form of a flash arc when the distance between two different potential sources is reduced below a tested distance. This breakdown voltage also reduces in case the air properties separating the live parts or live part to the ground are affected due to climatic conditions (like higher altitude areas). The dielectric test on the oil is based on this principle where two electrodes are immersed in the oil with a voltage applied across the electrodes. The oil dielectric test measures the voltage at which the oil breaks down. In case it is below acceptable limits, it means that the insulation property of the oil has deteriorated and the oil needs to be replaced or repaired to avoid insulation breakdown within the transformer oil tank.
This test setup consists of two spherical electrodes with provisions to adjust the gap between them. A high voltage is applied across these two electrodes. This is normally increased slowly from zero, by maintaining a gap of 2.5 mm (0.1 inch) with oil in between the electrodes. The dielectric strength of the oil prevents a flashover across the electrodes up to some voltage after which it breaks down. The acceptable flashover voltage across the electrodes is around 30 kV as per standards when transformers are in service, though new oil gives a value as high as 80 kV. This voltage is termed as the break down voltage (BDV) of the oil being used. Lower values of voltage indicate the presence of contaminating agents like moisture, fibrous materials, carbon particles, sludge’s, sediments, etc in the oil and oil filtration is necessary to remove these contaminants to increase its BDV.
The test instrument is shown in Figure 17.1. The oil is collected in a small beaker and electrodes are immersed in the sample. The voltage is slowly increased from zero and a provision exists to cut off the voltage supply as soon as a flashover occurs between the electrodes. The value is displayed in the digital window. The test is normally repeated for a minimum of 3 to 6 times and the BDV recorded. The average of these readings is taken as the BDV of the main oil from which the sample is taken.
Figure 17.2 illustrates how the dielectric strength of the oil is affected by impurities and foreign matters present inside. As can be seen, the dielectric strength goes on decreasing as the impurity contents increase. The oil is likely to fail if considerable impurities are present which can bring down the dielectric strength to as low as 10 kV at 2.5 mm gap.
Moisture also plays an important role in bringing down the BDV; even below the values given in the graph. The obvious way of improving the dielectric strength is by removing the impurities and the moisture. Whether a transformer is in service or not, considerable use of paper in transformer construction makes the insulation fail due to the presence of impurities and the moisture.
The variation of dielectric strength with increasing moisture content is given in Figure 17.3. It presents a picture similar to detiriotation in the presence of impurities.
Accordingly filtration of the transformer oil is a MUST whenerver the transformer is not in srevice for a long time or if it had been under service for about one year. The filtartion unit is generally brought to the site of installation and has provisions to circulate the oil through this machine. The following graph is an indication on how the transformer oil can provde an acceptable result once impurities are removed.
It is to be noted that the impurities are not completely removed after filtration but the size of impurity particles alone is restricted. Hence filtration is not the solution for aged transformers and it is normally recommended to replace the oil every five years of service. This if of course depends on operating conditions.
These units use a combination of a high vacuum treatment and fine filtration systems. High vacuum is used for extracting water, present in the form of vapors in the oil which are then condensed. This is then followed by fine filtration of oil. Finally the oil is passed through a column of activated alumina for correction of its acidity.
These units are available as mobile units or portable units, so that they can be moved from one place to another. Naturally an industry is not ready to buy these units and hence invariably these are organized through an agency/contractor. They are normally mounted on a trailer which can be towed to any location. The system is pre-piped and pre-wired and is practically ready for use. For making the system operational, only the following things are required to be done at the place of use.
Typical oil filtration units are shown in Figure 17.5.
The systems are designed to remove harmful contaminants such as moisture, dissolved gases and carbon particles and hence preserve the dielectric properties of the transformer oil. The system is also capable of removing sludge and other types of suspended solids. The system is designed on a low temperature and high vacuum principle. When a high degree of vacuum is applied, the boiling point of water and vapor pressure of volatile substances comes down drastically. Water vapors and vapors of volatile substances escape from the oil, thus improving dielectric properties. By using high vacuum systems the ppm level of moisture content can be brought down to as low as 5 ppm and dissolved gas content can be brought down to 0.1% to 0.2% by volume.
The unit comprises of following main components.
It sucks oil either from the transformer or from the transformer oil storage tank. It is a positive displacement pump.
The inlet pump sucks oil and delivers it into a heat exchanger. Electrical heaters are flitted inside the heat exchanger. Generally, oil is heated to 60ºC to 70ºC. It contains indirect low watt density (less than 2 W/cm2) bobbin type electric heaters. Oil temperature is controlled with a thermostat. A suitable oil distribution system is provided to ensure uniform flow of oil over the heaters.
It is coarse filter or pre-filter for an edge filter or a membrane filter. Some parts of sludge, free water and carbon are removed in this filter press. The pre -filter is a strainer with magnet and removes magnetic and coarse suspended particles and protects inlet pump from damage due to abrasion.
If the oil is acidic it is passed through an ionic reaction column where the acidity is reduced by ion exchange.
Oil is then pumped into an edge filter column for fine filtration, where suspended solids are easily and effectively removed.
A dehydrator is a highly efficient system in reducing dissolved gas and moisture content in oil. Also, it removes volatile acids which may be present. The number of stages for degassing and the type of vacuum pumping system depend upon the moisture content requirement at the outlet of the system.
The units are available as single stage and multi stage units. If requirement of dissolved gas content and moisture content is not stringent then single stage vacuum treatment plants are most suitable. For more stringent requirements multi-stage vacuum treatment plants can be used. Typical capacities of these units vary from 500 liters per hour to more than 10,000 liters per hour. The power consumption will vary from 10 kW to beyond 150 kW depending on the volume to be handled and the heating requirements.
The amount of moisture which can be dissolved in oil increases rapidly as the oil temperature increases. Therefore, insulating oil purified at too high a temperature may lose a large percentage of its dielectric strength on cooling because the dissolved moisture is then changed to an emulsion. Experience has shown that the most efficient temperature at which to filter insulating oil is between 20 and 40°C (68 and 100°F). Below 20°C the viscosity increases rapidly, while at temperatures above 40°C, the moisture is more difficult to separate from the oil.
The following factors govern whether the filtration is proper or not:
A good vacuum will ensure speedy and good filtration.
The oil in service gets oxidized not only because of contact with atmospheric air but also because of the large amount of copper present in the transformer. Acids formed due to these effects give rise to sludge, which precipitate out and deposit on the windings and other parts of the transformer. This affects oil circulation and transformer performance. The acids can also deteriorate the cellulose insulation.
The extent of oxidation is generally expressed as a simple number which is called Acid Neutralization Number. This number not only indicates the extent of oxidation of the oil but also identifies the extent of free organic and inorganic acids present in the oil.
The test measures the quantity of base component that is required to neutralize the acidic contents present in the oil. The test comprises of mixing the known amount of oil sample with a base compound (Potassium hydroxide – KOH) until the indicator solution turns bright pink. The neutralization number is expressed in terms of the amount of KOH in mg that takes to neutralize the acid in one gram of oil. i.e. in mg KOH/gm. Though the minimum specified is 0.03, the acceptable value under operating conditions can go up to 0.05 mg KOH/gm. However values of more than 0.1 are totally unacceptable. The difficulty in performing this test may be detecting the color change in slightly dark oil.
The surface tension of clean pure water is strong enough to allow a carefully placed (small) needle to float without sinking. Adding detergent to the water reduces the tension and the needle sinks.
Normally oil floats on water with a surface tension between a clean oil and clean water being around 50 dynes/cm. The contaminations in the oil decrease this value and an acceptable value is around 30 dynes/cm. Values below 30 dynes/cm are unacceptable and need improvement.
This test measures the tension between the oil and water content in terms of dynes per cm or mille Newton per meter. The lower the value, the higher is the degree of sludge in the transformer oil, which needs to be filtered out or removed.
This is a laboratory test where a metal ring is mounted in a beaker parallel to the surface of the water and a sensitive balance is used to measure the force required to pull the ring from the water. The presence of acidic compounds and peroxides in the transformer oil will lower the strength of the surface film of oil on water.
The new oil should have a value of 0.04 n/m (40 dynes/cm). The values fall during service and the decrease is proportional to the concentration of oil contamination. The fall of value during the initial stage is mainly due to dissolution of varnish etc from within the equipment. Subsequent falls can then be related to the deterioration of oil. Sludge formation is possible if its value goes below 0.18 n/m.
An interesting graph as per AIEE transactions 1955 is given in Figure 17.6. It shows how the interfacial tension and acidity vary with the length of service.
It is seen that the rate of change of IFT is also a more sensitive indication of early deterioration. The IFT measurements are particularly useful in identifying (at an early stage) new oil with poor life expectancy. It permits corrective actions to be taken while it is still practical and indicating when oil should be discarded and replaced. The rate of change of acidity is often a more sensitive indication of deterioration near the sludge point. However, this is only true if the oil does not contain alkali impurities. Such impurities neutralize the acids as they are formed, resulting in a low-acidity value.
New oil is relatively clear and the change in oil color over a period of service is inspected.
A sample of oil can be compared to a standard color disc assigned with a color number. The color standard ranges from 0.5 to 8.0 – the lower the number, the better the oil. Following are the typical numbers that are adopted.
Change in color may be due to moisture, dissolved copper compounds or suspended particles. The lab test is conducted by comparing a sample of oil to some color standards and applies to all types of oil including transformer oil. The color value of around 3.5 is generally acceptable. Any appreciable change in color (value exceeds 3.5 denoting darker oil), may indicate the presence of contaminations.
The specific gravity of the oil is measured by using a hydrometer. The normal value is around 0.91, which may go down to values around 0.85 over a period of time. If the specific gravity is more than 0.91, it could indicate the presence of contaminants.
A value lower than 0.84 indicates the presence of paraffin’s in the oil. However the measurement of specific gravity does not give a true picture, since the accidental mix up of dielectric liquid with lubricants, fuel oil etc, may also give values between 0.85 and 0.91, making it difficult to detect whether the oil is free from such lubricants, etc.
Further the acceptable value is normally based at a temperature of 29.5ºC. It also ensures that water remains as ice at the bottom for temperatures up to –10ºC.
This factor gives the relative percentage of current that leaks through the oil in a test cell, something similar to the dielectric strength giving the flashover value. The test cell consists of two metal shells with a small gap and the gap is filled with the dielectric liquid. Then a test voltage is applied and the leakage current through the oil is measured like a capacitance current. It is preferable to conduct this test at two temperatures viz., 25ºC and 100ºC. This is because lower temperature measurements may not detect contamination in the oil. New refined oil has a low factor in the range of less than 0.1% at 20ºC and below 3% at 100ºC. Respective values exceeding 0.3% and 4% are unacceptable.
The above factor is represented by tan δ for an oil-filled transformer. A similar test is conducted for dry type transformer where the power factor of the winding is measured by passing the current and finding the ratio of watts to VA input. This test is referred to as the power factor test.
The amount of free and dissolved water is termed as the moisture content and is normally expressed in mg of water/kg of oil (ppm – parts per million). Presence of moisture in oil is harmful because it adversely affects the electrical characteristics of the oil and subsequently accelerates the deterioration of the solid insulation as well. A value beyond 35 ppm is generally unacceptable.
The oil normally produces some vapor at higher temperatures. The flash point basically decides the temperature at which the oil releases sufficient quantity of this vapor, which when mixed with air forms an ignitable substance and gives a momentary flash on application of flame (under
certain conditions).
Viscosity is a measure of resistance offered by oil to flow without any external forces. Transformer cooling is achieved by radiators, which in turn depend on the mobility of hot oil at the top and relatively cooler oil at the bottom. Normally viscosity increases with decreasing temperature and hence the viscosity should be as low as possible (at low temperatures).
The lowest temperature at which the oil freely flows is termed as its pour point and below this point the oil becomes too viscous or gets solidified thus affecting the flow. Excessive cooling of the transformer severely affects the pour point.
Resistivity is expressed in ohm-cm, which is numerically equivalent to the resistance between opposite faces of a centimeter cube of liquid. A low resistance value represents the presence of moisture and possible contaminants. Low transformer resistance values also affect the insulation resistance value of the transformer windings.
Another important test on transformer oil under use is to take up a dissolved gas analysis to find the break up of gas contents present in used oil. The generation of gases in oil filled transformers due to sparks and arcs and severe overheating cannot be ruled out. The gases are produced due to chemical reactions during such times.
Initially the Hydrogen content was an indication for a possible fault within the transformer. However later it was recognized that there are also chances of hydrocarbons being present. For low temperature faults methane and hydrogen are generated. As the temperature of the fault increases, ethane is produced reducing the methane content. Hence the ethane-methane ratio is also an indication of the severity of the fault. At higher temperatures ethylene starts increasing overtaking the ethane content. At still higher temperatures, acetylene is produced and it ultimately becomes predominant. International standards define interpretation of gas analysis results that indicate the severity of internal faults.
The other way of testing is passing the gas sample evolved through a Buchholz relay then catching it in a balloon and analyzing its contents directly. Though both carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide are also present in the oil, it has been recognized that as long as their values remain without much change, there is no reason for concern.
It is very important to also conduct a dissolved gas analysis on oil samples. This analysis of the various constituents can provide some valuable information as to the rate of deterioration (or otherwise) of the transformer insulation.
Major faults in transformers are usually the result of the electrical and thermal stresses in the transformer oil or its insulation materials. Such excessive stresses normally produce a mixture of gases, which get dissolved in the oil. A study on the dissolved gas gives an indication of the type and location of such faults.
Electrical Faults in a transformer can result in
Similarly thermal faults inside a transformer can be classified as
Normally oil is taken out for making an analysis of the dissolved gases at regular intervals, the period normally depending on the loads and the faults faced by the transformers when in service. The nature of transformer operation is normally indicated by an analysis on the quantum of the following gases present in the oil.
1. Normal H2, O2, N2, CO, CO2, CH4
2. Abnormal H2, CH4, C2H2, C2H4, C2H6
3. Deterioration CO, CO2, CH4
Various faults in oil and insulation produce gases like Hydrogen, Methane, Ethylene, Ethane, Carbon dioxide, Carbon monoxide. The extraction of gas is done under vacuum and the gases are separated for knowing their respective concentration using a gas chromatographer.
Different faults result in different kinds of gases and hence the presence of each gas gives a direct indication of a corresponding fault. The following gases are produced under different fault conditions.
1. Over heating of solid insulations CO, CO2
2. Over heating of liquid and solid insulation CH4, C2H4, CO, CO2, H2
3. Arcing in oil CH4, C2H4, H2
4. Arcing of liquid and solid insulation CO, CO2, H2, C2H2
The percent of combustible gas in the sample oil is a reflection of internal conditions. A general evaluation is as per the table below:
Percent Combustible Gas | Evaluation |
0 – 1 | Check each transformer every 12 months. |
1 – 2 | Equipment shows some indication of contamination or slight incipient fault. Readings in this range should be followed immediately with a dissolved gas analysis. Take readings at 3- to 6-month intervals to establish a trend. |
2 – 5 | Take readings at monthly intervals. If trend continues upward, prepare to investigate cause, preferably by internal inspection. |
Greater than 5 | Remove equipment from service as soon as possible. Investigate by internal inspection. Prepare to move equipment to service shop. |
The dissolved gas analysis study may adopt any of the following methods.
The key gas method is mainly to identify the key gases that get dissolved in the oil over a period of time, which indicates whether the transformer operation had been normal or whether any internal undetected faults existed prior to the analysis.
The combustible Gas method evaluates the total ppm of dissolved gases without going into their individual components and the results can identify any of the following based on the total concentration. This is almost in line with the earlier table.
0-500 | Satisfactory |
500-1000 | Decomposition of oil in excess of normal aging-monitor |
>1000 | Significant decomposition – frequent analysis required to establish trend |
>2500 | Substantial decomposition – possibility of fault to be confirmed by testing/opening |
Roger’s ratio method compares the ratio of gases present in the oil. In the following table, 0 represents the ratio is less than 1 and 1 represents the ratio is above 1. Continuous 4 zero’s represent normal condition.
CH4/H2 | C2H2/CH4 | C2H4/C2H6 | C2H2/C2H4 | Observation |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | If ratio < 0.1, partial discharge possible, else OK |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Slight overheating >1500C |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Overheating >150 < 2000C |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | Overheating >200 < 3000 C |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | General overheating |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | Flash over |
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Tap selector breaking current |
0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Arcing/ Sparking |
The ratios of gases present are ascertained to decide the happenings inside a transformer as noted below. Table 17.4 contains the IEC recommendations.
C2H2/C2H4 | CH4/H | C2H4/C2H6 | Observation | |
No fault | 0 | 0 | 0 | Normal aging |
Partial Discharge of low intensity | 0 | 1 | 0 | Discharges in gas filled cavities resulting from incomplete impregnation or super saturation or high humidity. |
Partial Discharge of high intensity | 1 | 1 | 0 | Leading to tracking or perforation of solid insulation |
Discharge of low energy | 1 to 2 | 0 | 1 to 2 | Continuous sparking in oil between lead connection of different potential or floating potential |
Discharge of high energy | 1 | 0 | 2 | Discharges with power flow through arcing. Breakdown of oil between windings or coil to earth. |
Thermal fault < 1500 C | 0 | 0 | 1 | General overheating |
Thermal fault 150 to 3000C | 0 | 0 | 2 | Local overheating of core due to flux concentration. |
Thermal fault 300 to 7000C | 0 | 2 | 1 | Increasing hot spot temperature, bad contacts, and tank circulating current |
Thermal fault > 7000C | 0 | 2 | 2 | Overheating of copper |
Duval triangle method is an accurate and trustworthy method, using dissolved gas analysis for deduction of transformer problems. It is the most widely used technique for analyzing faults in transformers, with about one million DGA analyses being performed every year by more than 400 laboratories worldwide.
In Duval method, the cause of the problem is determined based on the concentration percentages of combustible gases evolved due to the problem. Table 17.5 shows the main gases analyzed by DGA.
Hydrogen | H2 |
Methane | CH4 |
Ethane | C2H6 |
Ethylene | C2H4 |
Acetylene | C2H2 |
Carbon monoxide | CO |
Carbon dioxide | CO2 |
Oxygen | O2 |
Nitrogen | N2 |
The method was developed empirically by Dr. Michel Duval, by using the database belonging to thousands of transformers, spanning many years. However, it is recommended to use Duval method after confirming the existence of a problem in the transformer by the presence of hydrocarbon gases and their rates of evolution. Table 17.6 below can be used as a guide to confirm the existence of a problem in the transformer. At least one of the individual gases must be at L1 level or above and the gas generation rate at least at G2 level to indicate the presence of the problem.
Gas | L1 Limits | G1 Limits (ppm per month) | G2 Limits (ppm per month) |
H2 | 100 | 10 | 50 |
CH4 | 75 | 8 | 38 |
C2H2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
C2H4 | 75 | 8 | 38 |
C2H6 | 75 | 8 | 38 |
CO | 700 | 70 | 350 |
CO2 | 7000 | 700 | 3500 |
Figure 17.7 below shows the Duval triangle.
PD – Partial Discharge
T1 – Thermal Fault less than 300°C
T2 – Thermal Fault between 300°C and 700°C
T3 – Thermal Fault greater than 700°C
D1 – Low Energy Discharge (Sparking)
D2 – High Energy Discharge (Arcing)
DT – Mix of Thermal and Electrical faults
The following Table 17.7 shows the faults ascribed to each of the segments shown in the Duval triangle.
Symbol | Fault | Examples |
PD | Partial Discharge | Corona discharge in voids, gas bubbles with possible formation of X-wax in paper |
D1 | Discharges of low energy | Partial discharges of the sparking type, inducing pinholes, carbonized punctures in paper Low energy arcing inducing carbonized perforation or surface tracking of paper, or the formation of carbon particles in oil |
D2 | Discharges of high energy | Discharges in paper or oil, with power follow-through, resulting in extensive damage to paper or large formation of carbon particles in oil, metal fusion, tripping of equipment and gas alarms |
T1 | Thermal Fault T<300ºC | Evidenced by paper turning brownish (>200ºC) or carbonized (>300ºC) |
T2 | Thermal Fault, 300<T<700 ºC | Carbonization of paper, formation of carbon particles in oil |
T3 | Thermal Fault, T<700ºC | Extensive formation of carbon particles in oil, metal coloration (800ºC) or metal fusion (> 1000ºC) |
DT | Electrical Fault and Thermal Fault | Development of one type of fault into another type of fault |
To use the Duval triangle, the following procedure is followed. First of all, establish that a real problem exists in the transformer, using table 17.8. Once the problem has been confirmed to exist, use the Duval triangle to plot the percentages of the three gases in the triangle to diagnose the nature of the problem. The percentage of each of the key gases CH4 (methane), C2H2 (acetylene) and C2H4 (ethylene) evolved in the transformer is calculated from the individual gas quantity and the total quantity of the three gases evolved after the sudden increase in evolution of gas. Subtracting the amount of gas generated prior to the sudden increase from the present amount gives the amount of gas generated since the fault began. The percentages thus obtained are then marked on the Duval triangle against each side representing that particular gas. Lines are then drawn across the triangle for each gas, parallel to the tick marks shown on each side of the triangle as shown in sample in the figure 17.4. In majority of the cases, acetylene % would be closer to zero, since presence of acetylene indicates an abnormally high temperature condition like arcing inside the transformer.
Example below shows a case study of using the Duval triangle. Table 17.8 shows the calculation of % of the three key gases for plotting of the Duval triangle.
Name of Key Gas | Quantity of gas prior to fault | Quantity of gas after fault occurrence | Increase in gas quantity | Gas increase as % of total quantity |
C2H4 | 82 | 180 | 98 | 62.8 % |
CH4 | 140 | 195 | 55 | 35.2 % |
C2H2 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 1.9 % |
Total Quantity of gas collected | 227 | 383 | 176 | 100 % |
Figure 17.8 below shows lines drawn in the Duval triangle with the above data. These lines have been drawn parallel to the tick marks on the sides of the triangle.
As can be seen, the intersection point of the lines falls within the T3 area of the triangle, which corresponds to a thermal fault greater than 700°C. Having identified the nature and the temperature range of the fault, next we find out whether there is deterioration in the cellulose insulation material by calculating the CO2/CO ratio. Let the CO2 and CO quantities in this case be 2412 and 212 respectively which gives a ratio value of 11.38. Since the ratio is more than 7 there is no concern regarding deterioration of the paper insulation (ratio less than 7 requires further investigation).
Figure 17.9 shows a triangular graph paper, which facilitates manual plotting of the lines corresponding to the gas percentages. Such a graph paper can be obtained free of charge in electronic form by email from duvalm@ireq.ca. The graph can also be plotted automatically by using software. Kelman company in UK and Serveron US provide such software with their on-line monitors. Delta-X Research company in Canada also provides such a display.
Dual Triangle should not be used without confirming the existence of a problem in the transformer, since there may always be a percentage available for the key gases and this would erroneously indicate a problem to be present in the transformer irrespective of whether there is a real problem or not.
Tight control of procedures and testing can prevent transformer faults occurring, whereas protection relays only operate after the event when the damage has been done. Gas analysis of samples taken form the Buchholz relay can also prove enlightening and reveal potential major problems. Tables 17.9 and 17.10 show typical DGA case studies for two different transformers.
Case 1: Transformer Rating: 250 MVA Voltage : 400/30 kV Circumstances : Buchholz trip but no obvious faults |
||
Gas | Main Tank | Buchholz Oil |
H2 | 13 | 1458 |
CO | 4 | 12 |
CH4 | 3 | 376 |
CO2 | 51 | 56 |
C2H4 | 3 | 204 |
C2H6 | 1 | 7 |
C2H2 | 6 | 576 |
Diagnosis: Findings: Discharges of high energy, arcing, sparking and overheating.
Flash over from dislocated connection in bushing turret.
Findings:
Case 2: Transformer Rating : 11 MVA Voltage :20/6.6 kV Circumstances : Old unit in service for + 17 years |
||
Gas | Main Tank | Conservator |
H2 | 219 | 51 |
CO | 1791 | 2300 |
CH4 | 1197 | 731 |
CO2 | 14896 | 11152 |
C2H4 | 2273 | 1880 |
C2H6 | 663 | 526 |
C2H2 | 11 | 9 |
Diagnosis: Thermal faults of high temperature. Overheated oil and cellulose.
Interturn flash over between winding layers.
Findings:
For dissolved gases, IEEE C-57-104-1991 (table 4) provides the basic clues, which are explained below:
Condition 1: Total dissolved combustible gas (TDCG) below this level indicates the transformer is operating satisfactorily. Any individual combustible gas exceeding specified levels in table 4 should have additional investigation.
Condition 2: TDCG within this range indicates greater than normal combustible gas level. Any individual combustible gas exceeding specified levels in table 4 should have additional investigation. A fault may be present. Take DGA samples at least often enough to calculate the amount of gas generation per day for each gas.
Condition 3: TDCG within this range indicates a high level of decomposition of cellulose insulation and/or oil. Any individual combustible gas exceeding specified levels in table 4 should have additional investigation. A fault or faults are probably present. Take DGA samples at least often enough to calculate the amount of gas generation per day for each gas.
Condition 4: TDCG within this range indicates excessive decomposition of cellulose insulation and/or oil. Continued operation could result in failure of the transformer.
If TDCG and individual gases are increasing significantly (more than 30 ppm/day), the fault is active and the transformer should be de-energized when Condition 4 levels are reached. A sudden increase in key gases and the rate of gas production is more important in evaluating a transformer than the amount of gas. One exception is acetylene (C2H2). The generation of any amount of this gas above a few ppm indicates high energy arcing. Trace amounts (a few ppm) can be generated by a very hot thermal fault (500 °C). A one-time arc caused by a nearby lightning strike or a high-voltage surge can generate acetylene. If C2H2 is found in the DGA, oil samples should be taken weekly to determine if additional acetylene is being generated. If no additional acetylene is found and the level is below the IEEE Condition 4, the transformer may continue in service. However, if acetylene continues to increase, the transformer has an active high energy. internal arc and should be taken out of service. Further operation is extremely hazardous and may result in catastrophic failure. Operating a transformer with an active high energy arc is extremely hazardous.
Above Table assumes that no previous DGA tests have been made on the transformer or that no recent history exists. If a previous DGA exists, it should be reviewed to determine if the situation is stable (gases are not increasing significantly) or unstable (gases are increasing significantly). Deciding whether gases are increasing significantly depends on your particular transformer.
Case Study 1
The types of gases normally generated based on different faults have been covered earlier and the diagnosis is in line with the gases shown in bold and italics and points 2,3 and 4 shown below.
1. Over heating of solid insulations CO, CO2
2. Over heating of liquid and solid insulation CH4, C2H4, CO, CO2, H2
3. Arcing in oil CH4, C2H4, H2
4. Arcing of liquid and solid insulation CO, CO2, H2, C2H2
Tables 17.7 and 17.8 illustrate typical readings on anonymous samples and it is important to interpret trends rather than absolute levels. There are no hard and fast rules that can be applied and even oil filtration/purification companies fight shy of interpreting results.
Case Study 1
In case 2, the diagnosis points more towards problems in solid insulation, which seems to match with the finding as shown in the points 1 and 4 below.
1. Over heating of solid insulations CO, CO2
2. Over heating of liquid and solid insulation CH4, C2H4, CO, CO2, H2
3. Arcing in oil CH4, C2H4, H2
4. Arcing of liquid and solid insulation CO, CO2, H2, C2H2
Serial No : 7324/3 | Design.: | TXR3 |
Customer : | Rating: | 10 MVA |
Site : | Main Sub Voltage: | 33/11 kV |
SAMPLE: B M T | ||||||
DATE | 92-09-02 | 92-11-23 | 93-05-12 | 93-07-09 | 93-08-30 | 93-08-31 |
NEXT DATE | 93-09-02 | 93-11-23 | 94-05-12 | 04-07-09 | 94-02-26 | 94-08-31 |
SAMPLE NO | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
REPORT NO | 1346 | 1441 | 16009 | 1693 | 1718 | 1714 |
H2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 16 | 55 | 41 |
02 | 35119 | 22433 | 20421 | 24759 | 21705 | 21480 |
N2 | 62326 | 58357 | 49992 | 59046 | 53134 | 63174 |
CO | 19 | 16 | 17 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
CO2 | 459 | 323 | 469 | 281 | 133 | 124 |
CH4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 0 |
C2H4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 23 | 41 | 1 |
C2H6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 109 | 5 |
C2H2 | 22 | 33 | 31 | 16 | 4 | 0 |
TCG | 51 | 53 | 55 | 104 | 211 | 47 |
TGC% | 9.7 | 8.1 | 7.6 | 8.5 | 7.7 | 8.7 |
Note: TCG is sum of all combustible gases (excluding O2, N2, CO2). TGC – the total gas content derived using a meter. TGC% is the content of total gas expressed in percentage from the total ppm of the gases present.
Serial No : 7324/3 | Design.: TXR3 |
Customer : | Rating: 10 MVA |
Site : | Main Sub Voltage: 33/11 kV |
Sampling No: 6 | Sample: B M T | |
Sampling Date : 93-08-31 | Next date : 94-08-31 | |
Gas Detected in Samples | Sample Values | Production Rates |
Hydrogen | 41 ppm | –14.00 ppm/day |
………………………………………….. | ||
H2 | 21480 ppm | —- |
Oxygen | 63174 ppm | —- |
…………………………………………. | ||
O2 | 0 ppm | –2.00 ppm/day |
Nitrogen | 124 ppm | –9.00 ppm/day |
…………………………………………. | ||
N2 | 0 ppm | 0.0 ppm/day |
Carbon Monoxide | 1 ppm | –40.00 ppm/day |
………………………………………….. C | ||
O | 5 ppm | –104.0 ppm/day |
Carbon Dioxide | 0 ppm | –4.00 ppm/day |
………………………………………….. C | 47 ppm | –164.0 ppm/day |
O2 | ||
Methane | 8.7 % | —- |
………………………………………….. C | ||
H4 | ||
Ethylene | ||
………………………………………….. C | ||
2H4 | ||
Ethane | ||
………………………………………….. C | ||
2H6 | ||
Acetylene | ||
………………………………………….. C | ||
2H2 | ||
Total Combustible Gas | ||
………………………………………….. T | ||
CG | ||
Total Gas Content | ||
………………………………………….. T | ||
GC |
A typical interpretation would be as follows:
Interpretation of historical results/trends
The high level of Ethane (C2H6) detected in sample no. 5 is a cause for concern. This is consistent with localized overheating having taken place in the transformer. The level of Ethylene (41 ppm) is also consistent with this conclusion.
Conclusion
The transformer appears to have had a localized hot spot between samples 4 & 5 but now appears to be fine. If the oil was purified between samples 5 & 6, then the results of sample 6 may not be significant and further samples should be drawn in 6 months time.
For dissolved gases, IEEE C-57-104-1991 (table 4) provides the basic clues, which are explained below:
Condition 1: Total dissolved combustible gas (TDCG) below this level indicates the transformer is operating satisfactorily. Any individual combustible gas exceeding specified levels in table 4 should have additional investigation.
Condition 2: TDCG within this range indicates greater than normal combustible gas level. Any individual combustible gas exceeding specified levels in table 4 should have additional investigation. A fault may be present. Take DGA samples at least often enough to calculate the amount of gas generation per day for each gas.
Condition 3: TDCG within this range indicates a high level of decomposition of cellulose insulation and/or oil. Any individual combustible gas exceeding specified levels in table 4 should have additional investigation. A fault or faults are probably present. Take DGA samples at least often enough to calculate the amount of gas generation per day for each gas.
Condition 4: TDCG within this range indicates excessive decomposition of cellulose insulation and/or oil. Continued operation could result in failure of the transformer
If TDCG and individual gases are increasing significantly (more than 30 ppm/day), the fault is active and the transformer should be de-energized when Condition 4 levels are reached. A sudden increase in key gases and the rate of gas production is more important in evaluating a transformer than the amount of gas. One exception is acetylene (C2H2). The generation of any amount of this gas above a few ppm indicates high energy arcing. Trace amounts (a few ppm) can be generated by a very hot thermal fault (500 °C).
A one-time arc caused by a nearby lightning strike or a high-voltage surge can generate acetylene. If C2H2 is found in the DGA, oil samples should be taken weekly to determine if additional acetylene is being generated. If no additional acetylene is found and the level is below the IEEE Condition 4, the transformer may continue in service. However, if acetylene continues to increase, the transformer has an active high energy. internal arc and should be taken out of service. Further operation is extremely hazardous and may result in catastrophic failure. Operating a transformer with an active high energy arc is extremely hazardous.
Above Table 4 assumes that no previous DGA tests have been made on the transformer or that no recent history exists. If a previous DGA exists, it should be reviewed to determine if the situation is stable (gases are not increasing significantly) or unstable (gases are increasing significantly). Deciding whether gases are increasing significantly depends on your particular transformer.
Referring to the case studies:
Case 1 : Transformer Rating : 250 MVA Voltage : 400/30 kV Circumstances : Buchholz trip but no obvious faults |
||
Gas | Main Tank | Buchholz Oil |
H2 | 13 | 1458 |
CO | 4 | 12 |
CH4 | 3 | 376 |
CO2 | 51 | 56 |
C2H4 | 3 | 204 |
C2H6 | 1 | 7 |
C2H2 | 6 | 576 |
Diagnosis: Findings: Discharges of high energy, arcing, sparking and overheating.
Flash over from dislocated connection in bushing turret.
Findings:
The TH manual identifies (in an earlier page), the types of gases normally generated based on different faults and the diagnosis matches with the gases shown in bold italics points 2,3,4 shown below.
1. Over heating of solid insulations CO, CO2
2. Over heating of liquid and solid insulation CH4, C2H4, CO, CO2, H2
3. Arcing in oil CH4, C2H4, H2
4. Arcing of liquid and solid insulation CO, CO2, H2, C2H2
In case 2, the diagnosis points more towards problems in solid insulation, which seems to match with the finding.
Case 2: Transformer Rating : 11 MVA Voltage :20/6.6 kV Circumstances : Old unit in service for + 17 years |
||
Gas | Main Tank | Conservator |
H2 | 219 | 51 |
CO | 1791 | 2300 |
CH4 | 1197 | 731 |
CO2 | 14896 | 11152 |
C2H4 | 2273 | 1880 |
C2H6 | 663 | 526 |
C2H2 | 11 | 9 |
Diagnosis: Thermal faults of high temperature. Overheated oil and cellulose.
Interturn flash over between winding layers.
Findings:
1. Over heating of solid insulations CO, CO2
2. Over heating of liquid and solid insulation CH4, C2H4, CO, CO2, H2
3. Arcing in oil CH4, C2H4, H2
4. Arcing of liquid and solid insulation CO, CO2, H2, C2H2
In this chapter, we will learn about some fundamentals related to motors, their performance and protection. In the subsequent chapters of this part we shall learn about aspects related to installation of motors, fault finding and failure analysis of motors. In the last chapter we shall learn about the aspects related to motor maintenance and cleaning.
Of all motors, squirrel cage induction motors, particularly the TEFC type (Totally Enclosed, Fan Cooled), have become extremely popular mainly because of their simple, rugged construction and good starting and running torque characteristics. The TEFC design improves the mechanical life of the motor because dust and moisture are excluded from the bearings and windings. This type of motor has proved to be extremely reliable with an expected lifetime of up to 40 years when used in the correct application.
However, the industry is witnessing failures in this kind of motors also, for various reasons, in spite of these much-improved designs and the continually improving maintenance practices. According to the statistics gathered by the ABB Group, as shown in Figure 18.1, 81% of such motor failures could have been avoided by using an accurate and effective relay for protecting the motor concerned.
Normally a motor’s operational heating curve and cooling circuit efficiency curve, as shown in Figure 18.2, can be represented as two exponential curves showing the temperature rise and drop against a particular time frame respectively. During normal running of a motor passage of load current through the winding results in I2R copper losses and other magnetic losses that will ultimately rise the temperature of the motor. This is represented by the heating curve. As the motor gets heated up, the rate of rise of temperature reduces and hence it is an exponential curve. In the same way, a running motor when stopped it looses the heat in it, to the environment. Also this temperature drop is also an exponential curve. In the normal running of a motor, the rate of heating and the rate of cooling strike a balance, specifically for a particular load.
At this point, the temperature of the motor remains constant for a particular load, at a particular ambient temperature. As the load on the motor changes, this stabilized temperature varies depending on the balance between the heating and cooling phenomena. At higher, persistent loads the motor temperature may reach dangerous values. If the motor is left to continue in these conditions, for long, the stator insulation may start breaking down resulting in the failure of the motor. Even if the motor doesn’t break down immediately, the high temperatures to which the insulation system is subjected to, will accelerate the degradation process of the insulation system. In this context it is worth remembering that higher the operating temperature of a motor the lesser the service life of the motor. Also, it has been proven empirically that for every 10 0C rise in temperature, the life of a motor reduces to half.
Hence, the basic intention of the thermal overload protection is to safeguard the motor against such overheating of the stator insulation system so as to extend the life of the motor. However, there is a trade-off between the loading of a motor and its protection. This demarcation line drawn between the load current and time is called as thermal capability curve or motor thermal withstand characteristic of the motor. Also it will have two different curves – the cold one involving no thermal trip and the hot one connected with a thermal trip. Operation of the motor above the thermal capability curve can be detrimental to the motor’s life in the long run, if not immediately, and the motor is said to be thermally overloaded. Therefore, this protection is called as thermal overload protection.
Also known as running protection, this is intended to protect the motor against only persistent overloads, while in operation. The National Electric Code (NEC) defines Motor Overload Protection as that which is intended to protect motors, motor-control apparatus, and motor branch-circuit conductors against excessive heating due to motor. This is not expected to protect the components against a ground fault or a short circuit fault. Hence a protection against thermal overloads is aimed at enhancing the longevity of a motor.
Motors can be protected against thermal overload by two broad methods – indirect method is by simulating the motor internal conditions by sensing the current flowing through it and direct method by sensing the temperature within the motor. Indirect methods employ thermal overload relays or magnetic overload relays or through differential current sensing systems. Direct methods can be are of inherent type or thermostat type. Inherent type engages bi-metallic strip to sense the ambient temperature, motor internal temperature, internal motor heating and the current flowing in the circuit. These are used for small (FHP) motors. Using thermostat type the motor winding temperature is directly sensed and the contact is used for tripping the motor. Usually it is used in conjunction with thermal overload relays.
The time constant T (tau) is defined (IEC 255-8) as the time in minutes required for the temperature of a body to change from an initial temperature θ0 to 63% of the difference between θ0 and the new steady state temperature θ∞.
Unfortunately the thermal time constant T of the motor is frequently not known. Table 18.1 gives typical values in relation to motor ratings and mechanical design.
The cooling time constants during operation are approximately equal to those for temperature rises, while at standstill they are four to six times the values given in the table.
A[mm] | ||||||||||||
Type | 355 | 400 | 450 | 500 | 560 | 630 | 710 | 800 | 900 | 1000 | 1120 | 1250 |
O | 20 | 25 | 28 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 65 | 70 | ||
R | 45 | 50 | 55 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 | 110 | |||
U | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | |||||||
A = Shaft height (mm) | ||||||||||||
O = Open Type (IP23) | ||||||||||||
R = Closed type with air/air heat-exchanger (IP54) | ||||||||||||
U = Fully clad with cooling finds (IP54) |
Some of the early designs of motor protection relays had a single function whose purpose was to protect the motor against overloading. This was done by continuously monitoring the electrical current drawn by the motor and arranging for the motor to be disconnected when the current exceeded the rated current for a certain period of time. The higher the overload current, the shorter the permissible time before disconnection. This time delay was achieved in various ways. An example is the “solderpot” relay, which relied on the time taken for solder in the measuring circuit to melt when the load current was passed through it. The bimetal type relays disconnect the motor when the load current passing through a resistor heated in a bimetallic strip sufficiently to bend it beyond a preset limit. This released the trip mechanism. In recent years, electronic relays utilise an analogue replica circuit, comprising a combination of resistors and capacitors, to simulate the electrical characteristics of the stator and rotor. The main principle linking all these methods is the design of a replica system to simulate as closely as possible the electrical characteristics of the motor.
It has in the past been common practice to detect high temperatures for temperature dependent elements built into the winding of the motor. However, this form of temperature measurement is in most cases unsatisfactory as it is not taken directly from the current conductor. Instead it is taken through the insulation which gives rise to considerable sluggishness. Due to insulation considerations, insertion of thermocouples in high-voltage motors can cause problems. Furthermore, after a fault (e.g. a break in the measuring lead inside the machine) high repair costs are encountered. Another problem is that no one can accurately predict, during the design, how many and where the “hot spots” will be.
Consequently, protection is preferably based on monitoring the phase currents instead. Because the temperature is determined by the copper and iron losses, it must be possible to derive it indirectly by evaluating the currents in the motor supply leads.
The performance of a Motor Protection Relay depends on how closely and accurately the protection simulates the motor characteristics. The ideal simulation occurs when the heating and cooling time constants of the motor windings are matched by the relay under all operating conditions. In some of the early devices, the protection could underestimate the heating time of the windings from cold and could trip before a motor/load combination with a long run-up time had reached running speed.
On the other hand, during several sequential starts and stops, the device could underestimate the cooling time of the windings, allowing the motor windings to overheat. This situation can very easily arise with the bimetallic thermal overload relays commonly used on motor starters even today. Under certain conditions, bimetallic thermal overload relays do not provide full protection because the device does not have exactly the same thermal heating and cooling characteristics as the motor which it is protecting. The heating and cooling time constants of a bimetallic relay are much the same but in actual installations it should be borne in mind that a stopped motor has a longer cooling time constant than that for a running motor. When a motor has stopped, the fan no longer provides a forced draft and cooling takes longer than when the motor is running on no load. A simple bimetallic device is a compromise and is calibrated for normal running conditions. As soon as an abnormal situation arises, difficulties can be expected to arise.
To illustrate the point, take the case of a motor that has been running at full load for a period of time when the rotor is suddenly stalled. Figure 18.1 shows typical temperature curves of the winding temperature (solid line) compared to the heating and cooling curve of the protective device (dotted line). Starting at a normal continuous running temperature of 120°C, the current increases for the locked rotor condition and temperature rises to 140°C when the thermal device trips the motor after some seconds. After about 10 minutes, the bimetal will have cooled to ambient, but the windings will only have reading 100°C. With the bimetal reset, it is then possible to attempt a restart of the motor. With the rotor still locked, high starting currents cause the temperature to quickly rise to 165°C before the bimetal again trips the motor.
Considering that a similar sequence of events as described above can again be repeated, where the different cooling times of the motor and bimetal strip allow the bimetal to reset before the windings have cooled sufficiently, and if the motor is again restarted after another 10 minutes, the winding temperature is likely to exceed 180°C, the critical temperature for Class B insulation materials. This illustrates the importance of an accurate simulation by the protection device in both conditions where the motor is running and when the motor is stopped.
Nowadays, solid-state electronic relays are able to deliver various functionalities integrated under one casing. They extend all the protections offered earlier by electromechanical relays. Apart from this, they can be programmed as universal relays suitable for even the smallest motor to even a multi MW rated motor. With the earlier relays, one was required to specify the rating of a motor for which it is intended to be used. These digital relays have lot of special features to their credit as mentioned blow:
The most recent versions of motor protection relays are digital, microprocessor based ones and have the capability to incorporate various, programmable protections. Even their prices are also making them very attractive as compared to their earlier counterparts, especially after considering the various functionalities.
Typically a new generation microprocessor based motor protection relay can fulfill the following protections for any rating motor:
All these are covered accurately with the bare minimum data that needs to be fed into the relay at site. Typical information required for the purpose are:
They use an element that accounts for the I2r heating effect of both the positive- and negative-sequence current. The element is a thermal model defined by the motor nameplate data entered as settings. The model estimates motor temperature and compares it to thermal limit trip and alarm thresholds. The relay trips to prevent overheating for the abnormal conditions of overload, locked rotor starting, too frequent or prolonged starts, and unbalanced current.
These relays typically include:
The present day concept is use of microprocessor based numerical relays for both HV and LV motors (say beyond 50 KW), as the relays come with lot of features which allow them to be interchangeable, ensures site settings and give valuable feedback on the load details whenever a trip occurs or not.
Starting and stalling conditions
As the magnitude and duration of motor starting currents and the magnitude and permissible duration of motor stalling currents are major factors to be considered in the application of overload protection, these will be discussed. It is commonly assumed that the machines started direct on line the magnitude of the starting current decreases linearly as the speed of the machine increases.
This is not true. For normal designs the starting current remains approximately constant at the initial value for 80-90% of the total starting time.
When determining the current and time settings of the overload protection it can be assumed that the motor starting current remains constant and equal to the standstill value of the whole of the starting time.
Refer to Figures 18.5 and 18.6. Should a motor stall when running or be unable to start because of excessive load, it will draw a current from the supply equivalent to the locked rotor current. It is obviously necessary to avoid damage by disconnecting the machine as quickly as possible if this condition arises.
It is not possible to distinguish this condition from a healthy starting condition on current magnitude.
Majority of the loads are such that the starting time of normal induction motors is about or less than 10 seconds, while the allowable stall time to avoid damage to the motor insulation is in excess of 15 seconds.
If a double cage drive is to be protected, it might be that the motor cannot be allowed to be in a stall condition even for its normal start-up time. In this case a speed switch on the motor shaft can be used to give information about whether the motor is beginning to run up or not. This information can be fed to suitable relays which can accelerate their operating time [Refer Figure 18.7 (a) and (b)].
Whether or not additional features are required for the stalling protection depends mainly on the ratio of the normal starting time to the allowable stall time and the accuracy with which the relay can be set to match the stalling time/current curve and still allow a normal start.
Over current protection for motors is usually required to safeguard the motor against short circuit mainly to take care of phase faults. In order to provide an effective protection, phase fault current shall be greater than starting current. Otherwise the protection will act during normal starts. In such extreme cases, differential protection shall be provided for the motor. An instantaneous, high set, simple protection provides reliable, inexpensive coverage against phase faults. The operation of this instantaneous protection may involve, typically, 70 – 130 milli second at twice the current setting.
IDMT characteristics suiting the motor’s thermal capability curve are realized using the overload units to provide protection against long duration, light and medium overloads. NEC recommends provision of such overload coverage in each phase. However thermal capability curve of a motor represents an approximate average of the safe thermal zone of operation only and cannot be the exact model of the motor. Also the overload protection requirement varies considerably with size and design.
Because of the relatively greater amount of insulation between phase windings, faults between phases seldom occur. As the stator windings are completely enclosed in grounded metal the fault would very quickly involve earth, which would then operate the instantaneous earth fault protection.
Differential protection is sometimes provided on large (2 MW) and important motors to protect against phase-phase faults, but if the motor is connected to an earthed system there does not seem to be any great benefit to be gained if a fast-operating and sensitive earth fault is already provided.
High set instantaneous overcurrent relays are often provided to protect against phase faults occurring at the motor terminals, such as terminal flashovers. Care must be taken when setting these units to ensure that they do not operate on the initial peak of the motor starting current, which can be 2.5 times the steady state r.m.s. value. The asymmetry in the starting current rapidly decreases, and has generally fallen to its steady state value after one cycle. A typical motor starting current is shown in Figure 18.8.
As per NEMA MG1 standards, AC induction motors shall operate satisfactorily at rated load, with the voltage varying within + / – 10 % of rated value at rated frequency. With a voltage decrease in this range, the power factor of the AC induction motor increases. In the same way, an increase in voltage results in a decrease of the power factor. The torque developed by the motor, whether of locked rotor or of breakdown will be proportional to the square of the voltage applied.
Average accelerating torque is given as:
[(voltage available at motor bus / rated motor voltage) 2 (rated torque)] – Load torque
Hence, due to the reduced accelerating torque, the motor will have problems in starting and reaching full speeds. Also a running motor may lose speed and draw heavy currents.
Hence under voltage protection is invariably provided for induction motors. Typically, by sensing a bus under voltage condition all the connected motors to that bus are tripped out.
The under voltage setting is normally 75 to 80 %.
Either an increase or a decrease in voltage results in increased heating of the motor at the rated load and hence may accelerate the deterioration of the insulation system, in the long run.
Similarly, over voltage can be detrimental to the insulation system as the temperature rises because of increased slip due to either an under voltage or an over voltage.
AC motors operate successfully under running conditions at rated load and at rated voltage with a variation in the frequency up to 5 percent above or below the rated frequency.
Performance within this frequency variation will not normally be as per the standards established for operation at rated frequency.
At a frequency lower than the rated frequency, the speed is decreased. Since the magnetic flux in the machine, which is proportional to the inverse of frequency at a particular voltage increases, locked-rotor torque also increases and power factor decreases.
Also this may result in over magnetization of the core of the motor that, in turn, may result in overheating of the stator due to increased iron losses. If left unchecked, this may cause severe damage to the motor.
Normally, the result being overheating that is protected separately, motor feeders will not be separately provided with this protection. Frequency cannot be different from the source to even the remotest utilization point, unlike voltage that can drop even atrociously. However the impact of this aspect being very serious the protection is provided at the source itself, be it generator or the switchgear incomer of the particular plant.
These aspects are purely applicable to synchronous machines only. During a pole-slip condition, negative currents can be induced into the field which is opposite of the normal positive current flow produced by the excitation system.
Hence, a large negative induced current with no current path will result in a very high positive voltage transient across the power rectifiers. The large voltage transient can cause damage to the solid-state devices and produce severe pitting on the slip rings.
With the application of the crowbar SCR circuit, the voltage sensing circuit will detect the positive induced field voltage and gate on the appropriate SCR to allow the negative current to flow from the field through the discharge resistor. When the crowbar circuit turns on, the rectifier bridge will be inhibited to prevent overload into the crowbar discharge resistor.
The out-of-step conditions (loss of synchronism) of a synchronous machine may occur as a result of pole slipping and hence pole slipping protection also detects loss of synchronism, but with the excitation intact.
Synchronous motors can develop torque only in synchronism. Overloading, beyond motor’s capability, may result in slowing down of the rotor. Once synchronism is lost, the motor will not be able to develop any torque. This is called ‘a motor going out of step’.
Since the rotor of a synchronous motor is applied DC voltage and the rotor doesn’t have any induced voltage, no AC voltage is supposed to be present when the motor is operating synchronously. Hence synchronous motors with brush type excitation can be easily protected against out of step or loss of synchronism by means of AC detection circuits connected to the rotor. Such circuits will detect pullout resulting from excessive shaft load or too-low supply voltage and protect the motor against overheating and the resulting damages.
Both effects may cause severe mechanical and thermal stresses to the machine. Loss of excitation protection is generally used to guard against the consequences of a partial or complete failure of the excitation. An under impedance relay is used to recognize this event.
Synchronous motors can be protected against loss of excitation by a low-set undercurrent relay connected to the field. This relay should have a time delay drop out.
On large synchronous motors an impedance relay is frequently applied that operates on excessive VAR flow into the machine, indicating abnormally low field excitation. If an under voltage unit is part of the relay, its function should be shorted out because loss of motor field may produce little or no voltage drop. Operation of synchronous motors drawing reactive power from the system can result in overheating in parts of the rotor that do not normally carry current. Some loss-of-field relays (device 40) can detect this phenomenon.
Inadvertertent energization protection is needed for synchronous motors especially to avoid any accidental closing of the breaker when the supply to the motor fails and the motor is coasting down. Due to the stored energy in the drive, especially from the driven side, motor starts acting like a Generator. Under such circumstances, the supply being restored will be out of phase with motor generated voltage and there can be a resultant flashover.
While giving permissive start to a motor, there can be an accidental energization which can cause physical damages to the equipment in spite of all precautions to avoid closing of the breaker of a motor satisfying all the mandatory conditions.
At frequencies lower than the rated frequency, the speed decreases. Since the magnetic flux in the machine, which is proportional to the inverse of frequency at a particular voltage increases, locked-rotor torque also increases and power factor decreases. Also this may result in over magnetization of the core of the motor that in turn may result in overheating of the stator, due to increased iron losses. If left unchecked, further fall in frequency will result in saturation of the magnetic core thereby impairing its torque delivering capability.
This kind of protection must invariably be provided in applications where the frequency of the supply is varied in order to obtain variable speeds. All modern day variable frequency drives have this protection built into the logics and hence they are called as variable voltage variable frequency drives, VVVF drives in short.
By reducing the over fluxing of the motor, and hence the iron losses, the motor runs cooler and more efficiently, the power factor is maintained at the most appropriate value for every condition of load, which, in turn, reduces the apparent reactive power. This will bring about a significant reduction in the apparent power demand which may reduce the input real power as well. This kind of protection is popularly known as V/Hz protection or “V / f” control.
Stall condition of a motor is the result of a hard-to-start load causing a blockage of its rotation. This results in the motor drawing heavy current without any scope for reduction on its own. One of the easiest ways to detect such conditions is sensing of the motor’s speed. It can safely be concluded that motor is stalled, if the zero speed (standstill) condition of the motor continues, even after energizing the motor. However, it may not always be feasible to provide such detection and the circuits must depend on the current drawing pattern to discriminate against a normal starting current. The motor manufacturer will give the motor’s withstanding capability. The protection must be strictly in agreement with this. Else the motor will be seriously damaged.
This majority of loads are such that the starting time of normal induction motors is about or less than 10 seconds, while the allowable stall time to avoid damage to the motor insulation is in excess of 15 seconds. It may not always be possible to distinguish this condition from a healthy starting condition on current magnitude, especially using the conventional thermal overload detection models.
A typical stalling protection circuit is able to determine stalling based on the current drawn and the duration of the current flow, instead of depending on the simulation of a thermal model, providing a reliable protection for the motor.
Acceleration time for electric motors is directly proportional to total inertia and inversely proportional to the electric motor torque. For electric motors with constant acceleration torque, acceleration time is:
where WK2 = rotational inertia in lb-ft2, (N2 – N1) = the speed difference, and Tx = acceleration torque in lb-ft.
Acceleration torque decreases with the motor’s voltage squared. It decreases with the load torque, which normally increases as a function of the increasing speed, and higher frictional losses and windage losses. Hence it can be summed up as a composite function of several parameters and cannot be a constant throughout its starting period. An approximation method is necessary to find the electric motor’s acceleration time if the acceleration torque is not linear during speed increase. The quickest method is to break up the speed versus torque curves of the electric motor and the driven machine into segments and calculate acceleration time for each segment. Accurate electric motor acceleration times usually result.
Typical startup supervision includes monitoring of the time taken for the motor to draw the huge inrush current. Out of experience and through the wisdom passed on by the fore-runners, it has been a regular practice to keep the record of the starting details of various, especially critical, motors of higher rating (above 200 kW). Such a typical record would contain the date and time of starting, the supply voltage in all the three lines, starting current range, as it declines over the period of starting, the starting time – right from the breaker closure to the resumption of normal current, breaker operation counter reading etc.
However all such data is being logged by the modern day, intelligent relays and even some of them support additional information. Apart from the regular features they give information about harmonic current, thermal parameters like the equivalent heat generated etc. Based on such data it will be possible to see the time remaining for the thermal overload to act at the present load. Accordingly, the operational personnel can be warned. In case the motor trips on overload, instead of relying on the conventional number of starts, the time required for a safe restart will be made available through the algorithm incorporated in it and based on the data entered by the user & actual data acquired by it.
The voltage supplied to a three phase motor can be unbalanced for a variety of reasons: single phase loads, blown fuses in p.f. improvement capacitors etc. In addition, the accidental opening of one phase lead in the supply to the motor can leave the motor running, supplied by two phases only.
It might seem that the degree of voltage unbalance met within a normal installation (except when one phase is open circuited) would not affect the motor to any great extent, but this is not so. It should be remembered that it is not the unbalanced voltage that is important but the relatively much larger negative sequence component of the unbalance current, resulting from the unbalanced voltage.
Loss of one phase represents the most dangerous case of unbalance. It is therefore essential for motors that are protected again short circuit by fuses (limited breaking capacitor of the breaker) to be equipped with fast operating loss of phase protection.
Voltage unbalance is defined as the percentage maximum voltage deviation from average voltage with respect to the average voltage. Higher voltage unbalances will result in reduced efficiency, overheating of the motor calling for derating of the power rating of the motor. This is because, rated performance of polyphase motors assumes a balanced power supply at the motor terminals and hence, unbalanced voltage affects the motor’s current, speed, torque, temperature rise and efficiency. A minor voltage unbalance in voltage significantly increases the losses and reduces the efficiency considerably. For instance, it is noticed that the usage an energy efficient motor that can reduce the losses by 20 % was offset by a voltage unbalance of 3.5 % on the energy front.
NEMA Standard MG 1–14.35, recommends the derating of the motor where the voltage unbalance is between 1% and 5% beyond which operation shall not continue.
Basically, unbalanced voltages, single phasing in the extreme case, will give rise to a pulsating flux in the rotor bars. This will result in uneven heating of the rotor bars and hence localized overheating will be taking place. Uneven expansion due to the localized heat of the rotor bars can be detrimental to the rotor’s integrity. This can result in the development of cracks ending up finally as rotor bar failures.
However this kind of protection against unbalanced voltages will safeguard the motor against an unbalance based on the magnitude of the voltages. This can turn out to be a sort-of-overbearing for the motor. The motor may be able to continue in service, satisfactorily, even with an appreciable amount of unbalance – that may not result in too dangerous overheating. To detect whether the unbalance can have a deleterious effect or not, it is required to analyze the three phase voltages both by means of the phase angle as well as magnitude difference, not just magnitude alone. This gives a picture about the quantum of negative sequence currents that are present, which will be contributing to the ultimate additional overheating of the rotor winding.
Analysis of negative sequence currents (one of the three symmetrical components of any type of current) are particularly of more importance in the case of large rating motors (1000 HP and above).
Symmetrical components of three phase currents consist of:
Negative- and zero-sequence currents are usually only present in substantial levels during unbalanced, faulted conditions.
The method of symmetrical components consists of reducing any unbalanced three phase systems of vectors into three balanced systems: the positive, negative and zero sequence components. The positive sequence components consist of three vectors equal in magnitude 120° out of phase, with the same phase sequence or rotation as that of the source of supply. The negative sequence components are three vectors equal in magnitude, displayed by 120° with a phase sequence opposite to the positive sequence. The zero sequence components consist of three vectors equal in magnitude and in a phase.
Larger rating motors are more prone to dangers arising out of negative sequence currents flowing. The presence of negative sequence can be expressed as a percentage with respect to the positive sequence currents.
Based on this value, the motor rating needs to be derated. The derating effect is more pronounced in the case of motors with high starting current to running current ratio. For example a motor with this ratio as 6 (starting current = 6 times the full load current) needs to be derated by 20 % for an unbalance (100 * negative sequence current / positive sequence current) of 5 %. For the same level of unbalance, a motor with this ratio as 4 needs to be derated by less than 10 %.
The reduction in output for the machines having ratios of starting to running current of 4, 6 and 8 respectively is shown in Figure 18.10.
The performance of AC induction motors, or for that sake any equipment, is influenced by various factors like ambient temperature, quality of the incoming power supply etc. these factors need to be specified explicitly while procuring, especially when the operating conditions differ widely from the standard values. For instance, when an induction motor is required to be operated at an ambient temperature exceeding 40 degree C, it must be clearly spelled out at the procurement stage itself.
Once a standard motor is available and needs to be utilized for an application with the operating conditions differing from the originally intended ones, the motor’s rating has to be suitably derated.
The factors that need to be considered in derating a motor’s performance are:
AC motors are designed to operate on voltages and frequencies that are well standardized. For example, NEMA standards specify voltage ratings of 380 V, 400 V, 415 V … at 50 Hz. Similarly, for 60 Hz of supply frequency, voltage ratings of 115 V, 200 V, 230 V, 460 V, 575 V are standardized.
A small variation in supply voltage can have a great influence on a motor’s performance. For example, when the voltage is 10% below the rated voltage of the motor, the motor has 20% less starting torque. This reduced voltage may prevent the motor from getting its load started or keeping it running at rated speed. A 10% increase in supply voltage, on the other hand, increases the starting torque by 20%. This increased torque may cause damage during startup. A conveyor, for example, may lurch forward at startup.
A voltage variation will cause similar changes in the motor’s starting amps, full-load amps, and temperature rise. It can be generalized that a 10 % rise in voltage will result in an increase in motor performance of 20 %.
In the same way, an increase in frequency of 5 % results in a corresponding increase in the speed and a 10 % decrease in the motor starting torque. Conversely, a decrease in the supply frequency by 5 % results in a proportionate reduction in speed and a 11 % increase in the starting torque. Hence suitable corrections have to be applied to the standard motors accordingly.
Standard motors are designed to operate below 3300 feet (1000 m). The motors operating at temperatures above 1000 meters have to be derated because of the impaired cooling of the motor due to the light air at higher altitudes. The thin air at higher altitudes will have less cooling effect on the motor as the net heat transfer, due to the reduced air mass, goes down. At an altitude of above 5000 ft, the derating factor becomes 0.94. Roughly for every 1600 feet rise in altitude, the derating factor reduces by 0.04.
Faults that occur within the motor windings are mainly earth faults caused by a breakdown in the winding insulation. This type of fault can be very easily detected by means of an instantaneous relay, usually with a setting of approximately 20% of the motor full load current, connected in the residual circuit of three current transformers.
It is important to note that unbalanced load currents do not cause nuisance earth-fault trips. If there is no leakage to earth, unbalanced load currents add to zero and do not cause an output from a core-balance CT.
Care must be taken to ensure that the relay does not operate from spill current due to the saturation of one or more current transformers during the initial peak of the starting current; this can be as high as 2.5 times the steady state r.m.s value, and may cause operation, given the fast operating speed of the normal relay. To achieve stability under these conditions, it is usual to increase the minimum operating voltage of the relay by inserting a stabilizing resistor in series with it (refer Figure 18.11).
Current sensing is the best method to detect and locate earth faults. However, system capacitance, unbalanced loads, current-sensor limitations, and harmonics affect current measurement and limit the lower level of practical earth-fault detection.
Current flowing to earth has only two paths—it can flow to earth through an earth fault or it can flow to earth through distributed capacitance. Current flowing to earth through distributed capacitance can cause sympathetic tripping during an earth fault and it can cause nuisance tripping during normal operation. If the earth-fault trip level is high enough to eliminate sympathetic tripping, nuisance tripping due to unbalanced and harmonic capacitive current is usually not a problem. Charging current is defined as the current that flows to earth when one phase of an unearthed system is faulted to earth.
When a motor is started across the line, the inrush current can have a DC-offset component that can cause an output from a core-balance current transformer. Such transient characteristics are unpredictable because the switch can close at any point in the electrical cycle. Transient conditions typically last less than 100 ms and nuisance earth-fault trips can be avoided by setting a longer trip delay time or by using a digital filter to reject the dc component. All current transformers, including the window-type core-balance CTs used to detect earth-fault (zero-sequence) current, have practical limitations. A minimum excitation current is required in the primary coil before there can be a proportional output current. Excitation current is a function of burden, CT construction, and size. Sensitive earth-fault detection requires excitation current to be small. A large fault current, such as a phase-to-phase fault or an earth fault on a solidly earthed system, can saturate a current transformer. Saturation occurs when a CT cannot maintain a secondary current waveform proportional to a large primary current. Secondary current characteristics in this case are unpredictable and earth-fault protection may not operate. Stability against external faults is guaranteed thanks to the use of a stabilizing resistor.
To detect high-impedance faults and provide machine-winding protection, the earth-fault current pickup level should be less than 20% of the prospective earth-fault current. The pickup level of all system earth-fault protection devices should be the same, and coordination should be accomplished by varying trip delay times.
A digital motor protection relays, typically, require the following details to be entered / programmed into the unit (the appropriate calculations / justifications for the settings are indicated in the remarks column). As an example, protective relay (microprocessor based relay) settings for a 700 kW, 3.3 kV, 147A squirrel cage induction motor driving a fan having an acceleration time of 44 seconds is considered and the settings will be as shown in Table 18.2. Example of a typical protection logic for a synchronous motor and an induction motor are shown in Figures 18.12 and 18.13 respectively.
However, most recent developments have made this new generation, digital (microprocessor based) relays much more intelligent, requiring very few parameters to be set by the user at site. At the same time they provide very fast, reliable response in clearing the faults.
ANSI Device numbers used in these circuits:
12 = Over speed
24 = Over excitation
25 = Synchronization check
27 = Bus/Line under voltage
32 = Reverse power (anti-motoring)
38 = Over temperature (RTD)
39 = Bearing vibration
40 = Loss of excitation
46 = Negative sequence / unbalance (phase current imbalance)
47 = Negative sequence under voltage (phase voltage imbalance)
49 = Bearing over temp (RTD)
50 = Instantaneous over current
51 = Time over current
51V = Time over current — voltage restrained
55 = Power factor
59 = Bus over voltage
60FL = Voltage transformer fuse failure
67 = Phase/Ground directional current
79 = Auto re-close
81 = Bus over / under frequency
37 Under current
48 Incomplete Sequence
49S (26) Locked Rotor
49/51 Over load
50 Short Circuit
50GS/51GS Ground Fault
51R Jam (Running)
59 Over voltage
60V Voltage unbalance
62 Timer
66 Successive
81L/H Under-and Over frequency
87M Differential
86M Lock-out Auxiliary
Addl. Protection for a Synchronous motor:
26F Ammortisseur Winding Over temperature
(Include if field is accessible)
27DC Under voltage Relay
37 Undercurrent
50 Short Circuit
55 Out of Step Protection/Power Factor
95 Reluctance Torque Synchronizing and Re-Synchronizing
96 Auto loading/Unloading Relay
Modern power electronic AC VVVF converters, which are used for the speed control of electric motors, are usually supplied as stand-alone units with one of the following configurations:
The first two are the most common configurations.
The manufacturer’s recommendations for installation should be carefully followed and implemented. The voltages present in power supply cables; motor cables and other power terminations are capable of causing severe electrical shock.
In particular, the local requirements for Safety, which is outlined in the wiring rules and other codes of practice should always take priority over manufacturer’s recommendations. The recommended safety earthing connections should be carefully installed before any power is connected to the Variable Speed Drive equipment.
AC Variable Speed Drives have large capacitors connected across the DC link. After a VSD is switched off, a period of several minutes must be allowed to elapse before any work commences on the equipment. This is necessary to allow these internal capacitors to fully discharge. Most modern converters include some form of visual indication when the capacitors are charged.
In general, power electronic converters should not be mounted in areas which are classified as Hazardous Areas, even when connected to an Ex rated motor, as this may invalidate the certification. When necessary, converters may be mounted in an approved enclosure and certification should be obtained for the entire VSD system, including both the converter and the motor.
The main advantage of an AC Variable Speed Drive (VSD) is that the TEFC squirrel cage motor is inherently well protected from poor environmental conditions and is usually rated at IP54 or better. It can be reliably used in dusty and wet environments.
On the other hand, the AC converter is far more sensitive to its environment and should be located in an environment that is protected from:
When installing an AC Converter, the following environmental limits should be considered:
In regions or environments where there is a high ambient temperature above the accepted 40oC specified in the standards, both the motor and the converter need to be de-rated, which means that they can only be run at loads that are less than their 40oC rating to avoid thermal damage to the insulation materials.
The manufacturers of AC converters usually provide de-rating tables for high temperature environments that are above 40oC. The design of AC converters is different from various manufacturers, so the cooling requirements are never the same. The cooling requirements of different models from the same manufacturer may also be different.
At high altitudes, the cooling of electrical equipment is degraded by the reduced ability of the air to remove the heat from the motor or the heatsink of the converter. The reason is that the air pressure falls with increased altitude, air density falls and consequently, its thermal capacity is reduced.
In accordance with the standards, AC converters are rated for altitudes up to 1000 meters above sea level. Rated output should be de-rated for altitudes above that.
The manufacturers of AC converters usually provide de-rating tables for altitudes higher than a 1000m. A typical characteristic is given in Figure 19.2 for a modern IGBT-type AC converter. Note that this table is NOT applicable to all AC converters. The de-rating of converters with high losses, such as those using BJTs or GTOs, will be much higher than the de-rating required for low loss IGBT or MOSFET converters. The higher efficiency of the latter requires less cooling and would therefore be less affected by altitude changes.
In accordance with accepted practice, power is normally provided to a VSD from a Distribution Board (DB) or a Motor Control Centre (MCC). Adequate arrangements should be made to provide safety isolation switches and short-circuit protection in the connection point to the power supply. The short-circuit protection is required to protect the power cable to the AC converter and the input rectifier bridge at the converter. The converter provides down-stream protection for the motor cable and the motor itself.
Adequate safety earthing should also be provided in accordance with the local Wiring Rules and Codes of Practice. The metal frames of the AC Converter and the AC Motor should be earthed as shown in Figure 19.3 to keep touch potentials within safe limits. The chassis of the AC converter is equipped with one or more Protective Earth (PE) terminals, which should be connected back to common safety earth bar.
The variable speed drive should be connected to the power supply by means of a cable that is adequate for the current rating of the VSD. The AC converter requires a 3-phase supply cable (red/white/blue) and a protective earth conductor (green/yellow), which means a 4-core cable with copper or aluminum conductors. A neutral conductor is not necessary and is usually not brought to the frequency converter.
The AC converter is a source of harmonic currents that flow back into the low impedance of the power supply system. This conducted harmonic current is carried into other electrical equipment, where it causes additional heat losses and interference. Sensitive electronic instrumentation, such as magnetic flow-meters, thermocouples and other microprocessor based equipment, ideally should not be connected to the same power source, unless via a filtered power supply.
In addition, interference can be radiated from the power supply cable and coupled into other circuits, so these cables should be routed well away from sensitive control circuits.
The power supply cable should preferably be laid in a metal duct or cable ladder and shielded in some way to reduce the radiation of EM fields due to the harmonic currents. Steel Wire Armored (SWA) cables are particularly suitable for this purpose. If the power cable is unshielded, control and communications cables should not be located within about 300mm of the power cable.
The conductor sizes should be selected in accordance with normal economic cable selection criteria, which take into account the maximum continuous current rating of the VSD, the short-circuit rating, the length of the cable and the voltage of the power supply system. The relevant local safety regulations should be strictly observed.
However, when selecting the cable cross-sectional area for the power supply cables and upstream transformers, a de-rating factor of at least 10% should be included to accommodate the additional heating due to the conducted harmonic currents. If a supply side harmonic filter is fitted at the converter, this may not be necessary. Three-phase systems composed of three single-conductor cables should be avoided if possible. Power cables with a trefoil configuration produce a lower radiated EM field.
The cable from the AC converter to the motor carries a switched PWM voltage, which is modulated at high frequency by the inverter. This results in a higher level of harmonics than the power supply cable. Harmonic frequencies are in the frequency spectrum of 100kHz to 1MHz. The motor cable should preferably be screened or located inside a metal duct. Control and communications cables should not be located close to this cable. The level of radiated EM fields is higher for cables with 3 separate single cores, laid horizontally on a cable ladder, than a trefoil cable with a concentric shield.
The recommended size for the cable between the AC converter and the motor should preferably be the same as the power supply cable. The reasons are:
It should be borne in mind that the AC converter VSD provides short-circuit and overload protection for the cable and motor.
A separate earth conductor between the converter and motor is recommended for both safety and noise attenuation. The earth conductor from the motor must be connected back to the PE terminal of the converter and should not be connected back to the distribution board. This will avoid any circulating high frequency currents in the earth system.
When armored or shielded cables are used between the converter and motor, it may be necessary to fit a barrier termination gland at the motor end when the cable is longer than about 50m. The reason is that the high frequency leakage currents flow from the cable through the shunt capacitance and into the shield. If these currents return via the motor and other parts of the earthing system, the interference is spread over a larger area. It is preferable for the leakage currents to return to the source via the shortest route, which is via the shield itself. The shield or Steel Wire Amour (SWA) should be earthed at both the converter end and to the frame of the motor.
The control cables should be provided in accordance with normal local practice. These should have a cross sectional area of at least 0.5 mm2 for reasonable volt drop performance. The control and communications cables connected to the converter should be shielded to provide protection from EMI. The shields should be earthed at one end only, at a point remote from the converter. Earthing the shield to the PE terminal of the drive should be avoided because the converter is a large source of interference. The shield should preferably be earthed at the equipment end.
Cables which have an individual screen for every pair provide the best protection from coupled interference. The control cables should preferably be installed on separate cable ladders or ducts, as far away from the power cables as possible. If control cables are installed on the same cable ladder as the power cables, the separation should be as fast as possible, with the minimum distance being about 300mm. Long parallel runs on the same cable ladder should be avoided.
As mentioned earlier, both the AC converter and the motor must be provided with a safety earth according to the requirements of local standards. The main purpose of this earthing is to avoid dangerous voltages on exposed metal parts under fault conditions.
When designing and installing these earth connections, the requirements for the reduction of EMI should also be achieved with these same earth connections. The main earthing connections of an AC converter are usually arranged as shown in Figure 19.3.
The PE terminal on the converter should be connected back to the system earth bar, usually located in the Distribution Board. This connection should provide a low impedance path back to earth.
The following are some of the common cabling errors made when installing VSDs:
Contactors are used to switch a large amount of electrical power through their contacts. Contactors typically have multiple contacts, and those contacts are usually (but not always) open. Power to the load will be normally routed through those contacts so that the power gets shut off when the coil is de-energized. The most common industrial utility for contactors is the control of power supply to electric motors.
As a practical example let us consider the case of a current source inverter, as shown in Figure 19.4, feeding an electrical motor, driving a pump, requiring typically power up to 500 kW. Since the cost of a LV / MV frequency converter is much cheaper as compared to that of a HV, the motor is selected to be a LV motor. Hence the power circuit starts with a step down transformer, typically a Dy11 transformer. For the sake of its protection from over temperature, a Pt100 RTD (resistance temperature detector) is embedded in the transformer core and is connected to the Transformer protection relay.
The secondary of the transformer is connected to an isolator, which is used only for the sake of maintaining the inverter panel. This power, through appropriately rated fast acting fuses, branches out into power circuit, auxiliary fans & auxiliary circuits. The contactor, being used for extending power, is in the power circuit between such fuses and the inverter assembly. The output of the inverter is connected to the motor through power cables.
It has to be appreciated that the contactor’s position cannot be in the downstream of the inverter as the opening out of the contactor for some reason will subject the inverter to a sudden, step load throw off situation which will create over voltage on the inverter output.
Similarly, the contactor cannot be in the upstream of the power fuse, as the dropping of the contactor will result in total powering down of the controller even.
If the environmental conditions are likely to exceed these accepted working ranges, then arrangements should be made to provide additional cooling and/or environmental protection for the AC converter. The temperature limits of an AC converter are far more critical than those for an electric motor. Temperature de-rating needs to be strictly applied. However, it is unlikely that a modern PWM converter will be destroyed if the temperature limits are exceeded. Modern AC converters have built-in thermal protection, usually a silicon junction devices, mounted on the heat sink. The main problem of over-temperature tripping is associated with nuisance tripping and the associated downtime.
Although the efficiency of a modern AC converter is high, typically ± 97%, they all generate a small amount of heat, mainly due to the commutation losses in the power electronic circuits. The level of losses depends on the design of the converter, the PWM switching frequency and the overall power rating. Manufacturers provide figures for the losses (Watts) when the converter is running at full load. Adequate provision should be made to dissipate this heat into the external environment and to avoid the temperature inside the converter enclosure rising to unacceptably high levels.
Converters are usually air-cooled, either by convection (small power ratings) or assisted by cooling fans on larger power ratings. Any obstruction to the cooling air flow volume to the intake and from the exhaust vents will reduce efficiency of the cooling. The cooling air volume flows and the power loss dissipation determine the air-conditioning requirements for the equipment room.
The cooling is also dependent on there being a temperature differential between the heat sink and the cooling air. The higher the ambient temperature, the less effective is the cooling. Both the AC converter and motor are rated for operation in an environment where temperature does not exceed 40oC.
When AC converters mounted inside enclosures, care should be taken to ensure that the air temperature inside the enclosure remains within the specified temperature limits. If not, the converters should be de-rated in accordance with the manufacturer’s de-rating tables.
In an environment where condensation is likely to occur during the periods when the drive is not in use, anti-condensation heaters can be installed inside the enclosure. The control circuit should be designed to switch the heater on when the drive is de-energized. The heater maintains a warm dry environment inside the enclosure and avoids moisture being drawn into the enclosure when the converter is switched off and cools down.
AC converters are usually designed for mounting in a vertical position, to assist convectional cooling. On larger VSDs, cooling is assisted by one or more fans mounted at the bottom or top of the heatsink.
Many modern converters allow two alternative mounting arrangements:
Sufficient separation from other equipment is necessary to permit the unrestricted flow of cooling air through the heat sinks and across the electronic control cards. A general rule of thumb is that a free space of 100mm should be allowed around all sides of the VSD. When more than one VSD are located in the same enclosure, they should preferably be mounted side by side rather than one above the other. Care should also be taken to avoid locating temperature sensitive equipment, such as thermal overloads, immediately above the cooling air path of the VSD.
Adequate provision must be made to dissipate the converter losses into the external environment. The temperature rise inside the enclosure must be kept below the maximum rated temperature of the converter.
The enclosure should be large enough to dissipate the heat generated by the converter and any other electrical equipment mounted inside the enclosure. The heat generated inside an enclosure is transferred to the external environment mainly by radiation from the surface of the enclosure. Consequently, the surface area must be large enough to dissipate the internally generated heat without allowing the internal temperature to exceed rated limits.
The surface area of a suitable enclosure is calculated as follows:
Where,
A Effective heat conducting area in m2 (Sum of surface areas not in contact with any other surface)
P Power Loss of heat producing equipment in Watts
TMax Maximum permissible operating temperature of Converter in oC
TAmb Maximum temperature of the external ambient air in oC
k Heat transmission coefficient of enclosure material
Example
Calculate the minimum size of an IP54 Cubicle for a typical PWM type Frequency Converter rated at 22kW.
The following assumptions are made:
The first step is to calculate the minimum required surface area of the enclosure. This can be done by applying the formula for surface area.
If the cubicle is standing on the floor against a wall, this area applies only to the top, front and two sides of the enclosure. A suitable cubicle can be chosen from a range of standard cubicles or could be fabricated for this installation. In either case, it is important to take into account the dimensions of the converter and to ensure that there is at least 100mm space on all sides of the converter.
With these requirements in mind, the procedure is to choose or estimate at least two of the dimensions and the third can be derived form the above equation. This calculated dimension must then be checked to ensure that the required 100mm clearance is maintained.
For a cubicle with dimensions H x W x D standing on the floor against the wall, the effective heat conducting area is
A = HW + 2HD + WD
Assuming that a standard cubicle is chosen with a height of 2.0m and a depth of 0.5m, the width is derived from:
A = 2.0W + 2 + 0.5W
A = 2.5W + 2
Using the required heat dissipation area from the above calculation
4.36 = 2.5W + 2
or,
2.5W = 2.36
W = 0.94
Based on the requirements of heat dissipation, the width of the cubicle would have to be larger than 0.94m. In this case a standard width of 1.0m would be selected.
Clearances around the sides of the converter should be checked. With typical converter dimensions of H x W x D = 700 x 350 x 300, the cubicle chosen would provide more than 100mm of clearance around all the converter and also leave sufficient space for cabling and other components.
From this calculation, it is clear that the overall dimensions of the cubicle can be reduced by the following changes:
The enclosure can be smaller if some additional ventilation is provided to exchange air between the inside and outside of the cubicle. There is several ventilation techniques commonly used with converters, but they mainly fall into two categories:
Natural ventilation
This type of ventilation relies on the convectional cooling airflow through vents near the bottom and top of the cubicle and is normally called the “chimney” effect.
Forced ventilation
This type of ventilation relies on cooling airflow assisted by a fan located either near the top or the bottom of the cubicle. It is difficult to maintain a high IP rating with ventilated cubicles, so ventilated cubicles need to be located in a protected environment, such as a dust-free equipment room.
For cooling purposes, a certain volume of airflow is required to transfer the heat generated inside the enclosure to the external environment. The required airflow can be calculated from the following formula:
Where,
V Required airflow in m3 per hour
P Power Loss of heat producing equipment in Watts
TMax Maximum permissible operating temperature of Converter in oC
TAmb Maximum external ambient temperature in oC
Example
Calculate the airflow ventilation requirements of the 22kW Converter used in the example above, using the same assumptions.
The required airflow to maintain adequate cooling:
An airflow of 75 m3/h is necessary to remove the heat generated inside the enclosure by the converter and to transfer it to the outside. In this case, the dimensions of the cubicle are based purely on the minimum physical dimensions required for the converter and any other equipment mounted in the cubicle.
This airflow could be achieved by the convectional flow of air provided that the size of the top / bottom openings is large enough and the resistance to airflow is not unnecessarily restricted by dust-filter pads. Alternatively, a fan assisted ventilation system would be necessary to deliver the required airflow.
One of the main problems associated with the ventilation of converter cubicles is that it is very difficult to achieve a high IP rating with a ventilated cubicle. In addition, if filters are used, an additional maintenance problem is introduced, as the filters need to be checked and replaced on a regular basis.
A solution which is rapidly gaining popularity is the recessed mounting. This technique has now been adopted by many of the converter manufacturers.
Most of the heat generated by a converter is associated with the power electronic components, such as the rectifier module, inverter module, capacitors, reactor and power supply. These items are usually mounted onto the heatsink base of the converter and most of the heat will be dissipated from the surfaces of this heatsink. The digital control circuits do not generate very much heat, at the most a few watts.
If the heatsink is recessed through the back mounting plane of the enclosure, most of the heat will be dissipated to the environment external to the cubicle. The portion of the converter with the control circuits remains within the enclosure. With a suitable seal around the converter, the enclosure can be relatively small and rated at >IP54 without the need for forced or convectional airflow ventilation.
The heatsink portion projecting outside the enclosure can be exposed to the environment with a lower IP rating (eg IP20) or it can be arranged to project into a cooling airduct system, which ducts the heat outside the building. Figure 19.7 shows a typical mounting arrangement of this type of converter with the heatsinks projecting into a cooling duct.
A failure of electric motor can be either due to mechanical fault(s) or electrical fault(s) or due to both. A mechanical failure, in turn, can be either due to a bearing problem or due to improper mechanical fitting of the components of the motor or even a root cause lying in the electrical system may show up the symptoms mechanically. In either case there is a possibility of vibrations giving a sufficient clue. If the vibrations are monitored and trended properly an impending failure may show up as an increasing vibration. In the earlier days, electrical symptomatic problems could be gauged only during off-line testing. But nowadays there are lot of methods to diagnose such dormant problems and if applied and analyzed properly can avoid repeated failures or even breakdowns.
It is the duty of the electrical maintenance professional to gain a good understanding about various mechanisms that can cause motor failures. Then effective usage of discretion in diagnosing the root cause of a failure must be applied. Based on these findings, practical action plans have to be devised. These plans shall be meticulously implemented in order to overcome the problems permanently. An electrical engineer must always remember that the obvious defect noticed may not be the real cause. The very cause of the failure may still be lying dormant in the system and again may result in the same failure or in a different failure for the same basic reason. Unless this approach is adopted the Plant will be witnessing repetitive failures and unplanned outages. Hence each and every motor failure has to be investigated thoroughly and, if required, the issue may be taken up with the OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturers).
Motor failures can be broadly classified as:
Insulation failures (as covered in Chapter 1, are related to stator insulation mainly) is the most important type of failure mode for an electric motor. This mode alone contributes a major chunk to the cases of motor failures. It is believed that more than 50 % of the motor failures are due to insulation failure alone. It can occur due to the stresses resulted by the thermal, electrical, mechanical & environmental processes that are deviating from the designed values or from the specification originally envisaged in the detailed engineering. These failures can manifest in various forms like winding shorts, insulation to ground faults etc.
Thermal processes harming insulation systems are usually a result of overheating of the winding due to various reasons like overload, too-frequent starts, a higher ambient temperature than the designed one, inadequate ventilation, hard-to-start (also known as high inertia) loads etc. Motor ventilation related problems, i.e., inadequate cooling will be mainly due to, congestion on fan cover, improper spacing at the end of motor etc.
Rotor bar failure is an important failure mode of especially large motors. It can be due to the manufacturing defects or complications developing out of improper operational & maintenance practices. Design problems that can create this problem are casting defects, loose laminations, improper protection provided for operation in harsh environments etc.
Operational problems that can contribute to this failure are frequent starts, inadequate cooling for the motor etc.
Maintenance problems like incorrect fitting, incorrect alignment can cause excessive vibration & overheat in the rotor.
Rotor failures can also arise due to rubbing with stator because of bearing failure, eccentricity of the rotor resulting out of bent shaft or improper air gap.
Mechanical failures are primarily caused by various reasons like misaligned couplings, sheaves out of alignment, poor shimming of feet, soft foot, dynamic imbalance of load, internal imbalance of motor rotor etc.
Most common failure under this category is bearings related. This can be due to excessive loading (causing bearing clearance problems), improper lubrication, general wear out, improper engineering of the system, non-suitability of the bearing for the particular application, corrosion etc.
Auxiliaries failure are failures related to the power supply, electrical circuits & cable termination. Unless due care is taken to fix these problems the motor may go out of service. In some extreme cases like imbalance in voltage, negative sequence currents etc., the motor insulation failure and even vibrations can be seen.
Some of the very common causes of motor failure are discussed below:
This is very critical factor for a large rating motor (usually 200 kW and above) started directly on-line. Hence it doesn’t apply for soft started motors.
A motor is said to be frequently started if the number of starts in an hour exceeds the one specified by the designer / manufacturer. Usually it is 3 Nos. of cold starts per hour or 2 Nos. of hot starts per hour. Cold start means when the motor is normally started without a preceding thermal overload trip in the previous start / operation. Hot start is the one involving a thermal trip.
To gain an understanding about the underlying principles, one has to appreciate the fact about the amount of inrush currents flowing through both the stator & the rotor and their deleterious heating effect. A motor’s temperature (mainly of the winding as it is the main concern) typically rises exponentially in response to the time taken for the motor to start. Even in operation this temperature continues to increase but with a declining rate of temperature rise.
Typical motor heating curve is shown in Figure 20.1. As shown in this figure, a motor will have another curve called as cooling curve. Based on the heat dissipating efficiency of the cooling circuit – comprising the cooling fans assembly, finned structure of the yoke etc. – the temperature of the motor drops exponentially with respect to time, once the motor is de-energized and allowed to coast down.
As the motor is started, since the starting currents and hence the power dissipated is very high the temperature keeps on increasing. During this period the cooling circuit will be almost ineffective.
If the motor gets tripped at time t1 with the motor temperature T1 and then allowed to cool down, the motor temperature decreases and would have touched T3 after time t2. Instead, if the motor is re-started, before complete cool down, the temperature of the motor will shoot up to a temperature (T2 as shown in the figure) which will be much higher than T3. This temperature may be tolerable for the motor as this re-start being the first one. However, if another such step is repeated the temperature of the motor may attain dangerous proportions unless it the motor is designed for such purpose. In practice, the values of these vary from each rating of motor to the other. Also for the same rating they differ from manufacturer to manufacturer and based on the specification given by the user.
Hence too-frequent-starts is the most detrimental aspect to the life of a motor, as both the stator and rotor get heavily stressed out during every start. Stator’s insulation degradation process rate gets multiplied with the rise in temperature.
Also the rotor’s thermal aging process gets accelerated. This is because the rotor will be running at much lesser speeds during starting and hence the induced currents are also high. Because of this excessive heat and the resulting thermal uneven expansion, the rotor bars may crack (at the joints where the bars are welded to the shorting ring) after expanding unevenly even with respect to the rotor. Due to the cracks the electrical resistance of the bars increases and hence heating of the rotor bars also increases. Since the current is diverted through other rotor bars, they get overheated. All these result in a localized overheating of the rotor bars. These high temperatures of the rotor may cause bowing effect thereby reducing air gap / bearing clearances. This can result in mechanical damage to the rotor.
Motor failures due to high inertia loads normally go undetected, as a hard-to-start load can’t be easily identified. Due to high inertia of the load, the motor takes excessive time to accelerate to full speed. As a motor draws very high current during acceleration phase, the windings get overheated. Typical high-inertia loads are certain fans, blowers, pumps, and some kinds of machine tools. Even though it can’t be considered as a definition, if the load’s moment of inertia is more than twice that of the motor, the acceleration gets prolonged and it can be considered as a high inertia load-motor combination. However the details of inertia may not always be available to the end user. Hence a practical way can be devised as follows: Observe and record the acceleration time needed to reach full speed during every start. If this time is more than a few seconds, and if the application requires frequent starting, there’s a good chance that inertia is the problem. A high inertia load usually demands high torque and hence lesser torque – difference of motor torque and the load torque – is available for acceleration. This lesser acceleration torque requires a much longer time to take the load to full speed. Hence the associated copper losses will also be huge, thereby overheating the motor. This often leads to the burnout of the motor.
When an energy efficient motor – which has a much higher starting current and somewhat lower starting torque – is used for replacing a standard motor the motor starting torque may not be sufficient for driving a high inertia load. Starting current can also be excessively high causing possible damage to equipment.
In motor-reversing applications, the motor needs to be selected / designed properly. This is because, certain types of electrical braking can impose substantial losses. For example a full-voltage reversal (plugging) will result in four times the normal acceleration losses.
To take care of these factors various protection techniques can be employed and are as follows:
Internal temperature protection: In case of a repeated failure of a motor, direct measurement of the temperature can be resorted to, in order to safeguard the motor against overheating. While rewinding in the motor shop, internal-temperature protectors can be embedded within the new winding. Such devices sense the actual winding temperature directly and will trip the motor starter when it reaches an unsafe temperature. This way the protection can be made very reliable as compared to the inherently less-sensitive indirect relay-sensing methods. Furthermore, the direct temperature-sensing method takes care of the motor’s thermal storage and cooling capacities – instead of utilizing the extrapolation techniques used by the indirect temperature measurement relay.
Solid-state protection: The advent of modern solid-state protective relays has simplified the job. In these, the motor’s losses are actually computed from current measurements using sophisticated “symmetrical component” techniques. Based on this, the motor temperature profile is developed and then adjusted to the cooling profile. Such an extrapolation is used to determine an approaching unsafe temperature. This provides a much closer degree of protection than indirect methods under more difficult conditions of operation. The great strides in the development of electronics and the reducing costs of solid-state protective devices have made this kind of protection available in less costly designs. So the application of these relays even for lower rating motors is turning out to be economical.
Earlier generation relays, typically electromagnetic ones, used to simulate a motor’s heating and cooling characteristics by means of thermal sensitive heater elements. Since there cannot be any discrimination employed between the heating associated with starting and in normal conditions, the heater element needs to be designed for not responding to 600 %. This makes the relay to be a bit insensitive during normal operation. The problem used to get further compounded when used for high load inertia loads which have longer-than-normal starting times. This kind of application drastically reduces the degree of protection with an increased probability of a motor burnout.
In order to cater to the needs of a high inertia load, if efficiency is not a bar, NEMA Design D motor can be used. But a careful evaluation is needed while selecting this motor and a good compromise between its price and the efficiency is required. This type of motor accelerates and decelerates the load much more rapidly and develops high torque from zero to full speed.
Another feasible solution is to enhance the quality of the winding insulation while re-winding the motor.
Insulation system plays a vital role in the life of a motor and its major enemy is heat, so it’s important to be sure to keep the motor within temperature limits. There is a rule of thumb that says a 10 degree Celsius rise reduces the insulation’s useful life by half, while a 10 degree Celsius decrease doubles the insulation’s life. From this it can be safely deduced that if we can keep a motor cool enough, the winding will last longer, which covers up other factors like moisture, vibration, chemicals and abrasives in the air that also attack insulation systems.
While selecting a motor for a particular application, due study needs to be carried out regarding the environmental conditions. This is because, at high ambient temperatures or at high altitudes, above 3,300 feet (1005.84m), the air will be light and has less cooling potential. Accordingly standard motors need to be de-rated or requirement is to be specified to make the motor suitable for use under these conditions. The cooling ineffectiveness needs to be addressed for variable speed drives as they can run at lesser temperatures and hence the shaft mounted cooling fan may not be able to give sufficient air flow. In such cases separate cooling fan driven externally may have to be provided depending on the operational requirements. Resistance to the ventilation air must be maintained to be the least. Also the cooling air system must be checked and always ensured to be without any short passes of air.
Another environmental concern is dirt, insects and fibers, which can clog ventilation openings, form a thermal insulating layer over the heat dissipating surfaces and cause a variety of mechanical problems. Hence regular maintenance schedule must include cleaning the fan covers effectively. The time interval has to be decided at site based on the ambient conditions and the prevailing operating and maintenance conditions differing on a case-by-case basis.
The layout preparation for a Project will normally be done at a very early stage where there will be not much of concrete information available. Hence they must be reviewed periodically as the detailed engineering proceeds.
The main driving force behind restricting the load on a motor is the thermal capability of the motor. As a motor gets loaded, the current drawn by the motor heats the windings by virtue of the copper (I2R) losses. The rate at which the winding temperature rises for a particular load, is dependent upon the characteristics of insulation material employed. This is an exponential function and hence the rate comes down at higher temperatures. Same way the cooling of the motor is a function of the heat exchange arrangement and the ambient temperature. The heat exchange mechanism typically consists of at least one external fan and for higher rating motors, one or two internal cooling fans. This mechanism will help in the cooling of the motor with an exponential rate, which is high at higher temperatures and reduces with lesser temperatures. A normal motor, under steady state conditions, stabilizes to a temperature for a particular load and ambient temperature, which is an intersection point between the heating and cooling curves of the motor. The heating of the motor gets accelerated during starting due to the higher copper losses due to large starting currents. As the motor’s heating is much more rapid than the cooling, the motor must be given sufficient time to cool down before another start is taken.
Simple, regular checks on the belt coupling can save a lot of time and trouble due to various reasons that can otherwise result in huge repair costs. These checks are mostly connected with proper alignment and tensioning of the belt and hence the maintenance personnel shall always endeavor for ensuring them.
Before going into the maintenance aspects, there are certain checks that must be taken care of during installation / design and are as follows:
A belt drive, as shown in Figure 20.2, must be not be too tight as to overload the motor or put unwanted extra force on the motor bearings. At the same time it should be tight enough to avoid it from slipping. Adjust the tension by changing the distance between the motor and driven load. The tension must be just enough to prevent excessive bow on the slack side.
Belt tension is determined by the sound the belts make when the drive is first started. Belts will produce a loud squeal that slowly vanishes as the speed approaches rated value. If the belt tension is too tight or too loose the operation becomes inefficient and damages can occur. Do not change the pulley pitch diameter to change tension. This will result in a different fan speed than desired.
Misalignments in belt drives can be categorized as angular and parallel.
Angular misalignment normally results from improper mounting of motor / reducer. A skewed bushing or a bent shaft can also contribute to angular misalignment. It is measured as angle between shafts or in Mils per Inch of coupling diameter. Normally an angular misalignment of less than 0.002 in for each inch diameter of pulley is considered to be fine.
Parallel misalignment is the misalignment arising out of mounting of motor / reducer on different planes as shaft centerlines don’t coincide. It is normally measured in Total Indicated Run out, TIR in Mils (0.001”).
Bearing misalignments can be classified as static and dynamic.
Static misalignment arises due to a non varying static load (like deflection) and is due to axes being not co-linear or the supports being not in the same plane.
Dynamic misalignment normally arises due to a bent shaft, which results in a balance problem as well as clearance problems in the bearings resulting in undue fatigue.
Motor / Reducer Soft Foot is a problem associated with warped or bent machine foot or an uneven mounting base. This in turn causes high stress on motor housing and bearings thereby resulting in higher vibrations. Such problems can be confirmed by using a dial indicator. Observation has to be made for any excessive movement while loosening one foot at a time.
Adjust belt alignment by moving the motor or driven load pulley inward or outward along the shaft.
The pulley’s horizontal alignment can be carried out by ensuring that the pulley face is perpendicular to the centerline of the conveyor. This ensures the bearings are co-linear. Slightly oversized bearing mounting holes on the conveyor structure along with welded adjusting bars facilitate proper installation. Vertical alignment is done by ensuring that the shaft centerline is matching the elevation of the reducer shaft centerline.
It is important that belt drives be protected from abrasive damage by using adequate drive guards. Keep drive guards clear for proper ventilation and clean pulley grooves to remove the build-up of dust, grime, rust or other foreign materials. Belt guards must be designed for adequate drive protection, yet provide ventilation and suitable access for oiling / greasing. Belt guards shall be open mesh type to aid in situ visual inspection of the belts. Belt guards shall have tachometer openings for motor and fan shafts.
Solid belt guards will normally be useful as fire proof construction apart from protecting the operator and other personnel moving around in the area. They are supposed not to interfere with efficiency and create no new hazard.
Excessive loading of the bearings due to reduced internal clearances is often encountered in industry. As the reduction in internal clearances can’t be seen directly, motors will be allowed to run. Normally this is accompanied by a change in appearance of the lubricant. Once the problem becomes more pronounced, the roller elements will be subjected to high heat and hence the draining grease can be seen in very dark color.
One of the possible reasons for such upset can be due to the bearing housing being out of round or a over size of the shaft. Hence at the time of overhauling a motor, it is advisable to take measurements of all dimensions, like shaft outer diameter, inner diameter of bearing housing etc. Any of the abnormalities noticed in the clearance between the bearing & shaft or bearing & housing are to be cleared. Also run out of the shaft has to be taken to detect whether the shaft is straight or any bend is there.
The bearing housing when it is being outer race to shrink, increasing the load. This kind of external cooling, if needs to be resorted to, has to be done away with at the earliest. Root cause analysis needs to be carried out and suitable permanent rectification can be carried out. It can be either replacement of the grease with synthetic, high temperature tolerant grease or upgrading the motor itself.
In case the motor has a tapered shaft, due care is to be taken to avoid driving the bearing beyond its intended position.
The pump side problems like cavitation, excessive axial thrust, water hammer in the lines or misalignment between the pump and motor, unbalance in the rotating assembly can also result in the reduction of bearing clearances.
The insulation system of an AC induction motor mainly consists of:
The developments being witnessed in the modern day have introduced good quality insulation material that can endure higher temperatures with little negative impact on their longevity. In spite of all these things, motor insulations do fail and hence needs a check mechanism to keep the deterioration under control or to take a corrective action pro-actively. To do so, the insulation degradation process needs to be understood properly.
Basically, this degradation process can be attributed to the ageing phenomenon, which gets further accelerated with various types of stresses due to thermal, electrical, mechanical or environmental reasons.
Thermal Stresses are imposed on the insulation by the operating temperature. Whenever an electrical motor is started or stopped it is subjected to thermal cycle of heating and cooling. Overloads will also cause the motor temperature to rise steeply, for very short periods may be, causing the degradation of the mica / resin bond. Whether it is conventional thermoplastic insulation or new thermosetting insulation, the excessive heat generation impairs the mica / resin bond. In the former case, delamination will take place and in the latter case embrittlement would occur.
Electrical Stress is a result of the working voltage of the machine and increases as the voltage is raised above normal values, even for brief time intervals. Unless deliberately suppressed, impulse due to system faults or opening of breakers can result in severe short time electrical stresses. Discharge treeing / erosion can be caused by discharges occurring in insulation voids or cavities.
Mechanical stresses are due to the operating philosophy. For example, direct on-line starting of motors will exert severe forces on the end winding structure. This effect gets multiplied during system faults. Another factor is vibration that results in insulation wear by fretting. Also the differential rates of expansion of the core and conductors result in tearing of the insulation.
Environmental stresses are a result of oxidation of the organic material, contamination (from water, oil, dust, carbon, salinity, sand, corrosion etc), deposition etc. As a result of these, the insulation can age and crack. Surface deposition and ingress of moisture make the stator windings to suffer a lot. This is very common in high humidity conditions and can damage the insulation system, if proper care by way of enclosure heating is not carried out.
All these processes are interrelated as thermal cycling may cause differential expansion. This will lead to void formation and in turn can aid propagation of electrical discharges. These in turn can cause electrical and subsequent electrochemical deterioration. The electrical factors like voltage imbalance, negative sequence currents etc. can cause undue overheating.
As a result of these various ageing factors in service delamination, shrinkage of wedges & side packing etc can take place. These in turn result in vibration abrasion and loss of the functionality of gradient control coatings. All these will invariably result in partial discharges, which increase in severity as the deterioration progresses. Partial discharge in turn contributes to the additional damage rate. Slot discharges, which are the discharges occurring between the electrical shield of the stator bar and the core, will ensue and are detrimental as they attain high energy levels that can damage over a period.
Bearing currents are produced in different forms and almost all rotating machines, either large or small in size, have a bearing current problem whether it is DC or AC. Even though bearing current is caused by an electrical phenomenon, it results in mechanical damages. That’s why it went undetected for so many years and was the reason for the slow pace of progress in studying these phenomena and solving the associated problems. Electric current flow in bearings can be seen simultaneously on both the races and the rolling element. The bottom of the depression will be dark in color and is known as fluting as shown in Figure 14.3.
The various sources of shaft voltage can be broadly categorized as electromagnetic induction, electrostatic coupled from internal sources and electrostatic coupled from external sources.
Electromagnetic induction from the stator winding to the rotor shaft is more prevalent in long axial machines. The shaft voltage is due to small dissymmetries of the magnetic field in the air gap that are inherent in a practical machine design. Most induction motors are designed to have a maximum shaft voltage to frame ground of < 1 V rms. The induced shaft voltages cause bearing current to flow in a circulating path from the shaft, thru drive end non-insulated bearing, thru the stator frame, thru non-drive end non-insulated bearing and back to the shaft. This circuit basically has very low resistance. Hence even though the induced shaft voltage is low in magnitude, a high circulating current flows through both motor bearings. Hence, theoretically it is advisable to provide insulated bearing at least on one side to break this circuit, whenever the estimated the likely shaft voltage is going to be higher. This may happen typically for motors with a rating greater than 250 horsepower. However, during transient start and stop conditions across the AC line, magnetic dissymmetries appear as increased shaft voltage, resulting in bearing current flow and reduced life. The traditional electromagnetic solution to induced shaft voltage on larger frames is to insulate the non-drive end bearing. This does not mitigate shaft voltage but rather the resulting bearing current. Voltage pulses fed by the inverter contain such high frequencies, that the leakage inductances of the motor winding provide paths for currents to leak to earth. This induces a voltage between the shaft ends. If the induced voltage is high enough to overcome the impedance of the lubrication film of the bearings, a circulating type of high frequency bearing current occurs.
Electrostatic induced shaft voltage may be present in any situation where rotor charge accumulation can occur. Examples are belt driven couplings, ionized air passing over rotor fan blades or high velocity air passing over rotor fan blades as in steam turbine. The electrostatic solution is to keep the shaft and frame at the same potential by installing a shaft grounding brush to reduce electrostatic build up and reduce shaft voltage to 70 – 400 mV. This value is not enough to cause damaging bearing current to flow.
Electrostatic coupled shaft voltage from external rotor sources, such as a static exciter in a turbine generator, is possible and historically solved with the application of a shaft grounding brush. Electrostatic coupled shaft voltage from external stator sources, such as a PWM inverter.
The shaft voltage magnitude measured is commonly used as an indicator of the possible bearing current that results. It is the magnitude and passage of electrical current thru the bearing that results in ultimate mechanical damage. Bearing damage caused by electrical current is characterized by the appearance of either pits or transverse flutes burnt into the bearing race. Electrical pitting continues until the bearing loses its coefficient of friction, further increasing the losses and breaking up bearing surface.
However, while modern motor design and manufacturing practices have nearly eliminated the low frequency bearing currents induced by the asymmetry of the motor, the rapid switching in modern drive systems may generate high frequency current pulses through the bearings. If the energy of these pulses is sufficiently high, metal transfer between the ball and races occurs. This is known as Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM). As a result, the bearing may need replacing after only a short time in service.
Each individual item of a drive system, such as the motor, the gearbox or the drive controller, considered alone is the product of sophisticated manufacturing techniques, and normally carries a favorable Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) rate. It is when these components are combined together and the system integrated as a whole has a much lesser MTBF.
Present drive technology, incorporating Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBT), create switching events 20 times faster than those considered typical ten years ago. Recent years have seen a rising number of EDM-type bearing failures in drive systems relatively soon after start up, within one to six months. The extent to which this occurs depends on the drive system architecture and the installation techniques used.
Bearings in the initial stages of EDM destruction exhibit more of a satiny finish distributed fairly evenly, depending on how a particular system is operated. The discharges tend to be a bit more random if the speed is being varied continually. However the earliest bearing damage cannot be detected through vibration monitoring.
When the oil film thins locally from variations in temperature or viscosity—or from changes in radial loading or vibration—and voltage on the shaft exceeds the dielectric strength of the oil film, electrical energy discharges, he said. If the energy is great enough, the discharge melts a tiny pit in the surface of the race.
Higher-quality bearings, with their smoother raceways and balls, exhibit fewer irregularities than their lower grade counterparts. Shaft voltage discharges less often with the better bearings. Consequently, voltage builds up to a higher level than it would in rougher bearings. Hence a high-quality bearing will see fewer, yet stronger, discharges than a low-grade bearing, and, as a result, will sustain deeper damage.
An inverter approximates the waveform with a series of voltage pulses and does not actually produce a sinusoidal shaped waveform to feed the motor. Unlike the three phases of sinusoidal power supply that always add to zero, the three phases of the PWM (Pulse Width Modulated) drive, although they balance in peak amplitude, do not balance between phases instantaneously because the pulses are of different widths. The resulting common mode voltage is a source of bearing currents.
Regular three-phase sinusoidal power supply is balanced and symmetrical under normal conditions, i.e., the peak-to-peak voltages are equal for all the three lines and the shape of each of the three waveforms is identical. Hence, the vector sum of the three phases always equals to zero. Thus, it is normal that the neutral is at zero volts, however this is not the case with the PWM inverter’s output. While the voltages may be balanced in peak amplitude, it is impossible to achieve perfect balance between phases instantaneously, when pulses of different widths are produced. When this happens, the neutral will not be zero and the voltage can be defined as a common mode voltage source. This creates a potential between the inverter output and earth which will force currents through stray impedances present between anything connected to the inverter phases, such as the motor cables and motor windings, and earth. This is known as common mode current.
Frequency converters built with BJTs (bipolar junction transistor), SCRs (silicon controlled rectifier) or GTOs (gate turn-off thyristors) are operable at a switching frequency less than 600Hz and hence make lot of audible noise. However, the IGBT (insulated gate bipolar transistor) came onto the scene and these represented a huge improvement in drive technology, increasing the switching frequency up to 20 kHz, reducing harmonics and audible noise. But these improvements have been bought at a price: IBGT technology has resurrected bearing problems due to electrical discharge, creating a new challenge to manufacturers of electric motors. The new problems arose because PWM inverters equipped with IGBT inverters distort the sinusoidal supply generating high frequency harmonics and high (dv/dt)s. The inverter switching mechanism also creates what is called common-mode voltage.
Due to the high switching frequencies of IGBT inverters, parasitic capacitances between stator winding and stator, and between rotor and stator winding become relevant. These capacitances result from the common mode voltage and lead to a common mode current flowing through the motor bearings. They are called on to handle two types of bearing currents that have been identified. The first these, conductive-mode bearing current, is discharged continuously during a period of time when bearings exhibit good conductivity. In contrast, the second type, discharge-mode bearing current, is discharged in discrete time intervals. The former prevails at lower speeds, because the good electrical contact between the rolling elements and bearing raceways connects the rotor to ground through the outer bearing race, whereas the latter is more significant for higher inverter output frequencies, as the electrical conductivity of the bearing decreases, enabling the capacitive voltage to build up till it is able to break down the dielectric resistance of the grease. Although both types of currents are present at the same time, it can be said that the discharge bearing current is the more critical. The conductive bearing current is usually less harmful to bearings, as it is a low-amplitude current that flows continuously without arcing. However, it increases bearing temperature, accelerating grease deterioration and reducing bearing life. On the other hand, the high energy level of the discharge bearing current works like an electro-erosion machine, resulting in bearing pits or flutes. The amplitude of bearing currents depends on operating conditions such as speed, temperature, lubrication type, motor size etc.
From all these factors, motor size is probably the most significant, as the larger the motor the larger its parasitic capacitances. Motor design can also have reasonable influence over bearing current amplitudes. Manufacturers offer a number of options as a means of overcoming the damage to bearings caused by electrical discharge. The most obvious of these is insulated bearings, which are used where it is desirable to achieve perfect insulation of the bearing from its application environment. However, the method increasingly used to achieve insulation is ceramic coating, which is very expensive, typically adding anything from GBP 600 to 700 to the price of motors with frame sizes in the range from 315 to 355. Another option for applications where some passage of current can be accommodated is a shaft grounding brush. A much less costly option than insulated bearings, the shaft brush reduces stray current through the motor bearings by half, as a result of short-circuiting the path between rotor and stator. By employing a shaft brush it is possible to keep voltages below the so-called “fritting voltage” which is responsible for the development of bearing defects due to electric current discharge. Although damage cannot be completely prevented by employing this measure, the extent of damage can be kept within such limits that the life expectancy of the bearing is not affected.
ABB has recently patented a motor winding designed to eliminate circulating bearing currents. The design divides the stator winding into an even number of equal parts per phase. The groups are then distributed uniformly between ac supply connections at both ends of the stator. This generates a high-frequency net current flowing equally, and in opposite directions, through the windings. By dividing the windings into two branches, we have a better chance of balancing the high-frequency common mode currents and getting more symmetric flux distribution
The solution pits one high-frequency net current against a current of equal magnitude flowing in the opposite direction. The currents, in effect, cancel each other out, and the bearings roll on, unmolested.