As you all know – reliability is a highly sought after measure (especially in engineering) of how long a product or system functions correctly before failure. The ultimate goal is always a reliability of 1 or 100% reliability with no failure over the life of the product. Zero % (0%) reliability refers to immediate failure and should obviously be avoided.

Dear Colleagues

As you all know – reliability is a highly sought after measure (especially in engineering) of how long a product or system functions correctly before failure. The ultimate goal is always a reliability of 1 or 100% reliability with no failure over the life of the product. Zero % (0%) reliability refers to immediate failure and should obviously be avoided.

You may recall the old ‘bathtub curve’ of reliability. At the beginning of a product’s life there is a heightened probability of failure. Subsequently, during the product’s life time this drops to a hopefully very much lower probability. Near the end of the product’s lifetime (as it wears out); there is again a heightened probability of failure (as you would expect). Hence the reference to a bathtub curve.

I am sure you have become irritable when a product fails soon after purchase. Or immediately after the warranty period has expired (e.g. phones).  Leading many cynics to refer to the vendor’s (often unethical?) ‘planned obsolescence’ of a product where it fails after a given planned time. It fails, so that you are forced to upgrade or buy a new one. Thus keeping the manufacturer’s production lines busy churning out new products.

100% is Crucial for Safety
The target reliability of a pacemaker has to be 1 because failure may result in loss of a life. Similarly with a bridge or other critical element in our lives. No compromises possible here, for obvious reasons.

Cost Plays a Key Role in Reliability
However, most consumer products (e.g. a toy, radio or dishwasher) most decidedly do not have a reliability of 1. Designing for perfect reliability would result in a very expensive product resulting in loss of competitive advantage for the manufacturer.

Oddly enough, some aircraft parts are not 100% reliable as weight has to be minimised.  This shortcoming is dealt with by a rigorous inspection regime (e.g. for cracks) and regular replacements of parts. The growth in (often illegal) second hand defective parts for aircraft is thus of major concern as their reliability would be unpredictable and certainly not what the manufacturer originally anticipated.

An interesting take by Orison Swett Mard on success: Success is not measured by what you accomplish, but by the opposition you have encountered, and the courage with which you have maintained the struggle against overwhelming odds.

Thanks to 101 Things I learned in Engineering School by John Kuprenas with Matthew Frederick.

Yours in engineering learning

Steve

Mackay’s Musings – 22nd March’16 #592    
125, 273 readers – www.idc-online.com/blogs/stevemackay

The Engineering Institute of Technology (EIT) is dedicated to ensuring our students receive a world-class education and gain skills they can immediately implement in the workplace upon graduation. Our staff members uphold our ethos of honesty and integrity, and we stand by our word because it is our bond. Our students are also expected to carry this attitude throughout their time at our institute, and into their careers.